Organizational change
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Implementing Organizational Change: Theory into Practice
Bert Spector
Chapter 4
Organizational Redesign
4-1
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
Define organizational design and differentiate between formal and informal design elements.
Explore the main challenges posed by organizational redesign.
Appreciate the special design challenges faced by multinational companies.
Analyze the requirements for building coordination and teamwork in an organization.
Discuss the dynamics of changing the design of an organization in order to impact patterns of behavior.
4-2
Building a Vocabulary
Organization design: the arrangements, both formal and informal, that an organization calls upon in order to shape employee behavior Organizational redesign: the process of changing an organization’s design in response to shifting dynamics in the organization’s environment
4-3Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Design Elements Formal
Arrangements Compensation and measurement Reporting structures
Informal Arrangements
Defining roles and responsibilities of employees
Defining relationships within the organization and between the organization and external stakeholders
4-4 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Effective change implementation starts with informal redesign rather than formal design changes.”
Organizational Redesign Sequencing
4-5
The most effective way to change organizational design is to be systemic and strategic rather than piecemeal and haphazard.
Effective change implementation starts with informal redesign in order to shape new behaviors; formal design changes can follow as a way of reinforcing new patterns of behavior.
When implementing change, seek early wins through pilot projects.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Piloting Redesign
Change pilots—small units or specific processes which can be targeted at the early stage of change implementation to experiment and learn
“When implementing change, seek early ‘wins’ through pilot projects.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“In selecting change pilots, select units where the change is most likely to be successful.”
4-6
Building a Vocabulary Differentiation: the degree to which different functions, departments, and units in an organization are allowed to develop their own approaches in response to their particular goals and unique competitive environments Integration: the required level of coordination across differentiated functions, units, and division
4-7
“Use high differentiation to enable different functions, departments, and units in an organization to develop their own responses to their particular goals and
unique competitive environments.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Use high integration to enable the organization to achieve efficient operations among different functions, departments, and units.”
“Levels of differentiation need to be matched by appropriate levels of integration.”
The Challenge of Differentiation and Integration
Integration
High
Low
Low High
Differentiation
Low differentiation hampers an
organization’s responsiveness to
a complex environment
In highly complex, dynamic
environments, effective firms operate here
SAP America’s consulting service
was operating here
4-8Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Dimensions of Differentiation Dimension Examples
Goals A sales function may have the goal of increasing revenues, whereas a manufacturing function may have the goal of
reducing costs
Time orientation A research department will likely have a long-term
orientation toward research and development, whereas a sales function will want new products that it can sell by the
end of the quarter
Interpersonal style
Research scientists might believe that they can maximize creativity and contribution by focusing all their individual attention on their task, whereas manufacturing managers
might desire to create rich interpersonal relationships among key individuals to maximize quality
Formality An assembly operation is more likely to be governed by tight
rules and strict procedures, whereas a research and development laboratory would find such rules stifling of
creativity
4-9 Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary Control: design choices called upon to shape employee
behavior in alignment with the requirements of outstanding performance
Organic controls: an approach to shaping employee behavior that emphasizes shared values, a common understanding of strategy, loosely defined roles and responsibilities, and overall organizational performance
4-10
“Traditional mechanistic control tools can create predictability and standardization but can undermine
creativity, flexibility, and collaboration” “Organic controls, which are intended to increase employee
flexibility and creativity, rely on shared values and clarity about overall strategy and performance expectations.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
Decision-making rights: the determination of who should make what decisions in organizations.
4-11
“Allowing front-line employees to make autonomous decisions is intended to unleash
motivation and creativity among those organizational members with the ‘best
information’ to make decisions.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Challenge of Multinational Organizations
Multinational organizations face special challenges regarding the allocation of decision‐making rights.
4-12Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“The challenge for multinational organizations is to allocate a high level of autonomy to national
units as a way of achieving marketplace responsiveness while simultaneously making
corporate‐level decisions that allow the exploitation of synergies across the divisions.”
Building a Vocabulary Synergies: the advantages of efficiency and effectiveness conferred by
the combined effect of interaction and collaboration among multiple units
Employee commitment: the internalized desire of employees to expend energy and discretionary effort on behalf of the goals of the organization
Collaboration: involves willing cooperation among individuals and groups with a common goal
4-13
“The challenge for multidivisional organizations is to allocate a high level of autonomy to separate divisions as a way of achieving marketplace
responsiveness while simultaneously making corporate-level decisions that allow the exploitation of synergies across the divisions.”
“High employee commitment can improve organizational performance by enhancing productivity, creativity, collaboration, and the willingness to change.”
“Collaboration will require effective teamwork across units and functions of an organization.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Informal Design Elements for Building High Commitment
4-14
Element What Happens Clarity of
organizational goals
Employees at all levels and in all units are provided with an understanding of the goals and values of the
organization as well as its strategic choices
Influence mechanisms A variety of formal (elected board of representatives) and informal (open doors and accessible managers)
mechanisms enable wide participation in the dialogue and decision making of the organization
Teamwork Teams designated to perform interdependent tasks
Shared information Employees kept informed about how the organization is performing, including the dissemination of data such as financial performance, costs, profitability, information
on competitors, and feedback from customers
Organic controls Control exerted through peer pressure, organizational culture, and expectations of outstanding performance
reinforced through performance feedback
Individual development opportunities
Control exerted through peer pressure, organizational culture, and expectations of outstanding performance
reinforced through performance feedback Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
Job design: organizational expectations for how tasks will be performed in order to meet both individual task requirements the overall performance requirements of the organization
4-15
“By enriching jobs along any or all of five characteristics, organizations can increase the
motivation and commitment of employees performing those tasks.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Using Job Enrichment to Increase Commitment
4-16
Job Dimension Description Enrichment Action
Skill variety The degree to which a job requires a variety of
different activities in carrying out the work, involving the use of a number of different skills and talents
Enlarging task requirements to involve multiple and varied
skills
Task identity The degree to which the job requires
completion of a “whole” and identifiable piece of work; that is, doing a job from beginning to a
tangible outcome
Combining individuals into a team with shared responsibility
for the final product
Task significance
The degree to which the performance of the task has a substantial impact on outcomes that are deemed to
be important to employees, to the organization, and/or to society as a whole
Communicating regularly and clearly how individual and group effort contributes to
overall performance of company
Autonomy The degree to which the job provides substantial discretion to the individual in scheduling work and
determining procedures for carrying it out
Allowing individuals or groups to schedule work and assign specific tasks consistent with achieving performance goal
Feedback The degree to which carrying out work activities
required by the job results in the individual acquiring direct and clear information about the
effectiveness of his or her performance
Communicating frequently concerning progress toward
work goals
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary Teams: interdependent groups with shared responsibility for an
outcome
Cross-functional teams: teams made up from representatives of multiple organization functions typically intended to achieve required coordination along a chain of interrelated activities and processes
4-17
“Don’t just place employees on teams and expect the performance benefits of teamwork; organizations will need to create the context required of teamwork.”
“When members of a team feel equally responsible for the outcome of their efforts, teamwork will be enhanced.”
“At least in the early stages of change, organizations will need to make sure teams are buffered from traditional hierarchical power and are allowed to work across functions.”
“In order to encourage teamwork, organizations can take care to ensure that team members have the appropriate skills to perform the task effectively.”
“Teams succeed or fail in organizations based not just on the efforts of team members but on the overall design and context of the organization, which must support and reinforce joint effort.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Team Types Team Type How they contribute
Work team By sharing responsibilities, developing multiple skills, and performing varied tasks, motivation
and quality are enhanced
Product development team Through concurrent rather than sequential
development activities, speed to market and innovation are enhanced while costs associated
with rework are diminished
Problem-solving team By bringing together individuals from multiple
functions, problems associated with handoffs and cross-functional interactions can be creatively
addressed
Project management team The multiple functions and tasks of the value chain are linked in order to enhance quality, coordination, and customer responsiveness
4-18Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any
means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 4-20