Organizational change
3-1
Implementing Organizational Change: Theory into Practice
Bert Spector
Chapter 3
Mutual Engagement and Shared Diagnosis
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Learning Objectives
Describe the role of diagnosis in assessing behaviors and values and in creating dissatisfaction with the status quo.
Discuss the use of a systemic framework for guiding diagnosis.
Explore ways to overcome the “climate of silence” that blocks mutual engagement.
Provide the key ingredients of a diagnostic intervention.
Define the role played by after-action reviews in created quick learning and improvement.
3-2Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-3
Learning is the process by which individuals receive data from the external environment, analyze that data, and adjust their thinking and behaviors accordingly.
“Don’t expect formulas and solutions that have worked in the past and are imposed on the current situation to work
for your organization.”
Diagnosis: process of learning about the dynamics of the organization in order to take action intended to improve performance
Diagnostic framework: a roadmap to analyzing alignment that makes explicit both the key elements of an organization that need to be aligned and the interconnections and interdependencies among those elements
3-4
Building a Vocabulary
“The most effective change implementation starts with a diagnosis that is shared by many employees at
multiple organizational levels.”
“Use a common organizational framework to shape mutual engagement and shared diagnosis”
“Use diagnosis as the preliminary stage in implementing change.” Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary Dialogue: involves a structured, collective
discussion among two or more parties without a predetermined outcome
Organizational silence: the lack of truthful dialogue in organizations
3-5
“Don’t mistake passive acceptance with agreement. ” “Leaders can ask themselves—has their organization bred a
‘climate of silence’ that discourages subordinates from speaking up and discourages bosses from seeking feedback? ”
“A large power distance between parties in a dialogue inhibits openness and risk taking while distorting communications.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Power Equalization Steps
3-6
Steps Leads to Delayering Removing hierarchical barriers that create and distort communication
Decentralizing Pushing down decision making to close the gap between decision makers and doers
Egalitarianism Removing “artifacts” of status differentials
Third-party Facilitation
Structuring effective “rules-of-engagement” around feedback and dialogue
Representation Inserting voice from multiple levels, both vertical
(managers, shop floor employees, etc.) and horizontal (union and management, various functions, etc.) into dialogue
Teamwork Building shared purpose and mutual responsibility to ensure equal participation and influence by all
members in dialogue
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
Psychological safety: a belief on the part of employees that the organizational climate is conducive for taking personal risks, especially around dialogue.
“Instead of committing to solutions, leaders can commit to a process of mutual engagement and learning, thus
inviting employees at all levels to cross barriers of silence and participate in a dialogue.”
3-7Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
3-8
Building a Vocabulary Consultant: an individual possessing a broad
range of diagnostic and developmental skills who contracts with the organization’s leaders to facilitate an intervention.
“Leaders can call on a consultant to introduce and teach skills required of mutual engagement and diagnosis.”
“Consultants may arrive from outside the organization: professional consultants or academics with a specialization in organizational
change and development. They may also come from within the firm: specially trained employees, often within the company’s human resource or organization development staff. Whether internal or
external, the task of the consultant is the same: to facilitate diagnosis and dialogue and to do so in a way that allows employees to develop
those skills themselves.”
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Principles for Organizational Diagnosis
Systemic Focus Targets the entire organization and guided by a
framework that focuses on interactions Consultant Facilitated
Specially trained individual(s) bring external perspective and required skills
Client-Oriented Employees participate in all stages as full partners
in order to build commitment and competency
Data-Based Participants agree on the validity and strategic
importance of data collected about performance
Honest Conversation
Employees engage the requirements of shared dialogue: mutuality, reciprocity, advocacy, and
inquiry Psychological
Safety Active steps taken to overcome climate of
organizational silence
3-9Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Data Collection Methods Questionnaires: self-administered paper-and-pencil data collection forms, often stressing areas of behavioral interaction such as communications, goals, and coordination
Advantages:
Reach large numbers of employees Fast Anonymous Used for benchmarking
Disadvantages
Based on preconceived ideas Can oversimplify complex issues Does not expose root causes Does not create commitment or motivation
3-10Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Be careful about the overuse of employee questionnaires in collecting data about organizational effectiveness. They can be useful for measurement purpose but do not create mutual engagement.”
Data Collection Methods Diagnostic interviews: a form of data collection in which a trained diagnostician meets with an employee, or small groups of employees, to solicit information pertaining to the performance of the organization
Advantages:
Collect rich data Begins process of dialogue Teaches communication skills
Disadvantages:
Requires investment in training interviewers Data hard to summarize or quantify Lacks anonymity
3-11Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
“Use diagnostic interviews and behavioral observation to collect rich and valid data about how employees behave and how
the organization functions.”
Data Collection Methods Behavioral observation: a form of data collection in which a trained diagnostician can watch actual behaviors of employees
Advantages:
Work-based behavior as data Data rich and deep on interactions Reveals underlying emotions
Disadvantages:
Observation will impact behaviors Time consuming Requires highly skilled observers
3-12Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
Discovery: the process of analyzing and making sense of data that has been collected as part of an organizational diagnosis
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-13
“Mutual engagement in the discovery stage will help both to assure the validity of the conclusions and build
commitment to corrective actions.”
Building a Vocabulary Closing the Loop
Feedback: the process of receiving information focused on the effectiveness of one’s actions and performance.
“Mutual engagement can be enhanced when top management feeds back to employees what it has learned from the
diagnostic process and uses that feedback as an opportunity to generate more learning.”
3-14Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
Building a Vocabulary
After-action review: an organized, disciplined approach to shared diagnosis and mutual dialogue in the immediate aftermath of a specific action or event.
“After-action reviews provided an opportunity for a sharply focused and timely mutual engagement that can
lead to quick corrections.”
3-15Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Printed in the United States of America.
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall 3-16