Nursing Dnp Essentials

C5: Summative Assessment Rubric

Criteria Ratings

Writing Mechanics

Sources

APA formatting

MASTERY Only minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctation errors present (1-2 errors). The overall sentence structure is well developed throughout, and paragraphs are fully developed with consistent style and clear communication.

PROFICIENT Minor spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks minor elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are consistently developed. (3-4 errors)

DEVELOPING Minimal spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure lacks elements of professional writing, and/or paragraphs are not consistently developed. (5-7 errors)

EMERGING Multiple spelling grammar and/or punctuation errors present and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are minimally developed. (more than 7-9 errors)

NOT EVIDENT Significant spelling, grammar, and/or punctuation errors present, and/or sentence structure does not meet professional writing standards, and/or paragraphs are poorly developed. (10 or more errors

MASTERY The use of sources was consistent throughout the document in all areas to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

PROFICIENT In most areas, sources were consistently used throughout the submission to support claims and/or statements in the artifact.

DEVELOPING Sources were occasionally used to support some claims and/or statements in the artifact, but statements were not consistently supported with sources throughout.

EMERGING Minimal usage of sources present in the artifact, and/or the overall communication lacked appropriate research support.

NOT EVIDENT Sources were not used to support major statements and/or claims, where needed in the artifact

MASTERY Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with only one or two minor errors.

PROFICIENT Citations, references, and formatting follow APA style guide, with more than 2 errors, but they are minor.

DEVELOPING APA style is demonstrated with some consistency, but the majority of the citation, references, and/or formatting is not correct.

EMERGING Formatting, citations, and/or references, are attempted, but do not follow APA style guidelines consistently.

NOT EVIDENT Formatting, citations, and references are not included, or do not follow appropriate APA style guide.

Criteria Ratings

Mind map format used and separate Word document is provided

Relationship between the nursing process and critical thinking is presented in mind map

Word document addresses key points/questions (4)

MASTERY A well- developed mind map and separate Word document are submitted.

PROFICIENT A mind map is provided but is not well- developed and a separate Word document is provided.

DEVELOPING A mind map with scant information is provided and a separate Word document is submitted.

EMERGING Either the mind map or the Word document are missing.

NOT EVIDENT Both the mind map and Word document are missing.

MASTERY The relationship between the nursing process and critical thinking is effectively linked in the mind map.

PROFICIENT between the nursing process and critical thinking is effectively linked in the mind map The relationship between the nursing process and critical thinking is clearly linked in the mind map.

DEVELOPING The nursing process and critical thinking are presented in the mind map without an indication of a relationship.

EMERGING The mind map is missing either the nursing process or critical thinking.

NOT EVIDENT Either the mind map is missing or the nursing process and critical thinking are not included.

MASTERY All four key points/questions are robustly discussed.

PROFICIENT All four key points/questions are clearly discussed.

DEVELOPING Two to three key points/questions are clearly discussed.

EMERGING One to two key points/questions are clearly discussed.

NOT EVIDENT No discussion is evident about the key points/questions.