10-15 Slide presentation

profileKjjanders4
SPD-521Rubric-FamilyInformationNightPresentationandCommunicationPlan.pdf

Family Information Night Presentation and Communication Plan - Rubric

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation - Descriptions 10 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation - Descriptions

5. Target 10 points

Each challenge description is insightful and compelling.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Each challenge description is clear and logical.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Challenge descriptions are vague and missing key elements.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Challenge descriptions are incomplete or inaccurate.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Collapse All

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation - Solutions and Strategies 10 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation - Solutions and Strategies

5. Target 10 points

Innovative potential solutions to each challenge are substantial and professional.

Aligned solution strategies proficiently demonstrate best practices for each

challenge.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Detailed potential solutions to each challenge are appropriate. Aligned solution

strategies demonstrate best practices for each challenge.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Potential solutions to presented challenges are basic. Solution strategies broadly

attempt to demonstrate best practices for each challenge.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Potential solutions to presented challenges are inappropriate or not included.

Aligned solution strategies fail to demonstrate best practices for each challenge.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation -Resources and Technology 10 points

Criteria Description

Part 1: Family Challenge Presentation -Resources and Technology

5. Target 10 points

Presentation includes beneficial, realistic, accessible resources for families facing

the challenges described, including resources that use technology.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

Presentation includes relevant, accessible resources for families facing the

challenges described, including resources that use technology.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Resources are described, including one or more that uses technology, but some are

lacking relevance for families facing the issues identified, or are not clearly

accessible to the families in need.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Resources, including those that use technology, are incompletely described, or

irrelevant for families facing the challenges described.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Part 2: Communication Plan 30 points

Criteria Description

Part 2: Communication Plan

5. Target 30 points

Realistic, efficient yearlong communication plan ensures collaboration with families

and caregivers, thoughtfully incorporating challenges some families may face.

Communication plan proficiently demonstrates best practices incorporating

technology.

4. Acceptable 26.1 points

Resourceful yearlong communication plan ensures collaboration with families and

caregivers, clearly incorporating challenges some families may face. Communication

plan demonstrates sound practices incorporating technology.

3. Approaching 22.2 points

Yearlong communication plan marginally ensures collaboration with families and

caregivers incorporating challenges some families may face. Communication plan

attempts to demonstrate sound practices incorporating technology, but lacks detail.

2. Insufficient 20.7 points

Yearlong communication plan does not ensure collaboration with families and

caregivers, poorly incorporating challenges some families may face. Communication

plan fails to appropriately incorporate technology.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation and Plan: Language Use and Purpose (includes sentence

construction, word choice, etc.) 5 points

Criteria Description

Presentation and Plan: Language Use and Purpose (includes sentence construction,

word choice, etc.)

5. Target 5 points

Word choice is distinctive, creative, and well suited to purpose, discipline, and

scope.

4. Acceptable 4.35 points

Word choice is reflective of the intended audience, uses a variety of appropriate

vocabulary, and communicates clearly.

3. Approaching 3.7 points

Some distracting inconsistencies or repetitions in word choice are present.

Language is not always appropriate for the submission purpose and discipline.

2. Insufficient 3.45 points

Inappropriate word choice is evident. Language is not reflective of the purpose and

discipline.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation and Plan: Overall Presentation 10 points

Criteria Description

Presentation and Plan: Overall Presentation

5. Target 10 points

The work is well presented. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor organizational flaws.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

The work is somewhat disheveled and includes several organizational flaws.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

The work is sloppy or chaotic.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Presentation and Plan: Organization 10 points

Criteria Description

Presentation and Plan: Organization

5. Target 10 points

The content is well organized and logical. There are sequential progressions of

ideas related to each other. The presentation and plan are each presented with a

clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The

content provides a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The

ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

The content is not organized. The ideas are in cohesive and disjointed.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Research Citations and Format 10 points

Criteria Description

Research Citations and Format

5. Target 10 points

All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All

required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.

4. Acceptable 8.7 points

All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects

of APA format are correct within the submission.

3. Approaching 7.4 points

Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not

support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are

missing or mistaken.

2. Insufficient 6.9 points

Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate

for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are

missing or mistaken.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language

use) 5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target 5 points

Presentation, speaker’s notes, and communication plan are virtually free of

mechanical errors. Sentence structures are engaging.

4. Acceptable 4.35 points

Presentation, speaker’s notes, and communication plan include some mechanical

errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are

used.

3. Approaching 3.7 points

Presentation, speaker’s notes, and communication plan include frequent and

repetitive mechanical errors that distract the reader. Sentence structure is lacking.

2. Insufficient 3.45 points

Presentation, speaker’s notes, and communication plan include surface errors that

are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate

sentence construction is used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 100 points

© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.© 2025. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.