Sources, Rules, and Creation of an Innovation Guide

6/3/2020 Sources, Rules, and Creation of an Innovation Guide Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/BMGT/BMGT8134/200100/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 1/1

Sources, Rules, and Creation of an Innovation Guide Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 8 Percentage of Course Grade: 35%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Analyze how effectively a publicly traded for-profit organization applies theories, models, and guidelines of disruptive innovation. 25%

Fails to mention how effectively a publicly traded for-profit organization applies theories, models, and guidelines for disruptive innovation.

Outlines how effectively a publicly traded for-profit organization applies theories, models, and guidelines for disruptive innovation.

Analyzes how effectively a publicly traded for-profit organization applies theories, models, and guidelines for disruptive innovation.

Analyzes how effectively a publicly traded for-profit organization applies theories, models, and guidelines for disruptive innovation. Synthesizes the application for gaps in an exceptionally accurate and impressive manner.

Develop approaches for leading strategic foresight and suggest alternative models of disruptive and value innovation for a publicly traded for-profit organization. 25%

Fails to list approaches for leading strategic foresight and suggesting alternative models of disruptive and value innovation for a publicly traded for-profit organization.

Outlines approaches for leading strategic foresight and suggests alternative models of disruptive and value innovation for a publicly traded for-profit organization.

Develops approaches for leading strategic foresight and suggests alternative models of disruptive and value innovation for a publicly traded for-profit organization.

Develops approaches for leading strategic foresight and suggests alternative models of disruptive and value innovation for a publicly traded for-profit organization. Recommendations are supported with substantial literature and superiority in critical thinking skills is evident.

Create an innovation “cookbook” with best practice guidelines. 25%

Fails to create an innovation “cookbook” with best practice guidelines.

Makes a limited attempt at creating an innovation “cookbook” with limited practice guidelines and limited or no supporting theories.

Creates an innovation “cookbook” with best practice guidelines.

Creates a robust innovation “cookbook” with exceptional clarity of best practice guidelines. Presents and carefully integrates supporting theories and highlighting similarities and differences.

Communicate in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition, including full APA compliance and demonstration of critical thinking skills. 25%

Fails to communicate in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition, including full APA compliance and demonstration of critical thinking skills.

Communicates at a basic level in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition and includes partial APA compliance and demonstration of critical thinking skills.

Communicates in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition including full APA compliance and demonstration of critical thinking skills.

Communicates in a manner expected of doctoral-level composition including full APA compliance and demonstration of critical thinking skills. Communication is exceptionally polished and impressive at a superior level.