Solving My People Puzzle

Criteria

Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):

Satisfies criteria w/ excellence

Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :

Satisfies Criteria

Developing 76-83 (C- to C+):

Satisfies most criteria

Below Expectations 1-75

(F to D+):

Does not satisfy criteria

Not Present

Points

Earned

Content: 125 points

Q#1: Guiding Purpose Statement

10 points

GPS is concise and clearly provides a primary and functional description of being and becoming more Christlike in a specific way in a specific relational context.

9 points

GPS provides a primary and functional description of being and becoming more Christlike in a specific way in a specific relational context.

8 points

GPS is confusing and does not demonstrate an understanding of primary and functional purpose.

The focus seems to be more on doing than being & becoming.

1 to 7 points

Attempts to draft a GPS, but is undeveloped and lacks integration of primary and functional purpose.

0 points

Q#2: DISC Description

14 to 15 points

Provides concise, thoughtful DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

13 points

Provides thoughtful DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

12 points

Provides insufficent DISC description about “This is Me!” and “This is Expected of Me”.

1 to 11 points

Effort made to describe “This is Me” and “This is Expected of Me”, but weak and undeveloped.

0 points

Q#3: DISC Alignment

55 to 60 points

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

51 to 54 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

46 to 50 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with each of the primary DISC styles.

1 to 45 points

Effort made to work with relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

0 points

Q#4: Communicating & Connecting

with Careseeker

14 to 15 points

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with careseeker’s primary DISC style.

13 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with careseeker’s primary DISC style.

12 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with the careseeker’s primary DISC style.

1 to 11 points

Effort made to work with careseeker’s relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

0 points

Q#5:

Communicating & Connecting

with Mentor

14 to 15 points

Provides significant insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and clearly shifts alignment with mentor’s primary DISC style.

13 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style from related texts & assessments and shifts alignment with mentor’s primary DISC style.

12 points

Provides insights about his/her relational style but with insufficient detail. Weakly developed alignment with the mentor’s primary DISC style.

1 to 11 points

Effort made to work with mentor’s relational alignment, but weak and undeveloped, as well as unsubstantiated.

0 points

Conclusion

10 points

The assignment includes a clear, cohesive conclusion that presents a convincing closing argument for the assignment’s “So What of it all?!”

9 points

The assignment includes a general conclusion that presents a closing argument for the assignment’s “So What of it all?!”

8 points

The assignment includes a partial conclusion summarizing the assignment.

1 to 7 points

The assignment includes an insufficient conclusion.

0 points

Structure: 25 points

Organization

14 to 15 points

All required elements (7 sources) are included and presented with strong headings and organizational clarity. There are clear transitions between paragraphs and sections. The paper meets the page length requirement.

13 points

All required elements (7 sources) are included, but organization of writing needs work. The paper meets the page length requirement.

12 points

Most required elements are included, but not well organized. Most paragraphs and sections have transitions. The paper may not meet the page length requirement.

1 to 11 points

Few or no required elements are included. Few or no transitions exist between paragraphs and sections. There may not be a logical treatment of the material. The paper does not meet the page length requirement.

0 points

Style

and

Format

10 points

The paper consistently follows current APA standards or Turabian form. Proper headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are formatted correctly. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are very few spelling and grammar errors.

9 points

The paper mostly follows current APA standards or Turabian form. Proper headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are formatted with few or no errors. The paper reflects a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are few spelling and grammar errors.

8 points

The paper inconsistently follows current APA standards or Turabian form. Headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are inconsistently formatted. The paper does not consistently reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

1 to 7 points

The paper erroneously uses or does not use current APA standards or Turabian form. Headings, in-text citations or footnotes, and references or bibliography are erroneously formatted or not present. The paper does not reflect a graduate level voice and vocabulary. There are spelling and grammar errors.

0 points

Total

/150

Instructor’s comments: