comm paper

profileefe123
socpenetrationslide.pptx

COM 203: Introduction to Communication

Week 4, Day 1, 2/13

Agenda

Paper 1 due

Review concepts of interpersonal communication

Discuss theories that help us understand interpersonal communication

Uncertainty, Social Penetration

Review for Quiz 1

Reminder:

Review guide is on Blackboard

THE VALUE OF RELATIONSHIPS

Six Provisions of Relationships

What do relationships offer us?

Attachment

Reassurance of Worth

Guidance

Reliable Alliance

Social Integration

Opportunity to Provide Nurturance

THE ROLE OF

INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION

We use interpersonal communication to…

Engage others

Manage relationships

Disengage from relationships

Common terms

Attachment: relationships linking partners through a sense of security

Exclusive, persistent, provide security

Affiliation: relationships linking partners through a sense of alliance

Aggregate, interrupted/change, satisfaction-seeking

Dyad: two people communicating interpersonally

Uncertainty Reduction Theory

Created by Berger and Calabrese

Addresses the idea that we use communication to predict and explain the behavior of others in the initial stages of a relationship.

Assumption that when we first meet people we are primarily concerned with reducing uncertainty about them

Want to increase predictability about the behavior of both ourselves and others in the interaction.

Definition of Uncertainty

What is uncertainty in relationships?

“….inability to predict or explain the attitudes and/or behavior of someone.”

High Uncertainty: feeling unsure or insecure about your ability to predict or explain someone’s attitudes and behaviors.

Low Uncertainty: feeling confident in your ability to predict and explain someone’s behavior, often because you believe you know someone well.

Motivations in URT

Incentives

Is the other person somehow rewarding to you?

Deviance

Are you motivated if the other acts in unexpected ways or violates rules or social norms?

Prospect of Future Interaction

Do you expect to interact with this person in the future?

Information-Seeking Strategies

Passive Strategies: Observe the

other in different social situations.

Active Strategies: Ask others about

the person of interest.

Interactive Strategies: Engage the

person in conversation and ask

questions to reduce discomfort.

Uncertainty Reduction in Established Relationships

While the theory originally was created to explain uncertainty in initial relationships it has since been extended to include established ones.

The need to reduce uncertainty in established relationships often occurs do to:

-Various stages in the relationship

-After particular events

Six Major Uncertainty Increasing Behaviors in Established Relationships

Research has suggested that there are six uncertainty increasing behaviors:

1) Competing Relationships

2) Unexplained loss of contact or closeness

3) Sexual behavior

4) Deception

5) Change in personality/value

6) Betraying confidence

Uncertainty Reduction Strategies in Established Relationships

“Secret tests”

1) Asking third party tests

- similar to active strategy…Test partners friends/family

2) Directness tests

- Similar to interactive strategy

3) Triangle tests

- creating a three person triangle to test partner’s commitment

4) Separation tests

- Creating physical distance between each other or reducing contact

Uncertainty Reduction Strategies in Established Relationships

5) Endurance tests

- Increasing the costs or reducing the rewards

6) Public presentation tests

- observing the others reaction to the use of certain relational labels

7) Indirect suggestion tests

- Bringing up a topic without taking direct responsibility. Usually involves hinting or joking

Social Penetration Theory

Developed by Altman and Taylor

Social Penetration Theory says that relationships move from initial interaction to greater stability through interpersonal communication.

This theory, also known as the “Onion Theory” (because of the many layers to a relationship), is based on a number of assumptions.

Assumptions of SPT

Relationships progress from non-intimate to intimate.

Progress is generally systematic and predictable.

Relationship development includes dissolution and depenetration (deterioration of the relationship).

Self-disclosure is at the heart of relational development.

See handout for self-disclosure activity

SPT as the ONION Model

The peeling away of the onion’s layers—movement from impersonal to more personal communication

Guided by our culture’s norm of reciprocity: when we reveal something about ourselves, the other person will typically respond with similar information.

SPT as the ONION Model

Relationships, like a halved onion:

Depth—how personal is the shared information

Breadth—the number of topics that can safely be discussed.

Four Stages of Social Penetration Theory

Orientation

Exploratory Affective Exchange

Affective Exchange

Stable Exchange

Orientation

Interaction between people who do not know one another.

There is little sharing of personal information, and communication is based on social convention.

Conversations are scripted and superficial.

Exploratory Affective Exchange

Communication here is more open and comfortable, less scripted.

The shared information goes beyond the norm-approved small talk of the previous stage, but still remains at the periphery.

Affective Exchange

Communication is characterized by a good deal of self-disclosure.

Breadth and depth of topics increase.

Stable Exchange

You and your partner can and do talk about everything.

Communication here is rich, open, and free across all the onion’s levels.

Review for Quiz 1

Quiz will start at start of class

30 minutes to take the quiz

Questions on concepts??

Next time…

Quiz 1

Continue discussions on interpersonal and relational communication

Please finish reading Ch. 6