8 pages due in 36 hours

Major Flaws in Objectivist Approach

Introduction

Although there are positive approaches to the study of social problems, especially in the United States of America, there exist various imperfections in methods to simulate and appreciate the concern of the Social Problem Process (Kerbo H, 2006). Social complications are the problems that are identifiable through a scientific method that is integral to human existence (Manis G, 1976). The social problem process is a complex concept in sociology that requires definitive approaches. Identification of drawbacks in the objectivism approach and further explanation of flaws to create distinctive elements of social complications and social conditions is a fundamental requirement.

Drawbacks of Objectivist Approach

Objectivist definition of social problems based on numbers is a pitfall to the approach in several dimensions (Best J and Harris S, 2013). In this case, identification of what immense number entrails is controversial since quantifying the affected group of individuals in a society becomes a problem. For instance, robbery might take place at point A, leading to the death of one person. Conversely, the same theft takes place at point B leading to the end of one hundred persons. The objectivist, therefore, find it difficult to qualify what a large number entails in a social problem. Moreover, the description of damage has several implications in objectivist definition and explanation of social problem approaches. The harm can be in all walks of life, such as political, economic, social, psychological, and cultural damage, among others. Similarly, identifying what is harmful receives an ideological difference within the social structure. For instance, the marriage of same-sex is a controversial topic with an accumulation of both proponents and opponents on the concern. Proponent believes that same-sex orientation is a social problem while the opponents aver that the condition is acceptable; thus cannot be a social problem. Classification of damages becomes a prominent flaw in objectivists' approach to the social complication process. The objectivist approach fails to identify a crucial difference between social and nonsocial crunch. HIV and AIDS can be classified as physical health problems, while other aspects such as floods are under natural phenomena.

Explanation of the Flaws

The drawback of non – differentiation in what “large group” means, creating a distinctive feature between social conditions and social problems is a challenge (Braveman P 2010). Social conditions involve individual outcomes from the social issue, therefore identifying one person affected by robbery as a social problem creates noncompliance to the objectivism approach to a group of people in social issues. Consequently, the objectivist description of what is social harm has a significant impact on the differentiation of social problems from social conditions. Community accommodates individuals from different social and ideological setups, thus creating controversy in identifying the category of social issues. For instance, alcohol consumption has a provision in statute to individuals above 18 years of age. Excess use of alcohol can cause individual harm as well as a social problem, thus creating an intersection in understanding the social problem and social conditions. Additionally, the classification of social and nonsocial problems creates a close distinction between social complications and circumstances. Issues such as physical health, natural, and economic damages in a societal setup can affect both at individual and group levels. Inobjectivist' classification of social problems, there is a limitation concise and precise differences from social conditions. Unemployment, for example, portrays both social and economic issues since an individual remains jobless, thus low income leading to low living standards, which affects societal, economic growth.

References