test whether the two variables relig16 and letdie1 are independent or if the belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family significantly depend on their religion.

profileMisiaczek
SOCI332Statistics_Agni_7thNovForum6.docx

Association between Religion and Belief on Euthanasia

We are testing the strength of the correlation between religion (relig16, RELIGION IN WHICH RAISED) and the belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family (letdie1, ALLOW INCURABLE PATIENTS TO DIE).

The research problem is to test whether the two variables relig16 and letdie1 are independent or if the belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family significantly depend on their religion.

Thus, the appropriate hypotheses to be tested is:

Null hypothesis H0: The belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family (letdie1) is independent of their religion (relig16).

Alternative hypothesis H1: The belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family (letdie1) significantly depend on their religion (relig16).

We use chi-square test statistic to test this hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance.

Religion in which raised * Allow incurable patients to die Crosstabulation

Count

Allow incurable patients to die

Total

YES

NO

Religion in which raised

PROTESTANT

424

210

634

CATHOLIC

279

135

414

JEWISH

16

2

18

NONE

74

27

101

OTHER

5

0

5

BUDDHISM

2

0

2

HINDUISM

7

2

9

MOSLEM/ISLAM

6

1

7

ORTHODOX-CHRISTIAN

5

4

9

CHRISTIAN

25

16

41

NATIVE AMERICAN

1

1

2

Total

844

398

1242

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

11.892a

10

.292

Likelihood Ratio

14.875

10

.137

Linear-by-Linear Association

.010

1

.920

N of Valid Cases

1242

a. 10 cells (45.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .64.

We observe that if we apply a chi-square test without any re-coding, 45.5% cells have expected count less than 5 (as is mentioned in the chi-square output table above).

Thus, the chi-square test fails to meet the desired requirement and so, we use re-coding to combine certain categories of religion (with expected counts less than 5).

Religion in which raised * Allow incurable patients to die Crosstabulation

Count

Allow incurable patients to die

Total

YES

NO

Religion in which raised

PROTESTANT

424

210

634

CATHOLIC

279

135

414

JEWISH

16

2

18

NONE

74

27

101

OTHER

21

4

25

CHRISTIAN

30

20

50

Total

844

398

1242

Then, we apply chi-square test of independence to obtain the following result:

Chi-Square Tests

Value

df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square

9.739a

5

.083

Likelihood Ratio

10.851

5

.054

Linear-by-Linear Association

.005

1

.943

N of Valid Cases

1242

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 5.77.

The p-value of the 2-sided chi-square test of independence is 0.083

p-value (0.083) > level of significance (0.05)

Since p-value > level of significance, we fail to reject the null hypothesis (H0).

Thus, we conclude that the belief that doctors should be allowed to euthanize a patient with an incurable disease on request of the patient and the patient’s family (letdie1) is independent of their religion (relig16).