soap note 2 assessment
1
SOAP NOTE 6
|
References Comment by Extra, Carmante: Please review APA format for references Perry.M, Whyte. A (1998). "Immunology of the tonsils." Immunology Today (Review). 19 (9): 414–21. doi:10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01307-3. PMID 9745205. Comment by Extra, Carmante: Reference is outdated. Galioto N.J. (2017). "Peritonsillar Abscess." American Family Physician. Retrieved from:95 (8): 501–506. PMID 28409615. Weber. R (2014). "Pharyngitis." Primary Care. 41 (1): 91–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.10.010. PMC 7119355. PMID 24439883.
|
|
Criteria |
Points |
Competent |
Need Improvement |
Not Acceptable
|
Score |
|
Subjective (35 points) |
|
Provides complete, concise, and accurate information which is well organized and easy to understand. |
Provides most of the pertinent information but is not well organized and/or is slightly challenging to understand. May be missing pertinent negative information (e.g., patient denies…). |
Limited or no summary of pertinent information, is organized poorly, contains inaccurate information, and/or is difficult to understand. |
|
|
Chief complaint |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
HPI |
10 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
10 |
|
Relevant PMH & FH |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
ROS |
10 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
8 |
|
Currents: Allergies, Meds/OTCs, Tobacco, Immunizations, Diet, Exercise, Sleep |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
Objective (40 points) |
|
Provides complete, concise, and accurate information which is well organized and easy to understand.
|
Provides most of the pertinent information but is not well organized and/or is slightly challenging to understand. May be missing pertinent negative information (e.g., patient denies) |
Limited or no summary of pertinent information, is organized poorly, contains inaccurate information, and/or is difficult to understand.
|
|
|
General survey (Describe the state of the patient at the time of the examination) |
10 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
10 |
|
Vital signs, wt., BMI |
10 |
10 |
8 |
6 |
10 |
|
Physical exam-systematic, organized and thorough and related to the reason of the visit |
20 |
20 |
18 |
16 |
18 |
|
Diagnosis/ Differentials Diagnosis (10 points) |
|
Main diagnosis/ Differentials Diagnosis is supported by the objective and subjective assessment and rationale for choosing the diagnosis is supported by the evidence |
Main diagnosis/ Differentials Diagnosis is supported by the objective and subjective assessment but the rationale for choosing the diagnosis is not supported by the evidence |
Main diagnosis/ Differentials Diagnosis is not supported by the objective and subjective assessment and the rationale for choosing the diagnosis is not supported by the evidence |
|
|
Diagnosis/ (Assessment) |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
List of differentials supported by S+O findings (5 points) Must provide 3 differential diagnoses with one citation for each diagnosis. |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
Plan of care (10 Points) |
|
Complete and appropriate plan for the main problem and other active problems. Includes pharmacologic and/or non-pharmacologic and/or complete sig components. |
Mostly complete and appropriate plan for the main problem and other active problems. May be missing appropriate non-pharmacologic treatments and/or sig components. |
Missing or inappropriate treatment plan for the main problem and other active problems. |
|
|
Diagnostic tests/therapies/medications |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
Follow-up/Pt. Education and Health Promotion |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
References (5 Points) |
|
Provides a complete and appropriate list of references that are in APA format. |
References listed are appropriate (i.e. guidelines or primary), but not complete and some may be missing. Not APA formatted. |
References missing or very limited. References listed are inappropriate (i.e. tertiary) and/or not relevant. |
|
|
References |
5 |
5 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
Total |
100 |
|
|
|
86 |
Comment: Good start.
This is a good case. However, you missed important subjective and objective assessment. Please take feedback into consideration for next soap note.