CAPSTOPNE PROJECT 5 page paper and 10 slides powerpoint

1/22/22, 1:36 PMRubric Evaluation Results - MHA598 Health Administration Capstone Course (2021DEC27FT-1) - Trident University International

Page 1 of 2https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…36293&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0

BSHLS MSHLS MSHA SLP grading rubric - Timeliness v1 Activity: SLP 1 Dropbox

Course: MHA598 Health Administration Capstone Course (2021DEC27FT-1)

Name: Cherrelle Warren

Criteria Level 4 - Excellent Level 3 - Proficient Level 2 - Developing Level 1 - Emerging

Assignment-Driven Criteria

Critical Thinking

Scholarly Writing, Referencing, and Organization

Timeliness

10 points

Demonstrates mastery

covering all key elements of

the assignment in a

substantive way.

8 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency covering all key

elements of the assignment.

4 points

Demonstrates limited or

poor proficiency covering all

key elements of the

assignment.

Criterion Feedback

Your submission was clear and provided good visuals. The powerpoint should be inclusive of speaker notes to provide a narration of what is being delivered verbally. I didn't hear that you

discussed surrounding towns to include the visual of a table comparing each, cultural competence, how your organization will cater to the medical conditions within the given area, and Identify

how your organization will differ from the organizations currently present in the area. Each point that is discussed in your case should be discussed in your powerpoint and reference each point in

the rubric. Please be sure to transfer each discussion from your case to your powerpoint.

10 points

Demonstrates mastery in

conceptualizing the issue.

Viewpoints and assumptions

of experts are analyzed,

synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are logically

presented with appropriate

rationale.

8 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency conceptualizing

the issue. Viewpoints and

assumptions of experts are

proficiently analyzed,

synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are presented

with necessary rationale.

4 points

Demonstrates limited or

poor proficiency

conceptualizing the issue.

Viewpoints and assumptions

of experts are either absent

or poorly analyzed,

synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are either

absent or poorly conceived

and supported.

7 points

Demonstrates mastery in:

scholarly written

communication; using

relevant and quality sources

to support ideas; using in-

text citations and properly

formatting references;

following the required

structure and organization of

the assignment, including

use of headings to guide the

flow of the document.

5 points

Demonstrates considerable

proficiency in:

scholarly written

communication; using

relevant and quality sources

to support ideas; using in-

text citations and properly

formatting references;

following the required

structure and organization of

the assignment, including

use of headings to guide the

flow of the document.

1 point

Demonstrates limited or

poor proficiency in:

scholarly written

communication; using

relevant and quality sources

to support ideas; using in-

text citations and properly

formatting references;

following the required

structure and organization of

the assignment, including

use of headings to guide the

flow of the document.

Criterion Feedback

There was only one in-text citation in your powerpoint to reference where information was retrieved

2 points

Assignment submitted 1-2

days after module due date.

1 point

Assignment submitted 3-4

days after module due date.

0 points

Assignment submitted 5 or

more days after module due

date.

6 points

Demonstrates partial

proficiency covering all key

elements of the assignment.

6 points

Demonstrates partial

proficiency conceptualizing

the issue. Viewpoints and

assumptions of experts are

somewhat analyzed,

synthesized, and evaluated.

Conclusions are somewhat

consistent with the analysis

and findings.

4 points

Demonstrates partial

proficiency in: scholarly

written communication;

using relevant and quality

sources to support ideas;

using in-text citations and

properly formatting

references; following the

required structure and

organization of the

assignment, including use of

headings to guide the flow

of the document.

3 points

Assignment submitted on

time or arranged in advance

with professor for an

approved extension on due

date.

1/22/22, 1:36 PMRubric Evaluation Results - MHA598 Health Administration Capstone Course (2021DEC27FT-1) - Trident University International

Page 2 of 2https://tlc.trident.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assess…36293&groupId=0&d2l_body_type=5&closeButton=1&showRubricHeadings=0

Total

Overall Score

Level 4 27 points minimum

Level 3 24 points minimum

Level 2 21 points minimum

Level 1 0 points minimum