LITERATURE REVIEW
Listen to this manuscript’s
audio summary by
JACC Editor-in-Chief
Dr. Valentin Fuster.
J O U R N A L O F T H E A M E R I C A N C O L L E G E O F C A R D I O L O G Y V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
ª 2 0 1 7 B Y T H E A M E R I C A N C O L L E G E O F C A R D I O L O G Y F O U N D A T I O N
P U B L I S H E D B Y E L S E V I E R
I S S N 0 7 3 5 - 1 0 9 7 / $ 3 6 . 0 0
h t t p : / / d x . d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . j a c c . 2 0 1 6 . 1 1 . 0 6 9
THE PRESENT AND FUTURE
STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW
Sleep Apnea Types, Mechanisms, and Clinical Cardiovascular Consequences
Shahrokh Javaheri, MD,a Ferran Barbe, MD,b Francisco Campos-Rodriguez, MD,c Jerome A. Dempsey, PHD,d
Rami Khayat, MD,e Sogol Javaheri, MD,f Atul Malhotra, MD,g Miguel A. Martinez-Garcia, MD,h Reena Mehra, MD,i
Allan I. Pack, MBCHB, PHD,j Vsevolod Y. Polotsky, MD,k Susan Redline, MD,f,l Virend K. Somers, MD, PHDm
ABSTRACT
Fro
Bio
Va
of
Sch
Ca
Cli
Me
Cri
Bo
Jav
Ox
Un
Ph
gif
car
wi
oth
Ma
Sleep apnea is highly prevalent in patients with cardiovascular disease. These disordered breathing events are associated with
a profile of perturbations that include intermittent hypoxia, oxidative stress, sympathetic activation, and endothelial
dysfunction,allof whicharecriticalmediators ofcardiovascular disease. Evidencesupportsa causalassociation ofsleep apnea
with the incidence and morbidity of hypertension, coronary heart disease, arrhythmia, heart failure, and stroke. Several
discoveries in the pathogenesis, along with developments in the treatment of sleep apnea, have accumulated in recent years.
In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of sleep apnea, the evidence that addresses the links between sleep apnea and
cardiovascular disease, and research that has addressed the effect of sleep apnea treatment on cardiovascular disease and
clinical endpoints. Finally, we review the recent development in sleep apnea treatment options, with special consideration of
treating patients with heart disease. Future directions for selective areas are suggested. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:841–58)
© 2017 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
C ardiovascular disease (CVD) accounted for >800,000 deaths (31% of all deaths) in 2013 in the United States, with an estimated
155,000 deaths in Americans <65 years of age (1). By 2030, total direct medical costs of CVD are projected to be $920 billion. The high prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), which affects
m the aPulmonary and Sleep Division, Bethesda North Hospital, Cincinn
mèdica de Lleida, Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
lme, Sevilla, Spain; dDepartment of Population Health Sciences and John R
Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; eSleep Heart Program, the Ohio
ool, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; gPulmona
lifornia, San Diego, California; hRespiratory Department, Hospital Universit
nic Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Clevela
dicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philad
tical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimo
ston, Massachusetts; and the mDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases,
aheri is a consultant for Respicardia, Philips, and Leva Nova Group. Dr. B
igen Salus; and has received a speaker’s fee from Philips. Dr. Khayat ha
iversity from Philips Respironics. Dr. Mehra’s institution has received pos
ilips Respironics and ResMed for research; and she has received royalties fr
t from the Phillips Respironics Foundation for the study of sleep and car
dia, ResMed, Sorin Inc., Biosense Webster, U-Health, Philips, Ronda Grey
th Mayo Health Solutions and their industry partners on intellectual prop
er authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the
nuscript received July 29, 2016; revised manuscript received November 2
34% of men and 17% of women and is largely undi- agnosed (2), is a modifiable CVD risk factor. OSA is a cause of systemic hypertension (HTN) and is associated with an increased incidence of stroke, heart failure (HF), atrial fibrillation (AF), and coro- nary heart disease (CHD) (3). OSA, particularly when severe, is associated with increased all-cause
ati, Ohio; bRespiratory Department, Institut Ricerca
; cRespiratory Department, Hospital Universitario de
ankin Laboratory of Pulmonary Medicine, University
State University, Columbus, Ohio; fHarvard Medical
ry, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of
ario de Politecnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain; iCleveland
nd, Ohio; jDivision of Sleep Medicine/Department of
elphia, Pennsylvania; kDivision of Pulmonary and
re, Maryland; lBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Dr. Shahrokh
arbe has received research grants from ResMed and
s received research grants through The Ohio State
itive airway pressure machines and equipment from
om Up to Date. Dr. Somers’ institution has received a
diovascular disease; he was a consultant for Respi-
, Dane Garvin, and GlaxoSmithKline; and is working
erty related to sleep and cardiovascular disease. All
contents of this paper to disclose.
1, 2016, accepted November 22, 2016.
A B B R E V I A T I O N S
A N D A C R O N Y M S
AF = atrial fibrillation
AHI = apnea-hypopnea index
CHD = coronary heart disease
CPAP = continuous positive
airway pressure
CSA = central sleep apnea
CVD = cardiovascular disease
HF = heart failure
HTN = hypertension
OSA = obstructive sleep apnea
TIA = transient ischemic attack
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 842
and cardiovascular (CV) mortality (Central Illustration).
A sleep apnea subtype, central sleep apnea (CSA) is rare in the general population, but is common in patients with HF, stroke, and AF (4,5). However, recent data suggest that CSA is also a risk factor for incident AF (6) and HF (7).
This review provides an update on sleep apnea and CVD. We hope to provide a cata- lyst for cardiologists to join with sleep phy- sicians to conduct research, particularly clinical trials, that addresses the role of sleep apnea treatment in patients who are at high risk of or have existing CVD.
DEFINITIONS OF TYPES OF SLEEP APNEAS
AND HYPOPNEAS
An apnea is the absence of inspiratory airflow for at least 10 s. A hypopnea is a lesser decrease in airflow, lasting 10 s or longer, and associated with a drop in arterial oxyhemoglobin saturation and or an electro- encephalographic arousal. Apneas and hypopneas are classified as obstructive or central, but regardless, they result from an absence or reduction of brainstem neural output to upper airway muscles (e.g., genio- glossus) and/or lower thoracic inspiratory pump muscles (diaphragm and intercostal muscles). The pattern of neural output determines the phenotype: OSA occurs when complete upper airway occlusion occurs (absent airflow, tongue falling backward) in the face of continued activity of inspiratory thoracic pump muscles (Figure 1) (8). In contrast, CSA (Figure 2) occurs when there is a transient reduction by the pontomedullary pacemaker in the generation of breathing rhythm, usually reflecting changes in the partial pressure of CO2 (PCO2), which can fall below the apneic threshold, a level of PCO2 below which breathing ceases (4,5). The 2 most common causes in adults are HF and opioid use (4).
PATHOGENESIS OF OSA
Sleep has multiple pronounced effects on the respi- ratory system and control of breathing. Experimental studies in instrumented cats have shown decreased electrical activity in medullary inspiratory neurons with efferent output to the upper and lower respira- tory muscles, reflected in decreased activity of dia- phragm and dilator muscles of the upper airway (also observed in human studies) (9). With reduction in the activity of the genioglossus muscle at the onset of sleep, the tongue falls backward, and individuals with altered mechanical properties of the upper airway are
prone to upper airway obstruction. Several anatomic processes may compromise the patency of the upper airway, including alterations in craniofacial struc- tures, enlarged tonsils, upper airway edema, decreased lung volume, and most importantly, obesity (9,10).
The mechanisms linking obesity to OSA (2,9) are complex, although mostly due to direct mechanical effects on the respiratory system. These include fat deposits within the upper airway and reduction in lung volume, resulting in a loss of caudal traction on the upper airway (10).
Although obesity is the major risk factor for OSA, roughly 20% to 40% of OSA patients are not obese. In these individuals, nonanatomic factors (9,10), such as upper airway dilator muscle dysfunction, height- ened chemosensitivity, and low arousal threshold (i.e., waking up from sleep prematurely, causing instability in ventilatory control), are important, and define various phenotypes of OSA that may be amenable to specific therapeutic options. Specif- ically, dilator muscle dysfunction should best respond to hypoglossal nerve stimulation, whereas heightened chemosensitivity and low arousal threshold may be amenable to pharmacotherapy to down-regulate ventilatory responses (nocturnal oxygen-attenuating hypoxic response), and hyp- notics to increase the arousal threshold. With the push toward personalized medicine, individualizing therapy may be a viable approach for OSA, as the mechanism(s) underlying disease are better defined and consequently corrected. Much work is needed in this area.
Another risk factor that has received recent atten- tion is that of fluid around the upper airway (5,11). In individuals with lower-extremity edema, excess fluid may accumulate in the pharyngeal area with cephalad transposition of fluid from lower extremities to the neck area when supine (5,11), rendering the upper airway susceptible to collapse during sleep. Redistri- bution of fluid to the lungs also may potentiate CSA, as discussed later in the text. Therapeutic ap- proaches, such as diuretic agents, stockings, and exercise, have been shown to improve OSA and CSA (5,11).
PATHOGENESIS OF CSA
APNEIC THRESHOLD IN SLEEP AND INCREASED
LOOP GAIN. Apneic threshold is the arterial PCO2 below which the ponto-medullary respiratory rhythm generator ceases, thereby silencing motor nerves innervating inspiratory thoracic pump muscles. Con- sequently, ventilation ceases and CSA occurs. Sleep
CENTRAL ILLUSTRATION Potential Etiological Risk Factors for Sleep Apnea and the Downstream Consequences
Sleep apnea
End-stage cardiovascular disease
Increased sympathetic
nerve activity
Heart disease Hypertension Atrial fibrillation
Metabolic dysregulation Inflammation
Oxidative stress
Vascular endothelial dysfunction
Intermittent hypoxia
Upper airway dysfunctionRespiratory control instability Obesity
Javaheri, S. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(7):841–58.
The illustration depicts the multietiological risk factors for sleep apnea and its downstream consequences, which include increased sympathetic nerve activity,
metabolic dysregulation, inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular endothelial dysfunction, and intermittent hypoxia. These mechanistic pathways are critical for the
pathogenesis of coronary heart disease, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation, all of which are etiological risk factors for end-stage cardiovascular disease. The figure is a
schematic representation to illustrate important concepts, but does not fully depict the complex interactions between the various key variables.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
843
unmasks a highly sensitive hypocapneic-induced apneic threshold, which in health at sea level, approximates the waking eupneic partial arterial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) (4). When ventilation increases in response to a transient spontaneous arousal or sigh, the subsequent venti- latory overshoot often elicits sufficient hypocapnia (i.e., in the �1 to �4 mm Hg PaCO2 range) to cause apneas. Once the central respiratory drive is with- drawn, apnea persists until PaCO2 rises above the apneic threshold.
Susceptibility to ventilatory instabilities depends critically on the “loop gain” of the respiratory control system. Loop gain defines the magnitude of a response (increased ventilation) to a disturbance (reduced breathing [4]). The higher the gain, the greater the ventilatory overshoot and undershoot, and the more likely the occurrence of continued ventilatory cycling and repeated apneas. The role of loop gain in mediating periodic breathing in HF has been reviewed elsewhere (4).
OVERNIGHT CONSEQUENCES OF SLEEP
APNEA
Normal sleep provides a time of low physiological stress, which is advantageous to the CV system. In particular, during non–rapid-eye-movement sleep (approximately 80% of total sleep time), sympathetic activity decreases and parasympathetic activity in- creases, with lowering of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (Figure 3). However, sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) disrupts normal sleep. Apneas and hypopneas, and the consequent compensatory hyperpneas, are associated with 4 acute adverse CV consequences (12): 1) arterial blood gas abnormalities, with intermittent hypoxemia–reoxygenation and fluctuations in PCO2; 2) excessive arousals; 3) decreased parasympathetic and increased sympathetic activity (9,12); and 4) large negative intrathoracic pressure swings (12) (Figure 4). These consequences are qualitatively similar for OSA and CSA, but more pronounced in OSA. The adverse consequences of SDB have been reviewed elsewhere
FIGURE 1 Polysomnographic Example of OSA
First tracing is chin electromyogram, second and third are electroencephalogram, fourth
is electrocardiogram, fifth and sixth are airflow measured by thermocouple (fifth) and
CO2 (sixth), seventh and eighth are rib cage (RC, seventh) and abdominal (ABD, eighth),
ninth is oxyhemoglobin saturation measured by pulse oximetry, and tenth is esophageal
pressure. Please note that during obstructive apnea, airflow is absent while breathing
effort continues. Breathing resumes with the onset of arousal. Reprinted with permission
from Javaheri (8). OSA ¼ obstructive sleep apnea.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 844
(4,5,9,12). We emphasize, however, that the large negative pressure swings due to inspiratory effort against a closed upper airway are reflected in juxta- cardiac pressure increasing the transmural pressure of all intrathoracic structures, including atria, ventricles, intrathoracic aorta, and pulmonary vascular beds, with adverse effects on these structures. The nega- tive pressure increases left ventricular afterload, increasing myocardial oxygen consumption, and im- pedes stroke volume. Thin-walled atria are vulnerable to surrounding negative pressure, stretching easily, stimulating mechanoreceptors with activation of ion channels that facilitate development of atrial ar- rhythmias, specifically AF. These effects are most prominent in association with other apnea-related consequences, such as tissue hypoxia and increased sympathetic activity. Atrial stretch also results in secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide, causing noctu- ria, a symptom of OSA.
MOLECULAR SIGNATURES OF SLEEP APNEA
IN RELATION TO CARDIOCEREBROVASCULAR
DISORDERS
OSA is a disorder associated with oxidative stress, up-regulation of redox-sensitive genes, and inflam- matory cascade (13,14). Multiple studies of bio- markers related to CVD in patients with OSA assess how they change with treatment (13–17). Much of this
work has focused on nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB– mediated pathways. Rapid reoxygenation at the end of apneas/hypopneas leads to production of free radicals, resulting in oxidative stress and up- regulation of nuclear factor-kappaB. There is some evidence that treatment of OSA with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can reduce levels of inflammatory mediators, such as interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-a, and C-reactive protein (17).
Another molecular signature of OSA is increased catecholamines, consistent with perturbations in the autonomic nervous system. With effective treatment of OSA, catecholamine levels decline, with reversal upon withdrawal of CPAP (18).
Many CVD-related biomarkers are also elevated in obesity, and disentangling obesity from OSA-related effects is a challenge, especially given the high corre- lation between the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and body mass index. Obesity may magnify the effects of OSA because macrophages in fat are likely the target cells for the effects of chronic intermittent hypoxia, leading to increases in inflammatory biomarkers; thus, OSA and obesity may have synergistic effects. The re- sults of a randomized controlled study in obese pa- tients (19) showed that combined treatment with weight loss and CPAP reduced BP more than either therapy alone; however, C-reactive protein levels were only reduced in association with weight loss. The Ice- landic Sleep Apnea Cohort (16) reported that intercel- lular adhesion molecule levels increase over 2 years in the most obese individuals with untreated OSA, whereas levels decrease in regular CPAP users. Thus, OSA may result in a progressive inflammatory state, which may be 1 mechanism of the vascular damage that occurs from OSA. Inflammatory consequences of OSA may vary with degree of obesity.
METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION AND OSA
OSA is independently associated with metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance, with an associated risk for incident CV events (20). Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (21–23) have demonstrated that treatment of OSA with CPAP improves insulin sensitivity. In 1 RCT, supervised CPAP treatment for 8 h over 2 weeks nightly significantly improved insulin sensitivity and glucose response in intravenous and oral glucose tolerance tests (21). In another RCT of pre-diabetic patients, the insulin sensitivity index improved significantly in those with severe OSA treated with CPAP (22), and there was a significant correlation between hours of CPAP use and improvement in insulin sensitivity, emphasizing the critical importance of adherence (21). Thus, current
FIGURE 2 Polysomnographic Example of Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes Breathing
The first 2 tracings are electro-occulogram; otherwise tracings as in Figure 1. Note the
smooth and gradual changes in the thoracoabdominal excursions and esophageal pressure
in the crescendo and decrescendo arms of the cycle. There is an intervening central apnea,
absence of naso-oral airflow, and excursions in pleural pressure, thorax, and abdomen.
The arousal occurs at the peak of hyperventilation. Desaturation is delayed because of
long circulation time in heart failure. Reprinted with permission from Dowdell WT,
Javaheri S, McGinnis W. Cheyne-Stokes respiration presenting as sleep apnea syndrome:
clinical and polysomnographic features. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141:871-9.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
845
evidence suggests that OSA is associated with insulin resistance, and CPAP treatment may improve insulin sensitivity in pre-diabetic patients.
The effects of CPAP therapy of OSA on full-blown diabetes remain to be elucidated (24). Large-scale RCTs of CPAP are needed to establish the role of OSA in proatherogenic dyslipidemia.
OSA AND RELATED CVD:
EFFECT OF CPAP THERAPY
OSA is strongly associated with a number of CVDs (Figure 5) including HTN, resistant HTN, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, pulmonary hypertension (PHTN), HF, CHD, AF, myocardial ischemia, myocar- dial infarction (MI), and sudden death. The epidemi- ology of these associations has been extensively reviewed (3,5,13,14,20). In the following sections, we discuss trials of CPAP, the most effective therapy of OSA. We also discuss adjunct therapy of OSA.
CPAP AND SYSTEMIC HTN. The effect of CPAP on HTN has been widely investigated, and the available evidence from multiple RCTs and several recent meta-analyses demonstrates that CPAP significantly reduces BP in OSA patients. Studies using 24-h BP monitoring (25–32) consistently report drops of 2 to 2.5 mm Hg and 1.5 to 2 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respectively, compared with subtherapeutic or con- servative treatment (Figure 6), with greater re- ductions in patients with resistant HTN (between 4.7 to 7.2 mm Hg and 2.9 to 4.9 mm Hg for SBP and DBP, respectively) (Figure 7) (33–39). CPAP has also been demonstrated to reverse nondipper or riser nocturnal BP patterns in OSA patients.
Because long-term reductions of 2 to 3 mm Hg in SBP are associated with a 4% to 8% reduction in the future risk of stroke and CHD, long-term treatment of OSA in hypertensive patients could eventually reduce incident CV burden.
There are multiple reasons why the antihyperten- sive effect of CPAP is limited. First, essential HTN is quite common in the general population, and should be equally prevalent in OSA patients. CPAP may not decrease BP if the underlying cause of HTN is unre- lated. Second, CPAP therapy can only reverse certain intermediate mechanisms associated with OSA. For example, CPAP reduces sympathetic tone, thereby decreasing BP (18). However, other pathophysiolog- ical mechanisms underlying HTN, such as those associated with obesity, salt intake, and volume overload, may be unaffected by CPAP. Third, OSA and HTN are chronic disorders, and if OSA-induced HTN has been longstanding, with consequent remodeling
of the vascular bed and/or increased set point for BP on the basis of prevailing BP regulatory mechanisms (e.g., baroreflex), CPAP may not be able to reduce BP much, certainly in the short term. Given this issue, for ethical reasons, RCTs have a follow-up of <1 year. Therefore, it is unknown whether BP may fall further in long-term follow-up.
Overall, highly variable BP improvement is ex- pected with CPAP therapy, as the drop correlates with OSA severity, baseline HTN, and hours of CPAP use. Depending on these characteristics, some study pa- tients might have greater antihypertensive benefits from CPAP, whereas others—for example, those with less severe OSA—might not. The level of adherence needed to obtain a significant reduction in BP levels is unknown, although a minimum threshold of 4 h, and optimally >5 to 6 h/night, is needed. In resistant HTN, a linear correlation has been observed between the number of hours of CPAP use and drop in BP mea- sures (decreases of 1.9 and 1.0 mm Hg in SBP and DBP, respectively, for each additional hour of CPAP use) (37), suggesting that greater CPAP adherence would be associated with better BP control. This dose- dependent relationship is similar to that for insulin sensitivity (22,23) and other CV outcomes, as dis- cussed later in the text.
FIGURE 3 Normal Cardiovascular Changes in NREM
and REM Sleep
Parasympathetic Activity
Sympathetic Activity
Sympathetic Activity
NREM sleep:
Phasic REM sleep:
BP, HR, COP Ventilation Metabolic rate
BP and HR
Cardiovascular Quiescence
During NREM sleep sympathetic activity decreases whereas
parasympathetic activity increases with consequent decrease in
BP and HR. The reverse occurs in phasic REM sleep. BP ¼ blood pressure; COP ¼ cardiac output; HR ¼ heart rate; NREM ¼ non–rapid eye movement; REM ¼ rapid eye movement.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 846
A recent study (40) reported that BP response to CPAP in OSA patients with resistant HTN can be pre- dicted by measuring the plasma levels of 3 specific microribonucleic acids, which may help to person- alize this treatment in the future.
There is evidence that the combination of antihy- pertensive drugs (41) or weight loss (19) with CPAP therapy could have a synergistic effect in reducing BP in OSA patients, supporting the multidimensional pathophysiology of HTN in this population. When hypertensive patients with and without OSA were treated with losartan for 6 weeks, the BP drop (measured by 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring) was significantly less in those with OSA than without. Importantly, when CPAP was added at the end of 6 weeks of losartan and used at least 4 h nightly for the next 6 weeks, BP decreased markedly in those with OSA (41). The combination of CPAP and weight loss may also have a synergistic effect, leading to larger BP reductions in OSA patients (19).
CPAP AND PHTN. About 10% of patients with OSA have PHTN (defined as the mean pulmonary artery pressure $25 mm Hg) (42,43), and multiple observa- tional studies demonstrate that treating OSA with CPAP improves PHTN (42,43). In the only small ran- domized crossover study (therapeutic vs. sham CPAP) (44), 12 weeks of treatment resulted in a significant decrease in pulmonary artery systolic pressure (from a mean of 30 to 24 mm Hg). The reduction was greatest (8.5 mm Hg) in patients with baseline PHTN (pulmonary artery systolic pressure $30 mm Hg
by echocardiography). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document recommends polysomnography to rule out OSA for all patients with PHTN (45). The recommendation comes from the idea that targeted therapy of OSA could either improve or prevent further deterioration in central hemodynamics.
CPAP AND STROKE/TIA. Sleep apnea is highly prev- alent in patients with stroke or TIA, and OSA also is associated with increased risk for incident stroke (46–48). There is some evidence that early CPAP therapy has positive effects on long-term survival in ischemic stroke patients with moderate-to-severe OSA (46–48). Additionally, consistent with observational studies (46–48), in a recent large RCT (49), those OSA patients who were adherent to CPAP therapy exhibited reduced risk of incident cerebral events.
The American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guideline states: “A sleep study might be considered for patients with an ischemic stroke or TIA on the basis of the very high prevalence of sleep ap- nea in this population and the strength of the evi- dence that the treatment of sleep apnea improves outcomes in the general population” (50).
CPAP AND ARRHYTHMIAS. Two small RCTs showed that treatment of OSA with CPAP reduces the mean 24-h heart rate, as well as the frequency of premature ventricular beats during sleep (51,52). Data from observational studies show that CPAP treatment is associated with a significantly decreased recurrence rate of AF, even after electrical cardioversion or ablative therapies, and that patients are less likely to progress to more permanent forms of AF and have significantly reduced occurrence of paroxysmal AF compared with untreated patients (53–56).
In a meta-analysis (57) of 698 CPAP users and 549 non-CPAP users, those with OSA treated with CPAP after AF intervention had a 44% reduced AF risk; younger, more obese, and male patients benefited the most. On the basis of this evidence, a recent expert consensus document on AF identified OSA as a risk factor for AF recurrence after surgical and catheter ablation, and recommended its treatment (58). Although the reproducibility of these findings from observational studies is compelling, data from clinical trials are needed.
CPAP, CHD, CV MORTALITY, AND COMPOSITE CV
OUTCOMES. Multiple observational studies demon- strate that untreated OSA is associated with CV morbidity and mortality, and that treatment with CPAP improves the need for revascularization, inci- dent CHD, and survival (59–62).
FIGURE 4 Pathophysiological Consequences of Sleep Apnea and Hypopnea
Hypoxic and hypercapnic pulmonary vasoconstriction
⇓ O2 delivery
Cycles of sleep apnea and recovery Arousals
⇓ Pleural Pressure
⇓ PO2 /⇑ PCO2 ⇑ PO2 /⇓ PCO2
Organ dysfunction
Endothelial dysfunction
⇑ Right ventricular afterload
⇑ Blood pressure Arrhythmias Myocyte toxicity
⇑ Heart rate
R and L ventricular afterload Arrhythmias (atrial)
Aortic dilation
Increased lung H2O
Oxidative stress Inflammation
Sympathetic activation
Parasympathetic withdrawal
⇑ Transmural pressure of all cardiac chambers and aorta ⇑ Pulmonary capillary hydrostatic pressure
Pleural pressure (Ppl) is a surrogate of the pressure surrounding the heart and other vascular structures. [ ¼ increased; Y ¼ decreased. Reprinted with permission from Javaheri (8). CV ¼ cardiovascular; H2O ¼ water; L ¼ left; O2 ¼ oxygen; PCO2 ¼ partial pressure of carbon dioxide in the blood; PO2 ¼ partial pressure of oxygen in the blood; R ¼ right.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
847
To date, 3 RCTs investigated the effect of CPAP on CV outcomes (Figure 8), with the main endpoint a composite outcome of different fatal and nonfatal CV events. In the first RCT (63), 725 nonsleepy patients (Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS] <11 of 24), free of CVD and with moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI $20/h), were randomized to CPAP (n ¼ 357) or conservative treatment (n ¼ 366), and were followed for a median of 4 years. CPAP did not result in a significant reduction in the incidence of the primary composite outcome. However, in an adherence analysis, pa- tients who used CPAP for $4 h/night did achieve a CV benefit (incidence density ratio 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52 to 0.98; p ¼ 0.04).
Peker et al. (64) randomized 244 nonsleepy (ESS <10) patients with newly revascularized CHD and moderate-to-severe OSA (AHI >15/h) to autoti- trating positive airway pressure (PAP) (n ¼ 122) or no PAP (n ¼ 122) for a median of 57 months. The inci- dence of the primary composite CV endpoint did not differ between the 2 groups. However, adjusted on- treatment analysis showed a significant CV risk reduction in those who used CPAP for >4 h, compared
with those who used the device <4 h/night or did not receive treatment (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.86; p ¼ 0.026).
The SAVE (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease) study (49) enrolled 2,717 nonsleepy or mildly sleepy (ESS <15) patients age 45 to 75 years, with prior history of coronary or cerebro- vascular disease and OSA, defined by an oxygen desaturation index $12/h, diagnosed by means of a 2-channel screening device. Patients were allocated to CPAP or usual-care treatment for a mean of 3.7 years. The incidence of a composite CV outcome was similar in the CPAP and control groups (p ¼ 0.34). One-to-one propensity-score matching was performed to compare 561 patients who were adherent to CPAP therapy with 561 patients in the usual-care group. In this sensitivity analysis, a lower risk of a composite endpoint of ce- rebral events was found in the group of patients who used CPAP for at least 4 h/day (hazard ratio: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30 to 0.90; p ¼ 0.02).
This study has several limitations. First, SDB was diagnosed by means of a screening device on the basis
FIGURE 5 Prevalence (%) of OSA in CVD
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Arrhythmias
Heart failure
Stroke
Coronary heart disease
Hypertension
20 50
12 55
57 75
6538
30 83
The lower limit is invariably using an AHI of $15/h, indicating presence of moderate-to-
severe OSA. The upper part of the range relates to a lower threshold of $5/h. CVD ¼ cardiovascular disease; OSA ¼ obstructive sleep apnea.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 848
of oximetry and nasal pressure recordings. In- vestigators excluded patients with a pattern of Cheyne-Stokes respiration on the ApneaLink (ResMed Corporation, San Diego, California) nasal pressure recording, but this device may not accurately detect Cheyne-Stokes respiration. Furthermore, this device could not differentiate between central and obstruc- tive events. It is likely that patients with CSA were included, particularly considering that CSA is com- mon in patients with stroke and HF associated with CHD. It is known that CSA is unlikely to respond to CPAP, and that these patients have a poorer CV prognosis. Second, the low average CPAP use of 3.3 h/day raises concern that the results were negative because of poor adherence. Third, patients with the most severe OSA were excluded (those with ESS >15 and hypoxemia, defined as oxygen saturation <80% for >10% of recording time). In fact, the mean AHI was 29/h, and the mean ODI was 28/h, values within the moderate OSA severity range. Hard CV outcomes have been associated with severe OSA, but are less associated with mild or moderate OSA; thus, it can be argued that many patients in this study with only mild-to-moderate OSA were not at an increased risk of CV outcomes. Fourth, 66% of the cohort was Asian in under-resourced areas, with some concern as to whether the findings can be generalized to other races in other settings that were less represented in the study. There is 1 ongoing RCT (65) that will shed more light on the true role of CPAP therapy in hard CV endpoints.
NOCTURNAL MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA, MI, AND
SUDDEN DEATH. OSA patients with severe SDB and marked hypoxemia are at risk for nocturnal cardiac
ischemia. OSA has been associated with onset of MI during the night/early morning (66). It is reasonable to consider that the increased likelihood of nocturnal nonfatal MI may also be accompanied by an increased risk of fatal MI and sudden death. In >10,000 in- dividuals, the presence of OSA and significant desa- turation was associated with an almost 2-fold increase in risk of sudden death, independent of known risk factors (67). Comparing the time of death of individuals with and without SDB, those with the disorder died mostly between 12:00 AM and 6:00 AM (68) suggesting that untreated OSA in patients with established CHD would likely lead to a poorer prognosis.
SUMMARY OF CPAP THERAPY AND CARDIOVASCULAR
DISEASE. High-quality evidence recommends CPAP therapy in patients with HTN and OSA, especially in patients with resistant HTN. For other CVD and ce- rebral events, CPAP is not effective unless it is used for $4 h of sleep. The available evidence for ar- rhythmias is consistent with adverse effects of OSA and beneficial effects of CPAP, but these data come from observational studies.
ADJUNCT THERAPY IN OSA
Although CPAP therapy is very effective in the treat- ment of OSA, by itself it has limited metabolic effects, and poor adherence further compromises its effec- tiveness, as evidenced by recent RCTs (49,63,64). Incorporation of exercise and weight loss as adjunct therapy has important health benefits beyond CPAP therapy, and could be potentially synergistic.
EXERCISE. Exercise training and physical activity attenuate OSA (69). In a meta-analysis of 5 studies enrolling a total of 129 participants, the pooled es- timate of mean pre- to post-exercise reduction in AHI was –6.3 events/h (95% CI: –8.5 to –4.0; p < 0.001) (about a 32% reduction), and occurred without significant weight loss (69). Multifactorial mechanisms (69) could include decreased rostral fluid redistribution (5,11,70); stabilization of chemo- receptor sensitivity; and improved nasal resistance, sleep quality, weight loss, and strength of pharyn- geal dilator muscles (69). In regard to the latter, a meta-analysis involving 120 adults concluded that selective oropharyngeal exercises reduced snoring and AHI by 50%, from about 25 to 12/h (71). Oropharyngeal exercise may also decrease the amount of tongue fat.
WEIGHT LOSS. Weight reduction, when applicable, should be a core element in OSA treatment. In a randomized trial discussed earlier, weight loss
FIGURE 6 Effect of CPAP Therapy on BP in Patients With Hypertension
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5 *16 (818)
*10 (587) *7 (471)
24h-SBP (mm Hg) 24h-DBP (mm Hg)
*12 (572) *28 (1,948)
*8 (968)
*§4 (1,206)
*31 (1,820)
Bazzano
N et
R ed
uc tio
n in
B lo
od P
re ss
ur e
(m m
H g)
M ea
n (9
5% C
I)
AIjami Mo Heantjens Montesi Fava Bakker Bratton
Summary of different meta-analyses of RCTs. Positive figures mean improvement in BP level with CPAP (net changes) *Number of studies
included (number of patients included). §Patients without daytime hypersomnia. BP ¼ blood pressure; CI ¼ confidence interval; CPAP ¼ continuous positive airway pressure; DBP ¼ diastolic blood pressure; RCT ¼ randomized controlled trial; SBP ¼ systolic blood pressure.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
849
provided an incremental BP reduction in CPAP- adherent participants (19). In contrast, use of CPAP often results in a small amount of weight gain, due in part to a reduction in nocturnal metabolic rate related to OSA work of breathing (eliminated by CPAP), with dietary intake and eating behavior having the great- est effects leading to a positive energy balance and weight gain (72). These findings highlight the impor- tance of lifestyle modifications combined with CPAP (19), and ongoing follow-up of patients after CPAP is initiated to monitor weight and other health behav- iors. Even though weight loss is an important component of long-term management of OSA and has significant respiratory and cardiometabolic effects, weight loss does not necessarily cure OSA, even after bariatric surgery, and requires follow-up sleep study after weight stabilization.
HF COMORBID WITH SLEEP APNEA
Both OSA and CSA are common in HF patients, and could lead to progression and decompensation of HF, as reviewed in detail elsewhere (4,5,73). Regarding CSA, John Hunter first described the Cheyne-Stokes breathing pattern. Hunter noted recurrent cycles of smooth and gradual crescendo–decrescendo changes in tidal volume with an intervening central apnea in a
patient with HF who probably had AF (Figure 2). For this reason, we refer to this pattern of breathing as Hunter-Cheyne-Stokes breathing (HCSB). HCSB is unique to patients with HF, as it has a long cycle time (Figure 2), reflecting the prolonged circulation time, a pathological feature of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (4,73).
Although HCSB with central apneas or hypopneas is common in HF, patients frequently experience the coexistence of both OSA and CSA; however, generally 1 variant predominates (73). Overall, moderate-to-severe SDB (AHI $15/h) is highly prevalent in various pathological conditions associ- ated with symptomatic or asymptomatic left ven- tricular dysfunction (Figure 9) discussed later in the text.
PREVALENCE OF SLEEP APNEA IN ASYMPTOMATIC
LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION. Using poly- somnography, Lanfranchi et al. (74) showed that 66% of individuals with asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction experience moderate-to-severe sleep apnea: 55% with CSA and 11% with OSA (Figure 9). The prevalence is lower in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), at about 25% (4% CSA), although the prevalence of diastolic dysfunction increases with the severity of OSA (75).
FIGURE 7 Effect of CPAP Therapy on BP in Patients With Resistant Hypertension
12 11
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
0 -1 -2 -3 -4
(n=41) (n=35) ∫ (n=40)
Randomized controlled trials Meta-analyses
(n=196)
(n=117)
*4 (n=329)
*5 (n=446)
24h-SBP (mm Hg) 24h-DBP (mm Hg)
Lozano
N et
R ed
uc tio
n in
B lo
od P
re ss
ur e
(m m
H g)
M ea
n (9
5% C
I)
Pedrosa Martinez-Garcia De Oliveira Muxfeldt Iftikhar Liu
The figure shows 5 randomized controlled trials and 2 meta-analyses. The differences between the 2 meta-analyses depend on the most
updated references included in the 2015 meta-analysis. Positive figures mean improvement in BP level with CPAP (net changes) *Number of
studies included (number of patients included). !Daytime BP values. Abbreviations as in Figure 6.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 850
What is the clinical significance of a high preva- lence of SDB in asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction? Because asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction is a predictor of incident symptomatic HF, undiagnosed SDB may contribute to the pro- gression from an asymptomatic to a symptomatic condition. In this context, 2 prospective longitudinal studies demonstrated that OSA was independently a significant predictor of incident HF in men (76) and women (77). Similarly, the presence of CSA/HCSB has been shown to predict incident HF in a prospective study of 2,865 participants (7). This suggests that HCSB is not simply a marker of more severe HF, but may precede the onset of clinical HF, possibly by making those with subclinical ventricular dysfunc- tion more likely to decompensate.
PREVALENCE OF SLEEP APNEA IN HFrEF, HFpEF,
AND ACUTE HF. Combining the results of several studies (4,8,73), 53% of 1,607 patients with HFrEF had moderate-to-severe sleep apnea (defined as an AHI $15), of whom an estimated 34% had CSA and 19% had OSA (Figure 9). These findings are consistent with a recent study of 963 well-treated HFrEF
patients, showing that 58% had moderate-to-severe SDB (AHI $15), with 46% classified as CSA and 16% OSA (78). However, there is considerable variation in the reported prevalence of these 2 forms of sleep apnea (73), with underestimation of prevalence of OSA in some studies due to misclassification of hypopneas (obstructive or central) as a component of AHI.
The prevalence of sleep apnea in HFpEF is similar to that in HFrEF. Combining 2 studies (79,80) with a total of 263 consecutive patients, 47% had sleep apnea (AHI $15): 24% OSA and 23% CSA (Figure 9). However, with decompensation, the prevalence increases considerably. In 1,117 consecutive HFrEF patients hospitalized with acute HF who underwent in-hospital polygraphy, 334 patients were identified with CSA (31%) and 525 with OSA (47%) (Figure 9) (81).
TREATMENT OF SDB IN HF
Depending on the predominant phenotype of sleep apnea, treatment strategies are different. However, a number of approaches are applicable to either type of sleep apnea.
FIGURE 8 Effect of CPAP Treatment on CV Risk
Barbe et al (CERCAS) (CPAP=358, control=367) Follow-up: 4 yrs
0.83 (0.63-1.1), p=0.20
0.72 (0.52-0.98), p=0.04
0.80 (0.46-1.41 ), p=0.44
1.10 (0.91-1.32), p=0.34
0.29 (0.1 0-0.86), p=0.026
0.52 (0.30-0.90), p=0.02 *
0 0.5
Intention-to-treat analysis Adherence analysis (patients with CPAP adherence ≥4 hours/day)
In Favor of CPAP In Favor of Control 1.51
Peker et al (RICCADSA) (CPAP=122, control=122) Follow-up: 4.7 yrs McEvoy et al (SAVE) (CPAP=1359, control=1358) Follow-up: 3.7 yrs)
The figure shows the incidence risk for the primary composite endpoints in 3 RCTs (49,63,64) in the CPAP compared with the control group
(hazard ratio or incidence density ratio, 95% CI) in the intention-to-treat analysis and in the adherence analysis (patients with CPAP
adherence $4 h/day). *In the McEvoy study (49), the significant CV improvement in patients who used CPAP $4 h/day was only achieved in
the risk of a cerebrovascular event, but not in the primary composite outcome. CV ¼ cardiovascular; other abbreviations as in Figure 6.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
851
GENERAL BENEFICIAL MEASURES. Optimization of cardiopulmonary function. Before obtaining an outpatient sleep study, it is often beneficial to use guided medical therapy of HF to improve cardiopulmonary function and minimize volume overload (5,11). Treatment of volume overload is important because fluid from lower extremities translocated cephalad can result in narrowing of the upper airway and precipitates obstructive events (5,11). In contrast, fluid translocation into the lungs promotes CSA (5) by increasing pulmonary capillary pressure (82).
Intensive HF therapy must be executed carefully, otherwise adverse consequences, such as renal fail- ure, may occur and improvement in quality of life and reverse remodeling may not ensue (83). Regarding device therapy, a meta-analysis (84) of cardiac resynchronization therapy trials in patients with HFrEF demonstrated improvement in CSA, but not OSA. Exercise. As discussed earlier in the text, several studies indicate that supervised exercise attenuates OSA. Exercise training of patients with HF also at- tenuates SDB, particularly OSA (85).
TREATMENT OF OSA: IMPACT OF THERAPY ON
SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY, LVEF, READMISSION, AND
MORTALITY. CPAP has been successfully used to treat OSA in patients with HF, both acutely (86) and chronically (87–89), with beneficial CV benefits.
One important issue is the augmentation of the adrenergic state imposed by SDB in patients with HFrEF (Figure 10). Small RCTs have shown that CPAP treatment decreases vascular (87) and myocardial sympathetic nerve function (88), improves myocar- dial energetics in the case of severe OSA (88), and increases left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (89,90), although not consistently (88). OSA is inde- pendently associated with excess hospital read- mission and mortality (81,91). In the largest observational study of about 30,000 Medicare bene- ficiaries newly diagnosed with HF (92), treatment of SDB was associated with decreased readmission, health care cost, and mortality (Figure 11) (91,92).
With regard to OSA comorbid with HFpEF, there is 1 randomized trial (93) showing reversal of diastolic dysfunction with CPAP.
TREATMENT OF CSA: IMPACT OF THERAPY ON
SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY, LVEF, READMISSION, AND
MORTALITY. Intensive therapy of HF with pharma- cotherapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy can improve cardiac function, periodic breathing, and CSA (5,73,84).
In contrast to OSA, CPAP is only partially effective in CSA (about 50% of patients) (86,94), and may be harmful in those whose CSA is not suppressed (94). Medications including theophylline and acetazol- amide have been used in small RCTs, and have been extensively reviewed previously (73). Cardiac
FIGURE 9 Sleep Apnea is Prevalent in Left Ventricular Dysfunction
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
%
30%
20%
10%
0%
66%
55%
11%
AHI > 15/h
OSA
CSA
AHI > 15/h OSA CSA
25%
21%
4%
53%
20%
33%
47%
23%
24%
78%
47%
31%
LVSD Asymptomatic
LVDD Asymptomatic HFrEF HFpEF ADHF
Prevalence (%) of moderate-to-severe sleep apnea (AHI $15) in asymptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) or left ventricular
diastolic dysfunction (LVDD), heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF),
and acutely decompensated heart failure (ADHF). AHI ¼ apnea-hypopnea index; CSA ¼ central sleep apnea; OSA ¼ obstructive sleep apnea.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 852
transplantation virtually eliminates CSA (95), but OSA develops in a large number of patients who gain weight (Figure 12). We will discuss 3 therapeutic op- tions: positive airway pressure, nasal oxygen, and phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS).
Similar to OSA, CSA also imposes an augmented hyperadrenergic state in HFrEF (96) (Figure 10), as measured by overnight urinary and morning plasma norepinephrine levels (97), and microneurography (98,99). Importantly, several randomized trials have demonstrated that attenuation of CSA by CPAP de- creases plasma and urinary norepinephrine and nocturnal minute ventilation (surrogate of work of breathing), improving respiratory muscle strength and fatigue (97,100,101). The decrease in urinary catecholamines has also been confirmed in random- ized trials comparing therapeutic adaptive servo- ventilation (ASV) to sham ASV (102) and nocturnal oxygen to sham (room air from a concentrator) (103). Consistent with a number of previous studies
(reviewed by Javaheri et al. [73]), in the largest and most recent mortality study of 963 well-treated pa- tients with HFrEF, those with CSA had the worst survival after accounting for several cofounders (78). These data are consistent with CSA as a negative prognostic indicator (104). Surprisingly, the recent ASV trial, SERVE-HF (Treatment of Predominant Central Sleep Apnoea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients With Heart Failure) (105), designed spe- cifically to treat CSA with ASV, not only did not show survival benefit, but was associated with excess CV mortality. The ASV algorithm provides an anticyclical pressure support such that when the patient is hypoventilating the support is augmented, and vice versa (106).
The SERVE-HF investigators (105) cited 2 explana- tions for their findings: 1) increased PAP compro- mised cardiac output; or 2) CSA serves as a compensatory mechanism with protective effects, as previously hypothesized (104). As detailed elsewhere
FIGURE 10 Effects of Sleep Apnea and HF on Central Sympathetic Outflow
Heart failure
Apnea
Hypoxemia
Hypercapnia
Arousal
Baroreceptors; Peripheral arterial chemoreceptors Sleep fragmentation; Periodic limb movement
Disinhibition of pulmonary stretch receptors
Peripheral arterial chemoreceptors Central Sympathetic outflow
Medullary central chemoreceptors Peripheral arterial chemoreceptors
Locus ceruleus
Heart failure is a hyperadrenergic state. Sleep apnea further contributes to increased central sympathetic outflow. Locus ceruleus is the
brainstem arousal network, and norepinephrine is the neurotransmitter. HF ¼ heart failure.
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
853
(107), there are additional reasons that may account for the observed increased mortality. One concern is that the results may not be applicable to the modern generation of ASV devices. SERVE-HF tested an early- generation ASV device (106), which may have sub- optimally treated CSA and OSA, and its application of pressure may have caused excessive ventilation, as well as adverse hemodynamic responses in vulner- able subsets of patients (107). Given results of the SERVE-HF trial, ASV is contraindicated to treat CSA in patients with low ejection fraction. Research with new-generation ASV devices is needed, with one in progress (ADVENT-HF [Effect of Adaptive Servo Ventilation (ASV) on Survival and Hospital Admis- sions in Heart Failure]; NCT01128816).
SUPPLEMENTAL NASAL OXYGEN. The uncertainty over use of pressure devices in patients with reduced ejection fraction has opened the door for other ther- apeutic options devoid of increasing intrathoracic pressure. We briefly review 2 options: nasal oxygen and PNS.
Systematic studies in patients with HFrEF (73,108) have shown that nocturnal nasal oxygen improves CSA, with randomized studies showing that therapy improves maximal exercise capacity; decreases overnight urinary norepinephrine excretion and muscle sympathetic nerve activity; and improves ventricular arrhythmias, LVEF, and quality of life (reviewed by Javaheri [73,108]). The potential bene- fits of supplemental oxygen include: improvement in oxygen stores; stabilization of breathing pattern;
reduction in loop gain; and improvement in hypoxemia-related effects. The use of oxygen in HF, particularly to overcome hypoxemia, is also sup- ported by data showing that degree of overnight hypoxemia is among the most significant de- terminants of HF-related mortality (78,109). How- ever, it is important to note that use of high levels of oxygen in normoxic HF patients (when awake) has been shown to cause unwanted hyperoxia, increased systemic vascular resistance, and impaired ventricu- lar function (110). RCTs are needed to determine the role of oxygen in treating CSA in HFrEF (108).
TRANSVENOUS UNILATERAL PNS. Transvenous unilateral PNS has been used to treat CSA. The phrenic nerve can be stimulated through the wall of either the right brachiocephalic vein or the left pericardiophrenic vein (111,112). In the recently completed RCT (112), 151 patients with CSA were implanted and randomized to stimulation or no stimulation for 6 months. With stimulation, multiple measures of sleep apnea severity (AHI, central apnea index, arousal index, and oxygen desaturation in- dex), quality of life, and daytime sleepiness improved significantly. The most common side effect was therapy-related discomfort that was resolved with reprogramming in all but 1 patient. During the 6 months of therapy, 2 deaths occurred in the treat- ment group during daytime when stimulation was off, and 2 deaths occurred in the control group. Local side effects, such as infection and dislodgment, occurred in 13 of 151 implanted patients.
FIGURE 12 Prevale
20
15
10
5
0-<
21
47%
N um
be r o
f S ub
je ct
s
Those who develope
Adapted with permis
failure; OSA ¼ obstr
FIGURE 11 Comparative Survival of 258 HF Patients Treated for Sleep Apnea and
30,000 Patients Not Tested for Sleep Apnea
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% Baseline 1 2
Quarters After HF Onset
Pe rc
en t
of C
oh or
t Al
iv e
Not tested or treated for sleep apnea N=30,065
Hazard ratio = .33 (95% CI: .21-.51 ), P <0.0001
Diagnosed with sleep apnea and treated N=258
3 4 5 6 7 8
Adapted with permission from Javaheri et al. (92). HF ¼ heart failure.
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 854
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE. RCTs are needed to provide unbiased assessments of the role of sleep apnea intervention on incident CVD, and CVD- associated morbidity and mortality. RCTs are designed to overcome potential biases in observa- tional studies, ensuring that groups who are treated are otherwise comparable to control groups. How- ever, RCTs present several challenges in design and implementation that need to be addressed in future trials. Studies need to be sufficiently large, and of sufficient duration to detect clinically and
nce of OSA in 45 of 60 Consecutive Cardiac Transplant Recipients
5 5-< 10 10-< 15 15-< 20 20-< 30 30-< 40 ≥40
1
7
0
5 4 7
16%
24% severe OSA
36% moderate to severe OSA
36%
51%
53% Apnea hypopnea index
d sleep apnea had gained the most weight after transplantation.
sion from Javaheri et al. (95). CI ¼ confidence interval; HF ¼ heart uctive sleep apnea.
statistically significant differences in event rates. Because there are no optimal control conditions for CPAP, outcomes should be objectively collected and prospectively ascertained to minimize bias. Trials require careful implementation of methods for opti- mizing treatment adherence across the duration of interventions, aiming to treat sleep apnea every night and all night. Low adherence to CPAP has been a major limitation of the 3 major trials (49,63,64) dis- cussed earlier in the text. Moreover, conventional methods for assessing adherence only consider average hours of use per night. For CVD, it may be that selective nonuse during early morning hours, when rapid-eye-movement sleep dominates and hypoxemia may be most profound, may contribute to specific CVD-related stress (113). Failure to treat sleep apnea during these critical periods may account for reduced treatment efficacy.
Future trials may benefit from more comprehen- sive approaches to CPAP adherence that account for both mechanical issues and behavior change. Careful attention to mask and pressure comfort, claustro- phobia, nasal clogging, naso-oral dryness, and oral leak are critical. However, social and behavioral fac- tors also are important, including bed partner support and self-efficacy. Motivational education, patient engagement using real-time electronic feedback, and peer support are promising strategies for improving adherence.
As alternatives to CPAP, such as nocturnal sup- plemental oxygen, oral appliances, or hypoglossal nerve stimulation, are identified, there is also opportunity to conduct comparative effectiveness trials. These trials may more easily be conducted in “real-world” settings, and may allow for broader patient enrollment, such as patients with sleepiness, who generally have been excluded from studies with “no treatment” arms (49,63,64). Symp- tomatic patients may better adhere to therapy, and also are a group who may be at high risk for adverse outcomes.
RCTs are necessary across a number of other CV disorders. Current studies show a high prevalence of SDB in asymptomatic left ventricular systolic and diastolic dysfunction. It remains to be established in RCTs if treatment of OSA or CSA aborts or delays incident HF in subjects with preclinical left ventric- ular dysfunction or, conversely, if treatment of left ventricular dysfunction improves SDB, breaking a vicious cycle.
In patients with HFrEF, studies have demonstrated reversal of adverse consequences of OSA, including diastolic dysfunction, with CPAP. Randomized, adequately-powered trials are needed to confirm the
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
855
results of largely observational studies showing that treatment with CPAP lowers hospital readmission and improves survival in such patients. With regard to HFpEF, a small RCT showed improvement in left ventricular diastolic dysfunction with CPAP treat- ment of OSA (93). This is an important observation that should lead to a large randomized trial, as so far there has not been a therapy for HFpEF showing reverse cardiac remodeling.
Results of the SERVE-HF trial suggest that treatment of CSA with ASV could be harmful. How- ever, the ASV used in the trial was an older- generation device with algorithm shortcomings (106). Another trial using state-of-the-art ASV is in progress. Nocturnal oxygen therapy and PNS are 2 treatment options devoid of increasing intrathoracic pressure. The pivotal study on PNS has been pub- lished (112). Time has passed for an RCT with oxygen therapy (108). These RCTs with PNS and oxygen should be powered to determine important cardio- vascular outcomes.
Many studies implicate untreated SDB in the development and recurrence of AF; the field is ripe for the conduct of RCTs with well-phenotyped partici- pants, followed closely for intervention adherence, to examine the effect of SDB treatment on AF outcomes.
PHENOTYPING. Pathogenesis underlying OSA is variable. With the recent push toward personalized medicine, individualizing therapy may be a viable approach for OSA if the exact mechanism(s)
underlying disease can be defined and corrected. For example, in patients with dysfunction in the upper airway dilator muscles, if well-defined, hypoglossal nerve stimulation of the upper airway muscles could be effective. Elevated loop gain can be effectively minimized using oxygen or acetazolamide. If certain sedative/hypnotic agents could raise the arousal threshold, they would be predicted to stabilize breathing in carefully selected individuals with low arousal threshold. An elevated arousal threshold can allow the accumulation of respiratory stimuli (carbon dioxide, negative intrathoracic pressure) that acti- vate upper airway dilator muscles, and thus stabilize breathing. In individuals in whom fluid accumula- tion around the upper airway is playing an important role in compromising the upper airway, diuretic therapy can be helpful to improve apnea, albeit to a modest extent. In certain individuals, multiple ab- normalities likely underlie OSA pathogenesis, and thus, combination therapy may be required to elim- inate SDB.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The authors thank Mr. Alex Mackey for his excellent technical contribution in preparing the figures.
ADDRESS FOR CORRESPONDENCE: Dr. Shahrokh Javaheri, Pulmonary and Sleep Division, Bethesda Sleep Laboratory, Bethesda North Hospital, 10535 Montgomery Road, Suite 200, Cincinnati, Ohio 45242. E-mail: [email protected].
R E F E R E N C E S
1. Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, et al., for the American Heart Association Statistics Com- mittee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Cir- culation 2016;133:e38–360.
2. Peppard PE, Young T, Barnet JH, et al. Increased prevalence of sleep-disordered breath- ing in adults. Am J Epidemiol 2013;177:1006–14.
3. Javaheri S, Drager LF, Lorenzi-Filho G. Sleep and cardiovascular disease: present and future. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and Practices of Sleep Medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017;1222–8.
4. Javaheri S, Dempsey JA. Central sleep apnea. Compr Physiol 2013;3:141–63.
5. Lyons OD, Bradley TD. Heart failure and sleep apnea. Can J Cardiol 2015;31:898–908.
6. May AM, Blackwell T, Stone PH, et al., for the MrOS Sleep (Outcomes of Sleep Disorders in Older Men) Study Group. Central sleep-disordered breathing predicts incident atrial fibrillation in older men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193: 783–91.
7. Javaheri S, Blackwell T, Ancoli-Israel S, et al., for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study Research Group. Sleep-disordered breathing and incident heart failure in older men. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:561–8.
8. Javaheri S. Cardiovascular Diseases. In: Kryger MH, Avidan AY, Berry RB, editors. Atlas of Clinical Sleep Medicine. 2nd edition. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders, 2014:316–28.
9. Dempsey JA, Veasey SC, Morgan BJ, et al. Pathophysiology of sleep apnea. Physiol Rev 2010;90:47–112.
10. Jordan AS, McSharry DG, Malhotra A. Adult obstructive sleep apnoea. Lancet 2014;383: 736–47.
11. Mendelson M, Lyons OD, Yadollahi A, et al. Effects of exercise training on sleep apnoea in patients with coronary artery disease: a rando- mised trial. Eur Respir J 2016;48:142–50.
12. Somers V, Javaheri S. Cardiovascular effects of sleep-related breathing disorders. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and Prac- tices of Sleep Medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017;1243–52.
13. Bauters F, Rietzschel ER, Hertegonne KB, et al. The link between obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2016; 18:1.
14. Baltzis D, Bakker JP, Patel SR, et al. Obstruc- tive sleep apnea and vascular diseases. Compr Physiol 2016;6:1519–28.
15. De Luca Canto G, Pachêco-Pereira C, Aydinoz S, et al. Diagnostic capability of biological markers in assessment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Sleep Med 2015;11:27–36.
16. Pak VM, Keenan BT, Jackson N, et al. Adhesion molecule increases in sleep apnea: beneficial ef- fect of positive airway pressure and moderation by obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2015;39:472–9.
17. Baessler A, Nadeem R, Harvey M, et al. Treat- ment for sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pressure improves levels of inflammatory markers—a meta-analysis. J Inflamm (Lond) 2013; 10:13.
18. Kohler M, Stoewhas AC, Ayers L, et al. Effects of continuous positive airway plressure therapy withdrawal in patients with obstructive sleep
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 856
apnea: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:1192–9.
19. Chirinos JA, Gurubhagavatula I, Teff K, et al. CPAP, weight loss, or both for obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2265–75.
20. Drager LF, Polotsky VY, O’Donnell CP, et al. Translational approaches to understanding meta- bolic dysfunction and cardiovascular conse- quences of obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2015;309:H1101–11.
21. Pamidi S, Wroblewski K, Stepien M, et al. Eight hours of nightly continuous positive airway pres- sure treatment of obstructive sleep apnea im- proves glucose metabolism in patients with prediabetes. A randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192:96–105.
22. Weinstock TG, Wang X, Rueschman M, et al. A controlled trial of CPAP therapy on metabolic control in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and sleep apnea. Sleep 2012;35: 617–25B.
23. Salord N, Fortuna AM, Monasterio C, et al. A randomized controlled trial of continuous posi- tive airway pressure on glucose tolerance in obese patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep 2016; 39:35–41.
24. Pamidi S, Tasali E. Continuous positive airway pressure for improving glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: where do we stand? Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:397–9.
25. Bratton DJ, Stradling JR, Barbé F, et al. Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with mini- mally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis using individual patient data from four randomised controlled trials. Thorax 2014; 69:1128–35.
26. Bakker JP, Edwards BA, Gautam SP, et al. Blood pressure improvement with continuous positive airway pressure is independent of obstructive sleep apnea severity. J Clin Sleep Med 2014;10:365–9.
27. Alajmi M, Mulgrew AT, Fox J, et al. Impact of continuous positive airway pressure. therapy on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lung 2007;185:67–72.
28. Fava C, Dorigoni S, Dalle Vedove F, et al. Ef- fect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with OSA/hypopnea: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Chest 2014;145:762–71.
29. Montesi SB, Edwards BA, Malhotra A, et al. The effect of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Sleep Med 2012;8:587–96.
30. Bazzano LA, Khan Z, Reynolds K, et al. Effect of nocturnal nasal continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in obstructive sleep apnea. Hypertension 2007;50:417–23.
31. Haentjens P, Van Meerhaeghe A, Moscariello A, et al. The impact of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: evidence from a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:757–64.
32. Mo L, He QY. [Effect of long-term continuous positive airway pressure ventilation on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: a meta-analysis of clinical trials]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2007;87:1177–80.
33. Liu L, Cao Q, Guo Z, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2016;18:153–8.
34. Muxfeldt ES, Margallo V, Costa LM, et al. Ef- fects of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on clinic and ambulatory blood pres- sures in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hypertension: a randomized controlled trial. Hypertension 2015;65:736–42.
35. Iftikhar IH, Valentine CW, Bittencourt LR, et al. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on blood pressure in patients with resistant hyper- tension and obstructive sleep apnea: a meta- analysis. J Hypertens 2014;32:2341–50; discussion 2350.
36. de Oliveira AC, Martinez D, Massierer D, et al. The antihypertensive effect of positive airway pressure on resistant hypertension of patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:345–7.
37. Martínez-García MA, Capote F, Campos- Rodríguez F, et al., for the Spanish Sleep Network. Effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and resistant hyperten- sion: The HIPARCO randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;310:2407–15.
38. Pedrosa RP, Drager LF, de Paula LK, et al. Effects of OSA treatment on BP in patients with resistant hypertension: a randomized trial. Chest 2013;144:1487–94.
39. Lozano L, Tovar JL, Sampol G, et al. Contin- uous positive airway pressure treatment in sleep apnea patients with resistant hypertension: a randomized, controlled trial. J Hypertens 2010; 28:2161–8.
40. Sánchez-de-la-Torre M, Khalyfa A, Sánchez- de-la-Torre A, et al., for the Spanish Sleep Network. Precision medicine in patients with resistant hypertension and obstructive sleep ap- nea: blood pressure response to continuous posi- tive airway pressure treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;66:1023–32.
41. Thunström E, Manhem K, Rosengren A, et al. Blood pressure response to losartan and contin- uous positive airway pressure in hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:310–20.
42. Javaheri S, Javaheri S, Javaheri A. Sleep apnea, heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2013;10:315–20.
43. Nieto FJ, Young T, Peppard PE, et al. Systemic and pulmonary hypertension in obstructive sleep apnea. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and Practices of Sleep Medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017;1253–63.
44. Arias MA, García-Río F, Alonso-Fernández A, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in obstructive sleep apnoea: effects of continuous positive airway
pressure: a randomized, controlled cross-over study. Eur Heart J 2006;27:1106–13.
45. McLaughlin VV, Archer SL, Badesch DB, et al. ACCF/AHA 2009 expert consensus document on pulmonary hypertension: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents and the American Heart Association. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53: 1573–619.
46. Lyons OW, Ryan CM. Sleep apnea and stroke. Can J Cardiol 2015;31:918–27.
47. Parra O, Sánchez-Armengol Á, Capote F, et al. Efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure treatment on 5-year survival in patients with ischaemic stroke and obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. J Sleep Res 2015;24: 47–53.
48. Kim Y, Koo YS, Lee HY, et al. Can continuous positive airway pressure reduce the risk of stroke in obstructive sleep apnea patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016;11: e0146317.
49. McEvoy RD, Antic NA, Heeley E, et al., for the SAVE Investigators and Coordinators. CPAP for prevention of cardiovascular events in obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2016;375:919–31.
50. Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al., for the American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for health- care professionals from the American Heart As- sociation/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014;45:2160–236.
51. Craig S, Pepperell JC, Kohler M, et al. Contin- uous positive airway pressure treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea reduces resting heart rate but does not affect dysrhythmias: a rando- mised controlled trial. J Sleep Res 2009;18: 329–36.
52. Ryan CM, Usui K, Floras JS, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on ventricular ectopy in heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnoea. Thorax 2005;60:781–5.
53. Fein AS, Shvilkin A, Shah D, et al. Treatment of obstructive sleep apnea reduces the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:300–5.
54. Neilan TG, Farhad H, Dodson JA, et al. Effect of sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure on cardiac structure and recurrence of atrial fibrillation. J Am Heart Assoc 2013;2: e000421.
55. Naruse Y, Tada H, Satoh M, et al. Concomitant obstructive sleep apnea increases the recurrence of atrial fibrillation following radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: clinical impact of continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Heart Rhythm 2013;10:331–7.
56. Holmqvist F, Guan N, Zhu Z, et al., for the ORBIT-AF Investigators. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pres- sure therapy on outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation-results from the outcomes registry for
J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7 Javaheri et al. F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 Sleep Apnea
857
better informed treatment of atrial fibrillation (ORBIT-AF). Am Heart J 2015;169:647–54.e2.
57. Qureshi WT, Nasir UB, Alqalyoobi S, et al. Meta-analysis of continuous positive airway pres- sure as a therapy of atrial fibrillation in obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Cardiol 2015;116:1767–73.
58. Calkins H, Kuck KH, Cappato R, et al. 2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design: a report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on Catheter and Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation. Heart Rhythm 2012;9:632–96.e21.
59. Peker Y, Franklin KA, Hedner J. Coronary ar- tery disease and obstructive sleep apnea. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and Practices of Sleep Medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017:1264–70.
60. Wu X, Lv S, Yu X, et al. Treatment of OSA reduces the risk of repeat revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention. Chest 2015; 147:708–18.
61. Marin JM, Carrizo SJ, Vicente E, et al. Long- term cardiovascular outcomes in men with obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea with or without treatment with continuous positive airway pressure: an observational study. Lancet 2005; 365:1046–53.
62. Campos-Rodriguez F, Martinez-Garcia MA, de la Cruz-Moron I, et al. Cardiovascular mortality in women with obstructive sleep apnea with or without continuous positive airway pressure treatment: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156:115–22.
63. Barbé F, Durán-Cantolla J, Sánchez-de-la- Torre M, et al., for the Spanish Sleep and Breath- ing Network. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on the incidence of hypertension and cardiovascular events in nonsleepy patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;307:2161–8.
64. Peker Y, Glantz H, Eulenburg C, et al. Effect of positive airway pressure on cardiovascular out- comes in coronary artery disease patients with nonsleepy obstructive sleep apnea: the RICCADSA randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:613–20.
65. Esquinas C, Sánchez-de-la Torre M, Aldomá A, et al., for the Spanish Sleep Network. Rationale and methodology of the impact of continuous positive airway pressure on patients with ACS and nonsleepy OSA: the ISAACC trial. Clin Cardiol 2013;36:495–501.
66. Kuniyoshi FH, Garcia-Touchard A, Gami AS, et al. Day-night variation of acute myocardial infarction in obstructive sleep apnea. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52:343–6.
67. Gami AS, Olson EJ, Shen WK, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea and the risk of sudden cardiac death: a longitudinal study of 10,701 adults. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:610–6.
68. Gami AS, Howard DE, Olson EJ, et al. Day- night pattern of sudden cardiac death in obstruc- tive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2005;352:1206–14.
69. Iftikhar IH, Kline CE, Youngstedt SD. Effects of exercise training on sleep apnea: a meta-analysis. Lung 2014;192:175–84.
70. Redolfi S, Bettinzoli M, Venturoli N, et al. Attenuation of obstructive sleep apnea and over- night rostral fluid shift by physical activity. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;191:856–8.
71. Camacho M, Certal V, Abdullatif J, et al. Myofunctional therapy to treat obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep 2015;38:669–75.
72. Tachikawa R, Ikeda K, Minami T, et al. Changes in energy metabolism after continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;194:729–38.
73. Javaheri S. Heart failure. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement WC, editors. Principles and Prac- tices of Sleep Medicine. 6th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2017:1271–85.
74. Lanfranchi PA, Somers VK, Braghiroli A, et al. Central sleep apnea in left ventricular dysfunction: prevalence and implications for arrhythmic risk. Circulation 2003;107:727–32.
75. Wachter R, Lüthje L, Klemmstein D, et al. Impact of obstructive sleep apnoea on diastolic function. Eur Respir J 2013;41:376–83.
76. Gottlieb DJ, Yenokyan G, Newman AB, et al. Prospective study of obstructive sleep apnea and incident coronary heart disease and heart failure: The Sleep Heart Health Study. Circulation 2010; 122:352–60.
77. Roca GQ, Redline S, Claggett B, et al. Sex- specific association of sleep apnea severity with subclinical myocardial injury, ventricular hyper- trophy, and heart failure risk in a community- dwelling cohort: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities–Sleep Heart Health Study. Circula- tion 2015;132:1329–37.
78. Oldenburg O, Wellmann B, Buchholz A, et al. Nocturnal hypoxaemia is associated with increased mortality in stable heart failure patients. Eur Heart J 2016;37:1695–703.
79. Bitter T, Faber L, Hering D, et al. Sleep- disordered breathing in heart failure with normal left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:602–8.
80. Herrscher TE, Akre H, Øverland B, et al. High prevalence of sleep apnea in heart failure out- patients: even in patients with preserved systolic function. J Card Fail 2011;17:420–5.
81. Khayat R, Jarjoura D, Porter K, et al. Sleep disordered breathing and post-discharge mortality in patients with acute heart failure. Eur Heart J 2015;36:1463–9.
82. Chenuel BJ, Smith CA, Skatrud JB, et al. Increased propensity for apnea in response to acute elevations in left atrial pressure during sleep in the dog. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2006;101:76–83.
83. Gandhi PU, Szymonifka J, Motiwala SR, et al. Characterization and prediction of adverse events from intensive chronic heart failure management and effect on quality of life: results from the Pro- B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Outpatient-Tailored Chronic Heart Failure Therapy (PROTECT) study. J Card Fail 2015;21:9–15.
84. Lamba J, Simpson CS, Redfearn DP, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treat- ment of sleep apnoea: a meta-analysis. Europace 2011;13:1174–9.
85. Ueno LM, Drager LF, Rodrigues AC, et al. Ef- fects of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure and sleep apnea. Sleep 2009;32: 637–47.
86. Javaheri S. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on sleep apnea and ventricular irritability in patients with heart failure. Circulation 2000;101:392–7.
87. Usui K, Bradley TD, Spaak J, et al. Inhibition of awake sympathetic nerve activity of heart failure patients with obstructive sleep apnea by nocturnal continuous positive airway pressure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;45:2008–11.
88. Hall AB, Ziadi MC, Leech JA, et al. Effects of short-term continuous positive airway pressure on myocardial sympathetic nerve function and ener- getics in patients with heart failure and obstruc- tive sleep apnea: a randomized study. Circulation 2014;130:892–901.
89. Kaneko Y, Floras JS, Usui K, et al. Cardiovas- cular effects of continuous positive airway pres- sure in patients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1233–41.
90. Mansfield DR, Gollogly C, Kaye DM. Controlled trial of continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169: 361–6.
91. Javaheri S, Brown LK, Randerath WJ. Positive airway pressure therapy with adaptive servo- ventilation: part 2. Chest 2014;146:858–68.
92. Javaheri S, Caref EB, Chen E, et al. Sleep apnea testing and outcomes in a large cohort of Medicare beneficiaries with newly diagnosed heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:539–46.
93. Arias MA, García-Río F, Alonso-Fernández A, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome affects left ventricular diastolic function: effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure in men. Cir- culation 2005;112:375–83.
94. Artz M, Floras JS, Logan AG, et al., for the CANPAP Investigators. Suppression of central sleep apnea by continuous positive airway pres- sure and transplant-free survival in heart failure: a post hoc analysis of the Canadian Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Patients with Central Sleep Apnea and Heart Failure Trial (CANPAP). Circulation 2007;115:3173–80.
95. Javaheri S, Abraham WT, Brown C, et al. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea and periodic limb movement in 45 subjects with heart trans- plantation. Eur Heart J 2004;25:260–6.
96. Costanzo MR, Khayat R, Ponikowski P, et al. Mechanisms and clinical consequences of un- treated central sleep apnea in heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:72–84.
97. Naughton MT, Benard DC, Liu PP, et al. Effects of nasal CPAP on sympathetic activity in patients with heart failure and central sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1995;152:473–9.
98. van de Borne P, Oren R, Abouassaly C, et al. Effect of Cheyne-Stokes respiration on muscle
Javaheri et al. J A C C V O L . 6 9 , N O . 7 , 2 0 1 7
Sleep Apnea F E B R U A R Y 2 1 , 2 0 1 7 : 8 4 1 – 5 8 858
sympathetic nerve activity in severe congestive heart failure secondary to ischemic or idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 1998;81: 432–6.
99. Andreas S, Bingeli C, Mohacsi P, et al. Nasal oxygen and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure. Chest 2003;123:366–71.
100. Naughton MT, Benard DC, Rutherford R, et al. Effect of continuous positive airway pressure on cen- tral sleep apnea and nocturnal PCO2 in heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:1598–604.
101. Granton JT, Naughton MT, Benard DC, et al. CPAP improves inspiratory muscle strength in patients with heart failure and central sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153:277–82.
102. Pepperell JC, Maskell NA, Jones DR, et al. A randomized controlled trial of adaptive ventila- tion for Cheyne-Stokes breathing in heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;168:1109–14.
103. Staniforth AD, Kinnear WJ, Starling R, et al. Effect of oxygen on sleep quality, cognitive function and sympathetic activity in patients with
chronic heart failure and Cheyne-Stokes respira- tion. Eur Heart J 1998;19:922–8.
104. Naughton MT. Cheyne-stokes respiration: friend or foe? Thorax 2012;67:357–60.
105. Cowie MR, Woehrle H, Wegscheider K, et al. Adaptive servo-ventilation for central sleep apnea in systolic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2015;373: 1095–105.
106. Javaheri S, Brown LK, Randerath WJ. Positive airway pressure therapy with adaptive servoventilation: part 1: operational algorithms. Chest 2014;146:514–23.
107. Javaheri S, Brown LK, Randerath W, et al. SERVE-HF: more questions than answers. Chest 2016;149:900–4.
108. Javaheri S. Pembrey’s dream: the time has come for a long-term trial of nocturnal supple- mental nasal oxygen to treat central sleep apnea in congestive heart failure. Chest 2003;123: 322–5.
109. Bodez D, Guellich A, Kharoubi M, et al. Prevalence, severity, and prognostic value of sleep
apnea syndromes in cardiac amyloidosis. Sleep 2016;39:1333–41.
110. Haque WA, Boehmer J, Clemson BS, et al. Hemodynamic effects of supplemental oxygen administration in congestive heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27:353–7.
111. Ponikowski P, Javaheri S, Michalkiewicz D, et al. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnoea in heart failure. Eur Heart J 2012;33:889–94.
112. Costanzo MR, Ponikowski P, Javaheri S, et al., for the remedé System Pivotal Trial Study Group. Randomised controlled trial of transvenous neu- rostimulation for central sleep apnoea. Lancet 2016;388:974–82.
113. Mokhlesi B, Finn LA, Hagen EW, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea during REM sleep and hy- pertension. Results of the Wisconsin Sleep Cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:1158–67.
KEY WORDS central sleep apnea, hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
- Sleep Apnea
- Definitions of Types of Sleep Apneas and Hypopneas
- Pathogenesis Of Osa
- Pathogenesis Of Csa
- Apneic threshold in sleep and increased loop gain
- Overnight consequences of sleep apnea
- Molecular signatures of sleep apnea in relation to cardiocerebrovascular disorders
- Metabolic Dysfunction And Osa
- Osa And Related Cvd: Effect Of Cpap Therapy
- Cpap And Systemic Htn
- Cpap And Phtn
- Cpap And Stroke/Tia
- Cpap And Arrhythmias
- Cpap, Chd, Cv Mortality, And Composite Cv Outcomes
- Nocturnal Myocardial Ischemia, Mi, And Sudden Death
- Summary Of Cpap Therapy And Cardiovascular Disease
- Adjunct Therapy In Osa
- Exercise
- Weight loss
- Hf Comorbid With Sleep Apnea
- Prevalence of sleep apnea in asymptomatic left ventricular dysfunction
- Prevalence Of Sleep Apnea In Hfref, Hfpef, And Acute Hf
- Treatment Of Sdb In Hf
- General beneficial measures
- Optimization of cardiopulmonary function
- Exercise
- Treatment Of Osa: Impact Of Therapy On Sympathetic Activity, Lvef, Readmission, And Mortality
- Treatment Of Csa: Impact Of Therapy On Sympathetic Activity, Lvef, Readmission, And Mortality
- Supplemental nasal oxygen
- Transvenous Unilateral Pns
- Future Directions
- Cardiovascular disease
- Phenotyping
- Acknowledgment
- References