|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Sigma Project - Report Rubric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instructor Name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student Name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CATEGORY
|
10 - 8
|
8 – 6
|
6 – 4
|
4 - 0
|
|
Content ( 30% )
|
The proposal contains all required parts. Even, balanced information clearly and effectively supports a central purpose, which is gaining the project approval, the ideas displays a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a sufficiently limited topic. Reader gains insights.
|
The proposal contains major parts of the requirements. Information provides firm support for the main purpose and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a sufficiently limited topic. Reader gains some insights.
|
Major parts of the requirements are missing. Information supports the main points at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights.
|
The proposal does not contain all required parts. Does not successfully support the main purpose. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed.
|
|
Support for Topic (30%)
|
Relevant, telling, quality details give the reader important information that goes beyond the obvious or predictable.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but one key issue or portion of the information is unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are relevant, but several key issues or portions of the information are unsupported.
|
Supporting details and information are typically unclear or not related to the topic.
|
|
Sequencing (Organization) ( 25%)
|
Details are placed in a logical order as indicated in the requirements and the way they are presented effectively keeps the interest of the reader.
|
Details are placed in a logical order, but the way in which they are presented/introduced sometimes makes the writing less interesting.
|
Some details are not in a logical or expected order, and this distracts the reader.
|
Many details are not in a logical or expected order. There is little sense that the writing is organized.
|
|
Grammar & Spelling
( 15%)
|
Writer makes no errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes minor errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
Writer makes several errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content
|
Writer makes major errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader from the content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|