FOR RAY WRITTER

profileLabala_la
similapapa2.pdf

Walden University ScholarWorks

Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies

Collection

2018

Maternal Socioeconomic Status and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Uptake Shawn Lockett Walden University

Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations

Part of the Public Health Education and Promotion Commons

This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected].

Walden University

College of Health Sciences

This is to certify that the doctoral study by

Shawn Lockett

has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made.

Review Committee Dr. Peter Anderson, Committee Chairperson, Public Health Faculty

Dr. Hope King, Committee Member, Public Health Faculty Dr. Ronald Hudak, University Reviewer, Public Health Faculty

Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D.

Walden University 2017

Abstract

Maternal Socioeconomic Status and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Uptake

by

Shawn Terrence Lockett

MPH, University of Oklahoma, 1999

BS, University of Oklahoma, 1993

Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Public Health

Walden University

February 2018

Abstract

There are more than 79 million people in the U.S. currently infected with human

papillomavirus (HPV), with an estimated 14 million new infections annually. There is a

lack of knowledge about the maternal socioeconomic influences and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series. Infection with HPV can cause cervical cancer in women, and there are

over 11,000 cervical cancer diagnoses in the U.S. responsible for 4000 deaths annually.

Vaccination coverage to prevent HPV infection does not meet the Healthy People 2020

goals of an 80% vaccination rate in the U.S. In this study, associations were tested

between maternal SES variables and uptake of the HPV vaccine in male and female

adolescents ages 13-17 from 1,125 participants who lived within the estimation areas of

New York City, New York and Houston, Texas in 2014. The health belief model was

used as the theoretical framework for the study. This was a cross-sectional quantitative

study using multiple logistic regression analysis of 4 maternal predictor variables. It was

found that 3 of the variables (income, p > .05, education β = -.026, p > .05, and age β = -

.096, p > .05) were not significantly related to uptake of the HPV vaccine series, whereas

ethnicity was found to be significant (Non-Hispanic White β = .429, p = .029, Non-

Hispanic Black β = .587, p = .002, and Non-Hispanic Other β = .586, p =.011). Hispanics

were nearly 2 times more likely to be vaccinated than other groups. The potential social

change implications of this research are that public health workers can use the findings to

develop targeted interventions to increase HPV vaccination uptake and reduce the

incidence of cervical cancer.

Maternal Socioeconomic Status and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Uptake

by

Shawn Terrence Lockett

MPH, University of Oklahoma, 1999

BS, University of Oklahoma, 1993

Doctoral Study Submitted in Partial Fulfillment

of the Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Public Health

Walden University

February 2018

Dedication

This research is dedicated to my son, Donovan Edward Lockett (December 7,

2005 – 9 August 2013). Donovan’s death at age 7 was my inspiration for returning to

school to finish my long-term goal of completing a doctorate. I will always remember my

son and his positive effect on my life from the day of his birth. I was proud to be his

father.

To my other children, Kaitlynn, Veronica, and Alexander for their unconditional

love and support through years of moving to different countries, meeting new friends and

leaving old friends related to our transient lifestyle within the Department of State.

To my late grandmother, Henrietta Lockett who helped form my ethical compass

and has been guiding me these last 17 years from Heaven.

Acknowledgments

I would like to profusely thank my advisor and committee chair, Dr. Peter

Anderson, for his frank coaching and providing the support that I needed to finish my

Dr.PH study and research; for his considerable patience, sincerity, positive motivation,

and knowledge. His guidance fully supported me through all the research and writing of

my final study. The research process has humbled me, and I thank Dr. Anderson for his

steady mentorship as I navigated the arduous research process.

In addition to my advisor, I would like to thank my former spouse, Stephanie

Laxa Lockett for all her dedication, support, and space that she provided me while I

completed the Dr.PH program. She was indeed the foundation that I needed to complete

the program. I would also like to thank my parents: Warren and Pauline Langdon for

providing me the environment and guidance that allowed me to reach my goals.

My close friends also played a significant role in the completion of my Dr.PH

program. I would like to thank my friends, Les Landry, Joe Santos, Dale Rush and

Michael Voorhies for the emotional support and motivation they provided me.

Lastly, I would like to thank my Department of State medical colleagues, Dr.

Jennifer Tseng, Dr. Jason Coe, Dr. Barry Fisher, and Dr. Edward Miron who provided the

professional mentorship that kept me focused on achieving my goal.

i

Table of Contents

List of Tables .......................................................................................................................v

Section 1: Foundation of the Study and Literature Review .................................................1

Introduction ....................................................................................................................1

Problem Statement .........................................................................................................4

Purpose of the Study ......................................................................................................5

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses ...........................................................................5

Theoretical Foundation for the Study ............................................................................7

Nature of the Study ........................................................................................................9

Literature Review Search Strategy ..............................................................................11

Literature Review of Key Concepts .............................................................................12

Maternal Income ................................................................................................... 12

Maternal Education ............................................................................................... 18

Maternal Age ........................................................................................................ 25

Ethnicity ................................................................................................................ 27

Decisional Influences ...................................................................................................31

Critics and Differing Opinions.....................................................................................35

Definitions....................................................................................................................41

Assumptions .................................................................................................................43

Scope and Delimitations ..............................................................................................44

Scope and Delimitations ....................................................................................... 44

Significance and Potential for Social Change ..............................................................45

ii

Significance of Study ............................................................................................ 45

Social Change ....................................................................................................... 45

Summary ......................................................................................................................46

Conclusion ...................................................................................................................47

Section 2: Research Design and Data Collection ..............................................................48

Introduction ..................................................................................................................48

Research Design and Rationale ...................................................................................48

Methodology ................................................................................................................50

Study Population ................................................................................................... 50

Sampling and Sampling Procedures ............................................................................52

Access to Secondary Data ..................................................................................... 53

Instrumentation and Operationalization of Constructs ................................................54

Instrumentation ..................................................................................................... 54

Operationalization ................................................................................................. 55

Data Analysis Plan .......................................................................................................56

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses .........................................................................56

Threats to Validity .......................................................................................................58

Ethical Considerations .................................................................................................60

Human Subjects .................................................................................................... 60

Ethical Issues ........................................................................................................ 60

Summary ......................................................................................................................61

Section 3: Presentation of the Results and Findings ..........................................................63

iii

Introduction ..................................................................................................................63

Data Collection of Secondary Data Set .......................................................................64

Discrepancies ........................................................................................................ 65

Univariate Analysis ......................................................................................................70

Descriptive Characteristics of the Sample Population .......................................... 70

Bivariate Analysis ........................................................................................................74

Logistic Regression Analysis .......................................................................................78

Results 80

Research Question 1 ............................................................................................. 81

Research Question 2 ............................................................................................. 81

Research Question 3 ............................................................................................. 82

Research Question 4 ............................................................................................. 82

Summary ......................................................................................................................83

Section 4: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Social

Change ...................................................................................................................85

Introduction ..................................................................................................................85

Concise Summary of Findings .....................................................................................85

Interpretation of the Findings.......................................................................................86

Ethnicity ................................................................................................................ 86

Maternal Age ........................................................................................................ 86

Maternal Income ................................................................................................... 87

Maternal Education ............................................................................................... 87

iv

Conceptual Framework ................................................................................................88

Limitations of the Study...............................................................................................89

Recommendations ........................................................................................................90

Implications for Professional Practice and Social Change ..........................................91

Professional Practice ............................................................................................. 91

Implications for Research ..................................................................................... 91

Positive Social Change ......................................................................................... 92

Conclusion ...................................................................................................................93

References ..........................................................................................................................95

v

List of Tables

Table 1. Health Belief Model...............................................................................................9

Table 2. Maternal Age .......................................................................................................71

Table 3. Maternal Income ..................................................................................................71

Table 4. Maternal Education ..............................................................................................72

Table 5. Ethnicity ...............................................................................................................72

Table 6. HPV Vaccine Series Uptake ................................................................................73

Table 7. Estimation Area of Residence ..............................................................................73

Table 8. Gender of Child ...................................................................................................73

Table 9. Crosstabulation Ethnicity and HPV Vaccine Uptake .........................................75

Table 10. Crosstabulation Maternal Age and HPV Vaccine Uptake .................................75

Table 11. Crosstabulation Maternal Education and HPV Vaccine Uptake .......................76

Table 12. Crosstabulation Maternal Income and HPV Vaccine Uptake ...........................77

Table 13. Logistic Regression Results for Maternal Education, Maternal Age,

Maternal Race/Ethnicity, and Maternal Income as Predictors of Teens’

HPV Vaccine Series Uptake ..................................................................................80

1

Section 1: Foundation of the Study and Literature Review

Introduction

The genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually

transmitted disease in the United States (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

[CDC], 2013). There are more than 79 million people in the United States currently

infected with HPV, and an estimated 14 million new infections occur every year (CDC,

2014a). Infection with HPV can cause cervical cancer in women and is the second

leading cause of cancer deaths in women worldwide (CDC, 2013).

The first HPV vaccine, Gardasil, was a significant step forward in the fight

against cervical cancer. Gardasil, introduced in June 2006, immunized against HPV

serotypes 6 and 11, plus the oncogenic HPV serotypes 16 and 18 (CDC, 2015a). A

second vaccine, Cervarix, introduced in 2007, also immunized against the oncogenic

HPV serotypes 16 and 18 (CDC, 2013). Collectively, Gardasil and Cervarix, both of

which are a three-shot vaccination series, immunized adolescent females to the serotypes

that account for 70% of cervical cancers (van Keulen et al., 2013). As previously stated,

Gardasil also immunized against non-oncogenic HPV serotypes 6 and 11, which cause

genital warts and which can affect men as well as women. Because of its efficacy against

genital warts and oncogenic strains of HPV, Gardasil has been the only vaccine approved

for use in both adolescent males and adolescent females since 2009 (U.S. Food and Drug

Administration, 2013). Cervarix is also approved for use in HPV infection and cervical

cancer prevention, but its use was restricted for use in females only (CDC, 2013).

2

In 2013, there were more than 6.2 million new HPV cases reported in the United

States, and HPV was responsible for over 11,000 new cases of cervical cancer

contributing to 4,000 deaths (Nettleman & Garcia-Chen, 2013). In 2014, there were an

estimated 14 million new HPV infections (CDC, 2014b). Furthermore, despite the release

of a safe, efficacious HPV vaccine in 2006, cervical cancer remains the second largest

killer of women worldwide (Crowcroft, Hamid, Deeks, & Frank, 2012; Union for

International Cancer Control (UICC), 2015). There has been some success against

cervical cancer as the incidences in the United States have significantly decreased since

the introduction of the Papanicolaou (Pap) test, or “Pap smear,” in 1941 (Techakehakij &

Feldman, 2008).

The Pap smear test enabled clinicians to screen for early-stage cervical cancer and

earlier detection of cervical tissue changes related to HPV infection. The result of the

screening test was earlier identification, intervention, and improved overall outcomes as

the mortality rate of cervical cancer in the United States decreased by 70% after the

introduction of the screening test (Techakehakij & Feldman, 2008). However, even

though there has been a significant improvement in the identification and treatment of

cervical cancer, it is still a significant burden to those affected by the disease (National

Institutes of Health, 2013). Both men and women can carry HPV, and together they

equally contribute to an epidemic that accounts for the most prevalent sexually

transmitted disease in the United States (Malkowski, 2014; Vanderpool, Van Meter

Dressler, Stradtman, & Crosby, 2015).

3

There are significant health disparities associated with race, ethnicity, and

SES(SES) regarding HPV vaccine uptake, which puts vulnerable groups at increased risk

of contracting cervical cancer (Btoush, Brown, Fogarty, & Carmody, 2015; Daniel-Ulloa,

Gilbert, & Parker, 2016). Researchers and public health officials have taken significant

steps over the years to study these disparities and improve intervention programs, but the

barriers remain, resulting in only a modest increase in the uptake of the HPV vaccine

(Schmidt & Parsons, 2014).

The potential for significant social change related to this study is based on the

evidence of an association between measurable maternal SES influences (maternal

income, maternal education) and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. Public health officials

and researchers could potentially use the results of the research to reduce the burden of

cervical cancer in women through the enhancement of vaccination programs contributing

to the decreased incidence of a significant health disparity for women.

Section 1 is an introduction to the subject of cervical cancer and its impact on

morbidity and mortality. I introduce the HPV vaccine series and its role in decreasing the

incidence of HPV infection, as HPV infection is a precursor to the development of

cervical cancer. I then describe the study, beginning with a discussion of the problem

addressed by the research, followed by a statement of the purpose of the study. I also

introduce the research questions and demonstrate how this research filled the gap in the

existing literature.

4

Problem Statement

There is a lack of knowledge about the maternal socioeconomic (SES) influences

and the voluntary uptake of the HPV vaccine series. Due to multifactorial issues, there

has been resistance to the uptake of the HPV vaccine (Navarro-Illana, Aznar, & Díez-

Domingo, 2014). Apte, Pierre-Joseph, Vercruysse, and Perkins (2015) reported that in the

United States, 57% of female adolescents and 34% of male adolescents initiated the HPV

vaccine series in 2013. The percentage of vaccinated male and female participants has

grown in recent years but does not meet the Healthy People 2020 goals of 80% (Savoy,

2014). Additionally, according to one study, over 30% of females and more than 50% of

males did not complete the series of three vaccinations (Apte et al., 2015). Lastly, there

was evidence of family influences decreasing the uptake of the HPV vaccine series for

their adolescent children. Cullen, Stokley, and Markowitz (2014) concluded that

increasing parent education could increase uptake of the vaccine. Attanasio and

McAlpine (2014) reported that the mother’s education level influenced the accuracy of

recall of HPV vaccinations given to their children. The lack of acceptance and subsequent

completion of the HPV vaccination series poses a continued public health threat, and

more research was needed to improve intervention programs, remove barriers, and

increase confidence in the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccine (Savoy, 2014). Other

than research performed by Musto et al. (2013), which analyzed school-based service

delivery models based on the SES status of schools, there are limited studies in recent

literature addressing the associations between maternal SES influences and the voluntary

uptake of the HPV vaccine series. In my research, I tested for such associations to gain

5

knowledge that researchers and public health officials could use to potentially enhance

educational programs designed to improve vaccination rates, increase prevention, and

reduce the overall incidence of cervical cancer. The problem statement for this study is as

follows: There is a lack of knowledge about the maternal socioeconomic influences and

the voluntary uptake of the HPV vaccine series. In this study, I sought to identify an

association between measurable maternal SES influences and uptake of the HPV Vaccine

based on the responses by participants of the 2014 National Immunization Survey-Teen

(NIS-Teen).

Purpose of the Study

In this cross-sectional quantitative research study, I investigated the association

between maternal SES variables and uptake of the HPV vaccine in female and male

adolescents, aged 13-17, based on postal codes within the city of Columbus, Ohio. I

included additional variables to observe for associations with maternal age and ethnicity.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses

The objective of this research study was to explore the association between

maternal SES and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. The research questions were as

follows:

RQ1: What is the association between maternal income and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in communities with

postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

H01: No association exists between maternal income and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 after controlling for

6

ethnicity and maternal age based on postal codes in Columbus, Ohio.

Ha1: An association exists between maternal income and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 after controlling for

ethnicity and maternal age based on postal codes in Columbus, Ohio.

RQ2: What is the association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes

within the Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

H02: No association exists between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes

within the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Ha2: An association exists between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes

within the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

RQ3: What is the association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in communities with

postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

H03: There is no association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in communities

with postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Ha3: There is an association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in communities

with postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

7

RQ4: What is the association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes within the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

H04: There is no association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes within

the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Ha4: There is an association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in male and female adolescents aged 13-17 in the postal codes within

the Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Theoretical Foundation for the Study

The theoretical framework for this study was the health belief model (HBM). The

HBM was developed in the 1950s by psychologists in the U.S. Public Health Service to

determine the rationale of people to not participate in programs that prevent and detect

disease (Skinner, Tiro, & Champion, 2015). In the 1950s, there was a widespread failure

of people to participate in screening and preventative programs for the early detection of

asymptomatic disease (Rosenstock, 1974). The HBM consists of five core constructs

proposed in order to influence an individual to perform a particular healthy behavior:

perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits, perceived barriers, cues

to action, and self-efficacy. The HBM has some limitations, most notably the low

predictive capacity (R2 < 0.21 on average) of existing HBM variables coupled with the

small effect size of individual variables (Orji, Vassileva, & Mandryk, 2012). The second

8

limitation of the HBM was the lack of clear guidance on its usage in combination and

relationship between the individual variables being studied (Orji et al., 2012). In my

study, I focused on the modifying factors that influence individual beliefs as defined

within the constructs of the HBM. As applied to this research, under the HBM, I would

evaluate my independent variables of maternal income, maternal education, and maternal

age to see if they significantly influence the dependent variable of uptake of the HPV

vaccine series through the constructs of the HBM. My rationale for using the HBM was

based on the hypothesis that differences in maternal SES and maternal age may have an

association with the uptake of the HPV vaccine series in communities defined by postal

codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis. The HBM was used in this study to look for an

association with measurable maternal modifying factors that may influence the uptake of

the HPV vaccine series by way of the HBM. Low SES has been associated with many

different disease processes (Goldberg, 2014). For example, research by Nicolai et al.

(2013) showed that higher rates of the precursors of cervical cancer, cervical

intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2, 2/3 and 3 (CIN2+) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)

were associated with higher levels of poverty and occurred disproportionately among

Black residents. In this study, I focused on maternal SES factors by exploring potential

associations based on maternal income, maternal education, and maternal age, as well as

the ethnicity of the participants, through the analysis of secondary data derived from the

2014 NIS-Teen survey.

9

Table 1

Health Belief Model

Modifying Factors Individual Beliefs Action Maternal Income Perceived

susceptibility and severity

Mother’s belief that her child can get HPV and HPV can lead to cervical cancer

Uptake of HPV vaccine

Maternal Education

Perceived benefits Mother’s belief that vaccination of her child with the HPV vaccine series will prevent HPV infection and cervical cancer

Non uptake of the HPV vaccine series

Maternal Age Perceived Barriers Mother’s personal barriers to vaccinate her children (i.e., insurance coverage, cost, knowledge about disease or vaccine)

Ethnicity Cues to Action Strategies to activate mother’s readiness to vaccinate

Self-Efficacy Non-applicable after uptake of vaccine

Nature of the Study

This was a cross-sectional quantitative study in which I investigated the

association between maternal income, maternal education, maternal age and ethnicity,

and the outcome of the uptake of the HPV vaccine series. I analyzed the categorical

independent variables (maternal income, maternal education, maternal age and ethnicity)

with the categorical dependent variable (uptake of the HPV vaccine series). The most

appropriate method of statistical analysis for these variables was a multiple logistical

10

regression. My rationale for using multiple logistic regression was its appropriateness to

explore for a functional association between the independent variables and the dependent

variable. This statistical plan can be used to predict probabilities of an effect of multiple

independent variables on a categorical dichotomous dependent variable, and in some

circumstances multiple logistic regression can be used to make inferences about which

independent variables have a larger effect or stronger association with the dependent

variable (McDonald, 2014).

My study analyzed a secondary dataset that contains detailed information about

the uptake of the HPV vaccine series, maternal income, maternal education, maternal age,

and ethnicity by postal code. I defined the dependent variable, HPV vaccination uptake as

a dichotomous (yes/no) response on whether the male of female adolescents received at

least one dose of the vaccine. The independent variables were (a) maternal income

defined as the income reported by the respondents living within certain postal codes

within the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area, (b) maternal education, (c) maternal age,

and (d) ethnicity. Maternal income was defined by total reported combined family

income, separated into the following groups: less than $20,000, $20,000 to $39,999,

$40,000 to $59,999, $60,000 to $75,000, and more than $75,000. I defined maternal

education by the highest level of education attained, separated into the following

categories: no high school diploma; high school graduate or GED; completed a

vocational, trade, or business school program; some college credit but no degree;

associate degree (AA, AS); bachelor’s degree (BA, BS, AB); master’s degree (MA, MS,

MSW, MBA); and doctorate (PhD, EDD) or professional degree (MD, DDS, DVM, JD).

11

Maternal age was measured by dividing the mothers’ age into the following groups: less

than 25 years old, 25-34 years old, 35-44 years, and 45+ years old. Ethnicity was

measured by the following six categories: White, Black/African-American, Native

American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander. The secondary dataset I used for

the study was the 2014 NIS-Teen. The rationale for the dataset was that it surveys HPV

vaccination, maternal education, and annual income. The 2013 NIS-Teen was an

instrument that researchers used to record the responses of over 18,000 households across

the United States (CDC, 2015c). For the purposes of my research, the 2014 NIS-Teen for

participants in Columbus, Ohio needed to be at least 1,188 participants based on

calculations using G*Power 3.1 Statistical Power Analysis for a logistic regression two-

tailed analysis with 0.95 power (1-β err prob; Faul, Erdfelder, Lang, & Buchner, 2007).

Since the NIS-Teen is an annual survey, there should be enough current information and,

therefore, less risk of the research being duplicated. Researchers used the NIS-Teen to

show at-risk groups for vaccine-preventable diseases (CDC, 2013).

Literature Review Search Strategy

I conducted a systematic literature search for pertinent research articles on the

factors affecting HPV vaccine uptake in different populations. Searches of several

databases, including Medline, Google Scholar, PubMed, Cinahl, and EBSCO resulted in

80 published articles relevant to the research. The keywords used in the search were

human papillomavirus vaccine, human papillomavirus vaccine and maternal income,

human papillomavirus vaccine and communities, human papillomavirus vaccine and

maternal education, and human papillomavirus vaccine and health belief model. I used

12

the search terms in various order to gather as many relevant articles to satisfy an

exhaustive search of literature that was less than five-years-old. The search for relevant

books and journal articles ranged from January 2011 to January 2016 unless otherwise

identified as an essential source for the development of the study.

Literature Review of Key Concepts

Key concepts noted during the exhaustive review of the literature concerning the

uptake of the HPV vaccine series were centered on maternal income, maternal education,

maternal age, and ethnicity. Below, I will highlight findings from previous research

regarding these key concepts that show tendencies relevant to my research.

Maternal Income

Higher income has been associated with increased uptake of the HPV vaccine

series. According to Link and Phelan (1995), money was a significant component of SES,

and the more money a person has, the better their health, with some exceptions. Musto et

al. (2013) investigated possible differences in HPV vaccine uptake in Calgary between

in-school and community delivery models and also whether SES contributed to the

phenomenon. Using 35,592 vaccination records the Calgary Zone Public Health

immunization database for all grades 5th through 9th-grade females for school years

2008–2011, logistic regression methods were used to examine the delivery system and

SES status on being vaccinated (Musto et al., 2013). The authors concluded that HPV

vaccination completion rates were 75% (95% confidence interval = 74.7%, 75.8%) for

females who received vaccination in school compared to 36% (95% confidence interval =

35.3%, 37.2%) for females who received the vaccination in the community (Musto et al.,

13

2013). Additionally, the researchers found that the participant's neighborhood SES was

related to the likelihood of being HPV vaccinated depended on the delivery model

available (Musto et al., 2013). Limitations of this study were that the authors used an

area-based material deprivation index as an alternative measure for individual SES as

individual SES reporting was not available (Musto et al., 2013). Based on the authors’

admission, the usage of this index may have potentially misclassified SES, and there may

be some misclassification bias (Musto et al., 2013). A strength of the research was the

linkage of postal code with the SES data was over 99% reducing the risk of selection bias

(Musto et al., 2013). Millen, Ginde, Anderson, Fang, & Camargo (2009) examined

knowledge and attitudes about HPV vaccine among emergency department patients if the

vaccine was mandatory. The researchers hypothesized that most women would be aware

of HPV, but few would know its association with cervical cancer or support mandatory

vaccinations (Millen et al., 2009). The researchers reported that one-third of those

surveyed had no knowledge of HPV, which correlated with recent U.S. survey data

concerning knowledge of HPV by women (Millen et al., 2009). Additionally, one-half of

patients surveyed supported state-administered mandatory HPV vaccination programs.

Participants were three times more likely to support mandatory programs based on the

knowledge of HPV being a sexually transmitted disease whereas cervical cancer

knowledge did not increase support for mandatory vaccinations (Millen et al., 2009).

However, the limitation of the study was that it had been conducted in a higher status

SES area within the Boston metropolis that was less ethnically diverse and more educated

than the more urban emergency departments (Millen et al., 2009). The authors asserted

14

that that lower SES areas would have less knowledge of HPV but never tested the

assertion (Millen et al., 2009). Another limitation was selection bias of the participants by

the investigators and participants, as people with certain medical conditions, such as

mental status changes were excluded from the study, as were non-respondents, which

could have affected the results of the survey (Millen et al., 2009). Cowburn et al. (2014)

tested for an association between insurance continuity and HPV vaccine use in a network

of federally qualified health facilities. Using retrospective electronic health record (EHR)

entries for females aged 9 to 26 from 2008 to 2010; the researchers categorized the

participants’ length of insurance in an ordinal fashion and studied HPV vaccine initiation

prevalence across the range of insurance coverages. They found that participants were

less likely to start the HPV vaccination series if they were insured less than 66% of the

time of the study, were 13 years or older, and belonged to an ethnic minority (Cowburn et

al., 2014). The authors concluded that disparities existed in the health facilities

researched in the study despite the fact that HPV vaccines are available to many of the

patients regardless of their ability to pay (Cowburn et al., 2014). Limitations of the

research included the potential for incomplete vaccination records if patients had received

immunizations outside of the network of facilities studied, which could have caused

underreported vaccination status especially in older children (Cowburn et al., 2014).

Btoush, Brown, Fogarty, and Carmody (2015) examined the prevalence and correlates of

HPV vaccination initiation among adolescents in low-income urban areas using

electronic health records from multisite community health centers in 2011. Their research

indicated that 27.4% of the adolescents and the study initiated HPV vaccination (Btoush

15

et al., 2015). Of those vaccinated, initiation was higher among males and higher among

Blacks than Hispanics (Btoush et al., 2015). HPV vaccination initiation was lower in

older adolescents, non-English speakers, and those who had received care from non-

pediatricians (Btoush et al., 2015). The limitations of the study are related to the 2009

inclusion of males in the U.S. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)

recommendations and the 2011 data analysis published by the researchers in 2015. An

important finding was evidence of the lack of vaccination among patients of non-

pediatricians. Smith et al. (2011) reviewed the usage of the HPV vaccine in Ontario

where the government spent over 100 million dollars to offer free quadrivalent HPV

vaccinations to young females. The researchers using administrative and immunization

databases conducted a population-based retrospective study cohort study of females

eligible to receive the vaccination in selected cities in the Ontario province of Canada. Of

the females eligible for vaccination and living within the study boundaries, 1,425 (56.6%)

received at least one dose of the HPV vaccination, and less than half (48.2%) completed

the vaccination series (Smith et al., 2011). The researchers found no differences in health

utilization between vaccinated and unvaccinated females, except that females in the

lowest income quintile were less likely to receive HPV vaccine than the quintile above

(Smith et al., 2011). Additionally, HPV-vaccinated females were more likely to have

received other childhood vaccinations than their unvaccinated counterparts showing an

association of parents’ attitudes and vaccinations (Smith et al., 2011). HPV vaccine series

initiation and completion were not associated with age, health services utilization, or

medical history, although there was an association with low-income neighborhoods,

16

which were less likely to complete the vaccine series than the females living in middle-

income neighborhoods (Smith et al., 2011). Females residing in rural areas were more

likely to complete their series than females living in urban areas (Smith et al., 2011). A

limitation of a study was that school grade was not always available for review in the

databases, so the researchers used the birth year to identify eligible females. Another

limitation was that investigators did not have vaccination information after December 31,

2009, meaning that females received their vaccinations after this date may have been

misclassified (Smith et al., 2011). There was also the potential for misclassification of

health systems usage because the database used in the research did not capture care

received in clinics that did not update the database (Smith et al., 2011). Lastly, the

validity of using neighborhood income as a proxy for household income has not been

assessed (Smith et al., 2011). The researchers concluded that the females in the lower

SES groups were least likely to complete the HPV vaccination series suggesting that

future intervention programs be modified to enhance the delivery of the vaccine to this

vulnerable population (Smith et al., 2011).

The following research provides evidence that some programs like the Vaccines

for Children Program (VFC) may be having an impact in compensating for families

lacking resources regarding the HPV vaccine. Bednarczyk, Curran, Orenstein, and Omer

(2014) conducted a study of the atypical demographic patterns of HPV vaccine initiation

phenomenon. The researchers used the NIS-Teen data from 2008-2011 and used

regression analysis to calculate the average annual increase by sociodemographic

characteristics. The researchers found that HPV series initiation increased overall 16%

17

during the time evaluated (Bednarczyk et al., 2014). The researchers also found that since

2008, adolescents living below the poverty level had higher HPV vaccination initiation

than adolescents above the poverty level (Bednarczyk et al., 2014). There were also some

variations in HPV initiation by ethnicity as Hispanic adolescents were consistently higher

in initiation followed by Black and White adolescents (Bednarczyk et al., 2014). There

were also consistent findings when you compared ethnicity and poverty status and HPV

vaccination. All ethnic groups had higher initiation of the HPV vaccine series if they

were below the poverty level than groups above the poverty line (Bednarczyk et al.,

2014). The research was limited by the small samples of some ethnic groups (Bednarczyk

et al., 2014). Additionally, the researchers used a 4-level race/ethnicity which may have

overlooked some racial differences and poverty status (Bednarczyk et al., 2014). The

researchers concluded that more research was needed to explore provider

recommendation and sociodemographic factors. The researchers also found that the VFC

program may have had a larger impact than previously thought as all adolescents below

the poverty level were consistently higher initiators for the HPV vaccine series

(Bednarczyk et al., 2014).

My study overcame the limits of previous studies by analyzing maternal income

defined by postal code. Unlike the study by Musto et al. (2013) which used an area-based

material deprivation index, this study established maternal SES by reported income

within the boundaries of the postal codes of the participants. This method may provide

evidence of a maternal influence on the uptake of the HPV vaccine series based on

maternal income, a limitation found in the study by Musto et al. (2013). Additionally, this

18

study evaluated all postal codes within the Columbus, Ohio metropolis and provided a

broader, temporal, and more complete evidence of an association between maternal

income and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. My research examined maternal income in

an ordinal fashion based on the responses on the 2014 NIS-Teen survey. By analyzing a

broader range of maternal income and HPV uptake, this study overcomes the limitations

of Millen et al. (2009) and Btoush et al. (2015) which examined communities of higher or

lower income only. By examining more than only the polar extremes of income across

communities in the same region, there may be some valuable associations with maternal

income found that could enhance future HPV vaccine series intervention programs.

Lastly, this was a secondary data research conducted by using responses from the 2014

NIS-Teen. There were no limitations associated with the reviewing medical records of a

particular facility. As part of the NIS-Teen Survey, permission was obtained from parents

to survey the primary provider’s vaccination records, and NIS-Teen researchers had

verified the vaccine administration, thus minimizing the risk of recall bias from parents

on when and if their children received the HPV vaccine.

Maternal Education

Knowledge is a modifying factor of the HBM as knowledge can moderate

individual beliefs as well as health literacy (Phelan & Link, 2013; Skinner, Tiro, &

Champion, 2015). Health literacy can decrease the asymmetry of information given

through access to care thus influencing the avoidance of disease (Phelan & Link, 2013).

The following publications show some contradictory evidence of maternal education and

uptake of the HPV vaccine series. My study analyzed maternal knowledge as the variable

19

maternal education as reported on the 2014 NIS-Teen to explore for an association with

HPV vaccine series uptake.

Dorell et al. (2014) conducted research using the NIS-Teen data to correlate

parents who refuse or delay the HPV vaccine series for their children with other

vaccinations compared to parents who do not refuse or delay HPV vaccination. The

researchers used the parental attitudes module of the 2010 NIS-Teen survey which

included 1808 completed household interviews (Dorell et al., 2014). The researchers

separated the respondents into four groups based on answers about delaying or refusing

the HPV vaccination. The results showed that 10% delayed only 16.6% refused only, and

3.4% both delayed and refused (Dorell et al., 2014). The females in the delayed only

group tended to be White, from higher income homes and have mothers with college

degrees (Dorell et al., 2014). The major rationale for delaying or refusing the HPV

vaccination found through the analysis of the responses was related to knowledge or

vaccine necessity, vaccine safety, and access (Dorell et al., 2014). The research had some

limitations related to the random digit dialing aspect of the survey, and it was limited to

households with landlines. The study also had the risk of non-response bias, parental

recall, and incomplete vaccination records may also have affected the outcome (Dorell et

al., 2014). The researchers concluded that parental education about HPV might help

improve acceptance of the vaccine.

Additionally, Feiring et al. (2015) studied the parental influence on HPV vaccine

in Norway. In this research, the researchers examined parental education and income as a

factor in the uptake of the HPV vaccine. The researchers used a national immunization

20

registry to study the uptake of the HPV vaccine and the income and education of parents

of adolescent females. Norway offered the HPV vaccine to the public free of charge to all

12-year-old females since 2009 (Feiring et al., 2015). The researchers found an

association with high maternal education with a lower probability of initiation of the

vaccine series whereas lower education was associated was associated with the higher

likelihood of the initiation of the vaccine series (Feiring et al., 2015). Conversely, high

maternal income was found to be significantly associated with a higher probability of

initiating the HPV vaccine than lower maternal income (Feiring et al., 2015). Paternal

income and education were found to have the same associations with HPV vaccine

initiation, but weaker association than of the mothers (Feiring et al., 2015). The

researchers concluded that more research was needed to determine the factors responsible

for the socioeconomic differences so that interventions could target these differences

(Feiring et al., 2015). The limitations of this study included incomplete information on

vaccinations, income and immigrant education obtained abroad may not be as precisely

accounted for in the survey and may have affected results (Feiring et al., 2015). The

strength of the study was that it was a national registry covering the entire population of

Norway limiting selection bias (Feiring et al., 2015).

The previous studies showed an inverse association with education and

acceptance of the vaccine, but the research by Feiring et al. (2015) reinforced the

association between increased income and the uptake of the HPV vaccine while the study

by Dorell et al. (2014) showed the opposite. The following studies showed a different

association in regards to education and the uptake of the HPV vaccine. Yu et al. (2016)

21

examined the awareness, knowledge, and acceptability of the HPV vaccine in mothers of

teenage daughters in Shandong, China. The goal to study was to examine the variables of

awareness, knowledge, and acceptability of the vaccine in preparation for the

introduction of the HPV vaccine rollout in China. The researchers wanted to gather

information on attitudes regarding the HPV vaccine to provide evidence to inform health

educators and improve programs targeting this population. Researchers used a cross-

sectional approach using self-administered surveys on a population of 1850 mothers who

had daughters aged 9 to 17 attending schools in the region of Weihai, Shandong, China

(Yu et al., 2016). Researchers used 12 public schools grouped by school level and

location for the research. The mothers were asked to complete the survey of which

researchers collected 1592 surveys. Researchers excluded 14 questionnaires related to

logic errors for a total of 1578 mothers, 85.3% of those initially invited finished the study

(Yu et al., 2016). The findings of the research showed that 19.33% were aware of HPV

before the investigation n=305 (Yu et al., 2016). For the mothers who were aware of

HPV, 14.75% had no knowledge 58.69 % had low knowledge and 26.56% at higher

knowledge (Yu et al., 2016). Additionally, 26.49% mothers voiced a willingness to

accept the vaccination for their daughters n= 418. The authors used Chi-square tests for

analysis and identified five variables that were significantly associated with the

acceptance of the HPV vaccine. These areas found to be associated with acceptance of

the vaccine were daughter's age, maternal education, maternal occupation, household

income, and knowledge level (Yu et al., 2016). There was increased vaccine acceptability

associated with older daughters, higher income, and knowledge score (Yu et al., 2016).

22

The prevalent reasons for the refusal of the HPV vaccination were that mothers felt their

daughters were too young to have the risk of cervical cancer (30.95%); not sure about the

use of a new vaccine on their daughters (24.91%); and worried about the safety of the

vaccine (22.85%) (Yu et al., 2016). The limitations of the research were that the research

was conducted and in an economically developed city in China, and not a multi-center

study (Yu et al., 2016). Additionally, there was potential for response bias as the survey

was completed by the mothers who may have been influenced to give socially desirable

responses (Yu et al., 2016). The researchers concluded with the recommendation for the

prioritization of education to raise awareness and knowledge about HPV and the HPV

vaccine. As evidenced by the research, decreased knowledge was associated with poor

acceptance of HPV vaccination which was contrary to the research in Norway which

higher education was associated with decreased acceptance. However, the HPV vaccine

in Norway was available at the time of the study whereas the HPV vaccine was

unavailable in China and the research may not reflect the intentions of mothers once it is

available in China.

Researchers in Botswana conducted a cross-sectional survey on the HPV vaccine

with adults recruited from general medicine and HIV clinics in the capital of Botswana.

The goal of the researchers was to study the intentions of parents and adults to get the

HPV vaccine for their adolescent daughters. There were 376 participants in the study and

the researchers reported that 77% of the respondents were female, and their median age

was 37 years old (DiAngi, Panozzo, Ramogola-Masire, Steenhoff, & Brewer, 2011). The

participants had varying levels of education. 31% of participants completed up to primary

23

school level (6th grade), 41% of the participants have a secondary school education (high

school), and 28% of the participants had a tertiary education or above (DiAngi et al.,

2011). The income of the respondents showed that many of the participants were poor.

Many of the interviewees had no regular income (48%) or made less than 360 U.S.

dollars a month (29%). Geographically, over two-thirds (65%) of the participants

reported living within 30 kilometers of the capital. 83% of the respondents had children,

and 77% of the children of the participants had one or more daughters (DiAngi et al.,

2011). The results of the survey showed that in the population surveyed only 9% had ever

heard of the HPV vaccine before the study (DiAngi et al., 2011). Additionally, 88% of

the respondents said that they would definitely vaccinate their daughter, and they were

more likely to vaccinate if they had a lower education level or if they lived more than 30

kilometers outside the capital (DiAngi et al., 2011). The researchers concluded that

providing more information about HPV and a widely available HPV vaccine while

minimizing barriers would improve uptake in Botswana (DiAngi et al., 2011). The

limitations of the study were centered on the convenience sample of participants from

adults with health care access, and the oversampling of HIV-positive patients in the

sample may have confounded the results (DiAngi et al., 2011).

In South Africa, researchers studied the acceptability of the HPV vaccine in

educated participants attending a masters-level program in KwaZulu-Natal South Africa.

A cross-sectional self-administered anonymous survey was conducted on 146 participants

to test their knowledge of HPV and cervical cancer and whether they would accept the

HPV vaccination for their daughters. The researchers found that in this group that 74%

24

had heard of cervical cancer, but only 26.2% had ever heard of HPV (Hoque & Van Hal,

2014). The participants, after reading the information sheet on HPV and cervical cancer,

the intention to vaccinate their daughters increased from 88% to 97.2% (Hoque & Van

Hal, 2014). The majority of those surveyed (75.4%) believed that the vaccination should

be given before their daughters were aware of sexual activity (Hoque & Van Hal, 2014).

The group that declined to vaccinate tended to want more information on the safety of the

vaccination. The limitations of the study are that it only surveyed one university and

because of the education level of the participants, the results cannot be generalized to a

larger population (Hoque & Van Hal, 2014). A strength of the study was that the

participants, masters-level candidates and future leaders in their perspective fields, could

initiate societal changes through their leadership and knowledge of HPV and cervical

cancer (Hoque & Van Hal, 2014).

Markovitz, Song, Paustian, and El Reda (2014) also found that higher household

education was positively associated with both initiation and completion of the HPV

vaccination series but that higher household income was only positively associated with

completion. This discovery was noted during research of an association between maternal

preventive care utilization and HPV vaccine uptake by their adolescent daughters

(Markovitz et al., 2014).

My analysis of maternal education could contribute to previous research and help

deconflict some of the findings found in the past. This study could overcome some limits

of previous studies by showing maternal income across the population defined by postal

code. Additionally, because this research was on populations in areas within the same

25

metropolis, there may be some association with HPV vaccination uptake and maternal

education based on the community surveyed because secondary education i.e. beyond

high school education was not based on postal code, and the overlap of education and

community could show a tendency with HPV uptake. Unlike the study by Dorell et al.

2014), my research attempted to show an association with maternal education and uptake

across a defined area. My use of this method might provide some clearer evidence of a

correlation between maternal education and community influence based on postal code

and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. Feiring et al. (2015) researched a nationwide

database for a correlation between education, income, and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series. A major limitation in this research was incomplete vaccination information. My

research uses the 2014 NIS-Teen which allows researchers to query participants’

vaccination prescribers to verify vaccination information. Additionally, my research uses

the HBM methodology and examines maternal tendencies delineated by maternal income

delineated by postal code to search for an association between these variables.

Maternal Age

Maternal age could be a significant factor in the mother’s decision-making

process for the acceptance of HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females. There

were no studies found that directly examined this phenomenon, but the variable was

discussed in a study conducted in Tanzania. Watson-Jones et al. (2012) conducted a case-

control study of the characteristics of the receivers and non-receivers of the HPV

vaccination in Tanzania as well as their rationale for not taking the vaccination.

Researchers utilized a randomized trial of HPV vaccinations in 134 primary schools.

26

Researchers randomized 67 of the schools to an age-based strategy and the other 67 to a

school-based strategy. A sample of 250 females who did not take the vaccine (cases) was

compared to a sample of 250 females who did receive the vaccine (controls). An analysis

of the responses the researchers determined that 53% did not get a dose of the vaccine

because they were absent from school on vaccination day, 40% because a parent refused,

and 1% because the girl refused (Watson-Jones et al., 2012). For the parent group that

received the vaccination, the common reasons for accepting the vaccination was

protection from cervical cancer (89%), health benefits (22%), and knowing someone who

had cancer (13%) (Watson-Jones et al., 2012). For the pupil group that received the

vaccination, the common reasons for accepting the vaccination was protection from

cervical cancer (91%), health benefits (24%), and parental wishes (21%) (Watson-Jones

et al., 2012). For the parent group that did not agree to the vaccination of their daughters,

the common reasons for not accepting the vaccination was concern over side effects

(40%), infertility (23%), or insufficient knowledge about the vaccine (22%) (Watson-

Jones et al., 2012). For pupil group that had not received the vaccination, the common

reasons for not accepting the vaccination was absent from school on vaccination day

(33%), both parents refused (24%), and concerns about side effects (22%) (Watson-Jones

et al., 2012). Further analysis of parents who refused vaccination of their daughters

showed a tendency to be older household members with less education (Watson-Jones et

al., 2012). In conclusion, Watson-Jones et al. (2012) recommended that sensitization

messages targeted at older and poor parents are crucial for vaccine acceptance in

Tanzania. The limitations of the study were related to potential selection bias as 60%

27

cases responded to the survey compared to more than 80% of the controls. This

deficiency could confound results and might not be representative of the non-receivers of

the HPV vaccine series.

Maternal age has not been adequately researched in recent literature. My study

provided new information about tendencies of the acceptance of the HPV vaccine and

mothers based on their age. This new information could provide insight for future

researchers to tailor interventions that target mothers of adolescent children to increase

HPV vaccination acceptance. Since this research was from secondary data obtained from

the 2014 NIS-Teen Survey, the limitation of selection bias seen in the study by Watson-

Jones et al. (2012) would not be a constraint because of the random digit dialing method

used to recruit participants of the survey.

Ethnicity

Blackman et al. (2013) compared and contrasted the knowledge and attitudes

toward the HPV and the vaccine within different cultures of African descent. The

researchers conducted a cross-sectional survey of African-Americans and Afro-

Caribbean’s living in the US and the Bahamas. The evidence indicated that there was a

significant difference between the two countries in knowledge about HPV and the HPV

vaccine. People from the Bahamas were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV and

the vaccine than African-Americans residing in the United States (Blackman et al., 2013).

Attitudes related to the vaccine were similar although Bahamians tended not to support

vaccination without parental consent versus African-Americans (80% to 57%) (Blackman

et al., 2013). Limitations of this study included a low response rate from Bahamian

28

parents on the rationale for the unwillingness to vaccinate their children compared to the

replies from African-Americans (Blackman et al., 2013). Luque, Raychowdhury, and

Weaver (2012) examined the provider’s perspectives of the VFC program for Hispanics

in rural Southern Georgia. The researchers performed structured interviews with

providers and focus groups with parents of Hispanic immigrant’s parents to understand

from the provider’s perspective the barriers to access and compliance of the HPV

vaccine. There were two focus groups of parents of females aged 9 to 18 years with

mothers and fathers in separate panels. Predominate barriers gathered from VFC

providers were related to: (1) low English proficiency of the parents; (2) Medicaid

reimbursement shortfalls; (3) mobile population creating difficulty completing a 3-dose

series over a 6-month span of time; (4) lack of transportation access; and (5) lack of

knowledge of the HPV vaccine (Luque et al., 2012). The limitations of the study include

a small sample size of parents for recruitment related to immigration status and Georgia’s

immigration law, and a media-driven controversy surrounding the HPV vaccine (Luque

et al., 2012). There were also limitations in the recruitment of VFC providers related to

contractual limitations on research participation (Luque et al., 2012). Ultimately, the

researchers concluded that inadequate insurance coverage by the VFC program was a

major barrier for not vaccinating adolescents with the additional reluctance to discuss

sexuality and lack of education about HPV and the vaccine (Luque et al., 2012). Kumar

and Whynes (2011) researched for an association between uptake, deprivation and ethnic

background that had been established in pilot research. Based on national immunization

programs in England, the HPV vaccine rates across the country were inconsistent and

29

varied by location, and the researchers sought to identify the factors explaining the

variation (Kumar & Whynes, 2011). The researchers analyzed published data of HPV

vaccination uptake, material deprivation, ethnic compositions of the different localities,

primary care access, and quality, and preventative services such as usage of cervical

screening and childhood immunization services. The analysis showed that ethnicity was

associated with attitudes towards cervical screening and other childhood vaccinations

while material deprivation and access to quality care were not significant (Kumar &

Whynes, 2011). The researchers found that ethnicity, childhood immunizations, and

usage of preventive and primary care and cervical screening were predictive of the uptake

of the HPV vaccine (Kumar & Whynes, 2011). The researchers also found an association

with increased material deprivation independent of race and lower access to quality care

with the decreased uptake of the HPV vaccine. The limitations of the study were related

to the data only tracked the first two doses of the HPV vaccine and the unavailability of

the data to the boundaries within the localities researched (Kumar & Whynes, 2011).

Lechuga, Swain, and Weinhardt (2011) performed a generalizability study to investigate

the strongest predictors of the mother’s intentions to vaccinate their daughters across

three cultural groups: Hispanic, non-Hispanic White and African American. The

researchers recruited a convenience sample of 150 mothers, 50 from each cultural group

from public health clinics in Milwaukee, Wisconsin and assessed their personal and

normative predictors of intentions to vaccinate their daughters (Lechuga et al., 2011). The

convenience sample of 150 mothers was drawn from Women Infant and Children (WIC)

federal program clinics at one of the four clinics in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin

30

metropolis. The research results indicated that the predictors of HPV vaccine intentions

varied by cultural group and that culture moderated the influence of norms on intentions

(Lechuga et al., 2011). Additionally, researchers discovered that in their attempt to

control for demographic differences through the recruitment of mothers enrolled in the

WIC program, that there was a significant amount of variability in insurance status

(Lechuga et al., 2011). Hispanic mothers in the study were more likely to be uninsured

and only have a high school education compared to both White and African American

mothers (Lechuga et al., 2011). The perceptions about the vaccine varied based on each

cultural group. For example, the non-Hispanic White mothers had the perception at the

vaccine would lead to increased sexual risk-taking, African American mothers believed

that the vaccine would cause a decrease in protective behaviors such as screening

(Lechuga et al., 2011). Hispanic mothers were more influenced by social norms as it was

a significant contributor to health decision-making (Lechuga et al., 2011). The limitations

of the research stem from the use of a small convenience sample, thus limiting the

generalizability of the results. Additionally, the varying levels of health insurance and

education within the small sample of mothers may have confounded the results. Lastly,

the intention to vaccinate was researched, not the initiation and completion of the HPV

vaccination series (Lechuga et al., 2011).

As noted above, there was much research on racial differences and HPV vaccine series

uptake. My research overcame some limitations of previous research because it was

examining a cross-section of populations defined not by race or ethnicity, but

socioeconomic status. Previous studies such as Blackman et al. (2013) and Luque,

31

Raychowdhury, and Weaver, (2012) examined specific ethnic groups for an association

with HPV vaccine uptake. My study does not specifically seek racial or ethnic groups,

but all social demographics confined to individual postal codes defined by maternal

income in Columbus, Ohio. My research might add new information to the field

concerning maternal influence via SES, regardless of race or ethnicity, and the uptake of

the HPV vaccine series.

Decisional Influences

The overall premise of the HBM was that people are likely to adopt a health

protective behavior if they believe: that they are susceptible to disease or condition; the

condition could have serious consequences; the remedy for the problem could eliminate

or reduce the susceptibility or severity of the problem; there are benefits to taking action;

and that the perceived costs are outweighed by the benefit of the action (Skinner et al.,

2015). These beliefs, shaped by modifying factors such as age, gender, ethnicity,

personality, socioeconomics, and knowledge may moderate an individual’s beliefs and

subsequent actions (Skinner et al., 2015). The constructs of the HBM collectively affect

behaviors, but precise relationships, weighting, or the combination of variables cannot be

delineated into action in the individual (Skinner et al., 2015). In adult women under 26

years of age, the decision to initiate the HPV vaccination series depends on their personal

choice to get the immunization. The forces that influence initiation or rejection of the

vaccination series vary person to person but have been studied by several researchers.

Harper et al. (2014) studied decisional satisfaction associated with HPV vaccination.

Researchers performed a prospective survey of urban college women aged 18 to 26 years

32

old about their HPV vaccination experience. The result of the study showed personal

satisfaction was very high regardless of the participant’s decision to accept or reject the

vaccination (Harper et al., 2014). There was variance in the initiation of the vaccine

based on perceived value of the vaccination by the participants. Participants who saw the

value of the vaccination as a method to prevent cervical cancer were more significantly

associated uptake than those who perceived the vaccination as a preventive measure for

genital warts (Harper et al., 2014). Additionally, the authors concluded that based the

participant’s responses targeting those who are neutral to HPV vaccination are a more

effective group to engage than those with high satisfaction to reject vaccination (Harper

et al., 2014). The limitations of the research are related to half the population had already

made a choice to receive at least one dose of the HPV vaccine series (Harper et al., 2014).

Additionally, within the decisional framework of the study, the researchers did not offer

the choice of no vaccination to the participants, so it was unknown how not having that

option might affect the results (Harper et al., 2014).

Knowledge and awareness of a disease process can influence parental choices to

vaccinate their children. Trim et al. (2011) conducted a systematic review of critical

surveys about HPV to understand how knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors were

influenced before and after the FDA release of HPV vaccination. The authors compared

the findings of previous research which studied parental knowledge attitudes and

behaviors towards the HPV vaccine. Additionally, the authors studied the factors that

influenced the decision to vaccinate their children. The authors used published articles

printed between the years 2001 and 2011. The findings from the research showed some

33

knowledge trends that changed throughout the study. Researchers found that parental

awareness of HPV increased in 2008 and 2009. Parental awareness of the HPV vaccine

increased in 2007 from 14% aware of the HPV vaccine in 2006 to 59% aware of the HPV

vaccine in 2007 and awareness continued to rise into 2008, but dropped slightly by 2010

(Trim et al., 2011). Behavior trends also fluctuated during the study as parents began

vaccinating their children after the 2006 release of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine,

reaching its peak in 2009 and 2010. For attitude trends, the highest percentage of parents

who intended to vaccinate their children peaked at 86% in 2005, the year before the HPV

vaccine release (Trim et al., 2011). Parental intent to vaccinate their children gradually

rose from 67% in 2007, and 80% 2008, but declined slightly over the last three years of

the study (Trim et al., 2011). There were also barriers for parents to accept the HPV

vaccine for their children. Parental knowledge of the HPV vaccine was a significant

factor in the acceptance of the vaccine for their children. In the review of the research, the

authors found evidence that in 37% of the studies reviewed, concerns about the safety of

the HPV vaccine were the parent's primary barrier with additional concerns about the

potential for side effects (Trim et al., 2011). Parents wanted more information to make an

informed decision was cited in 25% of the studies from the analysis. Conversely, parents

who were concerned about the risk of cancer in their child were more likely to accept the

HPV vaccination for their child (Trim et al., 2011). Parents differed in their attitudes on

when the vaccine should be given. In 19% of the studies reviewed by the researchers

showed a trend not to vaccinate if the parent believed that their child was too young for

the HPV vaccination (Trim et al., 2011). Earlier initiation to sex in adolescents related to

34

the HPV vaccine was also a barrier for parents. In 25% of the studies, researchers

examined parental concerns about increased risky sexual behaviors in adolescents after

vaccination (Trim et al., 2011). Research performed by Smith, Kaufman, Strumpf, and

Lévesque (2015) and Zimet et al. (2013) included in the review showed no evidence of

increased sexuality post-HPV vaccination. The strengths of the research were that it

included the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors from a large number of parents from

several countries (Trim et al., 2011). The limitation of the research was the lack of the

ability to validate parental responses (Trim et al., 2011). The authors concluded based on

their analysis that parents wanted more information and reassurance from their providers

that the HPV vaccine was safe to give to their children (Trim et al., 2011). The parental

decisional findings by Trim et al. (2011) were similar to the findings of the research

conducted by Hofman et al. (2013). Hofman et al. (2013) studied parent's decision-

making strategies through focus groups in the Netherlands. The researchers used four

focus groups of primarily Dutch parents (one urban and two rural) and one group of

Turkish parents, who represented the largest ethnic minority in the Netherlands. All of

the parents in each group had at least one daughter between the ages of 8 and 15. The

researchers concluded post analysis of the parental responses that many parents felt

uneasy about HPV vaccination. The concern was related to the safety and the

effectiveness of the HPV vaccine (Hofman et al., 2013). The common theme from the

analysis was child protection motivation, and with some of the parents, the motivation

was to vaccinate whereas there were also some parents who were motivated to protect

their daughter by not vaccinating (Hofman et al., 2013). The strength of the research was

35

that it provided information about parental attitudes and decisional strategies about HPV

uptake before the vaccine was discussed in the media. The limitations of the research

were that most of the participants in the focus groups were mothers. The other limitation

was related to the sample size of Turkish parents group as there were too few Turkish

parents studied to compare to Dutch parents (Hofman et al., 2013).

My research provided new information concerning decisional influences for HPV

vaccination based on the responses of parents in communities defined by postal code. The

variables of maternal income, maternal education, and maternal age could provide

additional insight of the decisional influences of parents in communities of various SES

by way of the health belief model. Maternal SES and maternal age could be contributing

influences for parent’s decisions to vaccinate adolescent males and females with the HPV

vaccine based on the core constructs of the health belief model.

Critics and Differing Opinions

Bresse, Goergen, Prager, and Joura (2014) researched the cost effectiveness and health

impact of universal vaccination against HPV in Austria. The focus of the study was to

note the cost savings of preventing cancers caused by HPV 16/18 in a cohort of 9-year-

old males and females (Bresse et al., 2014). The authors concluded that with vaccination,

the HPV-related cancer burden would decrease by 71% over 100 years (Bresse et al.,

2014). This total includes not only cervical cancers but also anal, penile and

oropharyngeal cancers (Bresse et al., 2014). Additionally, Crowcroft et al. (2012)

concluded that high vaccine coverage improves communities, reduces absolute risk, and

increase equity. Their research computed the comparative risks for invasive cervical

36

cancer in a population or subgroup before and after the implementation of a vaccination

program. A simple static multi-sensitivity analysis was completed to compare the relative

risk of HPV infections that would lead to invasive cervical cancers if they were not

prevented or detected (Crowcroft et al., 2012). The researchers evaluated 3,793,902

scenarios and in 63.9% of the considered scenarios; HPV vaccination would lead to a

better population outcome regardless of the effectiveness of the vaccine (Crowcroft et al.,

2012). A limitation in the research by Crowcroft et al. (2012) was not estimating the prior

probability distribution for their parameters as Bayesian methods require. A limitation of

both these studies was that according to Ruiz et al. (2012) there are other prevalent strains

of oncogenic HPV other than HPV 16/18 and would not be covered by the present

vaccine. Currently, there are 12 known oncogenic strains of HPV

(16/18/31/33/35/39/45/51/52/56/58/59) (Ruiz et al., 2012).

Usage of the HPV vaccine in males has been a recommendation in the United

States since 2009, but usage in males had only recently achieved approval in Canada in

2015. The National Advisory Committee on Immunizations in Canada recommended that

males aged 9-26 receive the HVP vaccination series (Smith et al., 2015). In 2009, the

ACIP recommended that males receive the HPV vaccine aged 9-26 but subsequently

modified the initiation age in males to ages 11-26 in 2011 (CDC, 2011). The current

recommendation by ACIP for HPV vaccination is routine vaccination at age 11 or 12

years with HPV4 or HPV2 for females and with HPV4 for males; the vaccination series

can be started beginning at age nine years (CDC, 2014a). There were additional studies

using the NIS-Teen survey data for analysis,

37

A different approach for the prediction of HPV vaccine uptake was done by (Hechter et

al., 2013), who studied the maternal use of preventative care and history of sexually

transmitted disease as a predictor of uptake of HPV vaccine in adolescent males. This

innovative study linked maternal information with electronic medical records of males

aged 9-17 enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO) in Southern California.

Based on the various criteria conducted during the study, the researchers found some

interesting results useful for future research. For example, there was an association

between the initiation of HPV vaccine in males if they received the seasonal influenza

vaccine (Hechter et al., 2013). Additionally, males whose mothers received Pap testing

were more likely to receive the HPV vaccine than males whose mothers without a history

of genital papillomatosis were more likely to receive HPV vaccine (Hechter et al., 2013).

The authors concluded that maternal use of preventive health services might influence

HPV vaccination uptake in males (Hechter et al., 2013). Rahman, Laz, McGrath, and

Berenson (2014) found a similar association with the uptake of the HPV vaccination in

older adolescent females who received a seasonal influenza vaccination.

Some researchers argued that the disparity of HPV vaccinations may be related to

underreporting due to parental recall. Attanasio & McAlpine (2014) implied that parental

recall might inaccurately depict HPV uptake rates. The researchers evaluated parental

recall of HPV vaccination compared to clinical records while also evaluating social

characteristics of the accuracy by the parents surveyed. Researchers used data from the

2009-2010 NIS-Teen. The NIS-Teen survey consists of household interviews and a

provider-completed immunization history to compare responses to patient records. The

38

results showed parental underreporting of HPV uptake associated non-White, lower

household income, and lower education attained adolescent mothers (Attanasio &

McAlpine, 2014). Limitations of the study were related to the timing of the change the

ACIP recommendations for the HPV vaccination for males and the survey depended on

households that participated that also had a complete provider report (Attanasio &

McAlpine, 2014). This research showed that parental recall might cause a significant

limitation in vaccine coverage studies because some parents based on multiple

sociodemographic factors underreported the number of HPV vaccinations given to their

adolescent teen (Attanasio & McAlpine, 2014).

Malkowski (2014) studied the gender impact of the rollout of the HPV vaccine by Merck

Pharmaceuticals in 2006. The initial promotion of Gardasil presented a solution for a

woman-only issue despite the evidence that HPV infected both men and women

(Malkowski, 2014). The author implied that the initial advertisements for the vaccine

focus were not on the soon to be released vaccine nor did it inform the public of anything

related to the sexual transmission of HPV (Malkowski, 2014). The second advertisement

campaign was more focused on the teenage target audience, this time; the focus of the ad

campaign was on the vaccine and the disease without mentioning the mode of

transmission of the virus or even the virus itself (Malkowski, 2014). The third

advertisement campaign launched four years after the initial advertisement offering, and

the target audience was women. Merck used personal testimonies of people infected with

HPV a different tactic from previous campaigns where they targeted women not yet

exposed to the virus. Women in this campaign were portrayed to be the guardians of

39

public health despite the fact that HPV virus infects both males and females (Malkowski,

2014). Through analysis of all three campaigns, the researcher concluded that Merck

targeted a specific audience and persuaded them to assume a disproportionate burden for

a public health problem that affects men and women (Malkowski, 2014). The author

recommended a retooling of efforts to deconstruct parts of the message to repackage

HPV and the disease process as a more inclusive disease that does not solely place the

burden of protection on women (Malkowski, 2014). There are several theories in the field

of HPV vaccine uptake research. Most of these theories have been used in research to

determine the leading barriers to the uptake of the vaccine (Savoy, 2014). The most

common reasons for decreased uptake are knowledge of the vaccine, cost of the vaccine,

safety, efficacy, and risks of increased promiscuity. Savoy (2014) theorized that the

infrequent visits to the doctor as adolescents than as toddlers for vaccinations to be a

possible cause for the lack of vaccinations. Another rationale considered for decreased

uptake was the parental fear the vaccination would lead to promiscuity which various

researchers have evaluated (Savoy, 2014). Smith, Kaufman, Strumpf, and Lévesque

(2015) evaluated a cohort of over 260,000 females and found no evidence of perceived

promiscuity based on pregnancy and other sexually transmitted diseases. This study was

limited because it only evaluated females up to age 17 and the high attrition rate of the

survey as over 131,000 of the returned questionnaires was ineligible for the analysis

(Smith et al., 2015). Two years before this research, Zimet, Rosberger, Fisher, Perez, and

Stupiansky (2013) also investigated the promiscuity hypothesis and evaluated sexual risk

compensation related to HPV vaccination. The researchers reviewed several selected

40

published behavioral and social science articles on HPV vaccine acceptance and attitudes

and found no evidence of increased sexual risk-taking in adolescents taking the vaccine

(Zimet et al., 2013). Brown, Blas, Heidari, Carcamo, and Halsey (2013) evaluated

changes in sexual behavior and HPV knowledge after an education and vaccination

intervention in Peruvian female sex workers. The researchers noted that the participants

had a significant decrease in new clients over a 30-day period and utilized at least one

preventative strategy against other sexually transmitted infection upon the seven-month

follow-up survey (Brown et al., 2013). This evidence was corroborated by Zimet et al.

(2013), who came to similar conclusions in a study reviewed that was done on 13 to 21-

year-old females. Ruiz et al. (2012) hypothesized that proximity of first sexual experience

to menarche or the start of menstruation was associated with increased risk of cervical

intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2/3. In their research, they evaluated 1009 Colombian and

1012 Finnish females aged 16 to 23 that enrolled in an HPV vaccination trial that had

accurate data concerning the onset of menstruation and their first sexual experience. Of

the women included in the study, the statistics showed the mean age of menarche as 12.4

years, and the mean age of first sexual intercourse was 16 years (Ruiz et al., 2012). The

results of this study showed that women who had their first sexual intercourse less than

three years after menarche had a higher risk of cervical cytological abnormalities

compared to women who waited beyond three years after menarche (Ruiz et al., 2012).

Ruiz et al. (2012) concluded with the emphasis on the importance of primary prevention

through early vaccination and sexual education of adolescent females. The perception of

the HPV vaccine contributing to infertility was another hypothesis investigated by

41

researchers. Schuler, Hanley, and Coyne-Beasley (2014) researched parent’s concerns

about infertility as a barrier to accepting the HPV vaccine in adolescent males. 39% of

respondents reported that they were concerned about vaccine acquired infertility (VAI)

(Schuler et al., 2014). Additional analysis showed that this group had no less knowledge

than other parents surveyed indicating an increased need for conversations concerning the

side effects of the HPV vaccine to parents rather than having parents read the vaccine

information sheet (VIS) (Schuler et al., 2014).

This study provided new information that could impact future HPV vaccination

interventions. Based on the evidence discussed in the literature above, increasing the

uptake of the HPV vaccine series decreases the overall cervical cancer risk. As stated in

the research by Crowcroft et al. (2012) high HPV vaccination coverage improves

community health, increases equity, and reduces the absolute risk of cervical cancer. This

research added additional empirical evidence to support the development of future HPV

vaccination intervention programs by way of predicting tendencies of parents of

adolescent males and females to vaccinate their children with the HPV vaccine series

based on the theoretical concepts of the health belief model. My research enhanced

knowledge of decision-making based on maternal income, maternal education, and

maternal age.

Definitions

Cervical cancer: A type of cancer that begins in the cells lining the cervix at the

lower portion of the uterus (American Cancer Society, Inc., 2014). Cervical cancer is the

second most common female cancer worldwide, and there are nearly 500,000 cases per

42

year contributing to >250,000 deaths each year (Union for International Cancer Control

(UICC), 2015).

Human papillomavirus (HPV): Genital HPV is the most common sexually

transmitted infection (CDC, 2014c). There are over 100 HPV types identified, and there

are more than 40 HPV types that can infect the genital area (Hariri, Dunne, Saraiya,

Unger, & Markowitz, 2011). HPV types are classified by their association with cancer.

Non-oncogenic or low-risk strains of HPV can cause genital warts while oncogenic or

high-risk HPV can cause cervical cancer (Hariri et al., 2011).

HPV vaccine: Two vaccines are available to prevent persistent infection with

oncogenic strains of HPV. One vaccine is effective against four HPV strains, two high

risk, and two low risk and both vaccines are effective at protecting against the types that

cause 70% of cervical cancers (CDC, 2013; U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2013).

Papanicolaou (Pap) test: A screening test for cervical cancer. The test looks for

abnormal cells on your cervix that could potentially turn into cancer. Early identification

of cancerous cells can improve the overall success of treatment. All women should start

getting regular Pap tests starting at age 21 (Techakehakij & Feldman, 2008).

Gardasil: The first HPV vaccine released in the United States in 2006. Gardasil

immunizes against HPV serotypes 6,11, 16 and 18 (U.S. Food and Drug Administration,

2013).

Cervarix: The second HPV vaccine released in the United States in 2009.

Cervarix immunizes against HPV serotypes 16 and 18 (CDC, 2010).

Maternal income: The value of the participant’s income reported on the NIS-Teen

43

survey by postal code.

Maternal education: The level of maternal educational reported by the 2014 NIS-

Teen survey participants (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC], National

Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases [NCIRD}, & National Center for

Health Statistics [NCHS], 2015).

Race: The 2014 NIS-Teen Survey defines race as White, Black or African

American, American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, and Native Hawaiian (CDC, NCRID

and NCHS, 2015).

Ethnicity: The 2014 NIS-Teen Survey defines ethnicity as participants of

Hispanic or non-Hispanic origin (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015).

Assumptions

This study was based on several assumptions. The most critical assumption was

that the instrument for data collection is valid and reliable based on the previous use of

the survey for HPV vaccination research. The NIS-Teen launched in 2006 provides the

most current, household, population-based, state and local area estimates of vaccination

coverage among children and teens using a standard survey methodology (CDC, 2016).

Additionally, there was the assumption that the random digit dial [RDD] sampling

method used to collect the NIS-Teen data resulted in a representative sample of telephone

households in Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. Another assumption was that surveyors

collected data in a nonbiased manner and the participants provided the most honest and

accurate responses on the survey. The target audience for the NIS-Teen were adolescents

13-17 years living in households in the United States at the time of the survey. Lastly, it

44

was assumed the questions in the NIS-Teen survey are reliable and valid measures of

gathering information. This assumption was based on several years of use by the CDC

and in multiple previously published research studies. These assumptions are necessary to

conduct this research using this secondary data source. Due to the multiyear collection of

data by the National Immunization Survey (NIS), it was assumed that this source of data

was valid and reliable to be used in research. These assumptions are critical to the

research and to the analysis of the data provided so that conclusions can be made on the

population surveyed.

Scope and Delimitations

Scope and Delimitations

This study was limited to the analysis of selected SES variables and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series by postal code in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. The

findings cannot be generalized to other vaccines. This survey data was limited by

information recall of parents who participated in the study. The sample population

interviewed for the 2014 NIS-Teen may not be generalizable to other populations. The

study did not analyze the variants of insurance coverage plans, or the state-related

variances in the VFC although some these variances may affect the conclusions and

should be considered for future research. Eligibility of the survey participants was

determined by the self-reporting by parents or guardians of adolescent children in the

household ages 13-17 years old via random digit dialing phone interviews. The NIS-Teen

is a large national representative sample that estimates vaccination coverage for the 50

States (CDC, 2016). Lastly, this research analyzed the responses from participants living

45

in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area and excluded postal codes not associated with

this location.

Significance and Potential for Social Change

Significance of Study

The significance of this research was that it could add potentially valuable

evidence that could contribute to the improvement of HPV intervention programs based

on maternal income and other selected SES variables examined in this study. Potential

evidence discovered through this research could enhance future researchers’

methodological approach to the implementation of community intervention programs by

tailoring HPV vaccination programs to fit selected communities based on maternal

income, education, maternal age, and ethnicity. Additionally, evidence found in the

analysis could potentially exclude some SES factors that were thought to influence the

uptake of the vaccine.

This research is an original contribution to field as there are many research studies

published exploring the barriers contributing to the decreased uptake of the HPV vaccine

series. None of the published contributions have explored maternal income, maternal

education and maternal age by community (defined by postal code) to explore for an

association within a community’s maternal SES status indicators and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent females and males ages 13-17.

Social Change

The potential for significant social change related to this study was based on the

potential evidence of an association between uptake of the HPV vaccine series and

46

maternal influences as it relates to measurable maternal SES factors (maternal income

and maternal education). Such results of the research could potentially be used to reduce

the burden of cervical cancer in women through the enhancement of vaccination

programs contributing to the decreased incidence of a significant health disparity for

women. As a potential result of this research, more women could live longer and reach

their full potential through the improvement and enhancement of HPV vaccine series

interventions. Additionally, as a secondary result, this research could potentially change

the recommended screening schedule for cervical cancer screening decreasing the

frequency of exposure to invasive screening tests. Both men and women are reservoirs

for the HPV virus, universal HPV vaccination of all adolescents could lower the

incidence of HPV infection in women and the progression to cervical cancer.

Summary

HPV infection is the most common sexually transmitted infection (CDC, 2013).

HPV can progress to cervical cancer, and cervical cancer is responsible for over 4,000

deaths in the United States annually and a much higher burden worldwide, especially for

developing countries (American Cancer Society, Inc., 2014; Union for International

Cancer Control (UICC), 2015). To prevent cervical cancer, the enhancement of HPV

vaccination programs to meet the healthy people 2020 goal of 80% HPV infection is

critical (Savoy, 2014). HPV infection reduction can be accomplished by the use of

Gardasil, which is effective against HPV serotypes 6, 11, 16 and 18, and Cervarix, which

protects women from HPV types 16 and 18 (CDC, 2013; U.S. Food and Drug

Administration, 2013). The identification of additional barriers to HPV acceptance could

47

contribute to the continued improvement of vaccine intervention programs. The use of

the health belief model as the framework for the study may bring to light additional

measures to improve and enhance HPV vaccination programs. This study focused on

maternal SES factors by exploring for a correlation based on maternal income, maternal

education, as well as the maternal age of the participants through the analysis of the 2014

NIS-Teen survey data.

Conclusion

In conclusion, there was a gap in the literature for research exploring associations

between maternal community-level SES influences and the voluntary uptake of the HPV

vaccine series. Improving HPV vaccination rates among adolescents ages 13-17 was an

issue that must be addressed (Moss et al., 2014). The protection offered by this vaccine

can keep women from acquiring strains of oncogenic HPV that account for 70 % of all

cervical cancers in the U.S.(Harper et al., 2014). As both men and women are reservoirs

for the HPV virus, universal HPV vaccination of all adolescents could lower the

incidence of HPV infection and the progression to cervical cancer. The following chapter

provided the rationale behind the research design and data collection methods to reinforce

the significance and need of this scholarly project.

48

Section 2: Research Design and Data Collection

Introduction

The purpose of this doctoral study was to assess if there was an association

between maternal SES variables of income, education, age, and ethnicity and uptake of

the HPV vaccine in adolescent females and males ages 13-17 in Columbus, Ohio. In this

section, I explain my research design and the rationale for the choice of design. This

section also provides a comprehensive explanation of the methodology used for the study

in the event future researchers may want to replicate this research. Next, I elucidate my

choice of instrumentation, its purpose, and how I operationalized the constructs. Lastly, I

describe threats to validity and ethical procedures, to include the protection of data, and

close by summarizing the pertinent details in this section.

Research Design and Rationale

This was a cross-sectional quantitative observational research study in which I

explored associations between maternal socioeconomic influences based on income and

education and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. Additional analyses covered the

association between maternal age and ethnicity. The dependent variable in this study was

uptake of the HPV vaccine series, which I defined as a dichotomous (yes/no) response to

whether the adolescent (male or female) received at least one dose of the vaccine. The

four independent variables were maternal income, maternal education, maternal age, and

ethnicity. The first independent variable, maternal income, was defined as the income

reported by the respondents living within a certain postal code within the Columbus,

Ohio metropolitan area. The second independent variable, maternal education, was

49

defined by the highest level of education reported by the mother divided into the

following categories: no high school diploma; high school graduate or GED; completed a

vocational, trade, or business school program; some college credit but no degree;

associate degree (AA, AS); bachelor’s degree (BA, BS, AB); master’s degree (MA, MS,

MSW, MBA); and doctorate (PhD, EDD) or professional degree (MD, DDS, DVM, JD).

The third independent variable, maternal age, was defined by the mother’s age at the time

of survey completion divided into the following categories: 18-22, 23-27, 28-31, 31-36,

37-41, 42-45, and 46 and above. Ethnicity was measured by the following six categories:

White, Black/African-American, Native American, Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific

Islander.

I chose a cross-sectional research design for this study. Cross-sectional design is

the predominate method for survey research and can be used sufficiently to examine

associations between properties and dispositions (Frankfort-Nachmias & Nachimas,

2008). There were no time or resource constraints related to using a cross-sectional

design approach, as the data analyzed was from a secondary analysis of the 2014 NIS-

Teen survey. Cross-sectional design was an optimal choice for this study as it allowed an

analysis of the dependent variables, uptake of the HPV vaccine series with multiple

independent variables, maternal income, maternal education and maternal age. By using

the cross-sectional design, the findings could be helpful in predicting outcomes based on

the SES variables analyzed in the study. The information gathered could enhance

intervention strategies based on any discoveries noted from the analysis of the SES

variables. A cross-sectional design was the best option because I was trying to elicit a

50

pattern of a relationship between the SES variables and uptake of the HPV vaccine series.

The statistical plan for my study was multiple logistical regression, which is used

when there is one categorical dependent variable and two or more independent variables

(McDonald, 2014). I chose multiple logistic regression because of its appropriateness for

seeking a functional association between the independent variables and the dependent

variable. This statistical plan can be used to predict probabilities of an effect of multiple

independent variables on a categorical dichotomous dependent variable and in some

circumstances can be used to make inferences about which independent variables have a

larger effect on or stronger association with the dependent variable (McDonald, 2014).

Methodology

In this section, I describe how I performed the research by defining the study

population, sampling techniques, access to secondary data, instrumentation,

operationalization of constructs, threats to validity, and ethical considerations.

Study Population

Columbus is the capital of the State of Ohio. The population of Columbus is

approximately 850,106 (Department of Commerce, 2016b). The target population for the

study was parents or guardians of adolescent teens who participated in the 2014 NIS-

Teen survey and live in the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan area. Since the participants of

the survey are asked specifically about HPV vaccine series uptake, I included all

participants of the survey who live in the geographic region when conducting the analysis

of the data. The sample size needed to be at least 1188 participants based on the

calculations using G*Power 3.1 Statistical Power Analysis for a logistic regression two-

51

tailed analysis with 0.95 power (1-β err prob; Faul et al., 2007). Optimally, if participants

resided across different postal codes, comparing uptake of the HPV vaccine series among

multiple SES variables would have improved the analysis. The target population for the

2014 NIS-Teen was adolescents aged 13–17 years living in non-institutionalized

households in the United States at the time of the interview (CDC, 2015b). Researchers

conduct the 2014 NIS-Teen concurrently with the 2014 NIS. The 2014 NIS-Teen

identified households containing one or more adolescents who was 13-17 years of age at

the time of the survey. Interviews were conducted with the household adults who were

the most knowledgeable about the teenager’s record of vaccinations (CDC, 2015b). Upon

completion of the survey and after obtaining consent from the parent or guardians of the

teenagers surveyed, the 2014 NIS-Teen surveyors also contacted the teenager’s

vaccination providers to request information on their vaccination records (CDC, 2015b).

The criteria for inclusion in this research study were as follows:

• Being an adolescent male or female between 13-17 years of age by the time of

the interview in 2014,

• Live in one of the Columbus, Ohio metropolitan postal codes

• The first HPV shot was received between 9 -17 years of age.

The ACIP recommends routine vaccination at age 11 or 12 years with HPV4 or

HPV2 for females and with HPV4 for males, although the vaccination series can be

started as early as age 9 (CDC, 2014b). For those unvaccinated at the routine age, the

vaccine is recommended for males aged 13 through 21 years and females aged 13

through 26 years who have not been vaccinated previously or who have not completed

52

the 3-dose series (CDC, 2014b).

Sampling and Sampling Procedures

The 2014 NIS -Teen Survey was used by surveyors to collect data from

households with adolescents 13-17 years and the teens’ vaccination providers (CDC,

2015). The NIS-Teen survey was conducted in two parts. The first part of the survey was

the random-digit-dialing (RDD) telephone survey of parents and guardians of randomly

selected households in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and the second part of

the survey was the survey of the teen’s vaccination providers (CDC, 2015). The NIS-

Teen surveyors obtained the consent to survey from the parents or guardians of eligible

teenagers so that contact could be made with their vaccination providers (CDC, 2015).

Researchers mailed a survey questionnaire to participants’ vaccine providers to perform a

check of their medical records (CDC, 2016). The goal of the mail survey of vaccination

providers was to confirm the accuracy and recall from the parents as compared to the

actual vaccination records and to assure the accuracy and precision of overall vaccination

coverage estimate (CDC, 2015c). The 2014 NIS-Teen survey included 59 geographic

strata for which vaccination coverage levels could be estimated, including seven mostly

urban cities and county areas (including the District of Columbia). Lastly, the remaining

52 estimation areas were either entire states or territories (including U.S. Virgin Islands

and Guam) or “rest of state” areas (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015). According to CDC,

NCRID and NCHS (2015), this design makes it feasible to produce yearly predictions of

vaccine coverage levels for each state or territory (including U.S. Virgin Islands and

Guam) and for each of the seven sub-state estimation areas with a specified degree of

53

precision (a coefficient of variation of approximately 7.5%). Additionally, using the same

data collection methods and survey instruments researchers use the NIS-Teen to produce

results that are comparable to predict vaccination coverage levels among estimation areas

and through subsequent years (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015). However, on the 2014

NIS-Teen survey, there was a change of the definition of adequate provider data (Reagan-

Steiner et al., 2015). As of 2014 on the NIS-Teen survey, adequate provider data was

achieved if the adolescent had vaccination history data from one or more of the named

vaccination providers or if the parent reported that the adolescent was completely

unvaccinated (Reagan-Steiner et al., 2015). Prior to 2014, there were more criteria

associated with the definition of adequate provider data, and it was based on a

comparison between provider reports of vaccination history and parental reports of

vaccination history, either by shot record report or recall (Reagan-Steiner et al., 2015).

This change means that future studies using the NIS-Teen survey data cannot be

compared to the previously published vaccine coverage estimates (Reagan-Steiner et al.,

2015).

Access to Secondary Data

The procedure to gain access to the 2014 NIS-Teen data was detailed at the CDC

website. The 2014 NIS-Teen public-use secondary dataset can be downloaded from this

website. In addition to the 2014 NIS-Teen dataset, users can download other pertinent

documents such as the readme file, data user's guide, household interview questionnaire,

provider-immunization history questionnaire data documentation, codebook and

frequencies, SAS input statements, and R Input Statements (CDC, NCRID & NCHS,

54

2015).

Permissions to use the 2014 NIS-Teen are clarified in the readme file. The

permissions for the use of data was strictly used only for the purpose of health statistical

reporting and analysis and any attempts to ascertain the identities of the participants were

prohibited by law (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015). To comply with permissions for the

usage of the 2014 NIS-Teen, users of the data must be in compliance with the following:

1. Use the data in these data files for statistical reporting and analysis only.

2. Make no use of the identity of any person or establishment discovered

inadvertently and advise the Director, NCHS, of any such discovery (301-458-

4500)

3. Not link these data files with individually identifiable data from other NCHS

or non-NCHS data files (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015).

Instrumentation and Operationalization of Constructs

Instrumentation

The NIS-Teen was launched in 2006. The target population for the NIS-Teen was

adolescents 13-17 years living in the United States at the time of the interview (CDC,

2015b). The NIS, developed in 1994 are a group of phone surveys used to monitor

vaccination coverage among children 19-35 months, teens 13-17 years, and flu

vaccinations for children 6 months-17 years (CDC, 2015b). The first NIS survey began in

April 1994 to examine vaccination coverage in the United States after measles outbreaks

in the early 1990s (CDC, 2015b). Researchers at the NCIRD of the CDC developed the

NIS by using a culmination of research experience using several different survey

55

methodologies (Zell et al., 2000). The NIS is an annual survey designed to provide

current and continuous estimates of vaccine coverage, provide reliable and valid

estimates of vaccination coverage in 78 separate areas (all 50 states, the District of

Columbia and 27 urban areas considered to be at risk of under-vaccination), provide

timely estimates, and produce estimates using reasonable resources (Zell et al., 2000).

Operationalization

Uptake of the HPV vaccine series: A person’s receiving one or more vaccinations

of the HPV vaccine series. This was the dependent variable. Based on the ACIP

recommendation, all participants of the HPV vaccination series are eligible to accept the

vaccine at 11-12 years of age but can be given as early as age 9 (CDC, 2014b). The

recommended age of initiation of the vaccine is well within the parameters of the NIS-

teen survey which gathers data of adolescents aged 13-17.

Maternal income: The household income reported based on the postal code of the

survey participants. Maternal income was measured by the income reported income per

postal code on the 2014 NIS-Teen survey. Maternal educational is measured by the

reported level of maternal educational reported during the survey by postal code.

Maternal education: The level of maternal education based on the postal code of

the survey participants, defined by the highest level of education attained, separated into

the following categories: no high school diploma; high school graduate or GED;

completed a vocational, trade, or business school program; some college credit but no

degree; associate degree (AA, AS); bachelor’s degree (BA, BS, AB); master’s degree

56

(MA, MS, MSW, MBA); and doctorate (PhD, EDD) or professional degree (MD, DDS,

DVM, JD).

Maternal age: The age of the mother at the time of survey participation. Maternal

age was measured by dividing the mothers’ age into the following groups: less than 25

years old, 25-34 years old, 35-44 years and 45+ years old.

Ethnicity: The grouping of the major divisions of humankind, having distinct

physical characteristics. Ethnicity was measured by dividing participants into the

following six categories: White, Black/African-American, Native American, Asian,

Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander.

Data Analysis Plan

I analyzed the 2014 NIS-Teen secondary data using SPSS® version 21 (IBM

Corp., 2016). I validated the analyses using the built-in validation functions in SPSS®

v.21. I conducted simple descriptive analyses of the variables. I recoded the identified

variables, categorized and manipulated them to fit the variables in line with the research

questions. I conducted normality testing and performed binary analyses, bivariate

analysis, followed by multiple logistic regression using SPSS® on the independent

variables to search for statistically significant associations with the dependent variable.

Research Question(s) and Hypotheses

The objective of this research study was to explore the association between

maternal SES and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. The research questions are as

follows:

Q1: what is the association between maternal income and uptake of the HPV

57

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in

the Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

HO: there is no association exists between maternal income and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after controlling for ethnicity

and maternal age based on postal codes in Columbus, Ohio.

HA: There is an association exists between maternal income and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after controlling for ethnicity

and maternal age based on postal codes in Columbus, Ohio.

Q2: What is the association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

HO: There is no association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis

HA: There is an association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Q3: What is the association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis?

HO: There is no association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the

58

Columbus, Ohio metropolis

HA: There is an association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

Q4: What is the association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the Columbus,

Ohio metropolis?

HO: There is no association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the Columbus,

Ohio metropolis.

HA: There is an association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in

adolescent males and females 13-17 in the postal codes within the Columbus, Ohio

metropolis.

A cross-sectional design study using multiple logistical regression analysis was

performed to predict the most parsimonious model of HPV vaccine series uptake. The

variables of the study were measured by using responses from the 2014 NIS-Teen. This

research explored the association between SES variables of maternal income, maternal

education, maternal age and ethnicity in communities within communities of Columbus,

Ohio and uptake of the HPV vaccine series.

Threats to Validity

The data produced by the NIS are considered the gold standard for public health

surveillance on immunization rates. The NIS is one of the largest telephone surveys and

59

produces high-quality estimates of vaccine coverage in the United States (NORC at the

University of Chicago, 2016). Due to the method in which this survey was conducted,

and the theoretical framework the analysis, there are several external and internal threats

to validity involving the participants, location, and their reported income via postal code.

The analysis was performed on participants who completed the 2014 NIS-Teen in

communities within Columbus, Ohio metropolitan and the results are not generalizable to

different populations. There also could be a temporal association between the effects of

SES related to the length of time participants resided in the sampled postal codes. Newer

residents may not have the full effect of access or lack of access to money, knowledge,

prestige, power and supportive social networks where they were surveyed. This threat

was addressed by the random digit dialing sampling of selected households during the

survey. Additionally, there is evidence that parental reporting of vaccination statuses can

be inflated as compared to provider records (Lu, Dorell, Yankey, Santibanez, &

Singleton, 2012). The NIS-teen survey compares the vaccination status reports from

parents to the reports from the adolescent’s providers only when the parents or guardians

have given consent (CDC, 2015c). Lastly, up-to-date vaccine information, individual or

vaccine series was drawn from provider-reported data. There was no recheck of

households or reconciliation of data that might be different from the report of parents or

guardians, and the NIS-Teen surveyors do not re-contact households or providers to

attempt to reconcile potential discrepancies in provider-reported vaccination dates or to

resolve date-of-birth reporting errors (NORC at the University of Chicago, 2016).

60

Ethical Considerations

Human Subjects

I conducted the research using the 2014 NIS public-use data file for this

secondary data analysis study. The 2014 NIS -Teen staff and contractors are subject to

strict federal laws in regards to protecting the participants and the provider’s privacy

(CDC, 2015e). Employees working on the NIS are required to sign a legal document

saying that they will keep all information private as well as details the consequences of

the illegal disclosure of the information (CDC, 2015e). All information in the 2014 NIS-

Teen was collected under strict confidentiality and can be used only for research as

outlined in [Section 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S. Code 242m(d), the

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S. Code 552a), and the Confidential Information Protection and

Statistical Efficiency Act (5 U.S. Code)] (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015). Prior to the

release of the public-use data file, the contents of file go through extensive review by the

NCHS Disclosure Review Board to ensure that participant privacy was protected as well

as the protection of data confidentiality (CDC, NCRID & NCHS, 2015). The information

collected in the NIS-Teen are used only for reporting of important statistical health

information in the United States and its territories, and the organization has taken

precautions to protect the privacy of individuals, families, and businesses participating in

the survey (CDC, 2015e).

Ethical Issues

During the data collection phase, many of the telephone numbers are randomly

selected by a computer so listed, and unlisted phone number receive phone calls

61

requesting permission to conduct the survey. Additionally, potential participants are

mailed a letter from the Director of the National Center for Immunization and

Respiratory Diseases, which describes the survey before a telephone interview was

conducted (CDC, 2015c). These steps were taken to protect participants’ confidentiality

and to make certain they understand that their participation was voluntary (CDC, 2015c).

Summary

In summary, this research was a cross-sectional quantitative study that explored

for a correlation between maternal socioeconomic influences and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in the communities within the cities of Columbus, Ohio metropolis. By

using multiple logistic regression analysis, this study analyzed the dependent variables of

uptake of the HPV vaccination series with the independent variable of maternal income

measured by postal code. Additionally, the research analyzed the additional independent

variables of maternal education, and maternal age as well as ethnicity. There are several

threats to validity, but due to the RDD nature of gathering participants to be surveyed, the

threats to validity should be minimal. The research was ethical and should satisfy the

requirements of protecting the privacy of human subjects as all information in the 2014

NIS-Teen was collected under strict confidentiality and can be used only for research as

outlined in [Section 308(d) of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S. Code 242m(d), the

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S. Code 552a), and the Confidential Information Protection and

Statistical Efficiency Act (5 U.S. Code)]. Additionally, the employees collecting

information for the 2014 NIS-Teen are under strict federal laws in regards to protecting

62

the participants and the provider’s privacy. The next section of this doctoral study

discussed the results and the findings of the research.

63

Section 3: Presentation of the Results and Findings

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to assess if there was an association between

maternal SES variables of maternal income and maternal education as well maternal age

and ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine in adolescent males and females ages 13-17

based on postal codes within communities within the city of Columbus, Ohio. I provided

evidence of an association between maternal SES influences and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series. Four research questions were answered as a result of this study: (a) What

is the association between maternal income and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in

adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the Columbus,

Ohio metropolis, and (b) What is the association between maternal education and uptake

of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with

postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis, and (c) What is the association between

maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-

17 in communities with postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio metropolis, and (d) What is

the association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent

males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the Columbus, Ohio

metropolis? The null hypothesis stipulated that there is no association between maternal

socioeconomic factors of income and education and uptake of the HPV vaccination

series, nor between the variables of age and ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccination

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities with postal codes in the

Columbus, Ohio metropolis.

64

In this section, I present the results of a secondary data analysis. I analyzed the

2014 NIS-Teen secondary data using SPSS® version 21 (IBM Corp., 2016). I validated

the analyses using the built-in validation functions in SPSS® v.21. I conducted simple

descriptive analyses of the variables. I recoded the identified variables and categorized

and manipulated them to fit the variables in the research questions. I conducted normality

testing and performed binary analyses and bivariate analysis, followed by multiple

logistic regression using SPSS® on the independent variables to search for statistically

significant associations with the dependent variable. I conclude this section with a

summary of the findings from the data analysis.

Data Collection of Secondary Data Set

The annual NIS-Teen survey is conducted as an adjunct to the NIS. The overall

goal of the NIS is to estimate vaccination coverage rates among 19- to 35-month-old

children in the United States. The NIS uses a random digit dialing (RDD) telephone

survey to identify households with children aged 19 to 35 months and interviews the

adult who was the most familiar with the child’s vaccination history. When such a

household was identified, and the NIS interview was completed, the household was

further screened for the presence of 13- to 17-year-old adolescents. Households without

19- to 35-month-old children are not administered the NIS interview but are further

screened for the presence of a 13- to 17-year-old adolescent. If a household containing

one or more adolescents aged 13 to 17 years was identified, one of those adolescents was

randomly chosen from within the household, and the adult who was most knowledgeable

about the teen's vaccinations was interviewed. The household interviews for the 2014

65

NIS-Teen landline and cell-phone samples began on January 9, 2014, and ended on

February 8, 2015 (CDC, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, &

National Center for Health Statistics, 2015). The samples were drawn independently from

RDD phone numbers from within the 58 selected geographical regions of the annual NIS.

Data obtained from the teen’s vaccine provider were collected from February 2014

through April 2015 for both landline and cell-phone sample sources. The response rates

for the 2014 NIS-Teen were as follows: resolution rate of 82.6%, screener completion

rate 87.2%, interview completion rate 83.8%, CASRO response rate 60.3%, and teens

with adequate provider data rate 57.1% (CDC, National Center for Immunization and

Respiratory Diseases, & National Center for Health Statistics, 2015).

Discrepancies

There were some discrepancies from the use of this secondary data set. Upon

review of the data, there were no specific methods to identify survey respondents by

postal code for the Columbus, Ohio metropolis. Additionally, I noted that the State of

Ohio (n = 754) did not have the required sample size to conduct multiple logistic

regression analysis. Based on this discrepancy, I modified my location of research into

two cities with differing levels of per capita income using the same methods I planned to

use in the research on Columbus, Ohio. My revised research plan analyzed New York

City, New York (n = 616) and Houston, Texas (n = 679). The combination of these cities

gave me a sample size of 1,295, which was adequate to perform multiple logistic

regression analysis. However, after reviewing the responses concerning HPV uptake for

the cities selected, I found that 170 respondents were unaware of HPV vaccine series

66

uptake in their adolescent teen and those respondents were excluded from the analysis.

The final sample size analyzed in this study was n = 1,125 which lowered the achieved

power to 0.939 power (1-β err prob) based on calculations using G*Power 3.1 Statistical

Power Analysis for a logistic regression two-tailed analysis from the original 0.95 power

(1-β err prob)(Faul et al., 2007). My study examined two large metropolitan areas with

vast differences in per capita income. In 2015, the per capita personal income (PCPI) in

New York City was $ 63,196 (Department of Commerce, 2017), whereas the PCPI in

Houston for 2015 was $36,913 (Department of Commerce, 2016a). The states that

encompass these cities have comparable HPV-related cervical cancer rates: New York at

7.57 and Texas at 8.27 per 100,000 (CDC, 2017). Both New York and Texas have the

highest cervical cancer rates for the United States. The change in my research plan

prompted a necessary change of my research questions.

My revised research questions are as follows:

Q1: What is the association between maternal income and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of

New York City, New York and Houston, Texas?

HO: There is no association exists between maternal income and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after controlling for ethnicity

and maternal age within the cities of New York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

HA: There is an association exists between maternal income and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after controlling for ethnicity

and maternal age within the cities of New York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

67

Q2: What is the association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City,

New York and Houston, Texas?

HO: There is no association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City,

New York and Houston, Texas.

HA: There is an association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City,

New York and Houston, Texas.

Q3: What is the association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New

York City, New York and Houston, Texas?

HO: There is no association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New

York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

HA: There is an association between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New

York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

Q4: What is the association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City, New

York and Houston, Texas?

HO: There is no association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

68

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City, New

York and Houston, Texas.

HA: There is an association between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine

series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City, New

York and Houston, Texas.

There were also some slight differences in my expectations in how the variables

were listed in the 2014 NIS-Teen data. The differences of the listing of the variables were

incorporated into the multiple logistic regression analysis. Maternal income was reported

on the 2014 NIS-Teen as: $0-$7500, $7501-$10000, $10001-$17500, $17501-$20000,

$20001-$25000, $25001-$30000, $30001-$35000, $35001-$40000, $40001-$50000,

$50001-$60000, $60001-$75000, and over $75000. Ethnicity was reported on the 2014

NIS-Teen as Hispanic, non-Hispanic White only, non-Hispanic Black only, and non-

Hispanic other + multiple race. Maternal education was reported on the 2014 NIS-Teen

as: less than 12 years education, 12 years of education, more than 12 years non-college

graduate, and college graduate. Maternal age was reported on the 2014 NIS-Teen as: less

than 34 years old, 35-44, and over 45 years. Lastly, HPV acceptance was reported on the

2014 NIS-Teen as Yes, No or I don’t know (CDC et al., 2015). The “I don’t know”

respondents were excluded from further analysis.

Additionally, there were other discrepancies from the use of this secondary data

as the NIS-Teen is a telephone survey and the results are weighted to be representative of

all children ages 19-35 months, and even with the statistical adjustments to account for

non-response and households without telephones, there may be some residual bias.

69

National estimates of vaccination coverage are precise, but state and local estimates

should be interpreted with caution because of limited sample size and widened

confidence intervals than for national estimates of vaccination coverage (CDC et al.,

2015).

The total sample, including the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico, contained

approximately 8.1 million telephone numbers (5.0 million landline and 3.1 million cell-

phone) and created household interviews for 38,703 teens (20,030 landline and 18,673

cell-phone), 21,057 of whom (11,353 landline and 9,704 cell-phone) had vaccine

provider data adequate to conclude whether the teen was current with the recommended

vaccination schedule (CDC et al., 2015). The NIS-Teen RDD telephone survey phase

used independent, quarterly samples of telephone numbers. Sampling frames for the NIS

were provided by Marketing Systems Group (MSG) and the target sample size of

completed interviews in each estimation area was designed to approximately achieve the

equal coefficient of 6.5% of the estimated vaccine coverage from provider reported

histories, given a true coverage parameter of 50% (CDC et al., 2015).

In order to best represent the general population, the 2014 NIS-Teen survey

weights for landline and cell-phone samples were combined in order to weight the full

population of teens aged 13 to 17 years. Teens that resided in landline-only households

(from the landline sample) and cell-phone-only households (from the cell-phone sample)

within the estimation areas were weighted to represent teens in landline-only and cell-

phone-only households. Additionally, because landline and cell-phone sampling frames

sometimes overlap in coverage of teens in landline and cell-phone dual-use households,

70

dual-users from both samples are combined based on the most effective number of teens

with completed household interview within each phone sample type (landline, cell-

phone), and were weighted to represent teens in dual-use households within each

estimation area. Lastly, teens who lived in houses without phones were excluded from the

dual-frame sample but were accounted for by using controls derived from combining the

2013 census population estimates and the public-use single year 2011 and the 2011-2013

American Community Survey (ACS) data for the United States and Puerto Rico. The

representation within the estimation areas was derived by using small area statistical

modeling techniques used by Blumberg et al. 2012. The modeled telephone estimates

were applied to the control total for the estimation area to approximate the control totals

by detailed telephone status within each estimation area. Additionally, sampling

variability was reduced, and precision of estimation was improved by trimming extreme

weights within an estimation area. RDD sampling weight values that surpassed the

median weight plus three times the interquartile range of the weights within an estimation

area were truncated to that threshold. This weight trimming prevented teens with

unusually large weights from having an unusually large effect on vaccination coverage

estimates (CDC et al., 2015).

Univariate Analysis

Descriptive Characteristics of the Sample Population

A total sample of 1295 respondents in the estimation areas of New York City,

New York (NYC) and Houston, Texas completed the 2014 NIS-Teen survey (NYC 522

and Houston 603). Of the 1,295 respondents, 170 responded that they did not know if the

71

teen had received any HPV vaccinations and were excluded from the analysis. Table 2-5

depict the sample sizes of the maternal SES variables that were evaluated in the study.

Table 2

Maternal Age

Age Groups Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

<= 34 YEARS 80 7.1 7.1 7.1

35 TO 44 YEARS 410 36.4 36.4 43.6

>= 45 YEARS 635 56.4 56.4 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

Table 3

Maternal Income

Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

$0 - $7500 35 3.1 3.1 3.1

$7501 - $10000 40 3.6 3.6 6.7

$10001 - $17500 74 6.6 6.6 13.2

$17501 - $20000 56 5.0 5.0 18.2

$20001 - $25000 58 5.2 5.2 23.4

$25001 - $30000 51 4.5 4.5 27.9

$30001 - $35000 38 3.4 3.4 31.3

$35001 - $40000 44 3.9 3.9 35.2

$40001 - $50000 55 4.9 4.9 40.1

$50001 - $60000 37 3.3 3.3 43.4

$60001 - $75000 60 5.3 5.3 48.7

$75001+ 436 38.8 38.8 87.5

DON'T KNOW 51 4.5 4.5 92.0

REFUSED 90 8.0 8.0 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

72

Table 4

Maternal Education

Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

LESS THAN 12 YEARS

213 18.9 18.9 18.9

12 YEARS 192 17.1 17.1 36.0

MORE THAN 12 YEARS, NON- COLLEGE GRAD

217 19.3 19.3 55.3

COLLEGE GRADUATE

503 44.7 44.7 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

Table 5

Ethnicity

Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

HISPANIC 352 31.3 31.3 31.3

NON-HISPANIC WHITE ONLY

409 36.4 36.4 67.6

NON-HISPANIC BLACK ONLY

231 20.5 20.5 88.2

NON-HISPANIC OTHER + MULTIPLE RACE

133 11.8 11.8 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

Tables 6-8 depict the sample sizes of HPV vaccine series uptake, the sample size of the

two communities sampled by the 2014 NIS-Teen survey and a summary depicting the

number of the males and females who received or did not receive the HPV vaccine.

73

Table 6

HPV Vaccine Series Uptake

Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

YES 610 54.2 54.2 54.2

NO 515 45.8 45.8 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

Table 7

Estimation Area Of Residence

Frequency Percent Valid

Percent Cumulative

Percent

NYC 522 46.4 46.4 46.4

Houston 603 53.6 53.6 100.0

Total 1125 100.0 100.0

Table 8

Gender of Child

HPV YES

HPV NO

Total

Male

257 289 546

47.1% 52.9% 100%

Female 353 226 579

61% 39% 100%

Total

610 515 1125

74

Bivariate Analysis

A bivariate analysis of the respondents’ four SES variables and uptake of the

HPV vaccine series revealed a significant finding related to ethnicity. The other three

variables, maternal age, maternal education, and maternal income were found to be non-

significant. The complete results of all bivariate analyses are shown in the following

tables. I conducted a bivariate Pearson χ2 test of the crosstabulation on the variables of

HPV vaccination uptake and maternal age. HPV uptake and maternal age were not

significantly related, Pearson χ2 (2, N = 1125) = .751, p = .69. For HPV uptake and

maternal education, I also conducted a bivariate Pearson χ2 test of cross tabulation of the

variables of HPV vaccination uptake and maternal education. HPV uptake and maternal

education were also showed no significant relationship Pearson χ2 (2, N = 1125) = 4.06,

p = .25. For HPV vaccination uptake and ethnicity, I conducted a bivariate Pearson χ2

test of the crosstabulation of the variables of HPV Vaccination Uptake and ethnicity.

There was a significant pattern of association between HPV uptake and ethnicity, Pearson

χ2 (2, N = 1125) = 8.37, p = .039. The results of the analysis showed that there was a

significant relationship between uptake of the HPV vaccine series and ethnicity of the

respondents living within the estimation areas analyzed in the study. Lastly, an

independent-samples t-test was conducted to evaluate HPV vaccine uptake and maternal

income. The test was non-significant, t(982) = -1.38, p = .17. The patterns of association

between HPV vaccine uptake and the maternal demographic variables are seen below in

Tables 9-12.

75

Table 9

Crosstabulation Ethnicity of Sample and HPV Vaccine Uptake

Ethnicity* HPV Uptake Yes NO

Total

Hispanic 213 (60.5%) 139 (39.5%) White 213

(52.1%) 196 (47.9%)

409 (36.4%)

Black 116 (50.2%)

115 (49.8%)

231 (20.5%)

Other 68 (51.1%)

65 48.9%

133 (11.8%)

Total Responses to Survey for Maternal Ethnicity

610 (54%)

515 (46%)

*Indicates p <.05

Table 10

Crosstabulation Maternal Age of Sample and HPV Vaccine Uptake

Maternal Age HPV Uptake Yes NO

Total

<= 34 YEARS

41 (51.2%)

39 (48.8%)

409 (36.4%)

35 TO 44 YEARS

218 (53.2)

192 (46.8)

231 (20.5%)

>= 45 YEARS

351

(55.3%) 284

(44.7%)

133

(11.8%)

Total Responses to Survey for Maternal

Age

610 (54%)

515 (46%)

76

Table 11

Crosstabulation Maternal Education of Sample and HPV Vaccine Uptake

Maternal Education HPV Uptake Yes NO

Total

LESS THAN 12 YEARS

123 (57.7%)

90 (42.3%)

213 (19%)

12 YEARS

97 (50.5%)

95 (49.5%)

192 (17%)

12 YEARS, NON- COLLEGE GRAD

109 (50.2%)

108 (49.%)

217 (19%)

COLLEGE GRADUATE 281

(55.9%) 222

(44.1%) 503

(45%)

Total Responses to Survey for Maternal

Education

610

(54%) 515

(46%)

77

Table 12

Crosstabulation Maternal Income and HPV Vaccine Uptake

Maternal Income

HPV Uptake

Yes No Total

$0 - $7500 20 (57.1%) 15 (42.9%) 35 (3.6%)

$7501 - $10000 19 (47.5%) 21 (52.5%) 40 (4.1%)

$10001 - $17500

54 (73%) 20 (27%) 74 (7.5%)

$17501 - $20000

32 (57.1%) 24 (42.9%) 56 (5.7%)

$20001 - $25000

32 (55.2%) 26 (44.8%) 58 (5.9%)

$25001 - $30000

28 (54.9%) 23 (45.1%) 51 (5.2%)

$30001 - $35000

18 (47.4) 20 (52.6%) 38 (3.9%)

$35001 - $40000

27 (61.4%) 17 (38.6%) 44 (4.5%)

$40001 - $50000

27 (49.1%) 28 (50.9%) 55 (5.6%)

$50001 - $60000

18 (48.6%) 19 (51.4%) 37 (3.8%)

$60001 - $75000

20 (33.3%) 40 (66.7%) 60 (6.1%)

$75001+ 245 (56.2) 191 (43.8%) 436 (44.3%)

Total Responses to Survey for Maternal Income

610

(54%) 515

(46%) 1125

(100%)

78

Logistic Regression Analysis

Multiple logistic regression was performed on all four variables simultaneously

to analyze the predictors for uptake of the HPV vaccine series in the cities of New York

City, New York and Houston, Texas. The parsimonious analysis of each predictor

variable corresponds with each of the research questions reviewed later in the analysis.

In addition, sex of the child (male/female) and city of residence (New York

City/Houston) were included as control variables. The outcome variable was ‘Ever

received any HPV Vaccinations (yes/no).’ The main goal of the logistic analysis was to

determine the role of several critical predictors in explaining the dichotomous outcome

(yes or no HPV vaccination). The critical predictors were: maternal education, maternal

income, maternal age, ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series. City of residence

and child sex were also included, as mentioned above. Linearity of the continuous

variables with respect to the logit of the dependent variable was assessed via the Box-

Tidwell (1962) procedure. Based on this assessment, the sole continuous independent

variable, maternal income was found to be linearly related to the logit of the dependent

variable. The model containing all four independent variables (maternal income,

maternal education, maternal age, and ethnicity) as well as the two control variables

(child sex and city of residence) was statistically significantly related to HPV

vaccination uptake (χ2(8) = 34.867, p = .0005.

Pseudo- R2 (Nagelkerke) was .047. Uptake of the HPV vaccine series was

correctly classified for 58.1% of cases by the combination of variables in the logistic

79

regression equation. Sensitivity was 73.33%, specificity was 39.63%, positive predictive

value was 59.64%, and negative predictive value was 55.00%. Of the six predictor

variables, two were statistically significant: ethnicity and child sex. Non-Hispanic

Whites, Non-Hispanic Blacks, and Non-Hispanic Others all had approximately half the

odds to of being vaccinated than Hispanics (as shown in Table 13). Difference in odds

ratio when comparing the racial groups indicated that an increase in one unit of the

independent variable (0 for Hispanic to 1 for White patients, for example) decreases the

odds of receiving the HPV vaccine series such that Whites were 1.535 times – Exp(B) -

less likely to receive the HPV vaccine series than Hispanics. The reason that the

comparison was seen as a decrease in odds of receiving the HPV vaccine series despite

the fact that the beta value was positive was that the designation of the outcome variable

was (arbitrarily) coded in the reverse direction, with the “yes HPV” category represented

by a lower number (‘1’) than the “no HPV” category (‘2’). When comparing Black teens

to Hispanic teens, the odds of Blacks receiving the vaccine were 1.799 less likely than

Hispanics to receive the vaccine, and teens who were identified as multi-race or “other”

were 1.796 times less likely than Hispanics to receive the vaccine.

Maternal Income, Maternal Education and Maternal age were not significant

predictors of uptake of the HPV vaccine series as their associations with the dependent

variable were non-significant Maternal income β = .013, p > .05, Maternal Age β = -

.096, p > .05, and Maternal Education, β = -.026, p > .05. City of residence was not a

significant predictor of HPV vaccination, β = .004, p > .05.

80

Child sex was a significant predictor of HPV vaccination, β = -.571, p > .0005.

Females were more likely (61 percent of females) than males (47 percent of males) to

have received the HPV vaccination. The designation of female in the dataset was 2 and

the designation of male was 1, which explains the negative beta coefficient for this result.

Table 13

Logistic Regression Results for Maternal Education, Maternal Age, Maternal

Race/Ethnicity, and Maternal Income as Predictors of Teens’ HPV Vaccine Series

Uptake

Predictor Variable B SE p Odds Ratio

95 % Confidence Intervals for Odds Ratio

Lower Upper Ethnicity

White .453 .194 .02 1.535 1.046 2.254 Black .534 .187 .004 1.799 1.239 2.612

Multi- race/ Other .509 .227 .025 1.796 1.141 2.827

Maternal Age -.096 .112 .387 .908 .730 1.130 Maternal Education -.026 .07 .734 .974 .839 1.132 Maternal Income .013 .024 .595 1.013 .966 1.062 City of Residence .004 .003 .170 1.004 .998 1.010 Child Sex -.571 .131 .0005 .565 .437 .730 Note: For the categorical variable “ethnicity,” Hispanic is the reference category. The outcome variable was coded as 1-yes, 2-no in the dataset; sex was coded 1-male, 2- female in the dataset.

Results

One logistic regression analysis was conducted that tested the specific

associations between the variables in the research questions and the outcome variable,

HPV vaccination. The results of the overall logistic regression are seen in Table 13. Each

81

component of the equation, corresponding to the individual research questions, is

presented below.

Research Question 1

Logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association between

maternal income and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females

13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York, and Houston,

Texas. The outcome variable of interest was uptake of the HPV vaccine series, and the

possible predictor variable was maternal income. The predictor variable, maternal income

was found to be non-significant β = .013, p > .05. Therefore, no statistically significant

association was found between maternal income and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in

adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City,

New York and Houston, Texas.

The null hypothesis that there is no association exists between maternal income

and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after

controlling for ethnicity and maternal age within the cities of New York City, New York,

and Houston, Texas could not be rejected.

Research Question 2

A logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association

between maternal education and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males

and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York and

Houston, Texas. The predictor variable, maternal education was found to be non-

significant β = -.026, p > .05. Therefore, no statistically significant association was found

82

between maternal education and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males

and females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York and

Houston, Texas.

The null hypothesis that there is no association exists between maternal education

and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 after

controlling for ethnicity and maternal age within the cities of New York City, New York

and Houston, Texas could not be rejected.

Research Question 3

A logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association

between maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and

females 13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York and

Houston, Texas. The predictor variable, maternal age was found to be non-significant β =

-.096, p > .05. Therefore, no statistically significant association was found between

maternal age and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-

17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

The null hypothesis that there is no association exists between maternal age and

uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities

of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas could not be rejected.

Research Question 4

A logistic regression analysis was conducted to investigate the association

between ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females

13-17 in communities within the cities of New York City, New York, and Houston,

83

Texas. The predictor variable, ethnicity was found to be significant: Non-Hispanic White

β = .429, p = .029, Non-Hispanic Black β = .587, p = .002, and Non-Hispanic Other β =

.586, p =.011. Therefore, the odds of Hispanic mothers reporting that their child had been

vaccinated were 1.535, 1.799, and 1.796 times that of Whites, African-Americans, and

those identified as multiracial or other race, was found between ethnicity and uptake of

the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in communities within the

cities of New York City, New York and Houston, Texas.

The null hypothesis that there is no association exists between ethnicity and

uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities

of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas was rejected. The evidenced

displayed in the above table suggested that the existence of a relationship between the

ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series was supported, hence rejecting the null

(Ho) hypothesis.

Summary

In summary, I presented the results of the 2014 NIS-Teen survey as it pertains to

uptake of the HPV vaccine series and maternal SES covariates. A total of 1125

respondents in the estimation areas of New York City, New York and Houston Texas

completed the survey. I used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationship

between the four variables of maternal income, maternal education, maternal age, and

ethnicity, and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 in

communities within the cities of New York City, New York and Houston, Texas. Based

on the results of the analysis, I found a statistically significant relationship between the

84

ethnicity and HPV vaccination uptake such that Hispanic teens were approximately twice

as likely to receive at least one dose of HPV vaccine series than teens from all other

ethnicities. The association between ethnicity and HPV vaccination uptake was

statistically significant; therefore, I rejected the null hypothesis. Bivariate analysis of

these variables also showed a relationship between ethnicity and HPV vaccination

uptake. Logistic regression analysis of the other three predictor variables (maternal

income, maternal education, and maternal age) resulted in a non-significant relationship;

therefore, I failed to reject the null hypotheses of these variables. In the next and final

section of the study, I discussed the findings of my research, their potential application to

professional practice, and the implications for social change.

85

Section 4: Application to Professional Practice and Implications for Social Change

Introduction

HPV vaccination coverage in the United States does not meet the Healthy People

2020 goals of an 80% vaccination rate. As a means to gather information that could

improve vaccination programs, I investigated the association between maternal SES

variables and uptake of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine in male and female

adolescents ages 13-17 within the estimation areas of New York City, New York, and

Houston, Texas. The study was designed to provide evidence about maternal SES factors

and their association with HPV vaccine series acceptance. I conducted an analysis of

secondary data from the 2014 NIS-Teen public-use survey dataset. The analysis of the

secondary data was done using SPSS version 21 where univariate, bivariate and

multivariate analyses were done.

Concise Summary of Findings

By analyzing the 2014 NIS-Teen data, I found that ethnicity was a significant

predictor of being vaccinated with the HPV vaccine series. HPV uptake and ethnicity

were found to be significantly related, Pearson χ2 (2, N = 1125) = 8.37, p = .039. The

results of the analysis showed a significant relationship between uptake of the HPV

vaccine series and the ethnicity of the respondents living within the analyzed estimation

areas. The odds of Hispanic mothers reporting that their child had been vaccinated were

1.535, 1.799, and 1.796 times that of Whites, African-Americans, and those identified as

multiracial or other race, respectively. Additionally, a child’s sex was a significant

86

predictor of HPV vaccination, β = -.571, p > .0005. Males had lower odds of being

vaccinated compared to females.

Interpretation of the Findings

Ethnicity

Ethnicity was associated with HPV vaccination uptake in the cities of New York

City, New York, and Houston, Texas. This evidence confirmed the findings of

Bednarczyk et al. (2014), who noted that Hispanic adolescents were consistently higher

in the initiation of the HPV vaccine. Additionally, Kumar & Whynes (2011) found that

ethnicity, childhood immunizations, and usage of preventive and primary care and

cervical screening were predictive of the uptake of the HPV vaccine. Lastly, Lechuga et

al. (2011) indicated that the predictors of HPV vaccine intentions varied by cultural group

and that culture moderated the influence of norms on intentions. The evidence discovered

through my research illustrates a need for additional research to more clearly explain and

find further evidence of the association of ethnicity and the initiation of the HPV

vaccination series in order to improve HPV vaccination initiation across all racial/ethnic

groups.

Maternal Age

Maternal age was not associated with HPV vaccination uptake in the cities of

New York City, New York, and Houston Texas. This non-significant maternal age

association with HPV vaccination uptake disconfirmed the findings of Watson-Jones et

al. (2012), who found that parents who refused vaccination of their daughters tended to

be older household members with less education. As there were not many studies in the

87

literature examining maternal age as a predictor for HPV vaccine uptake, my research

results indicate a need for further research to elucidate the association or lack thereof

between maternal age and HPV vaccine uptake.

Maternal Income

Maternal income was not associated with HPV vaccination uptake in the cities of

New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas. This non-significant maternal income

association with HPV vaccination uptake in my study disconfirms other research. For

example, Musto et al. (2013) found that the participant's neighborhood SES was related

to the likelihood of being HPV vaccinated. Additionally, Bednarczyk et al. (2014) found

that since 2008, adolescents living below the poverty level had higher HPV vaccination

initiation than adolescents above the poverty level. These previous studies showed an

association with maternal income not found in my study but also conflicting maternal

income associations in regards to level of SES. My research extends the knowledge of

maternal income as a possible predictor variable of HPV vaccine uptake and justifies

further research on this variable. As found in the above mentioned studies, maternal

income was found to be inconsistently related to levels of HPV vaccine uptake.

Maternal Education

Lastly, maternal education was not associated with HPV vaccination uptake in the

cities of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas. This non-significant

association between maternal education and HPV vaccine uptake disconfirms findings by

Dorell et al. (2014), who noted that females that delayed HPV vaccination tended to be

White, come from higher income homes, and have mothers with college degrees.

88

Similarly, Feiring et al. (2015) found an association between higher maternal education

and a lower probability of initiation of the vaccine series, whereas lower education was

associated with a higher likelihood of initiation of the vaccine series. Other studies,

however, suggested that a higher level of education was associated with increased uptake

of the HPV vaccine. Yu et al. (2016) found increased vaccine acceptability to be

associated with older daughters, higher income, and higher level of education. Cullen,

Stokley, and Markowitz (2014) also found that increasing parent education could increase

uptake of the HPV vaccine. My research disconfirms the overall association of maternal

education and HPV vaccine uptake found in these earlier studies. Based on these

contradictory findings in the literature, combined with my finding of a non-significant

association of maternal education and HPV uptake, I recommend further research to

expand knowledge about the role of maternal education as a predictor of HPV

vaccination uptake.

Conceptual Framework

Ethnicity, along with gender, age, personality, socioeconomics, and knowledge

can influence or moderate relationships between health beliefs and health behaviors

(Skinner et al., 2015). Applying the HBM to this study, I found evidence that ethnicity

was more associated with HPV vaccination uptake than the other SES variables

examined. According to the HBM constructs, the various sociodemographic variables of

age, sex, race, education or socioeconomic issues possibly moderate relationships

between health beliefs and health behaviors (Skinner et al., 2015). This concept seemed

consistent in my research as the modifying factor; ethnicity was a significant predictor of

89

HPV vaccine uptake. As this was a secondary data analysis, indirect analysis showed that

ethnicity could affect the perception of susceptibility to cervical cancer. More research is

necessary to directly test the perception of susceptibility to cervical cancer and the

potential moderation of the perception by ethnicity. According to (Skinner et al., 2015),

perceived susceptibility was a major component for the adoption of preventative health

behaviors. My study revealed that ethnicity was a significant factor predicting HPV

vaccination uptake in New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas. The effective use

of the HBM constructs during an HPV immunization program redesign could improve

HPV vaccination coverage across different ethnic groups and across different regions in

the United States. The effective tailoring of HBM construct-driven vaccination programs

towards communities and regions based on ethnic/racial cultural considerations and

barriers could provide a positive impact and enhance HPV vaccination coverage within

the broad range of diverse communities across the United States.

Limitations of the Study

The data used for this study was secondary data originally obtained as part of the

2014 NIS-Teen survey for immunization coverage estimates of 13-17-year-old adolescent

males and females in the United States. The findings of this study cannot be generalized

to the entire U.S. population as the study sample populations were only in the estimation

areas of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas and not adequate to be fully

representative of the entire U.S. population. Secondary data can create limitations to a

study as well, as the data were not originally collected for the purpose of this research.

Another limitation of the study was that it was based solely on parental recall and if the

90

teen received at least one HPV vaccination. This study did not analyze whether the

respondent’s teen completed the HPV vaccination series. Lastly, this study did not

analyze responses from participants’ vaccine providers to confirm the accuracy and recall

from the parents as compared to the actual vaccination records and to assure the accuracy

and precision of overall vaccination coverage estimate.

Recommendations

My current secondary data analysis only looked at two estimation areas in the

states of New York, and Texas. To be more comprehensive in the research process, other

estimation areas should be quantitatively researched to compare or provide additional

information about maternal SES variables in different regions. Additionally, as this was a

secondary data analysis, further research using an HPV vaccine tailored instrument

grounded in the HBM constructs to analyze parents and medical providers’ responses

regarding maternal SES variables and uptake of the HPV vaccine is recommended.

Another consideration for further research would be in-depth interviews and focus group

discussions to qualitatively analyze participants’ responses. Evidenced by the

contradictions in maternal SES associations in previous research, more research is

necessary to improve the knowledge of maternal SES associations and to minimize or

even eliminate some of the contradictions. Lastly, a study using mixed methods,

qualitative and quantitative with responses gathered by the primary researchers

examining the same maternal SES variables could provide more information that could

further advance the goals of this research.

91

Implications for Professional Practice and Social Change

The study has shown that ethnicity could have a positive or negative effect on

HPV vaccination uptake in New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas. My study

examined researchable modifying factors of the HBM via secondary data analysis to look

at factors that may influence HPV vaccination uptake in large metropolitan areas in

States with high levels of cervical cancer.

Professional Practice

This study provides valuable information gathered through the process of

secondary data research. In regards to professional practice, the findings from this study

could be used to develop and test strategies to improve the uptake of the HPV vaccine

series across the different racial/ethnic groups. The findings of this research could also be

used in the development or the enhancement of culturally-sensitive educational programs

for parents and adolescent teens for use by primary care practitioners. The evidence

found in this study could be used to target the evidenced-based predictors, such as

race/ethnicity as seen in my study in HPV vaccine series educational programs. Lastly,

the evidence found in this study could be used to enhance the knowledge of primary care

health providers about the importance of race/ethnicity sensitive education and literature

to improve the HPV vaccination uptake within their patient populations.

Implications for Research

Findings from this research study showed that future researchers should attempt

to expand the knowledge of the impact of ethnicity on the uptake of the HPV vaccine

series. The study results also indicated that future research should be performed to

92

improve the knowledge and strength of the relationship between ethnicity and uptake of

the HPV vaccine series and to also examine possible regional influences as my study

looked at two cities with different levels of per capita income in different locations in the

United States. These results provided information that can further advance the field of

HPV vaccination research. The study depicted secondary data analysis as a low cost,

effective means of testing relevant hypotheses concerning HPV vaccination uptake and as

a means to explore for associations that may act as facilitators or barriers to HPV

vaccination. This analysis should be repeated to analyze other regions or States in the

U.S. to test the hypotheses of this study. A strength of this study was it was a low-cost

analysis of a public-use secondary data collected annually to check immunization

coverage across the U.S. within the 58 selected geographical regions of the annual NIS.

Positive Social Change

The research was conducted to narrow the gap of previous research concerning

maternal SES variables and their association with uptake of the HPV vaccine series. In

this study, ethnicity was a significant predictor of uptake of the HPV vaccine series, and

more predictive than maternal education, maternal age, and maternal income. As of a

result of this research, this information could contribute to the improvement of HPV

vaccination programs aimed at increasing the coverage to meet the Healthy People 2020

goals. Using these findings to redesign, supplement or enhance HPV vaccination

programs could ultimately reduce overall morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in

the U.S.

93

Conclusion

The findings from this study revealed that: (a) there is an association between

ethnicity and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17

within the cities of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas, (b) there is not an

association between maternal income and uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent

males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City, New York, and Houston,

Texas, (c) there is not an association between maternal education and uptake of the HPV

vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities of New York City,

New York, and Houston, Texas, and (d) there is no association between maternal age and

uptake of the HPV vaccine series in adolescent males and females 13-17 within the cities

of New York City, New York, and Houston, Texas. Vaccination to prevent HPV

infection and subsequent cervical cancers should remain a public health priority, and

more research is necessary to further enhance the knowledge gaps in the uptake of the

HPV vaccine series associations within different communities in the U.S. Additionally,

based on conflicting evidence found in previous research, there is a need for more

research to decrease the contradictory evidence found in the literature on HPV

vaccination acceptance. Although there have been significant improvements in the

identification and treatment of cervical cancer, it is still a significant medical and

financial burden for those affected with the disease. Cervical cancer is much more costly

to treat than to prevent through the uptake of the HPV vaccine series. The evidence found

in the study could be used to potentially enhance educational programs designed to

improve vaccination rates, increase prevention, and reduce the overall incidence of

94

cervical cancer. The use of the results to enhance HPV vaccination programs have the

potential for positive social change by way of improving the lives of individuals,

families, and communities by increasing HPV vaccination and reducing cervical cancer

in the U.S.

95

References

American Cancer Society, Inc. (2014). What is cervical cancer? Retrieved July 23, 2016,

from http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cervicalcancer/detailedguide/cervical-cancer-

what-is-cervical-cancer

Apte, G., Pierre-Joseph, N., Vercruysse, J. L., & Perkins, R. B. (2015). Could poor

parental recall of HPV vaccination contribute to low vaccination rates? Clinical

Pediatrics, 54(10), 987–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922815590115

Attanasio, L., & McAlpine, D. (2014). Accuracy of parental reports of children’s HPV

vaccine status: implications for estimates of disparities, 2009-2010. Public Health

Reports (Washington, D.C.: 1974), 129(3), 237–244.

Bednarczyk, R. A., Curran, E. A., Orenstein, W. A., & Omer, S. B. (2014). Health

disparities in human papillomavirus vaccine coverage: Trends analysis from the

National Immunization Survey-Teen, 2008-2011. Clinical Infectious Diseases: An

Official Publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 58(2), 238–

241. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit707

Blackman, E., Thurman, N., Halliday, D., Butler, R., Francis, D., Joseph, M., … Ragin,

C. C. (2013). Multicenter study of human papillomavirus and the human

papillomavirus vaccine: Knowledge and attitudes among people of African

descent. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2013, 428582.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/428582

Bresse, X., Goergen, C., Prager, B., & Joura, E. (2014). Universal vaccination with the

quadrivalent HPV vaccine in Austria: Impact on virus circulation, public health

96

and cost-effectiveness analysis. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics &

Outcomes Research, 14(2), 269–281.

https://doi.org/10.1586/14737167.2014.881253

Brown, B., Blas, M. M., Heidari, O., Carcamo, C., & Halsey, N. A. (2013). Reported

changes in sexual behaviour and human papillomavirus knowledge in Peruvian

female sex workers following participation in a human papillomavirus vaccine

trial. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 24(7), 531–535.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0956462412473891

Btoush, R. M., Brown, D. R., Fogarty, S., & Carmody, D. P. (2015). Initiation of human

papillomavirus vaccination among predominantly minority female and male

adolescents at inner-city community health centers. American Journal of Public

Health, 105(11), 2388–2396. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302584

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2010). FDA licensure of bivalent human

papillomavirus vaccine (HPV2, Cervarix) for use in females and updated HPV

vaccination recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization

Practices (ACIP). Retrieved July 24, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5920a4.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). Recommendations on the use of

quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in males—Advisory Committee on

Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2011. Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6050a3.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). Vaccine information statement |

97

HPV Cervarix | VIS | CDC. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/vis/vis-statements/hpv-cervarix.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014a). Human papillomavirus

vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization

Practices (ACIP). Retrieved May 14, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/rr6305a1.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014b). STD Facts--Human papillomavirus

(HPV). Retrieved April 3, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/stdfact-

hpv.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015a). Human papillomavirus (HPV)

infection--2015 STD treatment guidelines. Retrieved January 3, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/hpv.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015b). National, regional, state, and

selected local area vaccination coverage among adolescents aged 13–17 years —

United States, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6429a3.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2015c). About the National Immunization

Surveys. Retrieved April 5, 2016, from http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-

managers/nis/about.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). NIS | About the National

Immunization Surveys | Vaccines | CDC. Retrieved July 19, 2016, from

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/imz-managers/nis/about.html

98

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and

Respiratory Diseases, & National Center for Health Statistics. (2015). 2014

National Immunization Survey - Teen.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Immunization and

Respiratory Diseases, & National Center for Health Statistics. (2015b). National

Immunization Survey-Teen A User’s Guide for the 2014 Public-Use Data File.

Retrieved from

ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/NIS/NIST

EENPUF14_DUG.pdf

Cowburn, S., Carlson, M., Lapidus, J., Heintzman, J., Bailey, S., & DeVoe, J. (2014).

Insurance continuity and human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in Oregon and

California federally qualified health centers. American Journal of Public Health,

104(9), e71–e79. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302007

Crowcroft, N. S., Hamid, J. S., Deeks, S. L., & Frank, J. (2012). Human papilloma virus

vaccination programs reduce health inequity in most scenarios: a simulation

study. BMC Public Health, 12, 935–935. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-

935

Cullen, K. A., Stokley, S., & Markowitz, L. E. (2014). Uptake of human papillomavirus

vaccine among adolescent males and females: Immunization Information System

sentinel sites, 2009-2012. Academic Pediatrics, 14(5), 497–504.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2014.03.005

Daniel-Ulloa, J., Gilbert, P. A., & Parker, E. A. (2016). Human papillomavirus

99

vaccination in the United States: Uneven uptake by gender, race/ethnicity, and

sexual orientation. American Journal of Public Health, 106(4), 746–747.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.303039

Department of Commerce. (2016a). Houston, Texas. Retrieved from

https://www.bea.gov/regional/bearfacts/pdf.cfm?fips=48225&areatype=48225&g

eotype=4

Department of Commerce. (2016b). Population estimates, July 1, 2015, (V2015).

Retrieved January 8, 2017, from

//www.census.gov/quickfacts/table/PST045215/3918000

Department of Commerce. (2017). NYCdata: Per Capita Income. Retrieved June 2, 2017,

from http://www.baruch.cuny.edu/nycdata/income-taxes/per_cap.htm

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3:A flexible

statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical

sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

Feiring, B., Laake, I., Molden, T., Cappelen, I., Håberg, S. E., Magnus, P., … Trogstad,

L. (2015). Do parental education and income matter? A nationwide register-based

study on HPV vaccine uptake in the school-based immunisation programme in

Norway. BMJ Open, 5(5), e006422. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-

006422

Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachimas, D. (2008). Research methods in the social sciences

(7th ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

Goldberg, D. S. (2014). The implications of fundamental cause theory for priority setting.

100

American Journal of Public Health, 104(10), 1839–1843.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302058

Green, S., & Salkind, N. J. (2014). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing

and understanding data (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Hariri, S., Dunne, E. F., Saraiya, M., Unger, E. R., & Markowitz, L. (2011). Human

Papillomavirus. In S. W. Roush & L. M. Baldy (Eds.), Manual for the

surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases (5th ed.). Atlanta, GA: Centers for

Disease Control and Prevention.

Harper, D. M., Irons, B. B., Alexander, N. M., Comes, J. C., Smith, M. S., Heutinck, M.

A., … Ahern, D. A. (2014). Quantifying the decisional satisfaction to accept or

reject the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: a preference for cervical cancer

prevention. Plos One, 9(2), e88493–e88493.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088493

Hechter, R. C., Chao, C., Sy, L. S., Ackerson, B. K., Slezak, J. M., Sidell, M. A., &

Jacobsen, S. J. (2013). Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in

adolescent boys and maternal utilization of preventive care and history of sexually

transmitted infections. American Journal of Public Health, 103(9), e63-68.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301495

Hofman, R., van Empelen, P., Vogel, I., Raat, H., van Ballegooijen, M., & Korfage, I. J.

(2013). Parental decisional strategies regarding HPV vaccination before media

debates: a focus group study. Journal of Health Communication, 18(7), 866–880.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.757390

101

IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 24.0 (Version 24).

Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Retrieved from http://www.ibm.com/support,

https://www-304.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21476197

Kumar, V. M., & Whynes, D. K. (2011). Explaining variation in the uptake of HPV

vaccination in England. BMC Public Health, 11, 172.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-172

Lechuga, J., Swain, G. R., & Weinhardt, L. S. (2011). The cross-cultural variation of

predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination intentions. Journal of Women’s

Health (2002), 20(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.1993

Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. (1995). Social conditions as fundamental causes of disease.

Journal of Health and Social Behavior, Spec No, 80–94.

Lu, P., Dorell, C., Yankey, D., Santibanez, T. A., & Singleton, J. A. (2012). A

comparison of parent and provider reported influenza vaccination status of

adolescents. Vaccine, 30(22), 3278–3285.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.03.015

Luque, J. S., Raychowdhury, S., & Weaver, M. (2012). Health care provider challenges

for reaching Hispanic immigrants with HPV vaccination in rural Georgia. Rural

and Remote Health, 12(2), 1975–1975.

Malkowski, J. (2014). Confessions of a pharmaceutical company: voice, narrative, and

gendered dialectics in the case of Gardasil. Health Communication, 29(1), 81–92.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2012.719178

McDonald, J. H. (2014). Multiple logistic regression - Handbook of Biological Statistics.

102

Retrieved January 28, 2017, from

http://www.biostathandbook.com/multiplelogistic.html

Millen, J. C., Ginde, A. A., Anderson, A. T., Fang, P., & Camargo, C. A. (2009).

Multicenter Study of Knowledge about Human Papilloma Virus and Attitudes

Among Emergency Department Patients. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent

Gynecology, 22(6), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2009.03.001

Moss, J. L., Feld, A. L., O’Malley, B., Entzel, P., Smith, J. S., Gilkey, M. B., & Brewer,

N. T. (2014). Opportunities for increasing human papillomavirus vaccine

provision in school health centers. The Journal of School Health, 84(6), 370–378.

https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12158

Musto, R., Siever, J. E., Johnston, J. C., Seidel, J., Rose, M. S., & McNeil, D. A. (2013).

Social Equity in Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: a natural experiment in

Calgary Canada. BMC Public Health, 13, 640. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-

13-640

National Institutes of Health. (2013). NIH Fact Sheets - Cervical Cancer. Retrieved April

11, 2016, from https://report.nih.gov/nihfactsheets/viewfactsheet.aspx?csid=76

Nettleman, M. D., & Garcia-Chen, V. (2013). Vaccinating Through a Lifetime: Adult

Priorities. South Dakota Medicine: The Journal of The South Dakota State

Medical Association, Spec no, 73–79.

NORC at the University of Chicago. (2016). National Immunization Survey (NIS) |

NORC.org. Retrieved October 9, 2016, from

http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/national-immunization-survey.aspx

103

Orji, R., Vassileva, J., & Mandryk, R. (2012). Towards an Effective Health Interventions

Design: An Extension of the Health Belief Model. Online Journal of Public

Health Informatics, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/ojphi.v4i3.4321

Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2013). Fundamental Cause Theory. In C. W. Cockerham

(Ed.), Medical Sociology on the Move: New Directions in Theory (pp. 105–125).

Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-

94-007-6193-3_6

Rahman, M., Laz, T. H., McGrath, C., & Berenson, A. B. (2014). Correlates of Human

Papillomavirus Vaccine Series Completion Among Young Adult Female

Initiators. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 10(8), 2163–2167.

https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.29633

Reagan-Steiner, S., Yankey, D., Jeyarajah, J., Elam-Evans, L. D., Singleton, J. A., Curtis,

C. R., … Stokley, S. (2015). National, Regional, State, and Selected Local Area

Vaccination Coverage Among Adolescents Aged 13-17 Years - United States,

2014 (pp. 784–792). Atlanta, United States: U.S. Center for Disease Control.

Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/healthcomplete/docview/17041

78569/abstract/7D6D3B944448470CPQ/3

Rosenstock, I. M. (1974). Historical Origins of the Health Belief Model. Health

Education Monographs, 2(4), 328–335.

https://doi.org/10.1177/109019817400200403

Ruiz, Á. M., Ruiz, J. E., Gavilanes, A. V., Eriksson, T., Lehtinen, M., Pérez, G., …

104

Haupt, R. M. (2012). Proximity of first sexual intercourse to menarche and risk of

high-grade cervical disease. The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 206(12), 1887–

1896. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jis612

Savoy, M. (2014). An opportunity for improvement: adolescent administration of the

human papillomavirus vaccine. Delaware Medical Journal, 86(2), 53–55.

Schmidt, S., & Parsons, H. M. (2014). Vaccination interest and trends in human

papillomavirus vaccine uptake in young adult women aged 18 to 26 years in the

United States: an analysis using the 2008-2012 National Health Interview Survey.

American Journal of Public Health, 104(5), 946–953.

https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301828

Schuler, C. L., Hanley, C. J., & Coyne-Beasley, T. (2014). Misconception: human

papillomavirus vaccine and infertility. Clinical Pediatrics, 53(2), 158–165.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0009922813504026

Skinner, C. S., Tiro, J., & Champion, V. L. (2015). The Health Belief Model. In K.

Glanz, B. K. Rimer, & K. Viswanath (Eds.), Health behavior: Theory, research,

and practice (5th ed., pp. 75–94). San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Smith, L. M., Brassard, P., Kwong, J. C., Deeks, S. L., Ellis, A. K., & Lévesque, L. E.

(2011). Factors associated with initiation and completion of the quadrivalent

human papillomavirus vaccine series in an Ontario cohort of grade 8 girls. BMC

Public Health, 11, 645–645. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-645

Smith, L. M., Kaufman, J. S., Strumpf, E. C., & Lévesque, L. E. (2015). Effect of human

papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on clinical indicators of sexual behaviour

105

among adolescent girls: the Ontario Grade 8 HPV Vaccine Cohort Study. CMAJ:

Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal De L’association Medicale

Canadienne, 187(2), E74–E81. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140900

Techakehakij, W., & Feldman, R. D. (2008). Cost-effectiveness of HPV vaccination

compared with Pap smear screening on a national scale: a literature review.

Vaccine, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.09.036

Trim, K., Nagji, N., Elit, L., Roy, K., Trim, K., Nagji, N., … Roy, K. (2011). Parental

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours towards Human Papillomavirus

Vaccination for Their Children: A Systematic Review from 2001 to 2011,

Parental Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviours towards Human Papillomavirus

Vaccination for Their Children: A Systematic Review from 2001 to 2011.

Obstetrics and Gynecology International, Obstetrics and Gynecology

International, 2012, 2012, e921236. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/921236,

10.1155/2012/921236

Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). (2015). Cervical Cancer Initiative (CCI) |

UICC. Retrieved December 3, 2015, from

http://www.uicc.org/programmes/cervical-cancer-initiative-cci/issue

U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2013). Press Announcements - FDA Approves

New Indication for Gardasil to Prevent Genital Warts in Men and Boys - Gardasil,

October 16, 2009 [WebContent]. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm187003.ht

m

106

Vanderpool, R. C., Van Meter Dressler, E., Stradtman, L. R., & Crosby, R. A. (2015).

Fatalistic Beliefs and Completion of the HPV Vaccination Series Among a

Sample of Young Appalachian Kentucky Women. The Journal of Rural Health :

Official Journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural

Health Care Association, 31(2), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12102

van Keulen, H. M., Otten, W., Ruiter, R. A. C., Fekkes, M., van Steenbergen, J.,

Dusseldorp, E., & Paulussen, T. W. G. M. (2013). Determinants of HPV

vaccination intentions among Dutch girls and their mothers: a cross-sectional

study. BMC Public Health, 13, 111–111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-

111

Watson-Jones, D., Tomlin, K., Remes, P., Baisley, K., Ponsiano, R., Soteli, S., … Hayes,

R. J. (2012). Reasons for Receiving or Not Receiving HPV Vaccination in

Primary Schoolgirls in Tanzania: A Case Control Study. PLOS ONE, 7(10),

e45231. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045231

Yu, Y., Xu, M., Sun, J., Li, R., Li, M., Wang, J., … Xu, A. (2016). Human

Papillomavirus Infection and Vaccination: Awareness and Knowledge of HPV

and Acceptability of HPV Vaccine among Mothers of Teenage Daughters in

Weihai, Shandong, China. PLOS ONE, 11(1), e0146741.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146741

Zimet, G. D., Rosberger, Z., Fisher, W. A., Perez, S., & Stupiansky, N. W. (2013).

Beliefs, behaviors and HPV vaccine: correcting the myths and the

misinformation. Preventive Medicine, 57(5), 414–418.

107

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.05.013

  • Walden University
  • ScholarWorks
    • 2018
  • Maternal Socioeconomic Status and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine Uptake
    • Shawn Lockett