sociology
Signature Assignment 2 – Critical Thinking and Communication Essay
Students will write an essay that is approximately three pages in length. They will upload this essay into Canvas. In this essay, students will use two middle-range theories to discuss and explain a social issue of their choice. Middle range theories are any theories from your text .
The essay should be in simplified MLA format and include: simple in-text citations where appropriate – i.e. (Chambliss and Eglitis 2019: 89); 12 point font, 1” margins, double spaced. Do not include a title page or a works cited page.
In their essay, students must do each of the following (related to critical thinking):
· Identify a social issue of interest from a recent newspaper article and briefly describe the issue (concept from rubric: inquiry)
· Compare and contrast two middle-range theories that relate to the selected social issue (concept from rubric: analysis)
· Critically evaluate the theories and explain which appears more plausible and why (concept from rubric: synthesis)
· Propose a coherent conclusion about the theories (concept from rubric: product).
Students must also do each of the following (related to communication):
· The essay must be grammatically correct with appropriate word choice, tone, and sentence structure.
· The student should use appropriate sources and documentation.
· The essay should be effectively organized with a logical order overall as well as being well-ordered within each section and having good transitions between sections.
· The essay should begin with an introduction that identifies the social issue and provides a brief outline for the essay.
· The body of the essay should focus on the application and critical examination of the theories to the social issue.
· The essay should end with a conclusion statement.
Critical Thinking Rubric for Signature Assignment 2
|
Point Value |
Detailed Description of Point Assessment |
Simple Explanation |
|
5 |
An essay scoring a 5 consistently demonstrates the following: · Inquiry: An exceptional examination of a matter through the interpretation of evidence, instructions, problems, tasks, etc. · Analysis: Identifies and presents exceptional explanations of complex analyses OR identifies and promotes novel or alternative problem-solving methods. · Synthesis: Identifies, organizes, and evaluates exceptional arguments OR presents well connected and holistically transformed ideas into original concepts. · Product: Follows the evidence to present unambiguous conclusions, solutions, and/or products OR transforms the evidence/takes an innovative approach to a task to present innovative and novel conclusions, solutions, and/or products.
|
Excellent |
|
4 |
An essay scoring a 4 demonstrates the following: · Inquiry: A thorough examination of a matter through the interpretation of evidence, instructions, problems, tasks, etc. · Analysis: Identifies and presents thorough explanations of complex analyses OR identifies novel or alternative problem-solving methods. · Synthesis: Identifies, organizes, and evaluates thorough arguments OR presents obviously connected ideas. · Product: Follows the evidence to present unambiguous conclusions, solutions, and/or products OR transforms the evidence/takes an innovative approach to a task to present innovative and novel conclusions, solutions, and/or products.
|
Good |
|
3 |
An essay scoring a 3 demonstrates the following: · Inquiry: An accurate examination of a matter through the interpretation of evidence, instructions, problems, tasks, etc. · Analysis: Identifies and presents accurate explanations of complex analyses OR identifies appropriate problem-solving methods. · Synthesis: Identifies, organizes, and evaluates accurate arguments OR presents connected ideas. · Product: Follows the evidence to present mostly unambiguous conclusions, solutions, and/or products OR effectively uses the evidence/effectively approaches a task to present conclusions, solutions, and/or products.
|
Competent |
|
2 |
An essay scoring a 2 demonstrates the following: · Inquiry: An incomplete examination of a matter through the interpretation of evidence, instructions, problems, tasks, etc. · Analysis: Identifies and presents incomplete explanations of complex analyses OR identifies inadequate problem-solving methods. · Synthesis: Identifies, organizes, and evaluates incomplete arguments OR presents weakly connected ideas. · Product: Somewhat follows the evidence to present unambiguous conclusions, solutions, and/or products OR somewhat uses the evidence/takes a somewhat effective approach to a task to present conclusions, solutions, and/or products.
|
Marginal |
|
1 |
An essay scoring a 1 demonstrates the following: · Inquiry: No examination of a matter through the interpretation of evidence, instructions, problems, tasks, etc. · Analysis: Does not identify or present explanations of complex analyses OR does not identify appropriate problem-solving methods.
|
Poor |
This rubric is from “General Education Competency Information including Rubrics 2012-2013” (Amarillo College).
Communication Rubric for Signature Assignment 2
|
Point Value |
Detailed Description of Point Assessment |
Simple Explanation |
|
5 |
An essay scoring a 5 demonstrates the following: · Focus: Includes all elements that build upon the thesis · Organization: Has an effectively creative pattern of development · Assignment’s Requirements: Enhances the assignment · Style: Has a flair for style with sustained grammatical accuracy
|
Excellent |
|
4 |
An essay scoring a 4 demonstrates the following: · Focus: Includes all elements that effectively support the thesis · Organization: Has a clear and consistent pattern of development · Assignment’s Requirements: Responds clearly to the assignment · Style: Has an effective style for the rhetorical situation with few interfering sentence-level errors
|
Good |
|
3 |
An essay scoring a 3 demonstrates the following: · Focus: Has a clear thesis but one or two digressive or unsupportive elements · Organization: Has a few minor problems (missing transition, short introduction and/or conclusion, etc.) · Assignment’s Requirements: Meets the assignment’s requirements · Style: Has an inconsistent style and/or sentence-level errors, but meaning is not compromised
|
Competent |
|
2 |
An essay scoring a 2 demonstrates the following: · Focus: Involves a missing thesis and/or insufficient support · Organization: Involves missing transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion · Assignment’s Requirements: Ignores several requirements · Style: Has an obstructive style and/or contains sentence-level errors that begin to hoard the reader’s attention
|
Marginal |
|
1 |
An essay scoring a 1 demonstrates the following: · Focus: Involves a missing thesis, no support, and/or plagiarized evidence · Organization: Rambles from one thing to another with no attempt at a consistent development · Assignment’s Requirements: Does not meet the majority of requirements · Style: Has an offensive style and/or includes sentence-level errors that are glaring throughout the paper and meaning is lost
|
Poor |
This rubric is from “General Education Competency Information including Rubrics 2012-2013” (Amarillo College).