Exam

profileag98
SHRMapproachesnmodels.pptx

Learning outcomes

Understand the key models supporting the strategic role of the HR function

Reflect on the skills, knowledge and experiences necessary to drive innovative and adaptive behaviours within professional contexts.

Critically discuss real world issues and their impact of people management and development strategies and practices.

Demonstrate competence in managing and leading the professional practice development of self and others.

Three approaches

2

What is Strategic HRM/PMD?

Developing and Implementing HR Strategies:

Alignment between the HR strategy, business strategy and culture achieves vertical and horizontal integration.

Three Resource-based HRM practices/strategies have emerged to support the integration:

Contingency (Best fit)

Universalistic (Best practice)

Configurational (Bundles of HRM practices)

Research these in your teams and explain to the class

3

Rees, G. and Smith, P. (2018) Strategic Human Resource Management. SAGE: London.

3

What is Strategic HRM/PMD?

(1) Best Practice Approach/Universalist:

“… is based on the assumption that there is a set of HRM best practices and that adopting them will inevitably lead to superior organisational performance.”

4

Armstrong, M. (2006) Human Resource Management Practice.

One set of HRM best practices

These inevitable lead to increased organisational performance

Equally applicable to each organisation regardless of the nature of the org

4

Best Practice 1: HRM ‘stakeholder’ Model (Harvard Model, Beer et al, 1985)

5

Situational Factors

Workforce characteristics Business Strategy and conditions Management philosophy Labour Market

Trade Unions Task technology Laws and societal values

Stakeholder Interests Shareholders Management Employee groups Government Community Unions

HRM Policy Choices

Employee influence

Human resource flow

Reward systems

Work systems

HRM outcomes

Commitment Competence Congruence Cost effectiveness

Long-term consequences

Individual well-being Organisational effectiveness Societal well-being

Positivist: clear directional flow and round

Beer M, Sector B, Lawrence, P, Quinn M.D., and Walton R, (1985) Human Resource Management: A General Manager’s perspective. Free Press: New York.

Called the stakeholder model because HRM strategy is shaped by stakeholders and the external situation they face

Employee influence - delegated levels of authority, responsibility, power

Human resource flow: recruitment, selection, placement, promotion, appraisal and assessment, promotion, termination,

5

Best Practice 1: HRM ‘stakeholder’ Model (Harvard Model, Beer et al, 1985)

Situational Factors

Work force characteristics Business Strategy and conditions Management philosophy Labour Market Unions Task technology Laws and societal values

Stakeholder Interests Shareholders Management Employee groups Government Community Unions

HRM Policy Choices

Employee influence

Human resource flow

Reward systems

Work systems

HRM outcomes

Commitment Competence Congruence Cost effectiveness

Long-term consequences

Individual well-being Organisational effectiveness Societal well-being

Implicit HR Policies

Flexibility

Selection Process

Appraisal

L&D

Reward

Employee Involvement

AMO:

Enhance ability

Motivate

Provide opportunities

Beer M, Sector B, Lawrence, P, Quinn M.D., and Walton R, (1985) Human Resource Management: A General Manager’s perspective. Free Press: New York.

Called the stakeholder model because HRM strategy is shaped by stakeholders and the external situation the face

Employee influence - delegated levels of authority, responsibility, power

Human resource flow: recruitment, selection, placement, promotion, appraisal and assessment, promotion, termination,

HR practices should be linked to organization goals and key stakeholders involved in decisions

Links to competitive advantage

6

Best Practice 2: The Human Equation

7

Pfeffer, J. (1994) Competitive Advantage through People Unleashing the Power of the Workforce. Harvard Business School Press: Boston. Rees, G. and Smith, P. (2018) Strategic Human Resource Management. SAGE: London. (pp. 83 – 84).

High Performance Management Practices

Employment security

Selective hiring and sophisticated selection

Training and L&D - extensive

Employee involvement

Self Managed teams

High compensation (dependent on performance)

Reduction of status differentials

Difficulty of imitation

Performance Results

Innovation

Flexibility

Customer Service

Productivity

Cost reduction

Sustained profitability

7

What is Strategic HRM?

Best Practice Approach/Universalist

Criticisms/critique (arguments against):

What works well in one organisation may not work well in others because it may not fit the other company’s strategy, culture, style, technology and working practices.

Organisational systems are highly idiosyncratic (unique) and must be tailored carefully to each firm’s individual situation to achieve optimum results.

Critical perspective …?

8

What is Strategic HRM?

Best Practice Approach/Universalist

On the other hand (counter arguments):

Knowledge of best practice can inform decisions on what practices are most likely to fit the needs of the organisation as long as it is understood why it is best practice.

Best practice might be more appropriate for identifying the principles underlying the choice of practices, as opposed to the practices themselves.

9

It just depends…

What is Strategic HRM?

(2) Best Fit Approach/Contingency

“Emphasises the importance of ensuring that HR strategies are appropriate to the circumstances of the organisation, including its culture, operational processes and external environments. There can be no universal prescriptions for HRM policies and processes.”

10

Armstrong, M. (2006) Human Resource Management Practice. Kogan Page: London.

HR practices should be in line with the context and circumstance of the organisation- culture, operations, external environment

No one size fits all approach

3 models: life cycle, competitive strategy and strategic configuartion (Armsrtong)

10

Systems theory and analysis

What is Strategic HRM?

Best Fit Approach/Contingency

Criticisms/critique (arguments against):

Organisations should be less concerned with best fit or best practice and be more sensitive to (1) modelling all the contingency variables, (2) the difficultly in showing their interconnection, and (3) the way in which changes in one variable have an impact on others (Purcell, 1999).

The best practice perspective does not consider for whom the practice may be considered ‘best’ (Boxall and Purcell, 2008).

11

What is Strategic HRM?

Best Fit Approach/Contingency

On the other hand (counter arguments):

The approach is flexible within the organisational context: culture, structure, technology and processes.

The approach can pick and mix ‘best practice’ ingredients, developing an approach aligned to the business needs.

12

What is Strategic HRM?

(3) Resource-based view (configurational)

RBV based on the ideas of Penrose (1959) is “an administrative organisation and a collection of productive resources”.

Developed by Hamel and Prahalad (1989): competitive advantage is obtained if a firm can obtain and develop human resources that enable it learn faster and apply its learning more effectively than its rivals.

Purcell (2003): the values and HR policies of an organisation constitute an important non-imitable resource.

The aim of RBV is to improve resource capability:

achieving strategic fit between resources and opportunities, and

obtaining added value from the effective deployment of resources.

13

The Resource-based view of SHRM

Changed the thinking from an ‘outside in’ approach to an ‘inside out’ approach. Focusing on the firm rather than the environment

Sustained competitive advantage stems from the acquisition and effective use of ‘bundles’ of distinctive resources that competitors cannot imitate.

This is achieved by developing HR strategies and policies which increase the resource capability of the organization by:

Ensuring that it has higher quality people than its competitors;

The unique intellectual capital possessed by the business is developed and nurtured;

Organisational learning is encouraged and

Organisation-specific values and a culture exist which (Purcell et al) “bind the organization together (and) gives it focus”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KN81_oYl1s

14

Farnham, D. (2010) Human Resource Management in context. CIPD: London. (p. 215).

Resource-based view of the firm

15

Adapted from: Barney, J.B. (1991) Firm Resources and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17: 99 – 120.

THE FIRM

Unique Resource

Immobile resource

Internal Resources

Valuable

Rare

Non imitable

Not substitutable

Outcome

Sustained competitive advantage

What is Strategic HRM?

Bundling RBV approach:

“Implicit in the notion of ‘bundle’ is the idea that practices within bundles are interrelated and internally consistent, and that ‘more is better’ with respect to the impact on performance, because of the overlapping and mutually reinforcing effect of multiple practices.”

16

MacDuffie, J.P. (1995) Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry. ILR Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800201

It ‘s all in the arrangement …

Competitive advantage comes from effectve use of bundles of resources which competitiors cannot imitate

HR practices which together complement and reinforce each other

Example: total reward

16

What is Strategic HRM?

Bundling approach/Configurational:

The aim of bundling is to achieve coherence.

Coherence exists when a set of mutually reinforcing HR policies and practices have been developed that jointly contribute to the attainment of the organisation’s strategies for matching resources to organisational needs, improving performance and quality and, in commercial enterprises, achieving competitive advantages.

17

MacDuffie, J.P. (1995) Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry. ILR Review. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399504800201

Synergy… ‘the whole is greater than the sum of the parts i.e. 1 + 1 + 1 = 5!!!!

What is Strategic HRM?

Bundling approach/Configurational:

Criticisms:

It is difficult to decide which is the best way to relate different practices together.

No evidence that one bundle is generally better than another.

18

What is Strategic HRM?

Bundling approach/Configurational:

On the other hand (counter arguments):

The approach can stimulate managers to adopt a unified, coherent manner rather than a disjointed approach based on some combination of best practice, accident and ad hoc response to outside pressures (Beer et al. 1984).

19

We started with the question …

What is strategic HRM? How does it contribute to organisational strategy and performance?

And now…?

If you now look back, how has SHRM contributed to people management and development?

20

20

So, strategy and HR strategy – is it formulated …?

Outside in … using

Porter’s positioning strategy for organisational level

Best fit/contingency type of SHRM

Or, inside out …?

Organisational approach to strategy: Resource-based view (RBV) of the Firm and its strategy (Penrose, 1959).

21

Penrose, E. T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. John Wiley: New York.

RBV

A basis for the competitive advantage of a firm lies primarily in the application of a bundle of valuable tangible or intangible resources at the firm's disposal.

Four empirical indicators (VRIN) of the potential of firm resources to generate sustained competitive advantage:

V = Valuable

R = Rare

I = Imperfectly imitable

N = (non) substitutability

If you now reflect on what you have learned, what do you know now?

What does your organisation want to achieve?

High commitment, high performance or high involvement (3 approaches)

How do we as HRM people want to achieve this?

3 different types of strategy (Best Practice, Best Fit, RBV)

What must we remember?

Integration

22

Strategic Role of the HR Function

Let’s consider some of the ‘typologies’ of HR functional roles

Storey’s (1992) strategic/tactical model

Ulrich’s (1997) ‘HR Champion’ model

Caldwell’s (2001) change matrix

Ulrich and Brockbank (2005) updated typology of HR roles

28/03/2021

Slide 23

CIPD: http://www.cipd.co.uk/cipd-hr-profession/profession-map/professional-areas/default.aspx (Accessed on 23.09.2013)

Research models

In your groups, research each of these models and present with a summary of each

How could we use these practically within HR?

How do these models help us to work more strategically?

Strategic Role of the HR Function

Strategic

Tactical

Non-Interventionary

Interventionary

Storey’s (1992) HR functional roles.

Examined 15 organisations

HR roles plotted on 2 axis

4 possible roles

Advisor: internal consultancy, advice to LM’s, not interventionary

Handmaiden: reactive to LM requests

Regulator: involved in development of employment rules and policy

Changemakers: strategic and interventionary, SHRM, management of change

Caldwell: advisor role most common: 80%

Changemaker 2nd most common role

25

Changemakers

Advisors

Regulators

Handmaidens

Strategic Role of the HR Function

Professor David Ulrich

 

Keynote address Human Asset 2011 summit.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hmpbVLYjoI

Who is Professor David Ulrich?

A university professor at Ross School of Business, University of Michigan.

Author, speaker, management coach, and management consultant.

Founding partner in the RBL Group, a global consulting organisation.

Ranked the #1 Management Educator & Guru by BusinessWeek, selected by Fast Company as one of the 10 most innovative and creative leaders, and named the most influential person in HR by HR Magazine for over three years.

26

Strategic Role of the HR Function

Future/Strategic Focus

Day-to-day Operational Focus

People

Processes

Ulrich’s (1997) typology of HR functional roles.

To make a real contribution to the organisation, all four roles need to be fulfilled- not necessarily by HR

Strategic partner: supports strategic direction of the organisation, design and development, improves productivity, facilitates mergers etc.

Admin expert: efficiency, meets needs of LM’s, demonstrates HR value

Employee champion: wellbeing, awareness of strategic issues

Change agent: manages change

Caldwell criticism: conflict between roles, less than 30% organisations have adopted this model according to CIPD

27

Strategic Partner

Change Agent

Admin Expert

Employee Champion

Strategic Role of the HR Function

HR Vision

HR Expertise

Incremental Change

Transformative Change

Caldwell (2001) HR functional roles.

Focus on HR role in managing change

Researched in-depth on the Change Agent role-Ulrich

Champion: high-level executive, leads transformational change

Synergist: senior internal or external HR professional- strategically coordinates and integrates large-scale change projects

Adapter: mid-level HR generalist- builds support for change

Consultant: specialists, internal or external- implements discrete change projects

Problems with synergist and consultant roles- HR expertise is becoming more fragmented

28

Champion

Adapter

Synergist

Consultant

Strategic Role of the HR Function

Ulrich and Brockbank’s (2005) typology of HR functional roles updated model.

5 core HR roles rather than 4

Combined strategic partner and change agent into one

Added 2 new: Human Capital Developer and HR Leader

Strategic partner: partners with Line managers to add value, manages change (previously strategic partner and change agent)

Functional expert: HR Professional knowledge (previously admin expert)

Employee advocate: employee relations focus, care for employees (previously employee champion)

Human capital developer: manages development of workforce for the future (new)

HR Leader: leads and values the HR function, best practice initiatives, role model, corporate governance (new)

29

HR leader

Human capital developer

Strategic partner

Functional expert

Employee advocate

Strategic HRM

KEY MESSAGES

CIPD Profession Map provides a framework for activities, knowledge and behaviours for the profession.

HR’s role in the contemporary organisation has developed piecemeal over time (Truss et, a., 2012).

Several models have emerged, most differentiate between the strategic and tactical role of HR.

Critical reflection: Which of the 4 models of HR roles, do you find most useful and why?

28/03/2021

Slide 30

Evolution of HRIS: from…to…

Administration (e.g. personnel details)

and transactional (e.g. payroll)

Recruitment & selection

Flexible reward systems

E-learning

Shared services

Self service

….and more

Impact:

Demand for evermore strategic HR Information

Devolution of HR activity to the line

HR supporting business strategy

Business says…..

This is where we are we going.

HR says….

This is who you will need and we know where & how to get them

How will we achieve performance? How will we ensure costs don’t become too great?

Our HRIS can support both

Exam practice

“With reference to contemporary examples critically evaluate the concept of strategic HRM.”

Instructions:

with reference to …”contemporary”...?

Critically evaluate …

What knowledge can you include?

What understanding can you demonstrate?

How can you show your ability to apply these?

28/03/2021

Slide 33