media Guided response withe certain reading assgined 900 + words
https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/2015/10/02/sherry-turkle-power-talking-face-
face/r6RFoy1LZBT4gIk2I0WJoK/story.html
Sherry Turkle on the power of talking
(face to face)
By Ethan Gilsdorf Globe Correspondent
October 02, 2015
“Who in this cafe is talking?”
Sherry Turkle looks around a trendy coffee shop in Downtown Crossing. The walls are
lined with old tomes, a thematic decorative touch, but the books aren’t meant to be read.
Aside from Turkle and a guest, one other couple is chatting. Most patrons are hunched
over laptops and smart phones, working, texting, or watching something on a screen.
“So, we’ve got four people talking,” she sighs. “Two groups of two. OK, that’s not very
good.”
Turkle, 67, professor of the Social Studies of Science and Technology at Massachusetts
Institute of Technology and a prolific author, wants to have a conversation. About
conversation — and why so few people seem interested in having, or are able to have,
that face-to-face anymore.
The crisis of conversation is at the heart of Turkle’s new book, “Reclaiming
Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age.” With it, she hopes to spark a
discussion about what we lose when we settle for fleeting texts, sound bites, and status
updates, instead of pursuing meaningful, nuanced human connection.
“I had a question. All these people were saying, I’d rather text than talk,” says Turkle.
“What happens if in business, in education, in romance, and child-rearing, you text rather
than talk?”
A sociologist and clinical psychologist, Turkle has studied the link between conversation
and empathy, and how conversation supports self-reflection. In her new book, out
Tuesday, she argues that our reliance on our devices endangers our ability to cultivate
friendships, raise healthy kids, nurture intimate relationships, succeed on the job, and
engage in civic discourse. “Fortunately, there was a flood of quantitative studies that
supported what I was saying.”
The Boston-based Turkle finished writing “Reclaiming Conversation” in New York
while she was on sabbatical. She has written several other books that explore, as she puts
it, the intersection of “technology and identity,” including “The Second Self,” “Life on
the Screen,” and “Alone Together.”
Telling stories of individuals, “Reclaiming Conversation” explores technology’s
insidious effects on chitchat. There’s the father who — estranged from his child —
accompanies her on a school field trip, only to spend it uploading photos and status
updates rather than engaging her in conversation. There’s the college sophomore who’s
terrified to apologize to her roommate in person. Instead, she “talks” to her using Google
Chat.
Then there’s Turkle’s own experience of how digital life affects her interactions with
students. She implores them to visit her during office hours, but they won’t. Instead, they
send e-mails. They think e-mail allows them to “ask the perfect question so I can give
them the perfect, more valuable answer,” says Turkle, who speaks slowly and
methodically, sometimes pausing for effect. Face to face, her feisty manner belies the
restrained tone of her book. “What am I supposed to do,” she continues, “sit there at my
machine trying to be perfect?”
She laments not only the “transactional” nature of communication, but the demise of
conversational give-and-take, its wrong turns and discoveries that build understanding.
She also tracks more subtle effects of technology.
“If I put my phone on the table,” she says, gesturing at an iPhone in front of her, “the
nature of the conversation will change.”
Discussion, she says, becomes more superficial. People will shy away from serious talk.
She cites a 2015 study by the Pew Research Center: 89 percent of all cellphone users
report taking out their phones during their most recent social interaction, and 82 percent
of them said it detracted from their conversations. But they did it anyway.
‘I had a question. All these people were saying I’d rather text than talk. What happens if
in business, in education, in romance, and child-rearing, you text rather than talk?’
hile there’s warning and weariness in her voice, she insists “the book is not anti-
technology. It’s pro-conversation.” And she welcomes all rebuttals. “I want to hear the
positive argument for robot dolls. I want to hear the positive argument for kids who don’t
have conversations with their parents.”
Which is not to say that Turkle is some cranky technophobe. “I’ll pit my iPhone against
anyone else’s,” she says. “I’m very ‘phone.’ ” She’s as susceptible to technology’s siren
song as the next person. But unlike most of us, Turkle is not willing to accept the way our
devices limit our communication.
Despite the evidence she’s compiled, Turkle insists the situation is not all doom and
gloom. The solution is simple: Talk to each other.
“It is time to make the course corrections,” she writes. “We have everything we need to
begin. We have each other.”