reservoir engineering
Report Assessment Rubric (Literature review):
|
CRITERIA |
High Distinction (80-100) |
Distinction (70-79) |
Credit (60-69) |
Pass (50-59) |
Fail (0-49) |
|
Understanding (40%) |
Insightful response that reflects a sophisticated interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
Response that reflects a good understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
Response that reflects an understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
Satisfactory response that reflects a basic understanding and interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
Response is unsatisfactory and does not show an understanding or interpretation of the literature reviewed. |
|
Use of evidence (20%) |
Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is well-integrated to enrich response. |
Analysis and evaluation of a range of relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. |
Analysis and evaluation of some relevant, reputable scholarly literature is used to support response. |
Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is present but limited. |
Reference to relevant, reputable scholarly literature is lacking or not evident. |
|
Structure and style (15%)
|
Logically organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows easily. Sophisticated and complex style appropriate for a literature review. |
Clearly organised introduction, body and conclusion that flows well. Style is appropriate for a literature review. |
Organised introduction, body and conclusion that generally flows well. Style is generally appropriate for a literature review. |
Contains introduction, body and conclusion. Style show a basic understanding of a literature review. |
Lacks appropriate structure and flow, and may be difficult to follow. Overall, style is inappropriate for a literature review. |
|
Technical skills (15%)
|
Uses varied and complex sentence structure. Almost error-free punctuation and grammar. A wide-range of highly appropriate vocabulary and discipline-specific terms. |
Uses varied sentence structure. Occasional errors in punctuation and grammar. A range of appropriate and accurate discipline-specific vocabulary. |
Produces mostly error free sentences. Infrequent errors in spelling and punctuation which do not impede understanding. Uses vocabulary and discipline-specific terms accurately. |
Produces sentences with some variety and accuracy. Errors in spelling, punctuation or grammar occasionally impede understanding. Mostly appropriate vocabulary and key discipline-specific terms. |
Produces sentences which are repetitive, simplistic, incomplete or run-on. Errors in grammar, spelling or punctuation that interfere with understanding. Limited/inappropriate vocabulary; discipline-specific terms misused/ missing. |
|
Referencing (10%) |
Citing and referencing in APA style is appropriate and accurate throughout |
Citing and referencing is generally appropriate and accurate. |
Some errors in citing and referencing may be present |
Citing and referencing is attempted, but with errors. |
Referencing is consistently inaccurate or not attempted
|
1
ENS5566 Literature Review rubrics