Adolescents and Pornography by Peter and Valkenburg
TutorRoseWilson
SexExplicitPornAdolescents.pdf
Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hjsr20
Download by: [24.90.139.136] Date: 20 May 2016, At: 05:39
The Journal of Sex Research
ISSN: 0022-4499 (Print) 1559-8519 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hjsr20
Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research
Jochen Peter & Patti M. Valkenburg
To cite this article: Jochen Peter & Patti M. Valkenburg (2016) Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research, The Journal of Sex Research, 53:4-5, 509-531, DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441
View supplementary material
Published online: 30 Mar 2016.
Submit your article to this journal
Article views: 191
View related articles
View Crossmark data
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SEX RESEARCH SPECIAL ISSUE
Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research
Jochen Peter and Patti M. Valkenburg Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam
The goal of this review was to systematize empirical research that was published in peer- reviewed English-language journals between 1995 and 2015 on the prevalence, predictors, and implications of adolescents’ use of pornography. This research showed that adolescents use pornography, but prevalence rates varied greatly. Adolescents who used pornography more frequently were male, at a more advanced pubertal stage, sensation seekers, and had weak or troubled family relations. Pornography use was associated with more permissive sexual atti- tudes and tended to be linked with stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. It also seemed to be related to the occurrence of sexual intercourse, greater experience with casual sex behavior, and more sexual aggression, both in terms of perpetration and victimization. The findings of this review need to be seen against the background of various methodological and theoretical shortcomings, as well as several biases in the literature, which currently precludes internally valid causal conclusions about effects of pornography on adolescents.
Due to the easy accessibility of pornography on the Internet for adolescents, along with concerns about potentially adverse ramifications (e.g., Davis, 2012; Dombrowski, Gischlar, & Durst, 2007; Mattebo, Larsson, Tydén, & Häggström-Nordin, 2013), empirical research on adolescents’ use of pornography has prolif- erated in recent years. Since 2005, more than 65 empiri- cal articles have appeared, with a peak of 11 articles in 2011. In response to this rapid increase in research on adolescents and pornography, several researchers have reviewed the field (Bloom & Hagedorn, 2015; Dombrowski et al., 2007; Owens, Behun, Manning, & Reid, 2012; Springate & Omar, 2013). However, the reviews have come to opposite conclusions, notably about the question of whether pornography is related to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. On the one hand, Dombrowski et al. (2007, p. 155) and Owens et al. (2012, p. 116) concluded that, except for sexual aggres- sion, there are no clear results about whether and to what extent pornography is associated with adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. On the other hand, two more recent reviews by Bloom and Hagedorn (2015, p. 88) and Springate and Omar (2013, p. 470), which dealt
with a somewhat smaller selection of the literature than Owens et al., observed that adolescents’ pornography use is negatively associated with their attitudes and behaviors.
Given these contradictory conclusions in existing reviews on pornography and adolescents, as well as the rapid increase of publications in the field, an up-to-date review seems timely and necessary. The first goal of our review is to give an encompassing account of the literature on pornography and adolescents from 1995 to 2015. Specifically, we revisit the question of the prevalence and predictors of adolescents’ use of pornography. Moreover, we investigate whether and to what extent pornography is related to adolescents’ sexual attitudes and beliefs, self- development, and sexual behavior. We chose the period 1995 to 2015 because only with the advent of the Internet in the mid-1990s did academic interest in adolescents and pornography become more widespread. Unlike earlier reviews, we pay systematic attention to methods of data gathering, study design, and sampling. In our view, the field as a whole, as well as specific results of the studies, can be evaluated meaningfully only when we consider the methodological characteristics of the studies. This is parti- cularly true for a field in which research is ethically con- strained by the protected status of its focal group, adolescents, and practically complicated by the sensitive character of its topic, pornography.
Correspondence should be addressed to Jochen Peter, Amsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 15793, 1001 NG Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
THE JOURNAL OF SEX RESEARCH, 53(4-5), 509–531, 2016 Copyright © The Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality ISSN: 0022-4499 print/1559-8519 online DOI: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1143441
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
The second goal of this review is to integrate the results of existing research in a recent theoretical model for media effects research. Previous reviews, valuable though they are, have tended to summarize the literature thematically rather than organize it theoretically. Specifically, the two dominant research lines—research on adolescents’ use of pornography and research on its implications—have either not been represented adequately or have been kept theoretically sepa- rate. However, recent theories in media effects research (e.g., Slater, 2007; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013) have empha- sized the need for more encompassing models to better understand when and how exposure to media content is related to individuals’ attitudes and behaviors. By integrat- ing findings about adolescents’ pornography use and its implications into one theoretical model, we will be able to not only systematize the literature from a theoretical point of view but also detect theoretical shortcomings to inspire future research.
In line with earlier literature (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d, pp. 1015–1016), we define pornography as professionally produced or user-generated pictures or videos (clips) intended to sexually arouse the viewer. These videos and pictures typi- cally depict sexual activities, such as masturbation and oral sex, as well as vaginal and anal penetration, in an unconcealed way, often with a close-up on genitals. Most pornography is currently accessed through the Internet, which is reflected in many studies in this review. However, we do not confine this review to Internet pornography to facilitate comparison with and extension of Owens et al.’s (2012) review, which is the most comprehensive review of the topic to date. In the Appendix (in the online supplemental material), we provide information on whether a study dealt with Internet pornogra- phy or pornography in other media. By adolescents we mean youth aged 10 to 17 (or samples of adolescents who are on average younger than 18 years of age). We chose 10 years of age as lower boundary because around this age puberty starts, which is typically accompanied by an enhanced interest in sexuality (Kail & Cavanaugh, 2010, p. 296). We limit this review to people younger than 18 years of age because, in the countries in which pornography is legal, pornography typically must be distributed or shown only to individuals who are 18 or older. Finally, as previous reviews have shown that the major- ity of studies on adolescents and pornography are quantitative- empirical (Bloom & Hagedorn, 2015; Owens et al., 2012), our review primarily deals with this type of studies. We, therefore, also chose a methodological orientation and theoretical setup that is best suited for quantitative-empirical studies. However, we compare the results of quantitative-empirical studies with those of qualitative-empirical research.
In the next two sections, we provide a rationale for the methodological characteristics of the studies that we center on and outline the theoretical model in which we try to embed research on adolescents’ pornography use and its implications. After explaining our procedure for selecting the literature, we first review the methodological character- istics of the various studies. Knowledge of the methodolo- gical state of the art of the field is crucial to assess the
validity of the results critically. Guided by our theoretical model, we subsequently summarize the findings on the prevalence and predictors of pornography use as well its relation with adolescents’ sexual attitudes, their sexual self- development (i.e., concepts related to the development of the sexual self, such as sexual uncertainty and sexual satis- faction), and sexual behavior. We then compare the aggre- gated results with the findings from qualitative research. The review concludes with a critical evaluation of the results and suggestions for future research. In various sections of the article, we organize the literature along the terms predictor and criterion variables. We use these terms in a statistical rather than in a causal sense: When one reports on a correla- tion between a predictor and a criterion variable, one can use the predictor to forecast the criterion variable, indepen- dent of causal considerations (e.g., Hayes, 2005).
Methodological Characteristics of Quantitative Research on Adolescents and Pornography
Because experimental research on adolescents’ use of por- nography is ethically not possible—it is usually illegal to show pornography to minors—researchers typically rely on surveys to study the issue, similar to research on other sensitive issues (e.g., Beebe, Harrison, Mcrae, Anderson, & Fulkerson, 1998; Owens et al., 2012). When reviewing survey-based research, at least three characteristics of such research are important as they relate directly to methodological problems in surveys on sen- sitive issues that endanger the validity and generalizability of the results (e.g., Bradburn, Sudman, & Wansink, 2004; Tourangeau & Yan, 2007).
The first characteristic of a survey that may endanger the validity and generalizability of its findings is the survey mode (e.g., face to face, telephone, or computer mediated) along with the administration of the question- naire (i.e., self-administered versus interviewer adminis- tered). Sensitive questions, such as questions about pornography use, are usually intrusive and involve a threat of disclosure (Tourangeau & Yan, 2007), certainly for adolescents who may feel uncomfortable revealing intimate issues, given their still developing sexual selves (Buzwell & Rosenthal, 1996; Peter & Valkenburg, 2011a). As a result, the accuracy of reporting may decrease, while item nonresponse may increase (Bradburn et al., 2004; Tourangeau & Yan, 2007). Research on the impact of the survey mode on the report- ing of sensitive behavior has shown that computer- mediated modes of surveys (e.g., audio-computer-assisted self-interviews or online surveys) elicit more accurate reporting than other modes of surveys (Mustanski, 2001; Tourangeau & Smith, 1996), also in surveys among ado- lescents (Beebe et al., 1998; Romer, 1997). Similarly, the accuracy of reporting is higher and item nonresponse is lower when a questionnaire is self-administered than when an interviewer administers the questionnaire (Mustanski, 2001; Tourangeau & Smith, 1996), also
PETER AND VALKENBURG
510
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
among adolescents (Romer, 1997). In this review, we therefore systematically compare the survey mode and the type of administration of the survey.
A second characteristic of a survey that may threaten the validity and generalizability of its results is the sampling procedure (i.e., random, quota, or convenience) along with the number of invited respondents who eventually partici- pate in a survey (i.e., response rate). This characteristic directly relates to the generalizability of the results and, while important to all types of surveys, is particularly rele- vant to sex-related surveys. Methodological research has documented various self-selection biases in research on sexual issues. Individuals who voluntarily participate in sex-related research are, for example, more sexually experi- enced, have more progressive sexual attitudes and greater sexual esteem, and tend to be sexual sensation seekers (e.g., Wiederman, 1993, 1999). Any survey that invites self-selec- tion (e.g., through invitation on Web sites) or has a low response rate may thus produce biased results. In this review, we therefore compare the sampling as well as the response rates of surveys. For panel surveys, we also com- pare attrition rates.
The third important characteristic of a survey is its design (i.e., cross-sectional versus longitudinal), along with the statistical techniques used for analysis of the data. Cross- sectional designs indicate whether, at a given point of time, pornography use is associated with a particular variable of interest. Longitudinal designs show not only whether, across at least two different points of time, pornography is asso- ciated with another variable but also what the temporal order between the two variables in the association is (i.e., whether one variable temporally precedes the other or whether the two are reciprocally related over time). However, although longitudinal designs have a higher inter- nal validity than cross-sectional ones, they still cannot rule out alternative explanations of a relation between pornogra- phy use and certain criterion variables with the same rigor as experimental designs can. It is therefore important to take into account the extent to which statistical analyses rule out alternative explanations, for example, through particular statistical techniques or the inclusion of control variables. In this review, we thus compare the design of the studies and the data analytical techniques, along with the inclusion of control variables.
An Integrative Approach to the Literature on Pornography and Adolescents
Social-scientific research on adolescents’ use of porno- graphy is multidisciplinary, spanning studies inspired, for instance, by developmental psychology (e.g., Bonino, Ciairano, Rabaglietti, & Cattelino, 2006; Doornwaard, van den Eijnden, Overbeek, & ter Bogt, 2015), commu- nication research (e.g., Lo & Wei, 2005; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a), and sexology (e.g., Chen, Leung, Chen, & Yang, 2013; To, Ngai, & Iu Kan, 2012). The
diverse disciplinary origin of the studies also shows in a diverse treatment of theory. Although it would be unjusti- fied to call the literature on adolescents’ pornography use atheoretical, it is important to note that a relatively large number of studies did not rely on established theoretical frameworks. In the studies that used established theoretical frameworks, the approaches chosen varied considerably. Researchers used, for example, the media practice model (e.g., Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b), the sexual behavior sequence (Chen et al., 2013; Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a, 2009a; To et al., 2012), social cogni- tive theory (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011b, 2011c; Ybarra, Mitchell, Hamburger, Diener-West, & Leaf, 2011), the theory of reasoned action (Hardy, Steelman, Coyne, & Ridge, 2013), social bonding theory, uses and gratification theory (Mesch, 2009; Mesch & Maman, 2009), the hedo- nic-valence model (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a), ego-iden- tity-status theory (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a), consistency theories (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a, 2010b), social com- parison theory (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009b), the sexual scripts approach (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b), and culti- vation theory (Weber, Quiring, & Daschmann, 2012).
Given the theoretical diversity in the field, it seems beneficial to organize a review of the literature within a theoretical framework that can parsimoniously accommo- date both research on predictors of adolescents’ pornogra- phy use and research on how this use is associated with certain criterion variables, such as sexual attitudes and behavior. Preferably, the framework should integrate approaches, such as the media practice model, the sexual behavior sequence, and social cognitive theory, which are used relatively often in research on adolescents’ use of pornography. Finally, the theoretical framework should help systematize existing research such that well-established knowledge, inconsistencies, and open questions become apparent in a theoretically meaningful way to inspire future research.
A theoretical framework that meets these requirements is the differential susceptibility to media effects model (DSMM; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). In line with other media effects theories (e.g., Anderson & Bushman, 2002; Slater, 2007), the DSMM integrates predictor and criterion variables of media use into one model and thus seems suitable for systematizing research on adolescents and por- nography. Moreover, the DSMM explicitly builds on theo- retical frameworks, such as the media practice model and social learning theory. Specifically, the DSMM puts forward four propositions that are also relevant to studies on adoles- cents and pornography.
The first proposition of the DSMM is that three types of variables (i.e., dispositional, developmental, and social) pre- dict media use (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). Although earlier reviews of the literature dealt with adolescents’ use of pornography (e.g., Bloom & Hagedorn, 2015), we still lack systematic knowledge about which types of adolescents expose themselves to pornography. In this review, we thus
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
511
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
compare dispositional, developmental, and social predictors of adolescents’ use of pornography.
The second proposition of the DSMM is that response states (i.e., state variables that originate from media use; Valkenburg & Peter, 2013) mediate the relationship between media use and criterion variables. These response states can be cognitive (i.e., the extent to which media users selectively attend to and invest cognitive effort to comprehend media content), emotional (i.e., all affectively valenced reactions to media content), and excitative (i.e., the degree of physiological arousal in response to media). While Owens et al. (2012) deliberately preclude indirect relationships from their review, theorizing on media effects has outlined the importance of underlying processes, and thus indirect relationships, for our understanding of how the use of media content may predict criterion variables (e.g., Anderson & Bushman, 2002). We therefore compare the various cognitive, emotional, and exci- tative mediator variables studied in the literature on adolescents and pornography.
The third proposition of the DSMM is that dispositional, developmental, and social variables may not only predict media use but also moderate the extent to which media use predicts criterion variables (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). Malamuth and colleagues (e.g., Malamuth, Addison, & Koss, 2000; Malamuth & Huppin, 2005) in particular have emphasized how important it is to take into account indivi- dual differences when studying pornography as a predictor of criterion variables of interest. The third proposition of the DSMM mirrors this emphasis. In this review, we therefore systematize and compare the various dispositional, develop- mental, and social moderator variables that have been stu- died in the literature.
The fourth and final proposition of the DSMM is that media use and criterion variables are related in a transac- tional way, that is, the notion that (changes in) criterion variables predicted by media use can themselves also pre- dict media use (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). Previous reviews of the literature have dealt with this notion only marginally. The media effects literature, however, has increasingly paid attention to transactional relations between media use and criterion variables because they seem to describe the implications of media use more realistically and validly than unidirectional and linear notions of media effects (Bandura, 2009; Slater, 2007). We therefore observe whether transactional relations between pornography use and criterion variables have been studied.
Method
We searched both Web of Science (SSCI database) and PsycINFO with the search terms (porn* AND adolescen*) OR (porn* AND teen*) OR (porn* AND youth) for empiri- cal studies on adolescents and pornography published in the period 1995 to 2015 (deadline December 15, 2015). In Web of Science, the search terms could appear in topic (i.e., title, abstract, author keywords, and keywords plus). In PsycINFO,
we searched the fields title, abstract, heading word, key concepts, and original title. We limited our search to peer- reviewed journal articles. We opted for journal articles because they are typically the main source for empirical studies and ensure some minimum of comparability. We chose peer-reviewed journals because peer review usually guarantees the basic academic quality of the articles.
Our search elicited initially 349 articles in Web of Science and 271 articles in PsycINFO. First, we checked whether an article was published in English. We included English-language articles only, because they are most easily accessible for most academics, which makes our review more transparent and verifiable. We thus excluded the fol- lowing articles: In the Web of Science selection, we removed eight in German, four in Spanish, two in French, one in Turkish, and one in Dutch; in the PsycINFO selec- tion, we excluded 13 in German, eight in Spanish, seven in French, four in Chinese, two in Japanese, two in Turkish, one in Czech, one in Italian, and one in Portuguese.
Next, we excluded articles according to one or more of the following criteria. First, we excluded articles that did not deal with adolescents who were between 10 and 17 years of age. When an article also included individuals who were younger than 10 and/or older than 17 years of age (or separate adult samples), the mean age of the (adolescent) sample had to be above 10 and below 18 for a study to be included; 113 articles in Web of Science and 43 articles in PsycINFO were excluded. Second, we excluded articles that did not present original empirical results: 31 articles in Web of Science and 49 articles in PsycINFO. Third, we excluded articles that focused exclusively on a special population of adolescents (e.g., delinquents, clinical samples): 14 articles in Web of Science and 17 articles in PsycINFO. Including these populations would introduce a confounding variable. Fourth, we excluded articles that did not substantially deal with adolescents’ pornography use: 115 articles in Web of Science and 66 articles in PsycINFO. Typically, such arti- cles had the term pornography only in the keywords but made no further substantial reference to it; focused only on issues such as child pornography or Internet addiction; or were content, discourse, or other types of text analyses. The set of articles resulting from our search was relatively simi- lar in Web of Science and PsycINFO, albeit larger in Web of Science. Therefore, we had an independent coder assess for 10% of the retrieved articles in Web of Science whether, according to our criteria, they had to be included in our review. The intercoder reliability was 100%.
Overall, 64 quantitative articles and nine qualitative articles qualified to be included in the review. However, when reading the included articles, we found references to two more quanti- tative studies that had not emerged in our search. We therefore also included a quantitative study by Lo, Neilan, Sun, and Chiang (1999; cited in Lo and Wei 2005) and a quantitative study by Vandenbosch and Eggermont (2013b; cited in Vanden Abeele, Campbell, Eggermont, and Roe, 2014). In total, we thus reviewed 75 studies, 66 quantitative (see Appendix in Supplementary online data) and nine qualitative
PETER AND VALKENBURG
512
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
studies (Abiala & Hernwall, 2013; Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015; Cameron et al., 2005; Kinsman, Nyanzi, & Pool, 2000; Lavoie, Robitaille, & Herbert, 2000; Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010; Marston & Lewis, 2014; Mattebo, Larsson, Tydén, Olsson, & Häggström-Nordin, 2012; Rothman, Kaczmarsky, Burke, Jansen, & Baughman, 2015).
Only two articles from our selection were published in the period 1995–1999 and only four in the period 2000–2004. In the period 2005–2009, however, the number of published articles rose to 20, and in the period between 2010 to 2014 to 41. In 2015 (until December 15), eight articles were pub- lished. Most of the quantitative and qualitative articles (n = 35) originated in Europe. Of these articles, 15 came from the Netherlands, seven from Sweden, five from Belgium, two from Greece, and one each from the Czech Republic, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, and Switzerland. One study drew on data from multiple European countries (Ševčíková, Šerek, Barbovschi, & Daneback, 2014). Sixteen articles origi- nated in Asia (six in Hong Kong, four in Taiwan, two in Korea, and one each in Cambodia, China, Malaysia, and Thailand). Fourteen articles came from the United States and one from Canada. Five studies were done in Africa (two in Ethiopia and one each in Morocco, Nigeria, and Uganda), and two articles each came from Australia and Israel.
With few exceptions (Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015; Bekele, Van Aken, & Dubas, 2011; Mattebo, Tydén, Häggström-Nordin, Nilsson, & Larsson, 2013; Odeyemi, Onajole, & Ogunowo, 2009; Skoog, Stattin, & Kerr, 2009; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013a), the articles focused on both male and female adolescents. Some articles dealt with early adolescents (e.g., Atwood et al., 2012; Ma & Shek, 2013; Shek & Ma, 2012a, 2012b); others centered on mid- dle (e.g., Skoog et al., 2009) or late adolescents (e.g., Chen et al., 2013; Flood, 2007; Luder et al., 2011; Weber et al., 2012). The majority of articles, however, focused on sam- ples of adolescents with a relatively wide age range, as the Appendix shows for the quantitative studies.
Several studies relied on the same samples. The same Dutch sample was used in the articles by Peter and Valkenburg (2006a, 2006b, 2007); another one in Peter and Valkenburg (2008a, 2008b, 2009a, 2009b, 2010a, 2010b); and a third in Peter and Valkenburg (2011b, 2011c, 2011d). Mitchell, Finkelhor, and Wolak (2003), Ybarra and Mitchell (2005) and Mitchell, Wolak, and Finkelhor (2007) relied on the same sample of U.S. adoles- cents (Youth Internet Safety Survey 1). Mitchell et al. (2007) and Wolak, Mitchell, and Finkelhor (2007) used the Youth Internet Safety Survey 2, while Jones, Mitchell, and Finkelhor (2012) combined the Youth Internet Safety Surveys 1 and 2 with the third version of that survey. Shek and Ma (2012a, 2012b, 2014) and Ma and Shek (2013) drew on one sample of adolescents in Hong Kong; and Mattebo, Tydén, et al. (2013) and Mattebo, Tydén, Häggström-Nordin, Nilsson, and Larsson (2014) based their work on one sample of adolescents in Sweden. Mesch (2009) and Mesch and Maman (2009) both used the 2004 National Israeli Youth Survey, while To et al.
(2012) and To, Iu Kan, and Ngai (2015) relied on the same sample of adolescents in Hong Kong. Finally, the studies by Doornwaard, van den Eijnden, et al. (2015) and by Doornwaard, Bickham, Rich, ter Bogt, and van den Eijnden (2015) relied on one sample of Dutch adolescents. Overall, our review is based on 49 genuine study samples for the quantitative studies and nine genuine samples for the qualitative studies.
We read the quantitative articles with a focus on the two goals of the review. If information that was necessary to address either of the two goals of our review was not men- tioned explicitly in the articles, we tried to derive this informa- tion from contextual information or references to other documents. To get insight into effect sizes, we calculated Cohen’s d (Cohen, 1988) for significant findings in multivari- ate analyses, provided that bivariate statistics, such as Pearson’s r or odds ratios, were also reported for these find- ings. It is important to note that the Cohen’s d values reported in this review present rough first approximations, as they are based only on the limited available statistics in the articles. They cannot replace formal meta-analytical computations of Cohen’s d. In line with conventions, we consider Cohen’s d values that range between 0.20 and 0.49 (equals r values between 0.10 and 0.24) small relations, values between 0.50 and 0.79 (equals r values between 0.25 and 0.37) intermediate relations, and values of 0.80 and above (equals r values of 0.38 and higher) strong relations. We read the qualitative articles with a focus on how their results compared with the findings of the quantitative articles.
Results
Methodological Characteristics of Quantitative Research on Adolescents and Pornography
The Appendix presents an overview of the quantitative- empirical research on adolescents and pornography published between 1995 and 2015 in peer-reviewed journal articles. As the Appendix shows, quantitative-empirical research on ado- lescents and pornography was exclusively based on surveys. In terms of the survey mode, the majority of studies used paper- and-pencil surveys (49%) or online surveys (20%). (These and the following figures were calculated on the basis of the number of genuine study samples.) In all, 12% of the studies relied on face-to-face surveys and 8% on telephone surveys, whereas computer-assisted self-interviews occurred only twice (in three articles, the survey mode was unclear). By far the most questionnaires were self-administered (73%), as opposed to interviewer administered (20%). Most self-administered questionnaires were completed at home or in a classroom or school setting. With three studies, the survey mode and admin- istration were unclear.
The majority of studies (59%) relied on a sample with some random component (typically at the first stage of sampling, for example, schools or households); 4% of the studies were based on quota samples, defined as samples in
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
513
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
which, based on official statistics, quotas for specific sample characteristics, such as age, biological sex, and educational level, were set before the data were gathered and targeted in the data collection. A total of 37% of the studies relied on convenience samples, defined as samples that did not have a random or quota element (e.g., when invitations are sent out to all visitors of a Web site). The sample sizes (defined on the basis of the respondents used for the analyses in a study) varied from N = 97 (Skoog et al., 2009) to N = 11,712 (Ševčíková et al., 2014), with a median size of N = 896. The average sample size was N = 1,498 with a standard devia- tion of 1,930, indicating great diversity in sample sizes. Response rates were reported in fewer than half of the studies and ranged between 10% (for parents; Hardy et al., 2013) and 98.7% (Mesch & Maman, 2009), with a median response rate of 82% and an average response rate of 74% (SD = 24.35). In the longitudinal studies, attrition was between 5% (Brown & L’Engle, 2009) and 46% (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a), with a median of 22% and an average attrition of 23% (SD = 11.80).
In terms of the design, 80% of the studies had a cross- sectional design and 20% had a longitudinal design; 64% of the articles relied on multiple ordinary least squares (OLS), logistic, or multinomial regression, and 21% used structural equation modeling (SEM). In addition, 15% of the articles presented results based exclusively on uni- or bivariate statistics. (The percentages for the statistical techniques used were calculated on the total number of quantitative articles.) As for the control variables, articles varied greatly, from controlling just for demographics (e.g., Bonino et al., 2006) to elaborate sets of control variables, encompassing demographic, personality, sexual, and Internet use variables (e.g., Luder et al., 2011). In articles based on cross-sectional designs, the diversity in substantive focus, samples, and statistical techniques made it difficult to identify a precise hierarchy of control variables used. However, it seems safe to say that demographics, Internet use–related variables (e.g., frequency, type, and location of use), and family- related variables (e.g., family structure, parental education, family relationships) were relatively often controlled for. In articles based on longitudinal designs, it was a common practice to control for previous levels of the criterion vari- able (i.e., autoregressive effects; see Appendix), with sev- eral studies controlling for, or including, additional variables in the analysis (Beyens, Vandenbosch, & Eggermont, 2015; Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2011b, 2011c, 2011d; Vandenbosch, 2015). When autoregressive effects were not investigated, either strong predictors of the criterion variable (i.e., general aggression rather than sexual aggression; Ybarra et al., 2011) were part of the model or it was impossible to control for previous levels of a criterion variable (i.e., sexual initiation; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b).
Conclusion: Dominance of Self-Administered Questionnaires and Cross-Sectional Designs. The vast majority of studies on adolescents and pornography followed
insights from survey research and used paper-and-pencil or online surveys with self-administered questionnaires. Nearly two-thirds of the studies (63%) relied on samples with some random or a quota component. The response rates were relatively high, probably because many studies were conducted in a school setting, but this figure is based on limited information. Attrition rates in longitudinal surveys were also relatively high.
Overall, then, some cautious generalization on the basis of the aggregate results seems possible. In terms of design, however, the dominance of cross-sectional designs, along with the correlational character of the longitudinal designs, asks for caution in drawing causal conclusions. This point seems even more important given the recent controversy (e.g., Brown, 2011; Steinberg & Monahan, 2011) about whether regression-based analyses, which dominate research on adolescents and pornography, should be replaced with propensity score analysis as it better accounts for differences in factors that make adolescents use porno- graphy differentially.
Prevalence of Adolescents’ Use of Pornography
Adolescents’ use of pornography has been assessed in the studies by focusing on (a) unintentional use, (b) inten- tional use, and (c) any use of pornography (i.e., not distin- guishing between unintentional and intentional use). Table 1 shows the prevalence of adolescents’ pornography use in the various studies in which it was reported. Adolescents’ unintentional use of pornography has typically been studied as unwanted (e.g., Mitchell et al., 2003; Wolak et al., 2007) or accidental (e.g., Flood, 2007; Tsaliki, 2011) exposure to Internet pornography. This type of exposure may occur, for example, through opening unsolicited messages or receiving spam e-mails (Chen et al., 2013; Mitchell et al., 2003), mistyping Web site addresses, searching for terms that have a sexual and a nonsexual meaning (Flood, 2007), or accidentally accessing pop-up images and advertisements (Chen et al., 2013; Ševčíková et al., 2014). Prevalence rates for unintentional exposure to Internet pornography ranged from 19% found among 10- to 12-year-olds in the United States (Mitchell et al., 2007) to 60% among Australian girls and 84% among Australian boys aged 16 to 17 (Flood, 2007); and rates seem to have dropped in recent years, at least in the United States (Jones et al., 2012). The most recent studies found that 41% of Taiwanese adolescents had been unintentionally exposed to Internet pornography (Chen et al., 2013), while 68% of adolescents in the United States had ever unintentionally encountered pornography (Hardy et al., 2013).
Adolescents’ intentional use of pornography has usually been studied as deliberate (e.g., Luder et al., 2011), purpo- seful (e.g., Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a) exposure to porno- graphic content, often involving active search for the material (Tsaliki, 2011). Prevalence rates of intentional exposure to pornography also varied greatly. While Ybarra and Mitchell (2005) found only 7% of 10- to 17-year-olds in
PETER AND VALKENBURG
514
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
the United States to be intentional users of pornography in traditional media (8% on the Internet), Chen et al. (2013) reported that 59% of Taiwanese 10- through 12th-grade students had intentionally used Internet pornography in the past year.
Investigations that dealt with any pornography use of adolescents without distinguishing between intentional and unintentional exposure to pornography also came to diver- ging results. Prevalence rates ranged between less than 7% (exposure to pornography; Dong, Cao, Cheng, Cui, & Li, 2013; pornography use on Internet and in traditional media in past year; Shek & Ma, 2012a) to 71% (use of Internet pornography in the past year; Chen et al., 2013). Weber et al. (2012) found that 93% boys and 52% girls aged 16 to 19 had watched a pornographic movie in the six months prior to survey. Prevalence rates for lifetime exposure to pornography ranged from 25% among Taiwanese adoles- cents (Internet pornography; Cheng, Ma, & Missari, 2014) to 98% among German boys and 81% among German girls (pornographic movie; Weber et al., 2012).
Nearly all studies to date have focused on one-time measurements of adolescents’ pornography use, thereby neglecting how this use may develop over time. Addressing this research gap, Doornwaard, van den Eijnden, et al. (2015) recently studied the trajectories that adolescents’ use of Internet pornography followed. They found four trajectories of pornography use for boys: a non- use or infrequent use trajectory; a trajectory in which por- nography strongly increased; a trajectory of occasional use; and a trajectory of decreasing use. Three trajectories of pornography use emerged for girls: a stable nonuse or infrequent use trajectory; a strongly increasing use trajec- tory; and a stable occasional use trajectory.
Conclusion: Adolescents Use Pornography, But Prevalence Rates Differ Greatly. Findings about the prevalence of adolescents’ use of pornography differ greatly, regardless of whether the studies dealt with unintentional, intentional, or any use of pornography. The studies suggest that at least a sizable minority of all adolescents use pornography, but exact aggregate figures about adolescents’ pornography use seem difficult to derive from the literature.
The diversity of findings about the prevalence of adoles- cents’ pornography use has at least three reasons. First, as Table 1 and the Appendix indicate, the studies vary metho- dologically, notably in terms of sampling method, sample size, sample composition, survey mode/administration, and operationalization of pornography use. As a result, many figures about pornography may be specific to the particular study and difficult to compare across investigations. Second, in the period from 1995 to 2015, which we reviewed here, the Internet has undergone dramatic changes—and with it adolescents’ access to Internet pornography. A finding that was valid in the early 2000s may thus no longer be up to date today. Third and finally, while a clear pattern is not discernible in the studies reviewed, the cultural context
(e.g., sex education, sexual liberalism) of studies is likely to affect how often adolescents (report to) use pornography. How these three factors—methodological differences, tech- nological changes, and cultural context—influence the pre- valence of adolescents’ pornography use needs systematic attention in future studies. Currently, we cannot preclude that any conclusion about prevalence rates of adolescents’ exposure to pornography is confounded by at least the three factors just mentioned.
Predictors of Adolescents’ Pornography Use
Predictors of adolescents’ pornography use refer to the variables that forecast which specific adolescents use porno- graphy. In what we identified as a predictor, we followed the focus and conceptualization in the particular study. To reduce the risk of spurious findings, we do not report results of bivariate analyses and focus instead only on results of multivariate analyses. For longitudinal studies, we report results from models with two variables only when autore- gressive effects were included (i.e., controlling for previous values of the criterion variable).
In what follows, we do not include the predictors of adolescents’ unintentional use of pornography that have been studied in the literature. It is logically questionable whether an activity that involves a chance component will vary systematically among adolescents. In addition, it is unclear whether a positive answer to a question about unin- tentional exposure is just a way to circumvent socially undesirable answers to a question about intentional expo- sure. Finally, in the conceptualization of unintentional expo- sure, the literature has not sufficiently explicated whether, after an inadvertent initial contact, exposure ceases to be unintentional. After all, if adolescents decide to continue watching the pornographic material encountered, it is diffi- cult to see how this continued exposure remains inadvertent or accidental.
The first proposition of the DSMM (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013) is that media use is predicted by dispositional, devel- opmental, and social variables. In terms of dispositional predictors of pornography use, five groups of variables have been investigated (excluding studies on unintentional use): demographics, personality characteristics, norm- related variables, sexual interest, and Internet behavior. As for demographics, many studies have shown that male ado- lescents used pornography more often than female adoles- cents did (Holt, Bossler, & May, 2012; Lo et al., 1999; Lo & Wei, 2005; Mesch, 2009; Mesch & Maman, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a, 2011d; Ševčíková et al., 2014; Shek & Ma, 2012a; Tsitsika et al., 2009; Wolak et al., 2007; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005). A recent cross-nationally comparative study in European Union countries, however, has pointed out that sex differences in the use of pornography are less distinct in more liberal countries than in less liberal coun- tries (Ševčíková et al., 2014). Vandenbosch (2015) found no sex differences in Dutch adolescents’ exposure to affection-, dominance-, or violence-themed Internet pornography. Bi-
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
515
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
T a b le
1 .
O p er a ti o n a li za ti o n a n d P re va le n ce
o f A d o le sc en ts ’ P o rn o g ra p h y U se
(U n in te n ti o n a l, In te n ti o n a l, A n y)
(O n ly
S tu d ie s T h a t R ep o rt ed
P re va le n ce )
A u th o r( s) , Y ea r P u b li sh ed ,
C o u n tr y
O p er a ti o n a li za ti o n o f P o rn o g ra p h y U se
P re v a le n ce
U n in te n ti o n a l
P re v a le n ce
In te n ti o n a l
P re v a le n ce
A n y
C o w an
& C am
p b el l, 1 9 9 5 ,
U n it ed
S ta te s
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h ic
v id eo
(a ) ev er
an d (b ) h o w
o ft en
(a ) 8 3 %
b o y s, 4 8 %
g ir ls ; (b ) 3 0 %
b o y s, 1 0 %
g ir ls at
le as t o n ce
a m o n th
L o et
al ., 1 9 9 9 , T ai w an
P o rn o g ra p h y u se
o n co m p u te rs an d p ri n t m ed ia at le as t o n ce
o r tw ic e a y ea r
2 3 %
(c o m p u te rs ) to
4 6 %
(p o rn
co m ic s)
K im
, 2 0 0 1 , K o re a
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h ic
fi lm
o n In te rn et
4 3 %
M it ch el l et
al ., 2 0 0 3 , U n it ed
S ta te s
E x p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
2 5 %
L o &
W ei , 2 0 0 5 , T ai w an
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y at
le as t o n ce
o r tw ic e a y ea r
3 8 %
Y b ar ra
& M it ch el l, 2 0 0 5 , U n it ed
S ta te s
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h y o n (a ) In te rn et
o r (b ) in
tr ad it io n al
m ed ia
in p re v io u s y ea r
(a ) 8 % ; (b ) 7 %
B o n in o et
al ., 2 0 0 6 , It al y
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h y in
co m ic s/ m ag az in es
o r fi lm
s/ v id eo s in
p as t si x m o n th s
3 6 %
P et er
& V al k en b u rg , 2 0 0 6 a,
N et h er la n d s
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s
5 5 %
(7 1 %
b o y s; 4 0 %
g ir ls )
F lo o d , 2 0 0 7 , A u st ra li a
E x p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
8 4 %
b o y s; 6 0 %
g ir ls
3 8 %
b o y s; 2 %
g ir ls
M it ch el l et
al ., 2 0 0 7 , U n it ed
S ta te s
E x p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t y ea r
1 0 - to
1 2 -y ea r- o ld s: 1 9 % ; 1 3 - to
1 5 -
y ea r- o ld s: 3 5 % ; 1 6 - to
1 7 -y ea r-
o ld s: 4 4 %
W o la k et
al ., 2 0 0 7 , U n it ed
S ta te s
E x p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t y ea r
6 6 %
3 4 %
P et er
& V al k en b u rg , 2 0 0 8 b ,
N et h er la n d s
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s (h er e:
p ic tu re s w it h p eo p le
h av in g se x )
2 8 %
b o y s; 3 %
g ir ls
B ro w n &
L ’E n g le , 2 0 0 9 , U n it ed
S ta te s
U se
o f se x u al ly
ex p li ci t m ed ia
(X -r at ed
m o v ie s, er o ti c an d
p o rn o g ra p h ic
m ag az in es , p ic tu re s o f n ak ed
p eo p le
o n
co m p u te r)
5 3 %
b o y s; 2 8 %
g ir ls
M es ch , 2 0 0 9 ; M es ch
& H am
an ,
2 0 0 9 , Is ra el
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
1 6 %
[1 5 % ] (v er y ) fr eq u en t u se
2 0 0 1
[2 0 0 4 ]
O d ey em
i et
al ., 2 0 0 9 , N ig er ia
W at ch in g p o rn o g ra p h ic
fi lm
s 3 6 %
g ir ls
S k o o g et
al ., 2 0 0 9 , S w ed en
D o w n lo ad in g an d w at ch in g In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y (b o y s
o n ly )
1 8 %
T si ts ik a et
al ., 2 0 0 9 , G re ec e
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t m o n th
2 4 %
B le ak le y,
H en n es sy , &
F is h b ei n ,
2 0 11 , U n it ed
S ta te s
S ee k in g p o rn o g ra p h y fr o m
In te rn et
si te s
2 6 %
(4 0 %
b o y s; 1 3 %
g ir ls )
H äg g st rö m -N
o rd in , B o rn es k o g ,
E ri k ss o n ,&
T y d én , 2 0 11 ,
S w ed en
R ea d in g o r w at ch in g p o rn o g ra p h y (e v er )
9 5 %
b o y s; 5 0 %
g ir ls
H as k in g et
al ., 2 0 11 , A u st ra li a
P u rc h as ed
p o rn o g ra p h ic
m at er ia l u n d er
ag e 1 8
1 6 %
(3 0 %
b o y s; 4 %
g ir ls )
K im
, 2 0 11 , K o re a
V ie w in g p o rn o g ra p h y
4 7 %
L u d er
et al ., 2 0 11 , S w it ze rl an d
D el ib er at e an d u n w an te d u se
o f In te rn et p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t
3 0 d ay s
4 7 %
b o y s; 3 5 %
g ir ls
2 9 %
b o y s; 1 %
g ir ls
P et er
& V al k en b u rg , 2 0 11 a,
N et h er la n d s
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s (h er e:
p o rn o g ra p h ic
v id eo s)
2 0 %
T sa li k i, 2 0 11 , G re ec e
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h y
4 4 % /2 8 %
1 5 -1 8 y ea r- o ld
b o y s/ g ir ls ;
4 0 % /2 7 %
o f 1 0 -1 4 y ea r- o ld
b o y s/ g ir ls
5 7 % /1 1 %
o f 1 5 -1 8 y ea r- o ld
b o y s/
g ir ls ; 1 3 % /4 %
o f 1 0 -1 4 y ea r- o ld
b o y s/ g ir ls
PETER AND VALKENBURG
516
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
Y b ar ra
et al ., 2 0 11 , U n it ed
S ta te s
U se
o f (v io le n t) p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t 1 2 m o n th s
P o rn o g ra p h y : 1 9 %
(T 1 ), 2 7 %
(T 2 ),
2 2 %
(T 3 );
v io le n t p o rn o g ra p h y (a v er ag es ):
1 %
m ag az in es ; 1 %
o n li n e;
3 %
m o v ie s
Jo n es
et al ., 2 0 1 2 , U n it ed
S ta te s
U n w an te d ex p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
2 0 0 0 : 3 5 % ; 2 0 0 5 : 3 4 % ; 2 0 1 0 : 2 3 %
S h ek
& M a,
2 0 1 2 a,
H o n g K o n g
P o rn o g ra p h y u se
(I n te rn et
an d tr ad it io n al
m ed ia , su ch
as re n ta l m o v ie s, m ag az in es ) in
p as t y ea r
< 7 %
S h ek
& M a,
2 0 1 2 b , H o n g K o n g
P o rn o g ra p h y u se
(I n te rn et
an d tr ad it io n al
m ed ia , su ch
as re n ta l m o v ie s, m ag az in es ) in
p as t y ea r
< 1 2 %
T o et
al ., 2 0 1 2 , H o n g K o n g
U se
o f se x u al ly
ex p li ci t o n li n e m at er ia l p as t y ea r
4 4 %
W eb er
et al ., 2 0 1 2 , G er m an y
E x p o su re
to p o rn o g ra p h ic v id eo
cl ip
o r fi lm
(a ) ev er
an d (b )
in p as t si x m o n th s
(a ) 9 8 %
b o y s, 8 1 %
g ir ls ; (b ) 9 3 %
b o y s, 5 2 %
g ir ls
C h en
et al ., 2 0 1 3 , T ai w an
E x p o su re
to In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
4 1 %
5 9 %
7 1 %
D o n g et
al ., 2 0 1 3 , C h in a
U se
o f p o rn o g ra p h y
6 %
H ar d y et
al ., 2 0 1 3 , U n it ed
S ta te s
E x p o su re
to p o rn o g ra p h y (e v er )
6 8 %
3 7 %
K ad ri , B en je ll o u n , K en d il i,
K h o u b il a, &
M o u ss ao u i, 2 0 1 3 ,
M o ro cc o
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y
4 7 %
b o y s; 1 8 %
g ir ls
M a &
S h ek , 2 0 1 3 , H o n g K o n g
P o rn o g ra p h y u se
(I n te rn et an d tr ad it io n al m ed ia ) in
p as t y ea r
< 1 5 %
M at te b o , T y d en , et
al ., 2 0 1 3 ,
S w ed en
F re q u en t u se
o f p o rn o g ra p h y (i .e ., at
le as t a fe w
ti m es /
m o n th )
1 0 %
V an d en b o sc h &
E g g er m o n t,
2 0 1 3 b , B el g iu m
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s
4 6 %
B o g al e &
S em
e, 2 0 1 4 , E th io p ia
W at ch ed
p o rn o g ra p h ic
m o v ie s o r re ad
p o rn o g ra p h ic
m ag az in es
(e v er )
5 2 %
C h en g et
al ., 2 0 1 4 , T ai w an
V is it ed
p o rn o g ra p h ic
W eb
si te s (e v er )
2 5 %
M an af
et al ., 2 0 1 4 , M al ay si a
R ea d in g an d w at ch in g p o rn o g ra p h ic
m at er ia l
2 5 %
Š ev čí k o v á &
D an eb ac k , 2 0 1 4 ,
C ze ch
R ep u b li c
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s (i n d iv id u al /
co ll ec ti v e)
5 7 %
V an d en
A b ee le
et al ., 2 0 1 4 ,
B el g iu m
M o b il e p o rn o g ra p h y u se
9 %
B ey en s et
al ., 2 0 1 5 , B el g iu m
U se
o f In te rn et
p o rn o g ra p h y in
p as t si x m o n th s
4 3 %
L o p ez
et al ., 2 0 1 5 , C am
b o d ia
P o rn o g ra p h y u se
11 % : 2 0 %
b o y s; 2 %
g ir ls
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
517
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
or homosexual male adolescents have been found to use Internet pornography more often than heterosexual male adolescents (Luder et al., 2011; Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d). Adolescents with higher academic achievement were more likely to encounter dominance-themed Internet pornography in a Dutch study (Vandenbosch, 2015). Similarly, higher-educated girls were more likely to use Internet pornography in a Swiss study (Luder et al., 2011). In another Dutch study, however, educational level was unrelated to the use of Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d).
In terms of personality characteristics, robust evidence has emerged that sensation-seeking adolescents use porno- graphy more often than their counterparts (Beyens et al., 2015; Luder et al., 2011; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a, 2011d; Ševčíková et al., 2014), although a recent study reported no influence of sensation seeking on the themes in Internet pornography (i.e., affection, dominance, vio- lence) to which adolescents were exposed (Vandenbosch, 2015). Similarly, young people with lower self-control con- sumed more Internet pornography (Holt et al., 2012). Adolescents who were less satisfied with their lives were also more likely to use Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a), a cross-sectional finding that was repli- cated in a longitudinal study (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d). In two Korean studies, adolescents with a lower self-esteem also used pornography more often (Kim, 2001, 2011). In an Israeli study, in contrast, self-esteem was found to be unre- lated to adolescents’ use of Internet pornography (Mesch & Maman, 2009). Less perceived autonomy was linked with more frequent use of pornography (Weber et al., 2012), as was greater self-efficacy (Kim, 2001, 2011). Finally, adoles- cents with a hyperfeminine or hypermasculine gender orien- tation were more likely to be exposed to violence-themed Internet pornography than adolescents without such a hyper- gender orientation (Vandenbosch, 2015).
Norm-related variables refer to concepts that deal with the extent to which adolescents comply with or reject norms and values in a given society. Regarding these variables, rule- breaking adolescents (Wolak et al., 2007; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005) and youth who use substances (Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005) have been reported to use pornography more frequently. Pornography use was also found to be most characteristic of a group of adolescents called “major delinquents” (Hasking, Scheier, & Ben Abdallah, 2011, p. 26). In contrast, religious adolescents (Hardy et al., 2013) and those in religious schools (Mesch, 2009; Mesch & Maman, 2009) use pornography less frequently, largely because religiosity has been shown to be associated with higher self-control, more negative attitudes toward pornography, and the feeling that watching pornogra- phy violates social expectations and norms (Hardy et al., 2013). Two Dutch studies, however, found no influence of religiosity on the use of Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a; Vandenbosch, 2015). Whether adolescents were enrolled in school and lived with both parents was also unrelated with pornography use (Lopez, Mukaire, & Mataya, 2015). Finally, negative attitudes toward school (Mesch, 2009;
Mesch & Maman, 2009) as well as having friends who engage in deviant activities (Holt et al., 2012) were associated with a greater use of Internet pornography.
As for adolescents’ sexual interest, those with greater sex- ual interest, as well as those who also used sexual content in other media, were also more often exposed to Internet porno- graphy (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a). Finally, in terms of Internet behavior, the use of Internet pornography use was higher among those with greater digital skills in a study across countries of the European Union (Ševčíková et al., 2014), but was unrelated to adolescents’ computer skills in a U.S. study (Holt et al., 2012). The use of Internet pornography seemed to be lower when filter software was installed (Wolak et al., 2007). Adolescents who used Internet pornography more fre- quently also used the Internet more often (Ševčíková et al., 2014) and for different activities, such as file sharing (Wolak et al., 2007), sex education (Tsitsika et al., 2009), talking to strangers (Wolak et al., 2007), Internet gaming, and buying goods (Tsitsika et al., 2009).
In terms of developmental predictors of pornography use, research has focused on three groups of variables: age/pubertal maturation, sexual experience, and developmental competen- cies. Regarding age, inconsistent results have emerged. While four studies have shown that pornography use increased with age (Ševčíková et al., 2014; Shek & Ma, 2012a; Wolak et al., 2007; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005), five other studies did not find such an increase (Holt et al., 2012; Mesch, 2009; Mesch & Maman, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a, 2011d). A recent study reported more exposure to affection-themed Internet pornography for younger adolescents and more exposure to dominance-themed pornography for older adolescents (Vandenbosch, 2015). For pubertal maturation, in contrast, results seem more consistent. More frequent use of Internet pornography was found both for boys (Beyens et al., 2015; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a) and girls (Luder et al., 2011) with a more advanced pubertal maturation. Regarding sexual experience, results are inconclusive. Greater sexual experience was associated with a more frequent use of Internet pornogra- phy in one study (Ševčíková et al., 2014) and with less frequent use of Internet pornography (among girls) in another (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a). As for developmental compe- tencies, cognitive-behavioral competencies (i.e., abilities to solve problems, set goals, make effective behavior choices and act accordingly) were related to more frequent pornogra- phy use. In contrast, positive youth development qualities (e.g., social competence, self-efficacy, and moral competence) were related to less frequent pornography use, both on the Internet and in less traditional media (Shek & Ma, 2012a).
In terms of social predictors of pornography use, researchers dealt with family-related and peer-related variables as well as with victimization. Less commitment to the family (Mesch, 2009; Mesch & Maman, 2009), poor family functioning in general (Shek & Ma, 2014), and specifically less mutuality in family functioning (Shek & Ma, 2012a) were all associated with a stronger use of pornography. The same was true for a poor emotional bond with the caregiver (for Internet pornography; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005) and a caregiver who used coercive
PETER AND VALKENBURG
518
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
discipline (for traditional pornography; Ybarra & Mitchell, 2005). In addition, family conflict and poor family communica- tion were related to more pornography use on the Internet and in traditional media, albeit mediated by less positive youth devel- opment (Ma & Shek, 2013). Weaker prosocial attitudes also correlated with more frequent pornography use (Mesch, 2009; Shek & Ma, 2012a). Restrictive parental mediation (Ševčíková et al., 2014) and installed blocking software (Wolak et al., 2007) were associated with less pornography use on the Internet. In contrast, the variables of parental control and parents talking about Internet pornography with their children were found to be unrelated to adolescents’ use of Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a; Wolak et al., 2007).
Regarding peers, more frequent online pornography use was found when the majority of adolescents’ friends were younger (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006a), when adolescents used the Internet at their friends’ homes (Wolak et al., 2007), when they communicated more often with their friends about por- nography (males only; Weber et al., 2012), and when peers were perceived to use pornography (for females only; Weber et al., 2012). A study on the use of pornography on mobile phones also showed that popularity with same-sex peers, popularity with opposite-sex peers, desire for popularity, and peer pressure were linked with more frequent pornography use (Vanden Abeele et al., 2014). Attachment to peers, how- ever, has been found to be unrelated to adolescents’ use of Internet pornography (Mesch & Maman, 2009). Finally, regarding victimization, Wolak et al. (2007) found that ado- lescents were more likely to use Internet pornography when they were harassed online and victimized in their offline lives.
Conclusion: The Typical Adolescent Pornography User Is a Male, Pubertally More Advanced, Sensation-Seeker, With Weak or Troubled Family Relations
Research has studied a plethora of predictors of adoles- cents’ use of pornography. However, cumulative evidence of what predicts adolescents’ use of pornography is still some- what limited. Although there are no generally accepted stan- dards about the number of replications needed to establish cumulative evidence, there is agreement that research findings should be reproduced at least once and preferably more times (e.g., Casadevall & Fang, 2010). In this review, we define cumulate evidence as the same result obtained by at least three different research teams in at least three different samples for identical (or conceptually close) predictors in the absence of a considerable number of opposing results. Against this background we can tentatively conclude that the most likely users of pornography are male, pubertally more advanced, sensation-seeking adolescents with weak or troubled family relations. However, it is important to note that the predictors of pornography use may change as access to pornography or the cultural context of pornography change. For example, if the Internet is accessible only for the privileged or skilled, those who access pornography on the Internet may differ strongly from those who access it if the Internet is accessible to every- one. Similarly, if pornography is normalized in a culture, its
use may be predicted by a very different set of variables than when it is considered deviant.
Pornography Use and Adolescents’ Sexual Attitudes, Self-development, and Behavior
Similar to our review of the predictors of adolescents’ pornography use, in this section we also report only findings of multivariate analyses. As previously done, we report results from models with only two variables in longitudinal designs only when autoregressive effects were included.
Sexual Attitudes
In terms of sexual attitudes, research has centered on two types of attitudes: permissive sexual attitudes and gender- stereotypical sexual beliefs. We use the term permissive sexual attitudes as an umbrella term for positive attitudes toward sex with casual partners, typically in an uncom- mitted setting or outside a romantic relationship. In the literature, permissive sexual attitudes have been assessed with measures such as sexually nonexclusive attitudes (Lo et al., 1999), instrumental attitudes toward sex (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b), attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b), or attitudes toward sexually permissive behavior (Lo & Wei, 2005). The term gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs refers to beliefs in which traditional, stereotypical notions of male and female roles as well as of gender relations dominate. Measures in the literature include progressive gender-role attitudes (Brown & L’Engle, 2009), notions of women as sex objects (Peter & Valkenburg, 2007, 2009a), gender- stereotypical beliefs about power imbalance in sexual rela- tionships (To et al., 2012), and beliefs about gender equality (To et al., 2015).
Permissive Sexual Attitudes. Consistent evidence has emerged that adolescents’ use of pornography is related to stronger permissive sexual attitudes (Brown & L’Engle, 2009, only boys; Doornwaard, Bickham, et al., 2015, only boys; Lo et al., 1999; Lo & Wei, 2005; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b, 2008b, 2010b; To et al., 2015; To et al., 2012). Most evidence is based on cross-sectional surveys (Lo et al., 1999; Lo & Wei, 2005; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b, 2008b; To et al., 2015; To et al., 2012). The sizes of the associations in cross-sectional studies ranged from Cohen’s d = 0.45 (Lo et al., 1999) to d = 0.72 (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b), with an average of d = 0.56 across the studies. In the longitudinal studies, the only meaningful effect size that could be calculated was d = 0.39 (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b). For interpretation of these results, it is important to note that the distribution of variables in the studies usually indicated that adolescents on average tended to reject permissive sexual attitudes (Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Doornwaard, van den Eijnden, et al., 2015; Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b, 2010b; To et al., 2012) or were
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
519
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
undecided (Lo et al., 1999; Lo & Wei, 2005; Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b). None of the studies found that, on average, adolescents endorsed permissive sexual attitudes.
The second proposition of the DSMM is that cognitive, emotional, and excitative response states mediate the rela- tion between media use and criterion variables. Some stu- dies have found that the perceived realism of pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b), notably its perceived social realism (i.e., similarity to real-world sex) and perceived utility as a source of sexual information (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b), mediated the association between the use of Internet pornography and permissive attitudes. There was also evidence that adolescents’ more active and affir- mative response states to pornography (i.e., a composite of physiological, affective, cognitive, and behavioral responses to Internet pornography; To et al., 2012) partly mediated this relation. Effect or association sizes between pornogra- phy use and the mediators ranged from Cohen’s d = 0.52 (for social realism; Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b) to d = 1.00 (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b), with an average of d = 0.79. The distribution of the variables in the two studies indicated that, on average, adolescents did not perceive pornography as (socially) realistic or as a useful source for sexual information.
The third proposition of the DSMM is that dispositional, developmental, and social variables may not only predict media use but also moderate the extent to which media use predicts criterion variables. To date, moderators of the asso- ciation between pornography use and permissive attitudes have not been investigated frequently. In terms of biological sex (a dispositional moderator according to the DSMM), Brown and L’Engle (2009) as well as Doornwaard, Bickham, et al. (2015) found an association between porno- graphy use and permissive sexual attitudes only for boys. Peter and Valkenburg (2010b), in contrast, found no mod- erating role of adolescents’ biological sex and sexual experi- ence (a developmental moderator). To et al. (2015) reported that the relation between the use of Internet pornography and permissive sexual attitudes (i.e., body-centered sexual- ity) was stronger if adolescents talked more with the parents about sexuality and felt more peer pressure about using pornography (social moderators).
As far as transactional relations between pornography use and permissive attitudes are concerned (proposition four in the DSMM), evidence is limited. The aforemen- tioned longitudinal studies by Peter and Valkenburg (2010b) and Doornwaard, Bickham, et al. (2015) found that, over time, the use of Internet pornography predicted permissive attitudes, while permissive attitudes did not pre- dict pornography use.
Gender-Stereotypical Sexual Beliefs. Two cross- sectional (Peter & Valkenburg, 2007; To et al., 2012) and two longitudinal studies (Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a) have shown that adolescents’ pornography use is related to stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. A third cross-sectional study found that the
association between the use of Internet pornography and general beliefs about gender equality became more negative as adolescents talked more often about sex with their parents. However, a direct association between pornography use and gender equality was not present in that study (To et al., 2015). Similarly, a third longitudinal study did not find an association between how often adolescents used Internet pornography and gender- stereotypical sexual beliefs (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011b). In the studies that provided statistics to compute effect sizes, the effect sizes ranged from Cohen’s d = 0.10 (To et al., 2015) to d = 0.74 (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a), resulting in an average Cohen’s d of 0.42. The distributions of the variables in the studies revealed that adolescents on average did not hold gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs.
Two studies demonstrated that the relation between ado- lescents’ pornography use and various criterion variables was mediated (proposition two of the DSMM) by specific response states: Active and affirmative response states to pornography partly mediated the association between the use of Internet pornography and stereotypical beliefs in To et al.’s study (2012). Liking pornography mediated this relation in Peter and Valkenburg’s (2009a) investigation. The size of the effect of pornography use on liking in Peter and Valkenburg’s (2009a) study was Cohen’s d = 1.21.
The moderators that were studied (proposition three of the DSMM) elicited inconsistent differential associations between pornography use and gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. On the one hand, adolescents’ biological sex (a dispositional moderator) did not augment or diminish the relation between pornography use and stereotypical beliefs (Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a), nor did adolescents’ age (a developmental moderator) (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a). On the other hand, communication with parents about sexuality (a social moderator) seemed to render the association between the use of Internet porno- graphy and beliefs about gender equality more negative (To et al., 2015).
As for transactional relations (proposition four of the DSMM), one longitudinal study found evidence of transac- tional relations between the use of Internet pornography and gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a). The use of Internet pornography not only predicted stronger stereotypical beliefs over time but stereotypical beliefs also predicted a more frequent use of Internet porno- graphy over time (Cohen’s d = 0.68). This relation was significantly stronger for male than for female adolescents and was mediated by liking pornography.
Sexual Self-Development
Three longitudinal and three cross-sectional studies have dealt with the relation between adolescents’ pornography use and their sexual self-development (i.e., aspects and tasks related to the development of the sexual self). Some evidence has emerged that adolescents’ use of Internet
PETER AND VALKENBURG
520
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
pornography is related to greater sexual uncertainty, that is, the extent to which adolescents are unclear about their sexual beliefs and values (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b, 2010a), although uncertainty levels were low on average. Effect sizes varied between Cohen’s d = 0.32 in a cross- sectional study (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b) and d = 0.20 in a longitudinal study (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010a). One study found that male adolescents’ use of Internet porno- graphy was linked, through self-objectification and the inter- nationalization of appearance ideals, with greater body surveillance (Cohen’s d = 0.35; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013a). Body surveillance was low to moderate among the boys in that study.
Studies have also shown that more frequent pornography use is related, with an effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.62, to sexual preoccupancy (i.e., a strong cognitive engagement in sexual issues, sometimes to the exclusion of other thoughts; Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a), as well as to sexual fantasizing (To et al., 2012). On average, adolescents’ level of sexual preoccupancy was moderate (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a), while sexual fantasizing occurred infrequently (To et al., 2012). Finally, pornography use has been found to be asso- ciated with greater sexual dissatisfaction over time, Cohen’s d = 0.24 (Wave 1 to Wave 2) and 0.28 (Wave 1 to Wave 3) (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009b), with adolescents being on average neither dissatisfied nor satisfied with their sex lives. Across the different indicators of sexual self-develop- ment, the average effect size was Cohen’s d = 0.28 when the outlier sexual preoccupancy was excluded and d = 0.35 when sexual preoccupancy was included.
At least four articles have indicated that the relation between adolescents’ pornography use and sexual self- development is not direct but mediated (proposition two of the DSMM). To et al.’s (2012) study showed that active and affirmative response states when watching Internet porno- graphy partly mediated the association between pornogra- phy use and sexual daydreaming. Peter and Valkenburg (2008a) demonstrated that sexual arousal mediated the rela- tion between the use of Internet pornography and sexual preoccupancy, with an effect size of Cohen’s d = 1.28 between pornography use and sexual arousal. The same authors also found that involvement in pornography mediated the relation between the use of Internet pornogra- phy and sexual uncertainty, Cohen’s d = 1.09 (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010a). However, the means of these mediators indicated that, on average, adolescents reported they were not particularly sexually aroused by, nor involved in, porno- graphy. Finally, Vandenbosch and Eggermont (2013a) showed that male adolescents’ self-objectification (Cohen’s d = 0.32, with pornography use) and their internalization of appearance ideals (Cohen’s d = 0.37, with pornography use) mediated the relation between the use of Internet pornogra- phy and body surveillance. The average Cohen’s d for the various mediators was 0.77.
Researchers focused on biological sex, sexual experi- ence, and age as moderators of the relation between por- nography use and sexual self-development (proposition
three of the DSMM). When female adolescents watched more pornography, they became more strongly involved with the material than male adolescents did (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010a). However, the association between the use of Internet pornography and sexual preoccupancy, as well as the mediation through sexual arousal, was the same for adolescent boys and girls (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a). Regarding sexual experience (a developmental variable), Peter and Valkenburg (2009b) showed that ado- lescents with no or little own sexual experience, as well as those who perceived their friends as sexually inexper- ienced, became more dissatisfied with their sex lives when they watched more Internet pornography. As for adolescents’ age, all relations between pornography use and sexual self-development were the same for different age groups.
Three longitudinal studies investigated transactional rela- tions between adolescents’ use of Internet pornography and sexual self-development (proposition four of the DSMM) but did not find consistent evidence for such relations. The use of Internet pornography predicted greater sexual preoc- cupancy, greater sexual uncertainty, and greater sexual dis- satisfaction, but neither sexual preoccupancy nor sexual uncertainty nor sexual dissatisfaction consistently predicted the use of Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a, 2009b, 2010a).
Sexual Behavior
Research on the relation between adolescents’ use of pornography and their sexual behavior can be divided in four groups: (a) the occurrence of sexual intercourse and experience with different sexual practices; (b) casual sex behavior (i.e., sex-related and sexual behavior without rela- tional commitment); (c) sexual risk behavior (i.e., sexual behavior that may increase the likelihood of unhealthy con- sequences); and (d) perpetration of sexual aggression as well as sexual victimization.
Four longitudinal studies (Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Cheng et al., 2014; Doornwaard, Bickham, et al., 2015; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b) and five cross-sectional studies (Atwood et al., 2012; Bogale & Seme, 2014; Luder et al., 2011; Manaf et al., 2014; Mattebo et al., 2014) have dealt with the association between pornography use and the occurrence of sexual intercourse as well as experience with different sexual practices. Both cross-sectionally and long- itudinally, evidence has emerged that more frequent porno- graphy use is related to a higher likelihood to have sexual intercourse (Atwood et al., 2012; Bogale & Seme, 2014; Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Manaf et al., 2014). More speci- fically, when adolescents used pornography more often, they also seemed to be more likely to start having sexual inter- course (Cheng et al., 2014; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b). This association, however, was stronger for girls than boys (Cheng et al., 2014) and emerged only among adolescents at an early pubertal stage (Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b). Luder et al. (2011) did not found a
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
521
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
relation between pornography use and early sexual debut. Finally, researchers did not find consistent associations between pornography use and a greater experience with different sexual practices (Doornwaard, Bickham, et al., 2015; Mattebo et al., 2014). In the studies on the occurrence of sexual intercourse, the majority of adolescents, who ranged in age from 12 to 24, did not have sexual inter- course. Effect sizes could be calculated for only two studies, with a Cohen’s d = .35 in Atwood et al.’s (2012) study and a Cohen’s d = 0.45 in Bogale and Seme (2014), resulting in an average effect size of d = 0.40.
Regarding casual sex behavior, one longitudinal Taiwanese study (Cheng et al., 2014) and three cross-sec- tional studies demonstrated that adolescents’ pornography use was associated with more experience with casual sex behavior, both in Taiwan (Lo et al., 1999; Lo & Wei, 2005) and in Sweden (Mattebo et al., 2014). The majority of adolescents did not have experience with casual sex beha- vior. Effect sizes could be calculated for only the two cross- sectional Taiwanese studies, resulting in an average effect size of Cohen’s d = 0.55.
Evidence for an association between adolescents’ porno- graphy use and sexual risk behavior was mixed. Two cross- sectional studies have found positive relations between por- nography use and sexual risk behavior. For example, Luder et al. (2011) found that adolescent males who more fre- quently used pornography were more likely to not have used a condom during their last sexual intercourse, while for female adolescents this was not the case. Van Ouytsel, Ponnet, and Walrave (2014) reported an association between more frequent pornography use and sexting (i.e., the send- ing of sexually suggestive pictures or videos of oneself). However, in their longitudinal study Peter and Valkenburg (2011c) found no association between adolescents’ porno- graphy use and unprotected sex with a casual sex partner. Similarly, in Luder et al.’s (2011) cross-sectional study, pornography use was unrelated to a higher number of sexual partners and first sexual intercourse before age 15. Across the studies, the majority of adolescents did not engage in sexual risk behavior, although occurrence rates varied con- siderably among the studies.
Regarding the perpetration of sexual aggression, use of pornographic magazines and comics was found to be asso- ciated with sexually harassing a peer or forcing someone to have sex in a cross-sectional study among Italian adoles- cents, while viewing pornographic films and videos was not (Bonino et al., 2006). Biological sex and age were con- trolled for. In a longitudinal U.S. study (Brown & L’Engle, 2009), the use of sexually explicit material via movies, magazines, and computers was associated, among boys, with sexual harassment perpetration (e.g., touching or brushing up against a schoolmate in a sexual way, cornering a schoolmate in a sexual way). Baseline behavior, age, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, parent education, pubertal maturation, and sensation seeking were controlled for.
In another longitudinal U.S. study (Ybarra et al., 2011), use of violent pornography was related to the perpetration of
sexual assault, both in person and technology based, while use of pornography in general was not, controlling for demographics, generalized aggression, technology use, psy- chosocial indicators, victimization, truthful answering, and being alone while answering. Adolescents’ use of violent pornography was operationalized as seeing in an X-rated movie, in a magazine, or on a Web site “a person being physically hurt by another person while they were doing something sexual” (Ybarra et al., 2011, p. 5). In-person sexual assault was operationalized as kissing, touching, or doing “anything sexual with another person when that per- son did not want to do so” (Ybarra et al., 2011, p. 5). Technology-based sexual harassment was operationalized with items such as asking “anyone to do something sexual online when the other person did not want to do so” and sending “a picture text message that was sexual in a way when that person did not want to receive it” (Ybarra et al., 2011, p. 5). The occurrence of active sexual harassment varied between 60% in the second wave in Brown and L’Engle’s (2009) study and 4% in the studies by Bonino et al. (2006) and Ybarra et al. (2011). In the study by Ybarra et al. (2011), on average a maximum of 3% of adolescents’ used violent pornography. On the basis of the documenta- tion in the studies, meaningful effect sizes could not be calculated.
Three cross-sectional studies also found that (sexual) victimization was related to pornography use. A study con- ducted in Ethiopia (Bekele et al., 2011) demonstrated a statistically strong association between female students’ use of pornographic films and their sexual violence victimi- zation (r = 0.61, Cohen’s d = 1.54). This association was also significant for the various subscales of the overall sexual violence victimization index (i.e., becoming the vic- tim of sexual offense, sexual assault, sexual coercion, and sexual aggression). In the context of the strong effect size, it is noteworthy that “Watched pornographic films pressured by a male school friend” was an item on the sexual offense scale, as was “Have had sexual intercourse as a result of watching pornographic film” on the sexual coercion scale (Bekele et al., 2011, pp. 614–615). In line with the study from Ethiopia, the aforementioned study from Italy also indicated that female adolescents who watched porno- graphic magazines and videos more often were more likely to become the victim of sexual violence (Bonino et al., 2006). However, it remains somewhat unclear whether the pertinent analyses (see Table 4 in Bonino et al., 2006, p. 282) were multivariate and controlled for age (as suggested in the text on p. 281). Reading pornographic magazines and comics was unrelated to becoming a victim of sexual vio- lence (Bonino et al., 2006). Finally, in a study conducted in China, pornography use was linked with greater polyvicti- mization (i.e., multiple simultaneous types of abuse and neglect, including sexual victimization) among both male and female adolescents (Dong et al., 2013).
Victimization rates varied between the studies: 8% of female adolescents in the study by Bonino et al. (2006) reported having been sexually harassed by peers, and 10%
PETER AND VALKENBURG
522
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
of the girls reported having been forced to have sex. In the study by Dong et al. (2013), 17% experienced polyvictimi- zation, while 68% of the female adolescents in the study by Bekele et al. (2011) experienced at least one instance of sexual violence throughout their lives.
None of the studies on adolescents’ pornography use and their sexual behavior studied mediators (proposition two of the DSMM). As for moderators (proposition three of the DSMM), the available evidence suggests the relation between pornography use and the perpetration of sexual aggression may be stronger among boys than girls (Brown & L’Engle, 2009). By contrast, the association between pornography use and sexual victimization has been demon- strated notably among girls (Bekele et al., 2011; Bonino et al., 2006). The association between pornography use and sexual initiation was stronger among girls than boys (Cheng et al., 2014). This association was also moderated by pub- ertal maturation: Among those at an early stage of pubertal maturation, pornography use was related to a higher like- lihood to initiate sex. Conversely, among those at a later stage of pubertal maturation, it was related to a lower like- lihood to do so (Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b). In at least one study the relation between pornography use and casual sex behavior emerged only among female adoles- cents (Cheng et al., 2014). Transactional relations between pornography use and the occurrence of certain sexual beha- viors (proposition four of the DSMM) were investigated only by Vandenbosch and Eggermont (2013b) and Doornwaard, Bickham, et al. (2015), who found no evi- dence that sexual behavior would affect pornography use.
Conclusion: Pornography Related to Sexual Attitudes and Some Sexual Behaviors, But Causality Unclear
Overall, existing research has produced consistent evi- dence that adolescents’ pornography use is related to their sexual attitudes. Robust evidence has emerged regarding the association between pornography use and stronger permis- sive sexual attitudes, which was, according to Cohen’s (1988) standards, intermediate in the cross-sectional studies. However, adolescents’ scores on permissive sexual attitudes were low on average. Consequently, it seems more appro- priate to speak of an association between more frequent pornography use and less strict (rather than more permis- sive) sexual attitudes.
Regarding the relation between pornography use and stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs, evidence seems to demonstrate that adolescents’ pornography use is related to less progressive sexual beliefs (which seems the more appropriate wording given the distributions of the variables). However, the size of the relation between more frequent pornography use and more gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs was small. In light of the not entirely consis- tent research findings and small effect sizes, the relation between pornography use and stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs thus deserves further attention in future studies.
Some studies suggest that the relation between pornogra- phy use and both permissive sexual attitudes and gender- stereotypical beliefs is mediated by cognitive and emotional response states. However, cumulative evidence is still miss- ing because the various mediators are conceptually diverse. To date, research has also not yet established consistent evidence of dispositional moderators (e.g., biological sex) of the association between pornography use and both per- missive sexual attitudes and gender-stereotypical beliefs. While developmental variables (e.g., age) do not seem to moderate the relation, some preliminary (albeit noncumula- tive) evidence has emerged that social variables, such as parental communication about sexuality, may play a role. There was not much evidence of transactional effects between adolescents’ pornography use and permissive sex- ual attitudes. However, one study did find transactional effects between pornography use and gender-stereotypical beliefs.
Existing research points to an association between ado- lescents’ pornography use and various concepts related to adolescents’ sexual self-development, but cumulative evi- dence has not yet been established: The majority of findings are based on analyses of the same sample (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b, 2009b, 2010a), and the concepts stu- died are still rather diverse. Similarly, conclusions about which response states exactly mediate the relation between pornography use and sexual self-developments are not pos- sible yet: Half of the results were based on the same sample (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008a, 2010a), and evidence of cog- nitive response states as mediators is still scarce. No con- sistent evidence emerged about whether the relation between pornography use and sexual self-development was stronger for male or female adolescents. In addition, while one study found that adolescents’ sexual experience reduced the strength of the relation between pornography use and sexual self-development, age was not found to moderate it. No evidence of transactional effects emerged.
By and large, the studies we reviewed tended to show that adolescents’ pornography use was related to the occur- rence of sexual intercourse, more experience with casual sex behavior, and a higher likelihood to engage in sexual aggression as well as to experience it, notably among female adolescents. There was no evidence that more frequent pornography use is associated with greater experience with different sexual practices. In addition, consistent, robust, and cumulative evidence of a relation between pornography use and sexual risk behavior is missing.
Research did not provide any insights into mediators of the relation between adolescents’ pornography use and their sexual behavior, nor was there evidence of transactional effects. The relation between pornography use and sexual aggression was stronger for boys, while that between porno- graphy use and sexual victimization was demonstrated mainly for girls. The association between pornography use and sexual initiation was stronger for girls and adolescents at an early pubertal stage. Girls also showed a stronger relation between pornography use and casual sex behavior
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
523
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
in one study. Generally, however, our knowledge about moderators of the association between pornography use and sexual behavior is still diverse and lacks a cumulative character.
Conclusions about adolescents’ pornography use and their sexual behavior should be seen in light of the follow- ing caveats: First, effect sizes for the relationship between pornography use and the occurrence of sexual intercourse as well as experience with casual sex behavior were small and intermediate, respectively. However, the calculation of the effect sizes was based on only a few studies that provided the necessary statistics. The effect sizes thus present only rough, incomplete first approximations. Second, on average adolescents did not engage frequently in sexual intercourse or casual sexual behavior. This means that adolescents’ pornography use was associated with a low rate of these behaviors rather than with their massive occurrence. Third, both the figures for the perpetration of sexual aggression and for sexual victimization varied considerably among the studies. Future research needs to systematically work on comparable conceptual and operational definitions of sexual aggression and sexual victimization. Fourth, while all asso- ciations found between adolescents’ pornography use and sexual behavior would benefit from a more systematic approach to the conceptual and operational definition of pornography use, this is particularly necessary for the rela- tion between pornography and sexual aggression. The mea- sures used to study this association were relatively diverse, and we need to know better which characteristics of porno- graphy are related to sexual aggression, and which are not, to explain this association more thoroughly. Similarly, we need to know more about the processes that underlie the relation between pornography and sexual victimization to understand better why this relation has been found in the literature.
Comparison With Findings from Qualitative Research
Several of the research foci of quantitative research on adolescents’ use of pornography have also been addressed in qualitative research on the issue. For example, similar to quantitative research, qualitative research has shown that adolescents use pornography both accidentally and inten- tionally (Cameron et al., 2005; Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010). Similarly, there is consistent evidence in qualitative research that male adolescents use pornography more frequently than female adolescents do (Cameron et al., 2005; Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010). Qualitative research, in addition, has yielded reasons for this sex differ- ence in pornography use. Compared to girls, boys use pornography more often out of curiosity, for sexual arousal (Abiala & Hernwall, 2013; Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015; Cameron et al., 2005; Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010), and for entertainment (Rothman et al., 2015). Boys also seem to use pornography more frequently for what Lofgren-Mårtenson and Månsson (2010) have called “social
intercourse,” the watching of pornography together with other boys. Although boys are generally critical of porno- graphy, girls are more repelled by pornography: They often find it dumb and gross (Cameron et al., 2005) and approach it from a negative point of view (Abiala & Hernwall, 2013; Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010).
While qualitative research did not provide more infor- mation on other predictors (e.g., developmental or social) of pornography use, it did shed light on two issues that quantitative studies have neglected to date. First, it more elaborately pointed to the functions of pornography use for nonheterosexual adolescents. For example, a recent U.S. study has found that same-sex- attracted Black adolescents used pornography in particu- lar to explore their own sexual identity and to determine their readiness for sex (Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015). Second, qualitative research has studied the specific con- tent of pornography that adolescents choose. For exam- ple, urban, low-income, Black and Hispanic adolescents most often watched pornography that portrayed hetero- sexual intercourse, but they also got in contact with more extreme forms of pornography, such as public humiliation, bestiality, bondage, and bukkake (Rothman et al., 2015).
Qualitative studies have also addressed the relation between pornography use and gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. Two Swedish studies, for example, showed that both male and female adolescents were critical of the unequal depiction of men and women in pornography (Lofgren- Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010), with men being stereotypi- cally presented as dominant and women as subordinate (Mattebo et al., 2012). At first sight, these results seem to be at odds with the finding from quantitative studies that pornography use is related to stronger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs (Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Peter & Valkenburg, 2007, 2009a; To et al., 2012). However, in all quantitative studies, adolescents held, on average, rather progressive beliefs about gender roles. More frequent use of pornography may thus be related to gender-stereotypical beliefs in the sense that it weakens progressive beliefs about gender, at least when adolescents learn to like the material (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009a). Still, an important question for future research will be whether critical attitudes toward gender relations in pornography may moderate the relation between pornography use and gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs.
Regarding adolescents’ sexual self-development, qualita- tive studies pointed to some ambivalence in how adoles- cents approach pornography (Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010; Mattebo et al., 2012). Female adolescents reported both sexual arousal and agony, and male adoles- cents described both positive and negative feelings to por- nography (Mattebo et al., 2012). This ambivalence tentatively corresponds with the sexual uncertainty that has been linked to pornography use in quantitative studies (Peter & Valkenburg, 2008b, 2010a). The ambivalence that ado- lescents feel when confronted with pornography may
PETER AND VALKENBURG
524
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
translate into uncertainty about what they feel and want sexually. There was no further overlap between quantitative and qualitative studies in other aspects of adolescents’ sex- ual self-development. However, some qualitative studies found that, while female adolescents, in particular, criticized the unattainable body ideals featured in pornography (Mattebo et al., 2012), they also admitted being influenced by these ideals (Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010), considered them a source of sexual information (Kinsman et al., 2000), and more generally felt pressured by sexual messages in pornography (Mattebo et al., 2012).
Regarding the relation between pornography use and sexual behavior, recent qualitative studies tentatively showed that adolescents may learn sexual performance scripts or sexual practices from pornography (Lavoie et al., 2000; Marston & Lewis, 2014), with some adoles- cents imitating what they see in pornography (Arrington- Sanders et al., 2015; Rothman et al., 2015). These find- ings suggest some relation between pornography use and sexual behavior, as demonstrated by quantitative studies (e.g., Brown & L’Engle, 2009; Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b), and also point to the pornographic script as a frame of reference for sexual performances (Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010). Specifically, some adolescents seem to use pornography as a “manual for sex” (Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015), for example, to learn about sexual organs, sexual positions, sexual roles, and the performance of particular sexual techniques, as well as how to behave during sex (Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015; Rothman et al., 2015). In a Canadian study, adolescent girls also pointed out that boys may learn sexual aggression from pornography, with which some boys seemed to agree (Lavoie et al., 2000). While parti- cipants in Swedish research emphasized that they were able to distinguish between pornographic fiction and sex- ual reality, they also sometimes considered pornography a reliable source of information (Lofgren-Mårtenson & Månsson, 2010).
These findings dovetail with quantitative research that has shown the perceived realism (Peter & Valkenburg, 2006b), and notably the perceived utility of pornography as a source of sexual information (Peter & Valkenburg, 2010b), can explain why pornography use is related to permissive sexual attitudes. In these quantitative studies, adolescents on average did not perceive pornography as realistic. More frequent pornography use, however, made them perceive this material as “less unrealistic,” which in turn was related to more per- missive sexual attitudes. To deepen our understanding of the role of pornography as source of sexual information, future research will have to deal with the conditions under which specific types of adolescents use pornography to learn about sex and sexuality.
In sum, while quantitative and qualitative research on ado- lescents and pornography differ in the particular research foci chosen, their results are more often consistent or complemen- tary than contradictory. In several cases, the comparison of findings from quantitative and qualitative research also raises
crucial questions for future research. Of central importance will be to identify the situations in which relations between pornography use and sexual attitudes, self-development, and behavior are bigger or smaller, as well as the types of adoles- cents for whom these relations are more or less distinct.
Critical Evaluation of Results
Our review of the past 20 years of research on adoles- cents and pornography has shown that adolescents use por- nography although prevalence rates vary greatly. The most frequent adolescent users of pornography are male, sensa- tion-seeking adolescents at a more advanced pubertal stage with weak or troubled family relations. Pornography use is associated with more permissive sexual attitudes and stron- ger gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs. Adolescents’ porno- graphy use is also related to the occurrence of sexual intercourse, greater experience with casual sex behavior, and more sexual aggression, both in terms of perpetration and victimization. In contrast to an earlier review of the topic (Owens et al., 2012), our review thus suggests that, by now, some more cumulative evidence is building up about the predictors of adolescents’ use of pornography and its relation with sexual attitudes and sexual behavior. However, this evidence is still preliminary, as it needs to be interpreted in the context of at least four shortcomings and four more general biases in the literature.
Shortcomings
The first shortcoming in the literature on adolescents and pornography refers to the operationalization of pornography use. As evident from Table 1, researchers have operationa- lized pornography use in many different ways, which makes the findings difficult to compare. Operationalizations vary, for example, in the types of use (i.e., intentional, uninten- tional, any use); the time frame for which use is assessed (e.g., past 30 days, past six months, past year, ever); whether the focus is on Internet-based pornography or other types; and whether Playboy-type nudity is included in the assessment of pornography use next to more explicit material (e.g., Lo et al., 1999; Van Ouytsel et al., 2014; Ybarra et al., 2011). We therefore need homogeneous, vali- dated measures of pornography use. Ideally, such measures are standardized, but given the diversity in cultural stan- dards of pornography and sexuality, much is gained already when the measures compare across different cultures. In this context, it will also be important to take into account ado- lescents’ increasing use of mobile Internet access.
When designing and validating such measures it will be crucial to try to assess also what pornographic content adolescents are exposed to when they use pornography. Owens et al. (2012) have already pointed out that we know nearly nothing about the content adolescents actually encounter when using pornography. Several years later, we observe this issue is still not resolved. Currently, we know
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
525
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
from only one qualitative study that adolescents use main- stream pornography as well as more extreme types of por- nography (Rothman et al., 2015). Ybarra et al.’s (2011) study, however, suggested this distinction is important: Sexual aggression was related only to watching violent pornography but not to watching mainstream pornography. Only with a closer investigation of the pornographic content that adolescents use can we truly understand why adoles- cents are attracted to, or repelled by, pornography and how it relates to their sexual attitudes, self-development, and behavior.
A second shortcoming refers to the high number of cross-sectional designs in the field. While, overall, quanti- tative research seems reasonably solid in terms of survey mode and administration as well as sampling and response rates, the dominance of cross-sectional designs precludes causal claims about the relations between pornography use and sexual attitudes, self-development, and behavior. Although the increasing number of longitudinal designs adds methodological rigor to the literature, such designs do not solve this problem. Not only do we lack supporting evidence from experimental studies, but we also need to pay systematic attention to control variables in the statistical analysis because in longitudinal designs spurious associa- tions are also possible due to the correlational nature of the research. The majority of longitudinal studies do include autoregressive effects and some studies include additional control variables (see, however, a recent critique of autore- gressive effects in Hamaker, Kuiper, & Grasman, 2015). By and large, however, the use of control variables seems to be guided by study-specific considerations and availability of variables rather than by overarching theoretical and empiri- cal rationales. Moreover, only a few studies to date have considered important distal variables, such as sexual inter- est/drive and pubertal maturation, as control variables. Biological variables, such as testosterone or cortisol levels, also have rarely been studied. In the light of these important caveats, it seems premature to interpret the relations estab- lished in this review in the sense that pornography use causes changes in sexual attitudes, self-development, and behavior.
A third important shortcoming in current research that hampers a deeper understanding of adolescents’ pornogra- phy use and its ramifications is the lack of a more advanced overarching theoretical perspective. We organized the litera- ture along propositions of a recent integrative model from media effects research, the DSMM (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013). With this model, we tried to systematize both pre- dictors of pornography use, as well as underlying processes and moderators of the associations of pornography use and transactional relations. In line with the first proposition of the DSMM, we identified various dispositional, develop- mental, and social predictors of pornography use. However, evidence of the underlying processes (second proposition of the DSMM) and moderators of the associa- tions of pornography use (third proposition of the DSMM) and notably of transactional relations (fourth proposition of
the DSMM) remained scarce and, if available, inconsistent. Research did provide some first insights into cognitive, emotional, and excitative response states that mediate the relationship between pornography use and permissive atti- tudes, gender-stereotypical sexual beliefs, and sexual self- development. However, we are missing cumulative knowl- edge about these response states from multiple studies or replications, done in different cultural contexts and by dif- ferent researchers to get a sense of the validity and relia- bility of the existing results. The studies on dispositional, developmental, and social moderators of the relations of pornography use currently form a patchwork of haphazardly selected moderators with inconsistent results rather than a systematic research program. Finally, research has paid little attention to transactional relations between pornography use and criterion variables. Studies devote elaborate attention to the influence of pornography use on sexual attitudes, sexual self-development, and behavior, but much less to the equally important and theoretically justified question of whether sexual attitudes, sexual self-development, and behavior may be related to pornography use in a transac- tional way.
The lack of a more advanced theoretical perspective in current research along with a lack of pertinent results has several troublesome consequences. After 20 years of research, we still know little about why pornography use is associated with, for example, sexual attitudes and beha- vior. However, without knowing why pornography use is associated with other variables, we are unable to counteract undesirable associations and stimulate desirable ones. Moreover, we also do not know for which types of adoles- cents the associations of pornography use are the strongest —and for which types of adolescents they are weak or nonexistent. As the comparison of quantitative and qualita- tive research findings has shown, some of the most impor- tant emerging research questions center on the issue of who is resilient to messages in pornography and who is suscep- tible. Finally, we lack evidence of whether the ramifications of pornography use can be conceptualized as a multidirec- tional, cyclical process (i.e., transactional) rather than as a unidirectional and unilinear one. Many public debates about adolescents’ use of pornography tend to rely on a simplistic monkey-see-monkey-do notion of how adolescents deal with pornography and how it affects them. To inform such debates, knowledge about transactional relations of porno- graphy use is needed.
A fourth shortcoming lies in the absence of a genuine developmental perspective. With pubertal maturation, this review identified a developmental predictor of adolescents’ pornography use. Two studies pointed to the moderating role of pubertal maturation (Vandenbosch & Eggermont, 2013b) and sexual experience (Peter & Valkenburg, 2009b) in the ramifications of adolescents’ use of pornogra- phy. Still, we hardly understand what pornography use means to adolescents in the context of the enormous cogni- tive, emotional, and social changes young people experience during adolescence.
PETER AND VALKENBURG
526
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
In this context, it also seems important to compare adoles- cents’ and adults’ use of pornography and its implications for the two groups. The scarce existing research suggests that adults and adolescents do not differ in their use of Internet pornography (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d). However, associa- tions between pornography use and risky sexual behavior as well as a specific stereotypical gender belief (token resistance) have been found among adults but not among adolescents (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011b, 2011c). At the same time, the results on the association between adolescents’ pornography use and permissive sexual attitudes dovetail with recent sur- vey-based research on adults’ use of pornography (e.g., Wright, 2013, 2014a). It is thus currently unclear whether pornography use has similar or different implications for ado- lescents and adults. Systematic comparisons between adoles- cents and adults may therefore improve a developmental understanding not only of pornography use in adolescence but also across the life span.
Biases
In addition to the more specific shortcomings in the current literature on adolescents and pornography, there are four general biases in large parts of the research (see also Peter, 2013). First, research suffers from a cultural bias. More than two-thirds of the articles we reviewed came from Europe, North America, or Australia. Moreover, 63% of the articles originated in only a handful of countries (i.e., the Netherlands, the United States, Sweden, Hong Kong/China, and Belgium). Although five of the articles we reviewed dealt with African countries, we do not have the same knowledge about Africa as we have about Europe, Northern America, and some Asian countries, notably Hong Kong/China and Taiwan. We still know nothing about adolescents and pornography in Central and South America, several Asian countries, Russia, and the Middle East (except Israel).
The results of this review may also be biased by cultural differences in adolescents’ sexual and gender socialization in the countries that dominate the research on adolescents’ pornography use. The Netherlands and Sweden, for exam- ple, are characterized by liberal approaches to adolescent sexuality and pornography. Relatively strong input from these two countries in the overall results of this review may thus preclude generalizing our findings to sexually more conservative countries. We therefore need knowledge from more and more diverse countries, and preferably from cross-nationally comparative research, to understand the cultural contingencies of adolescents’ use of pornography.
Second, current research suffers from a heteronormativity bias. With one exception (Arrington-Sanders et al., 2015), all studies have at least implicitly focused on heterosexual pornography and, consequently, investigated issues that often presuppose opposite-sex relations. Although some studies have found that bisexual and gay male adolescents use pornography more often than heterosexual male adoles- cents (Luder et al., 2011; Peter & Valkenburg, 2011d), our
knowledge about the functions, meanings, and implications of pornography use among gay, lesbian, and bisexual ado- lescents is restricted. Based on the findings by Arrington- Sanders et al. (2015), however, many implicitly heteronor- mative assumptions of current research may be revealed by studying nonheterosexual adolescents.
Third, the research we reviewed tends to have a negativ- ity bias, focusing primarily on risks and dangers of adoles- cents’ pornography use rather than on opportunities and potential positive implications of pornography use, such as sexual pleasure (e.g., Tsaliki, 2011). The focus of research on negative implications of pornography use may be justi- fied by theoretical considerations and addresses culturally based public concerns. However, to get an encompassing notion of what adolescents’ pornography use entails, it seems necessary to ask also whether pornography use can be associated, for example, with greater sexual knowledge (for an exception, see To et al., 2012), sexual self-efficacy, or sexual self-esteem. Such questions may also help ques- tion the implicit assumption in much current research that adolescents are generally vulnerable to messages in porno- graphy. Not only does the assumption of vulnerable adoles- cents deny them agency and critical skills (Buckingham & Bragg, 2004), it also seems at odds with recent studies that compared adolescents with adults and found associations between pornography use and gender-stereotypical beliefs as well as sexual risk behavior only among adults (Peter & Valkenburg, 2011b, 2011c).
Fourth, current research on adolescents’ use of pornogra- phy is biased toward the status quo. Many studies tend to overlook that the transformation of adolescent sexuality is part of larger social and cultural changes, for example, the informalization of personal and sexual relationships and the individualization of sexual choice, at least in many Western countries. Adolescent sexuality is thus no longer fully con- trolled by traditional authorities but is, at least partly, a question of personal taste and pleasure (Attwood & Smith, 2011). In this view, the associations found between porno- graphy use and permissive attitudes, sexual uncertainty, the occurrence and frequency of sexual behavior, and experi- ence with casual sex may (also) be understood as part of larger sociocultural changes.
Future Research
From the various shortcomings in the literature, several requirements for future research can be derived. First, more longitudinal studies are needed, accompanied by a systema- tic, theoretically and empirically grounded treatment of con- trol variables. In this context, it may also be useful to think about longitudinal panel studies spanning several years to track developments in adolescents’ pornography use and pertinent attitudes, self-development, and behavior. Ideally, longitudinal studies should be linked with experimental research among young adults to tackle causal questions. In addition, it seems prudent to avoid studies using
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
527
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
convenience samples and accept research based on such samples only if it can be shown that they do not bias the results.
Second, the field needs to commit itself to theory build- ing and testing. Several studies rely on theoretical ad hoc reasoning and empirical regularities rather than on estab- lished theories as a rationale for their research. Future researchers, therefore, need to try to test unifying theore- tical frameworks that guide research and reduce and sys- tematize the myriad concepts currently being studied. In this review, we offered one integrative model, the DSMM (Valkenburg & Peter, 2013), which has been used in recent studies (Beyens et al., 2015; Vanden Abeele et al., 2014) and may be able to guide future research. However, other frameworks, such as the media practice model (Steele & Brown, 1995), the sexual behavior sequence (Byrne, 1976; Fisher, 1986), or the 3A model (Wright, 2014b), are also suitable.
Third, research needs to pay more attention to the content in pornography that adolescents use. We need to know the prevalence and predictors of the use of particular porno- graphic content similar to what we now know about the use of pornography in general. In this context, it may also be important to study to what extent and how preferences for different pornographic content develop.
Fourth, given the enormous developmental changes in adolescence, future research needs to pursue a developmen- tal perspective on adolescents’ use of pornography. Comparisons with other age groups, such as (young) adults may greatly advance our knowledge about whether adoles- cents’ pornography use and its implications may be specific for this age group or apply to other age groups as well.
Fifth, we need to de-Westernize research on adolescents and pornography more strongly than is currently the case. As outlined, our current knowledge is biased toward rich Western or Westernized countries. While in several coun- tries in this world pornography is illegal and extremely difficult to study, if not impossible, we believe a more diverse look at adolescents and pornography will challenge and enrich what we currently know about the topic.
Sixth, researchers should devote more attention to the use of pornography among gay, lesbian, and bisexual adoles- cents, similar to research done among adults (e.g., Duggan & McCreary, 2004; Traeen, Nilsen, & Stigum, 2006). As Arrington-Sanders et al. (2015) have suggested, the avail- ability of sexual information, the knowledge about sexual scripts, and the confidence about one’s sexual identity may differ for same-sex-attracted adolescents, which in turn may affect how they use pornography.
Seventh, the field needs to become more open to ques- tions about positive implications of adolescents’ use of pornography, notably sexual pleasure, and address more strongly notions of differential susceptibility as well as resilience to pornography. Only with such a more encom- passing view of adolescents’ use of pornography can we achieve a more nuanced understanding of what pornography means to adolescents.
Eighth and finally, at least at a theoretical level, we need to learn to put adolescents’ use of pornography in the context of larger social and cultural developments. Many debates about adolescents and pornography may benefit from considering adolescents’ use of pornography as a part of bigger develop- ments rather than as a singular phenomenon of its own.
In conclusion, research on adolescents and pornography has progressed considerably in the past 20 years, particu- larly at the empirical level. In our view, however, future research needs to address at least the aforementioned eight requirements to put our knowledge about adolescents and pornography at an empirically rigorous, theoretically advanced, and intellectually unbiased and open-minded basis. We believe this endeavor is necessary not only to advance the academic debate about pornography and ado- lescents but also to be able to inform the public soundly.
Supplemental Material
Supplementary data for this article can be found by acces- sing the publisher’s Web site.
References
Abiala, K., & Hernwall, P. (2013). Tweens negotiating identity online: Swedish girls’ and boys’ reflections on online experiences. Journal of Youth Studies, 16(8), 951–969. doi:10.1080/13676261.2013.780124
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
Arrington-Sanders, R., Harper, G. W., Morgan, A., Ogunbajo, A., Trent, M., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2015). The role of sexually explicit material in the sexual development of same-sex-attracted Black adolescent males. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(3), 597–608. doi:10.1007/ s10508-014-0416-x
Attwood, F., & Smith, C. (2011). Investigating young people’s sexual cultures: An introduction. Sex Education, 11(3), 235–242. doi:10.1080/14681811.2011.590040
Atwood, K. A., Zimmerman, R., Cupp, P. K., Fongkaew, W., Miller, B. A., Byrnes, H. F., … Chookhare, W. (2012). Correlates of precoital behaviors, intentions, and sexual initiation among Thai adolescents. Journal of Early Adolescence, 32(3), 364–386. doi:10.1177/ 0272431610393248
Bandura, A. (2009). Social cognitive theory or mass communication. In J. Bryant & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 94–124). New York, NY: Routledge.
Beebe, T. J., Harrison, P. A., McRae, J. A., Anderson, R. E., & Fulkerson, J. A. (1998). An evaluation of computer-assisted self-interviews in a school setting. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62(4), 623–632. doi:10.1086/297863
Bekele, A. B., Van Aken, M. A. G., & Dubas, J. S. (2011). Sexual violence victimization among female secondary school students in eastern Ethiopia. Violence and Victims, 26(5), 608–630. doi:10.1891/0886- 6708.26.5.608
Beyens, I., Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2015). Early adolescent boys’ exposure to Internet pornography: Relationships to pubertal timing, sensation seeking, and academic performance. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(8), 1045–1068. doi:10.1177/0272431614548069
Bleakley, A., Hennessy, M., & Fishbein, M. (2011). A model of adoles- cents’ seeking of sexual content in their media choices. Journal of Sex Research, 48(4), 309–315. doi:10.1080/00224499.2010.497985
Bloom, Z. D., & Hagedorn, W. B. (2015). Male adolescents and contem- porary pornography: Implications for marriage and family counselors. Family Journal, 23(1), 82–89. doi:10.1177/1066480714555672
PETER AND VALKENBURG
528
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
Bogale, A., & Seme, A. (2014). Premarital sexual practices and its pre- dictors among in-school youths of Shendi town, West Gojjam zone, north western Ethiopia. Reproductive Health, 11, 49. doi:10.1186/ 1742-4755-11-49
Bonino, S., Ciairano, S., Rabaglietti, E., & Cattelino, E. (2006). Use of pornography and self-reported engagement in sexual violence among adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3(3), 265–288. doi:10.1080/17405620600562359
Bradburn, N. M., Sudman, S., & Wansink, B. (2004). Asking questions: The definitive guide to questionnaire design: For market research, political polls, and social and health questionnaires (Rev. ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Brown, J. D. (2011). The media do matter: Comment on Steinberg and Monahan (2011). Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 580–581. doi:10.1037/A0022553
Brown, J. D., & L’Engle, K. L. (2009). X-rated: Sexual attitudes and behaviors associated with U.S. early adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit media. Communication Research, 36(1), 129–151. doi:10.1177/0093650208326465
Buckingham, D., & Bragg, S. (2004). Young people, sex, and the media: The facts of life? Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzwell, S., & Rosenthal, D. (1996). Constructing a sexual self: Adolescents’ sexual self-perceptions and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6(4), 489–513.
Byrne, D. (1976). Social psychology and the study of sexual behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3(1), 3–30. doi:10.1177/ 014616727600300102
Cameron, K. A., Salazar, L. F., Bernhardt, J. M., Burgess-Whitman, N., Wingood, G. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2005). Adolescents’ experience with sex on the web: Results from online focus groups. Journal of Adolescence, 28(4), 535–540. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.10.00
Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2010). Reproducible science. Infection and Immunity, 78(12), 4972–4975. doi:10.1128/IAI.00908-10
Chen, A.-S., Leung, M., Chen, C.-H., & Yang, S. C. (2013). Exposure to Internet pornography among Taiwanese adolescents. Social Behavior and Personality, 41(1), 157–164. doi:10.2224/sbp.2013.41.1.157
Cheng, S., Ma, J., & Missari, S. (2014). The effects of Internet use on adoles- cents’ first romantic and sexual relationships in Taiwan. International Sociology, 29(4), 324–347. doi:10.1177/0268580914538084
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Cowan, G., & Campbell, R. R. (1995). Rape causal attitudes among adolescents. Journal of Sex Research, 32(2), 145–153. doi:10.1080/ 00224499509551784
Davis, V. (2012). Interconnected but underprotected? Parents’ methods and motivations for information seeking on digital safety issues. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(12), 669– 674. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0179
Dombrowski, S. C., Gischlar, K. L., & Durst, T. (2007). Safeguarding young people from cyber pornography and cyber sexual predation: A major dilemma of the Internet. Child Abuse Review, 16(3), 153–170. doi:10.1002/car.939
Dong, F., Cao, F., Cheng, P., Cui, N., & Li, Y. (2013). Prevalence and associated factors of poly-victimization in Chinese adolescents. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(5), 415–422. doi:10.1111/ sjop.12059
Doornwaard, S. M., Bickham, D. S., Rich, M., ter Bogt, T. F. M., & van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M. (2015). Adolescents’ use of sexually explicit Internet material and their sexual attitudes and behavior: Parallel development and directional effects. Developmental Psychology, 51 (10), 1476–1488. doi:10.1037/dev0000040
Doornwaard, S. M., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Overbeek, G., & ter Bogt, T. F. M. (2015). Differential developmental profiles of adolescents using sexually explicit Internet material. Journal of Sex Research, 52 (3), 269–281. doi:10.1080/00224499.2013.866195
Duggan, S. J., & McCreary, D. R. (2004). Body image, eating disorders, and the drive for muscularity in gay and heterosexual men: The
influence of media images. Journal of Homosexuality, 47(3–4), 45– 58. doi:10.1300/J082v47n03_03
Fisher, W. A. (1986). A psychological approach to human sexuality: The sexual behavior sequence. In D. Byrne & K. Kelley (Eds.), Alternative approaches to the study of sexual behavior (pp. 131–171). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Flood, M. (2007). Exposure to pornography among youth in Australia. Journal of Sociology, 43(1), 45–60. doi:10.1177/1440783307073934
Häggström-Nordin, E., Borneskog, C., Eriksson, M., & Tydén, T. (2011). Sexual behaviour and contraceptive use among Swedish high school students in two cities: Comparisons between genders, study pro- grammes, and over time. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care : Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception, 16(1), 36–46. doi:10.3109/13625187.2010.536922
Hamaker, E. L., Kuiper, R. M., & Grasman, R. P. P. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20(1), 102– 116. doi:10.1037/a0038889
Hardy, S. A., Steelman, M. A., Coyne, S. M., & Ridge, R. D. (2013). Adolescent religiousness as a protective factor against pornography use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 34(3), 131–139. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2012.12.002
Hasking, P. A., Scheier, L. M., & Ben Abdallah, A. (2011). The three latent classes of adolescent delinquency and the risk factors for membership in each class. Aggressive Behavior, 37(1), 19–35. doi:10.1002/ab.20365
Hayes, A. F. (2005). Statistical methods for communication science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holt, T. J., Bossler, A. M., & May, D. C. (2012). Low self-control, deviant peer associations, and juvenile cyberdeviance. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 37(3), 378–395. doi:10.1007/s12103-011-9117-3
Jones, L. M., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2012). Trends in youth Internet victimization: Findings from three youth Internet safety sur- veys 2000–2010. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50(2), 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.015
Kadri, N., Benjelloun, R., Kendili, I., Khoubila, A., & Moussaoui, D. (2013). Internet and sexuality in Morocco, from cyber habits to psychopathology. Sexologies, 22(2), e49–e53. doi:10.1016/j.sexol.2012.08.006
Kail, R. V., & Cavanaugh, J. C. (2010). Human development: A lifespan view (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Kim, Y.-H. (2001). Korean adolescents’ health risk behaviors and their relationships with the selected psychological constructs. Journal of Adolescent Health, 29(4), 298–306. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(01) 00218-X
Kim, Y.-H. (2011). Adolescents’ health behaviours and its associations with psychological variables. Central European Journal of Public Health, 19(4), 205–209.
Kinsman, J., Nyanzi, S., & Pool, R. (2000). Socializing influences and the value of sex: The experience of adolescent school girls in rural Masaka, Uganda. Culture, Health, and Sexuality, 2(2), 151–166. doi:10.1080/136910500300778
Lavoie, F., Robitaille, L., & Herbert, M. (2000). Teen dating relationships and aggression: An exploratory study. Violence Against Women, 6(1), 6–36. doi:10.1177/10778010022181688
Lo, V., Neilan, E., Sun, M., & Chiang, S. (1999). Exposure of Taiwanese adolescents to pornographic media and its impact on sexual attitudes and behaviour. Asian Journal of Communication, 9(1), 50–71. doi:10.1080/01292989909359614
Lo, V., & Wei, R. (2005). Exposure to Internet pornography and Taiwanese adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 49(2), 221–237. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem4902_5
Lofgren-Mårtenson, L., & Månsson, S.-A. (2010). Lust, love, and life: A qualitative study of Swedish adolescents’ perceptions and experiences with pornography. Journal of Sex Research, 47(6), 568–579. doi:10.1080/00224490903151374
Lopez, J. R., Mukaire, P. E., & Mataya, R. H. (2015). Characteristics of youth sexual and reproductive health and risky behaviors in two rural provinces of Cambodia. Reproductive Health, 12, 83. doi:10.1186/ s12978-015-0052-5
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
529
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
Luder, M.-T., Pittet, I., Berchtold, A., Akre, C., Michaud, P.-A., & Suris, J.- C. (2011). Associations between online pornography and sexual beha- vior among adolescents: Myth or reality? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 1027–1035. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9714-0
Ma, C. M. S., & Shek, D. T. L. (2013). Consumption of pornographic materials in early adolescents in Hong Kong. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology, 26(Suppl. 3), S18–25. doi:10.1016/j.jpag.2013.03.011
Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91. doi:10.1080/ 10532528.2000.10559784
Malamuth, N. M., & Huppin, M. (2005). Pornography and teenagers: The importance of individual differences. Adolescent Medicine Clinics, 16 (2), 315–326. doi:10.1016/j.admecli.2005.02.004
Manaf, M. R. A., Tahir, M. M., Sidi, H., Midin, M., Nik Jaafar, N. R., Das, S., & Malek, A. M. A. (2014). Pre-marital sex and its predicting factors among Malaysian youths. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 55 (Suppl. 1), S82–88. doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.03.008
Marston, C., & Lewis, R. (2014). Anal heterosex among young people and implications for health promotion: A qualitative study in the UK. BMJ Open, 4(8), e004996. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004996
Mattebo, M., Larsson, M., Tydén, T., & Häggström-Nordin, E. (2013). Professionals’ perceptions of the effect of pornography on Swedish adolescents. Public Health Nursing, 31(3), 196–205. doi:10.1111/ phn.12058
Mattebo, M., Larsson, M., Tydén, T., Olsson, T., & Häggström-Nordin, E. (2012). Hercules and Barbie? Reflections on the influence of porno- graphy and its spread in the media and society in groups of adolescents in Sweden. European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 17(1), 40–49. doi:10.3109/13625187.2011.617853
Mattebo, M., Tydén, T., Häggström-Nordin, E., Nilsson, K. W., & Larsson, M. (2013). Pornography consumption, sexual experiences, lifestyles, and self-rated health among male adolescents in Sweden. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 34(7), 460–468. doi:10.1097/DBP.0b013e31829c44a2
Mattebo, M., Tydén, T., Häggström-Nordin, E., Nilsson, K. W., & Larsson, M. (2014). Pornography and sexual experiences among high school students in Sweden. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 35(3), 179–188. doi:10.1097/DBP.0000000000000034
Mesch, G. S. (2009). Social bonds and Internet pornographic exposure among adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 601–618. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.06.004
Mesch, G. S., & Maman, T. L. (2009). Intentional online pornographic exposure among adolescents: Is the Internet to blame? Verhaltenstherapie & Verhaltensmedizin, 30(3), 352–367. doi:10.1037/t01038-000
Mitchell, K. J., Finkelhor, D., & Wolak, J. (2003). The exposure of youth to unwanted sexual material on the Internet: A national survey of risk, impact, and prevention. Youth and Society, 34(3), 330–358. doi:10.1177/0044118X02250123
Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Trends in youth reports of sexual solicitations, harassment, and unwanted exposure to porno- graphy on the Internet. Journal of Adolescent Health, 40(2), 116–126. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.05.021
Mustanski, B. S. (2001). Getting wired: Exploiting the Internet for the collection of sexually valid data. Journal of Sex Research, 38(4), 292–301. doi:10.1080/00224490109552100
Odeyemi, K., Onajole, A., & Ogunowo, B. (2009). Sexual behavior and the influencing factors among out of school female adolescents in Mushin market, Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 21(1), 101–110. doi:10.1515/IJAMH.2009.21.1.101
Owens, E. W., Behun, R. J., Manning, J. C., & Reid, R. C. (2012). The impact of Internet pornography on adolescents: A review of the research. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 19(1–2), 99–122. doi:10.1080/10720162.2012.660431
Peter, J. (2013). Media and sexual development. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents and Media, (pp. 217–223). London, UK: Routledge.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006a). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material on the Internet. Communication Research, 33(2), 178–204. doi:10.1177/0093650205285369
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2006b). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit online material and recreational attitudes toward sex. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 639–660. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00313.x
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexua- lized media environment and notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56(5), 381–395. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9176-y
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008a). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit Internet material and sexual preoccupancy: A three-wave panel study. Media Psychology, 11(2), 207–234. doi:10.1080/ 15213260801994238
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2008b). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit Internet material, sexual uncertainty, and attitudes toward uncommitted sexual exploration: Is there a link? Communication Research, 35(5), 579–601. doi:10.1177/0093650208321754
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009a). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit Internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication, 59(3), 407–433. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01422.x
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2009b). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit Internet material and sexual satisfaction: A longitudinal study. Human Communication Research, 35(2), 171–194. doi:10.1111/ j.1468-2958.2009.01343.x
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2010a). Adolescents’ use of sexually explicit Internet material and sexual uncertainty: The role of involvement and gender. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 357–375. doi:10.1080/ 03637751.2010.498791
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2010b). Processes underlying the effects of adolescents’ use of sexually explicit Internet material: The role of per- ceived realism. Communication Research, 37(3), 375–399. doi:10.1177/ 0093650210362464
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011a). The impact of “forgiving” introduc- tions on the reporting of sensitive behavior in surveys: The role of social desirability response style and developmental status. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 779–787. doi:10.1093/Poq/Nfr041
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011b). The influence of sexually explicit Internet material and peers on stereotypical beliefs about women’s sexual roles: Similarities and differences between adolescents and adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14(9), 511–517. doi:10.1089/cyber.2010.0189
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011c). The influence of sexually explicit Internet material on sexual risk behavior: A comparison of adolescents and adults. Journal of Health Communication, 16(7), 750–765. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551996
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011d). The use of sexually explicit Internet material and its antecedents: A longitudinal comparison of adolescents and adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(5), 1015–1025. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9644-x
Romer, D. (1997). “Talking” computers: A reliable and private method to conduct interviews on sensitive topics with children. Journal of Sex Research, 34(1), 3–9. doi:10.1080/00224499709551859
Rothman, E. F., Kaczmarsky, C., Burke, N., Jansen, E., & Baughman, A. (2015). “Without porn … I wouldn’t know half the things I know now”: A qualitative study of pornography use among a sample of urban, low-income, Black and Hispanic youth. Journal of Sex Research, 52(7), 736–746. doi:10.1080/00224499.2014.960908
Ševčíková, A., & Daneback, K. (2014). Online pornography use in adolescence: Age and gender differences. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(6), 674–686. doi:10.1080/17405629.2014.926808
Ševčíková, A., Šerek, J., Barbovschi, M., & Daneback, K. (2014). The roles of individual characteristics and liberalism in intentional and uninten- tional exposure to online sexual material among European youth: A multilevel approach. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(2), 104– 115. doi:10.1007/s13178-013-0141-6
Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. S. (2012a). Consumption of pornographic materials among early adolescents in Hong Kong: Profiles and
PETER AND VALKENBURG
530
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
psychosocial correlates. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 11(2), 143–150. doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0024
Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. S. (2012b). Consumption of pornographic materials among Hong Kong early adolescents: A replication. Scientific World Journal, 2012, 1–8. doi:10.1100/2012/406063
Shek, D. T. L., & Ma, C. M. S. (2014). Using structural equation modeling to examine consumption of pornographic materials in Chinese adoles- cents in Hong Kong. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 13(2), 239–245. doi:10.1515/ijdhd-2014-0309
Skoog, T., Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2009). The role of pubertal timing in what adolescent boys do online. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19(1), 1–7. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2009.00578.x
Slater, M. D. (2007). Reinforcing spirals: The mutual influence of media selectivity and media effects and their impact on individual behavior and social identity. Communication Theory, 17(3), 281–303. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2007.00296.x
Springate, J., & Omar, H. A. (2013). The impact of the Internet on the sexual health of adolescents: A brief review. International Journal of Child and Adolescent Health, 6(4), 469–471.
Steele, J. R., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Adolescent room culture: Studying media in the context of everyday life. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 24(5), 551–576. doi:10.1007/BF01537056
Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2011). Adolescents’ exposure to sexy media does not hasten the initiation of sexual intercourse. Developmental Psychology, 47(2), 562–576. doi:10.1037/A0020613
To, S., Iu Kan, S., & Ngai, S. S. (2015). Interaction effects between exposure to sexually explicit online materials and individual, family, and extrafa- milial factors on Hong Kong high school students’ beliefs about gender role equality and body-centered sexuality. Youth and Society, 47(6), 747– 768. doi:10.1177/0044118X13490764
To, S., Ngai, S. S., & Iu Kan, S. (2012). Direct and mediating effects of accessing sexually explicit online materials on Hong Kong adoles- cents’ attitude, knowledge, and behavior relating to sex. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(11), 2156–2163. doi:10.1016/j. childyouth.2012.07.019
Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(2), 275–304. doi:10.1086/297751
Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
Traeen, B., Nilsen, T. S., & Stigum, H. (2006). Use of pornography in traditional media and on the Internet in Norway. Journal of Sex Research, 43(3), 245–254. doi:10.1080/00224490609552323
Tsaliki, L. (2011). Playing with porn: Greek children’s explorations in pornography. Sex Education, 11(3), 293–302. doi:10.1080/ 14681811.2011.590087
Tsitsika, A., Critselis, E., Kormas, G., Konstantoulaki, E., Constantopoulos, A., & Kafetzis, D. (2009). Adolescent pornographic Internet site use: A multivariate regression analysis of the predictive factors of use and psychosocial implications. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(5), 545–550. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0346
Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2013). The differential susceptibility to media effects model. Journal of Communication, 63(2), 221–243. doi:10.1111/jcom.12024
Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., & Walrave, M. (2014). The associations between adolescents’ consumption of pornography and music videos and their sexting behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 17(12), 772–778. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0365
Vanden Abeele, M., Campbell, S. W., Eggermont, S., & Roe, K. (2014). Sexting, mobile porn use, and peer group dynamics: Boys’ and girls’ self-perceived popularity, need for popularity, and perceived peer pressure. Media Psychology, 17(1), 6–33. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.801725
Vandenbosch, L. (2015). Antecedents of adolescents’ exposure to different types of sexually explicit Internet material: A longitudinal study. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 439–448. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.032
Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2013a). Sexualization of adolescent boys: Media exposure and boys’ internalization of appearance ideals, self-objectification, and body surveillance. Men and Masculinities, 16 (3), 283–306. doi:10.1177/1097184X13477866
Vandenbosch, L., & Eggermont, S. (2013b). Sexually explicit websites and sexual initiation: Reciprocal relationships and the moderating role of pubertal status. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(4), 621–634. doi:10.1111/jora.12008
Weber, M., Quiring, O., & Daschmann, G. (2012). Peers, parents, and pornography: Exploring adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit material and its developmental correlates. Sexuality and Culture, 16 (4), 408–427. doi:10.1007/s12119-012-9132-7
Wiederman, M. W. (1993). Demographic and sexual characteristics of nonre- sponders to sexual experience items in a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30(1), 27–35. doi:10.1080/00224499309551675
Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. Journal of Sex Research, 36(1), 59–66. doi:10.1080/00224499909551968
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, D. (2007). Unwanted and wanted exposure to online pornography in a national sample of youth Internet users. Pediatrics, 119(2), 247–257. doi:10.1542/peds.2006-1891
Wright, P. J. (2013). U.S. males and pornography, 1973–2010: Consumption, predictors, correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 50(1), 60–71. doi:10.1080/00224499.2011.628132
Wright, P. J. (2014a). Americans’ attitudes toward premarital sex and pornography consumption: A national panel analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44(1), 89–97. doi:10.1007/s10508-014-0353-8
Wright, P. J. (2014b). Pornography and the sexual socialization of children: Current knowledge and a theoretical future. Journal of Children and Media, 8(3), 305–312. doi:10.1080/17482798.2014.923606
Ybarra, M. L., & Mitchell, K. J. (2005). Exposure to Internet pornography among children and adolescents: A national survey. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8(5), 473–486. doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.473
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Hamburger, M., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. J. (2011). X-rated material and perpetration of sexually aggressive behavior among children and adolescents: Is there a link? Aggressive Behavior, 37(1), 1–18. doi:10.1002/Ab.20367
ADOLESCENTS AND PORNOGRAPHY
531
D ow
nl oa
de d
by [
24 .9
0. 13
9. 13
6] a
t 05
:3 9
20 M
ay 2
01 6
- Abstract
- Methodological Characteristics of Quantitative Research on Adolescents and Pornography
- An Integrative Approach to the Literature on Pornography and Adolescents
- Method
- Results
- Methodological Characteristics of Quantitative Research on Adolescents and Pornography
- Conclusion: Dominance of Self-Administered Questionnaires and Cross-Sectional Designs
- Prevalence of Adolescents’ Use of Pornography
- Conclusion: Adolescents Use Pornography, But Prevalence Rates Differ Greatly
- Predictors of Adolescents’ Pornography Use
- Conclusion: The Typical Adolescent Pornography User Is a Male, Pubertally More Advanced, Sensation-Seeker, With Weak or Troubled Family Relations
- Pornography Use and Adolescents’ Sexual Attitudes, Self-development, and Behavior
- Sexual Attitudes
- Permissive Sexual Attitudes
- Gender-Stereotypical Sexual Beliefs
- Sexual Self-Development
- Sexual Behavior
- Conclusion: Pornography Related to Sexual Attitudes and Some Sexual Behaviors, But Causality Unclear
- Comparison With Findings from Qualitative Research
- Critical Evaluation of Results
- Shortcomings
- Biases
- Future Research
- Supplemental Material
- References
