Measuring Change ( discussion )
Chapter 10:
Get and Use Data
Throughout the Change Process
Chapter Overview
Measurement and control processes can play critical roles in guiding change and integrating the initiatives of others throughout the Change Path Model
Four types of control systems are discussed: Diagnostic/Steering Controls, Belief Systems, Boundary Systems, and Interactive Controls
Different types of controls are needed at different stages of the change process
The use of strategy maps as an alignment tool is explored
Three measurement tools are presented: the Balanced Scorecard, the risk exposure calculator, and the duration, integrity, commitment, and effort (DICE) model
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
2
The Change Path Model
Tracking and measuring the change over time to assess progress, make modifications (as needed), and manage risk
Institutionalizing the change through aligning related systems and structures
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
3
Awakening
Chapter 4
Acceleration
Chapter 9
Institutionalization
Chapter 10
Mobilization
Chapters 5 through 8
Can Control Processes Facilitate Change?
Change agents often complain about how control systems and metrics impede change
BUT when controls and metrics are effectively deployed, they can be powerful aids to change
First understand the impact of existing controls on the change initiative
Then tackle the challenge of aligning controls and measures to facilitate change
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
4
Toolkit Exercise 10.2—Impact of Measures and Control Processes on Change
Think of a change initiative that you are familiar with:
What measures and controls were used to track the change? Were they congruent with the change vision and strategy? Were they viewed as legitimate by users?
How was information captured and fed back? Did it arrive in a useful and timely form?
Did measures need to evolve and be modified over the life of the change initiative? How was this managed?
Were steps taken to ensure measures would be properly used? Were there risks arising from their use that needed to be managed?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
5
Toolkit Exercise 10.2—Impact of Measures and Control Processes on Change
Were goals and milestones established, used to plot process, and make midcourse corrections? Were small victories celebrated?
Were the end state measures developed for the change consistent with the vision and strategy? Were they viewed as legitimate?
How were the end state measures fed back to users?
Were steps taken to ensure that end state measures were properly used? Were there risks and potential consequences that needed to be managed?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
6
Choosing Measures
Focus on key factors
Use measures that lead to challenging but achievable goals
Use measures and controls that are perceived as fair and appropriate
Avoid sending mixed signals
Ensure measures deliver accurate and useful data
Match the precision of the measures with the ability to measure
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
7
7
The Change Context and the Choice of Measures
| Choose Precise, Explicit, Goal-Focused Measures | Choose Approximate Measures, Vision Focused, “Learn as You Go” Measures | |
| When Complexity and Ambiguity are: | Low | High |
| When Time to Completion is: | Short | Long |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
8
Types of Control Levers
Interactive Controls—systems that sense environmental changes crucial to strategic concerns (e.g., market intelligence)
Boundary Systems—systems that set limits of authority and action and determine acceptable and unacceptable behavior
Belief Systems—organizational values and beliefs that underpin decisions
Diagnostic/Steering Controls—traditional control systems, focused on key performance variables
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
9
The 4 Levers of Control
Change
Strategy
Risks to be Avoided
Critical Performance Variables
Core Values
Strategic Uncertainties
Interactive Control Systems
Belief Systems
Boundary Systems
Diagnostic Control Systems
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
10
10
Control System Measures and Stage of the Change
| Controls When Planning Change | Controls in Early Stages of Change | Controls in Middle Stages | Controls Toward End of Change Initiative | |
| Interactive Controls | Assessing opportunities and threats Testing viability of existing vision, mission, and strategy, given the environment | Affirm that change project is aligned with environmental trends Assess how to use trends to increase prospects for success | Ongoing monitoring Confirm that environmental assessment continues to support the change | Obtain feedback regarding success of the change relative to environmental factors Ongoing environmental scanning |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
11
Control System Measures and Stage of the Change (cont..)
| Controls When Planning Change | Controls in Early Stages of Change | Controls in Middle Stages | Controls Toward End of Change Initiative | |
| Boundary System | Limit the change options to those within the boundary conditions Test the limits of what is acceptable | Go/no go guidance on appropriateness of actions | Go/no go guidance on appropriateness of actions Reassess risks Reestablish boundaries, if needed Test new boundaries, where appropriate | Re-evaluate the boundary limits |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
12
12
| Controls When Planning Change | Controls in Early Stages of Change | Controls in Middle Stages | Controls Toward End of Change Initiative | |
| Belief System | Assess congruence with purpose | Congruence assessment Appeals to beliefs to overcome resistance | Congruence assessment | Congruence assessment Re-evaluation of core values |
Control System Measures and Stage of the Change (cont..)
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
13
Control System Measures and Stage of the Change (cont..)
| Controls When Planning Change | Controls in Early Stages of Change | Controls in Middle Stages | Controls Toward End of Change Initiative | |
| Diagnostic and Steering Controls | Assess impact of controls on the change project Consider what diagnostic controls will need to be developed and/or altered | Develop milestones, diagnostic measures, and steering controls Develop tactics to alter control systems as needed | Evaluate progress against milestones and measures Assess whether things are workings as they should Modify milestones and measures as needed | Determine when project is completed Confirm changes are working appropriately Evaluate project and pursue learning on improvements for the next time |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
14
Control System Focus an Stage of the Change
| Early Stage of Change | Middle Stages of Change | Late Stages of Change |
| Focus on the “what” of change | Focus on the “how” of change | Focus on outcomes and the “what next” of change |
| Strategic Analysis: Goals, Resources, Environment | Measure Progress and Effectiveness of Processes | Strategic Reanalysis: Goals, Resources, Environment |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
15
Toolkit Exercise 10.3—Application of Simon’s Control Systems Model
Consider a change you are familiar with:
Describe the control processes and measures that were used. What was their impact?
During the earlier stages of the change initiative
During the middle stages of the change initiative
During the later stages of the change initiative
Were there forbidden topics, such as questioning strategy or core values? Were those limits appropriate and were limits tested?
Were small successes recognized and celebrated along the way?
What changes to measures and control processes would have assisted change?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
16
Strategy Maps and Change
Visual representation can be used to show how the change vision and strategy intend to link with each other.
They are linked through:
Employee learning and growth targets and goals
System and process targets and goals
Customer (internal/external) targets and goals
Desired financial targets and goals
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
17
Strategy Maps and Change (cont..)
Human Capital
Informational Capital
Organizational Capital
LEARNING AND GROWTH PERSPECTIVE
INTERNAL PROCESS PERSPECTIVE
CUSTOMER PERSPECTIVE
FINANCIAL PERSPECTIVE
VISION FOR CHANGE AND STRATEGY
How Strategy Links the Perspectives
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
18
A Generic Strategy Map
Learning & Growth
Internal
Customer
Financial
What do we want to accomplish?
How do we plan to accomplish this?
| Human Capital (staff competencies) | 2. Information Capital (technology infrastructure) | 3. Organizational Capital (climate for action) |
Customer
mgmt
leadership
Innovation & comm. supremacy
Internal ops excellence
Effective governance and control
Perception, public relations
Current
Migrated
New
New offerings
Solution focused
Scalability strategies
Add / retain value customer
Increase revenue/customer
Reduce cost/customer
Revenue Growth Strategy
Productivity Strategy
Asset Utilization
Maximize Organizational Value
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
19
19
The Balanced Scorecard and Change Management
Vision and Strategy
Customers
Internal Business Process
Financial Shareholders
Employee Learning and Growth
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
20
Generic Balanced Scorecard for Change
Vision & Change Strategy
Customers: To achieve our change vision, how should we appear to our customers?
Internal Bus. Processes: To achieve our change vision, what business processes do we need to excel
at?
Financial: To succeed financially, how should we appear to our shareholders?
Learning and Growth: How will we sustain our ability to change and improve?
| Objectives | Measures | Targets | Initiatives |
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. |
| Objectives | Measures | Targets | Initiatives |
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. |
| O | M | T | I |
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. |
| O | M | T | I |
| 1. | |||
| 2. | |||
| 3. |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
21
Toolkit Exercise 10.4—Aligning Change and Building the Balanced Scorecard
Think about a change you are familiar with:
State the Mission, Vision, and Strategy for the change.
Consider the Mission, Vision, and Strategy of the organization:
Is the proposed change consistent with these?
If not, what needs to be done to bring them into alignment?
Financial Component of Scorecard: If you succeed with the change vision, how will it appear to the shareholders or those responsible for funding the change? How will you know (objectives and metrics)?
Customer Component of Scorecard: If you succeed with the change, how will it appear to your customers? How will you know (objectives and metrics)?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
22
Toolkit Exercise 10.4—Aligning Change and Building the Balanced Scorecard (cont..)
Internal Business Processes Component of Scorecard: If you succeed with the change, how will it appear in your business processes? How will you know (objectives and metrics)?
Employee Learning and Growth Component of Scorecard: If you succeed with the change, how will it appear to your employees and demonstrate itself in their actions? How will you and they know (objectives and metrics)?
Lay out the scorecard you’ve designed for your change and seek feedback from a classmate.
Can you show how the different components are connected to each other by developing a strategy map for the change?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
23
Factors Leading to Increase Risk
Change Pressure—Risk increases when change leaders feel:
Significant pressures to produce and accomplish the change
There are high levels of ambiguity
The leaders have little experience with change
Change Culture—Risk increases when:
The rewards for risk taking are high
Senior executives resist hearing “bad” news
There is internal competition between units
Information Management—Risk increases when:
The situation is complex and fast changing
Gaps in diagnosis exist
If decision making is decentralized
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
24
Toolkit Exercise 10.5—Using the Risk Exposure Calculator
| Score | ||||
| Change Pressure | Pressure to Produce Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Level of Ambiguity Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Experience with Change High Low 1-2-3-4-5 | Out of 15 ___ |
| Change Culture | Rewards for Risk-taking Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Executives Resist Bad News Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Internal Competition Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Out of 15 ___ |
| Information Situation | Situation is Complex and Fast-changing Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Gaps Exist in Diagnostic Measures Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Change Decision-Making Decentralized Low High 1-2-3-4-5 | Out of 15 ___ |
| Total Score = |
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
25
Four Key DICE Factors
Duration [D]
The time until the change program is completed or the amount of time between reviews of milestones
Integrity [I]
Extent to which companies can rely on teams of managers, supervisors, and staff to execute change projects successfully
Commitment [C]
Dedication and support from top management [C1] and the employees [C2] to the change initiative
Effort [E]
Additional work that the change initiative demands from employees
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
26
Toolkit Exercise 10.6—Applying the DICE Model
Consider a change initiative that you know is currently being considered for adoption and apply the DICE model to it.
Duration Score: 1 --- 2 --- 3 --- 4 Score: ___
Score of 1 if formal reviews less than 2 months
Score of 2 if formal review every 2–4 months
Score of 3 if formal review every 4–8 months
Score of 4 if formal review more than 8 months
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
27
Toolkit Exercise 10.6—Applying the DICE Model (cont..)
Integrity of Performance Score: 1– 2 -- 3 -- 4 Score: __
Score of 1 if team leader has the skills needed and the respect of coworkers, team members have the skills and motivation to complete the project on time and at least 50% of the team members’ time has been assigned to the initiative
Score of 4 if change team and change leader are lacking on all dimensions
Score of 2 or 3 if the factors lie somewhere in-between
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
28
Toolkit Exercise 10.6—Applying the DICE Model (cont..)
Commitment Score is a 2-part measure…
Senior Management Commitment: 1-2-3- 4 Score: __
Score of 1 if words and deeds of senior managers regularly reinforce the need for change
Score of 2 or 3 if senior managers are fairly neutral
Score of 4 if senior managers are perceived as less than supportive
Employee Commitment: 1 –- 2 –- 3 --- 4 Score: ___
Score of 1 if employees are very supportive
Score of 2 if they are willing but not overly eager
Scores of 3 or 4 as reluctance increases
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
29
Toolkit Exercise 10.4—Applying the DICE Model (cont..)
Level of Additional Employee Effort and Demands over the Normal Load:
1 –- 2 –- 3 --- 4 Score: ___
Score of 1 if incremental effort less than 10%
Score of 2 if incremental effort 10% to 20%
Score of 3 if incremental effort 20% to 40%
Score of 4 if additional effort more than 40%
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
30
30
Interpreting DICE Change Risk Scores
Calculating the DICE Score:
(Duration Score +
2 × Integrity Score +
2 × Senior Management Commitment Score +
Local-level Commitment Score +
Effort Score)
Interpreting the Score:
Scores between 7 and 14: Win Zone
Scores between 14 and 17: Worry Zone
Scores over 17: Woe Zone
Do the findings help you to think about sources of risk and how to manage risk?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
31
31
Summary
Care taken in the selection of measures and control processes help focus energy and effort
They can help enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the change, provide an early warning system, and provide direction to midcourse corrections
They can help clarify what will be accomplished, what it will take to bring these things to reality and chart progress
The careful selection and use of metrics can be used to enhance the legitimacy and sense of ownership of the change
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
32