MGT-521: Managing Dynamic Environment - Module 03: Critical Thinking
Chapter 3: What to Change in an Organization: Frameworks
1
Chapter Overview
Change leaders must understand both the HOW and the WHAT of change. The focus here is on WHAT needs to change
Open systems organizational frameworks are valuable assessment tools of what needs to change. Nadler and Tushman’s Congruence Model is explored in detail
The non-linear and interactive nature of organizations is explored to make sense of their complexity
Quinn’s competing values model is used to create a bridge between individual and organizational levels of analysis
Organizational change over time is discussed
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
2
2
The Change Path Model
Use Diagnostic Frameworks in Ch.3 to better understand:
How to Change &
What to Change
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
3
Awakening
Chapter 4
Acceleration
Chapter 9
Institutionalization
Chapter 10
Mobilization
Chapters 5 through 8
Open Systems Perspective
Organizations exchange information, material & energy with their environment. They are not isolated
A system is the product of its interrelated and interdependent parts
It represents a complex web of interrelationships, not a chain of linear cause–effect relationships
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
4
Dynamic Complexity because Systems are:
Constantly changing
Tightly coupled
Governed by feedback
Nonlinear
History-dependent
Self-organizing
Adaptive
Characterized by trade-offs
Counterintuitive
Policy resistant
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
5
Open Systems Perspective (cont.)
A system seeks equilibrium and one at equilibrium will only change if energy is applied
Individuals within a system may have views of the system’s function and purpose that differ greatly from those of others
Things that occur within and/or to open systems should not be viewed in isolation. See them as interconnected, interdependent components of a complex system
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
6
Nadler & Tushman’s Organizational Congruence Model
Input
Environment
(PESTEL)
Resources
History / Culture
Output
Systems
Unit
Individual
Informal Organization
Work
Formal Organization
People
Strategy
Transformation Process
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
7
7
Nadler & Tushman’s Organizational Congruence Model
Input
Environment
(PESTEL)
Resources
History / Culture
Output
Systems
Unit
Individual
Informal Organization
Work
Formal Organization
People
Strategy
Transformation Process
8
Environmental Pressures for Change
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
8
Analyzing Organizations Using Nadler and Tushman’s Model
Use the congruence model to describe your organization or an organization you are familiar with. Categorize the key components (environment, strategy, tasks, etc.). What outputs are desired? Are they achieved?
Is the strategy in line with organization’s environmental inputs? Are the transformation processes aligned well with the strategy? How do they interact to produce the outputs?
When you evaluate your organization’s outputs, are there things your organization should address?
Are there aspects of how your organization works that you have difficulty understanding? If so, what resources could you access to help with this analysis?
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
9
9
Linear Event View of the World
Goal
Situation
Gap / Problem
Decision / Action
Results
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
10
Issues & Problems with the Linear View
Time delays and lag effects related to variables and outcomes you are trying to manage (e.g., inventory stocks and flows, customer satisfaction and purchase decisions)
Complexity makes cause–effect relationships difficult to predict and track
Attribution Errors and False Learning often result from the above
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
11
A Feedback Model
Decisions
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
12
Environment
Decisions
But Feedback Models are Messier
Goals
Decisions
Environment
Goals of Others
Action of Others
Side Effects
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
13
Quinn’s Competing Values Framework
Flexibility
Control
Internally Externally Focused Focused
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
14
14
Quinn’s Competing Values Framework (cont.)
Flexibility
Control
Internally Externally Focused Focused
Human Resources View
Open Systems View
Internal Processes View
Rational Economic View
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
15
Quinn’s Competing Values Framework (cont.)
Flexibility
Control
Internally Externally Focused Focused
Human Resources View
How to work with individuals and groups
Teamwork and HR dept.
Mentor and group facilitator roles
Open Systems View
How to use power and manage change
The challenge of change
Innovator and broker roles
Internal Processes View
How to understand & control the work unit
Consolation and continuity
Internal monitor and coordinator roles
Rational Economic View
How to stimulate individual and collective achievement
Maximization of output
Producer and director roles
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
16
Greiner’s Five Phases of Organizational Growth
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
17
Stacy’s Complexity Theory and Organizational Change
Organizations are webs of nonlinear feedback loops that are connected with individuals and organizations through similar webs
These feedback systems operate in stable and unstable states of equilibrium, even to the point at which chaos ensues
Organizations are inherently paradoxes, pulled by forces of stability and instability
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
18
18
Stacy’s Complexity Theory and Organizational Change (cont.)
If organizations give into forces of stability, they become ossified and change impaired
If organizations succumb to forces of instability, they will disintegrate
Success is when organizations exist between frozen stability and chaos
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
19
19
Stacy’s Complexity Theory and Organizational Change (cont.)
Short-term dynamics (or noise) are characterized by irregular cycles and discontinuous trends, but long-term trends are identifiable
A successful organization faces an unknowable specific future because things can and do happen
Agents can’t control the long-term future—they can only act in relation to the short term
Long-term development is a spontaneous, self-organizing process that may give rise to new strategic directions
It is through this process that managers create and come to know the environments and long-term futures of their organizations
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
20
20
Summary
When assessing organizations, think of them as open systems—webs of interconnected and interdependent relationships that interact with the environment
Change often originates in the external environment.
Change upsets the internal equilibrium in an organization and thus may be resisted.
Both evolutionary and revolutionary change is needed for organizational growth
We need to understand the WHY and WHAT of change.
Models in this chapter have focused on the WHAT of change
Change is not clean and linear—it is messy
Deszca, Ingols & Cawsey, Organizational Change: An Action-Oriented Toolkit, 4th ed.. © 2020 SAGE Pub.
21
Evolution stages
Revolution stages
Size of
organization
LARGE
SMALL
YOUNG
Age of Organization
MATURE
1: Growth through
CREATIVITY
1: Crisis of
LEADERSHIP
2: Growth through
DIRECTION
2: Crisis of
AUTONOMY
3: Growth through
DELEGATION
4: Growth through
COORDINATION
5: Growth through
COLLABORATION
3: Crisis of
CONTROL
4: Crisis of
RED TAPE
5: Crisis of ?
PHASE 1
PHASE 2
PHASE 3
PHASE 4
PHASE 5