Exchange Rate Determination

ECN500 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 11

Exceeds Expectation

Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points

Requirements Exceeds Expectation - Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence - Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points

Content Exceeds Expectation - Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions.

Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions.

Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions.

Limited Evidence - Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions.

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points

Analysis Exceeds Expectation - Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding the pegged exchange rate.

Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding the pegged exchange rate.

Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding the pegged exchange rate.

Limited Evidence - Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications regarding the pegged exchange rate.

13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points

Sources Exceeds Expectation - Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

Limited Evidence - Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

ECN500 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 11

Mechanics and Writing

5 Points 4 Points 3 Points 1-2 Points

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

Exceeds Expectation - Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Below Expectation - Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references.

Limited Evidence - Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references.

Total points possible = 110