S121 ECO504 BUSINESS ECONOMICS
29/02/2016
1
OTHER TYPES OF IMPERFECT COMPETITION
Market structure II- Other types
of imperfect competition
Characteristics of Monopolistic Competition
Monopolistic competition is a market structure in which
many firms sell products that are similar but not identical
Characteristics
• Many sellers
• Product differentiation
• Free entry
Product Differentiation
•A firm in monopolistic competition practices product
differentiation if the firm makes a product that is slightly
different from the products of competing firms.
What Is Monopolistic
Competition?
29/02/2016
2
Monopolistic Competition
Many Sellers
•The presence of a large number of firms in the market
implies:
Each firm has only a small market share and therefore
has limited market power to influence the price of its
product.
Each firm is sensitive to the average market price, but no
firm pays attention to the actions of others. So no one
firm’s actions directly affect the actions of others.
Collusion, or conspiring to fix prices, is impossible.
Entry and Exit
•There are no barriers to entry in monopolistic
competition, so firms cannot make an economic profit
in the long run.
Monopolistic Competition
Examples of markets which have characteristics of
monopolistic competition
• Restaurants
• Computer games
• Hotel accommodation
• Beauty consultants
• Opticians
29/02/2016
3
The Monopolistically Competitive Firm in the Short Run
• The firm in panel (a) makes a profit because, at this quantity, price is
above ATC
• The firm in panel (b) makes losses because, at this quantity, price is less
than ATC
The Long-Run Equilibrium When firms are making profits
new firms have an incentive to
enter the market
• Supply increases
• Prices fall
• Existing firms wanting to sell
more must reduce prices
• Close substitutes means
effectively the demand curve for
an individual firm shifts to the left
• Firms making loses will exit
market
• Supplies fall and prices rise
• Process continues until zero
profits are made
$ AC
MC
D
MR
Q*
P*
Quantity of Brand
X MR1
D1
Entry
P1
Q1
Long Run Equilibrium
(P = AC, so zero profits)
Long-Run Monopolistic
Competition
29/02/2016
4
Long Run: Zero Economic Profit
In the long run, economic profit induces entry.
And entry continues as long as firms in the industry earn
an economic profit—as long as (P > ATC).
In the long run, a firm in monopolistic competition
maximises its profit by producing the quantity at which its
marginal revenue equals its marginal cost, MR = MC.
Price and Output in Monopolistic
Competition
Monopolistic vs. Perfect Competition • Panel (a) shows the long-run equilibrium in a monopolistically competitive market
• Panel (b) shows the long-run equilibrium in a perfectly competitive market
• Only the perfectly competitive firm produces at the efficient scale
• Price equals marginal cost under perfect competition, but price is above marginal
cost under monopolistic competition so exerting market power
• Monopolistic competition uses of advertising and tries to establish a brand
Monopolistic Competition and Perfect Competition
•Two key differences between monopolistic competition and perfect competition are:
Excess capacity
Markup
•A firm has excess capacity if it produces less than the quantity at which ATC is a minimum.
•A firm’s markup is the amount by which its price exceeds its marginal cost.
Price and Output in
Monopolistic Competition
29/02/2016
5
Making the Relevant Comparison
The markup that drives a gap between price and marginal
cost arises from product differentiation.
People value product variety, but product variety is costly.
Price and Output in Monopolistic
Competition
Monopoly, monopolistic
competition and perfect
competition A monopoly firm, in contrast, can earn persistent profits
provided that source of monopoly power is not eliminated.
A monopolistically competitive firm can earn profits in the short run, but entry by competing brands will erode these profits over time.
Oligopoly
Oligopoly is where competition is between a few
Duopoly is an oligopoly with just two members
Competition, Monopolies and Cartels
Groups of firms might decide to behave like a
monopoly by agreeing between them what to
charge or what quantities to produce. They are
colluding
The group of firms colluding is a cartel
29/02/2016
6
Game Theory Framework
Game theory is the study of how people behave
in strategic situations.
Games consist of the following components:
• Players or agents who make decisions.
• Planned actions of players, called strategies.
• Payoff of players under different strategy scenarios.
Overview of Games and Strategic Thinking
One-Shot Games: Theory
Strategy
• A decision rule that describes the actions a player will
take at each decision point.
Dominant strategy
• A strategy that is best for a player regardless of the
strategies chosen by the other players.
Simultaneous-Move, One-Shot
Games
Normal-Form Game
Player A
Player B
Strategy Left Right
Up 10, 20 15, 8
Down -10 , 7 10, 10
Set of players
Player A’s strategies
Player B’s strategies
Player A’s possible payoffs
from strategy “down”
Player B’s
possible
payoffs
from
strategy
“right”
29/02/2016
7
The Prisoners’ Dilemma The Prisoners’ dilemma is a ‘game’ between two captured prisoners
that illustrates why cooperation is difficult to maintain even when it is
mutually beneficial
• In this game between two criminals suspected of committing a crime
• The sentence that each receives depends both on his decision whether to
confess or remain silent and on the decision made by the other.
A dominant strategy if it is the best strategy for a player to follow regardless of the strategies pursued by other player Both Mr. Green and Mr. Blue confess and both spend 8 years in jail If they had both remained silent, both of them would have been better off
The Equilibrium for an Oligopoly
Competition laws prohibit explicit agreements among
oligopolists
A Nash equilibrium is a situation in which oligopolies
choose their best strategy given the strategies the others
have chosen
• Oligopolies would be better off cooperating
• Instead oligopolies choose self interest at the expense of maximizing
joint profit
Oligopolies as a Prisoner’s Dilemma Consider an oligopoly with two firms, BP and Shell. Both firms refine crude oil
Both firms agree to keep refined oil production low in order to keep the world
price of refined oil high
They must now decide to stick to the agreement or ignore it
The profit that each earns depends on both its production decision and the
production decision of the other oligopolist
• The dominant strategy is for both to ignore the agreement
and go for high production
• This is an inferior outcome than if both stuck to the agreement
The dilemma also applies to
advertising and common resources
29/02/2016
8
Games in Economics
Repeated Game: game is played repeatedly over a period
of time
In a perpetual repeated game, equilibria that are not stable
may become stable due to the threat of retaliation.
Restraint of Trade & Competition Law
Designed to discourage collusion
Controversies over Competition Policy
Resale Price Maintenance • A business may wish to protect brand image of which a high price is
part of its marketing strategy
Predatory Pricing • Where is the boundary between predatory and competitive pricing?
Tying • Where a customer is required to buy something they do not want as a
condition of buying something they do want