Psychology poster assignment

profilenikkieramsey
SEPA2016sexualfrustration.pptx

A Measures of Sexual Satisfaction and Frustration

Tammy Lowery Zacchilli, Rebecca Liller, Alanna Marrero,

Andree Garnier, and Anella Garness

The main purpose of the present studies was the construction of a sexual frustration measure. Few studies have examined sexual frustration. Wright (2012) found that the majority of participants in her study reported some degree of sexual frustration. Specifically, participants who reported less sex during the past week reported more sexual frustration. Thus, sexual satisfaction seems to be important to relationship quality but little is known about the effects of sexual frustration. In the two previous studies, items were created to measure sexual frustration. These items were subjected to an exploratory factor analysis and two factors emerged. Thus, a third study was launched to further examine these factor structures.

Discussion

Although the alphas for each of the new factors were acceptable, the results of the CFI indicated that the two factor model did not show good fit. Only the SRMR was in the acceptable range of < .10 (Kline, 2005). The RMSEA should be between .05 and .08 for acceptable fit and the CFI should be >.90 to indicate good fit (Kline, 2005). Two of the factor loadings for factor 2 were low (.473 and .484) which may be why the model did not fit well. Future research is needed to further examine how to best measure sexual frustration.

  Factor 1(α = .73) Satisfaction Factor 2 (α = .71) Reactions to Frustration
I am sexually satisfied. .635 -.253
I feel comfortable asking my partner for what I want. .573 -.181
I have sexual intercourse. .596 -.131
I masturbate. .071 .766
I initiate sexual activity with my partner. .576 .087
During sexual activity, I experience orgasms. .650 .063
The amount of pleasure I receive from sexual activity is .785 .022
There are sexual acts that I wish my partner would perform. -.078 .473
My partner’s sexual attitude matches mine. .559 -.189
My sexual activity has decreased. -.571 .019
My sexual activity has increased. .553 .029
I enjoy sexual activity. .613 .192
I watch porn. .088 .744
I am easily stimulated during sexual activity. .529 .170
I seek sexual stimulation through watching movies. -.044 .484

Items and Factor Loadings Correlations

Poster Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association in March 2016 in New Orleans, LA.

Participants

Participants include 84 males and 260 females with mean age of 33.45 (SD = 9.89). The majority of the sample was Caucasian (50%) and heterosexual (92%).

Materials and Procedure

Participants responded to an online questionnaire that included a demographics measure, Hendrick et al.’s (1998) Love and Relationship Biography, Janssen et al.’s (2002) Sexual Inhibition and Sexual Excitation Scales, Wright’s (2012) Sexual Frustration Scale (α = .86), and the scale developed by the researchers.

  Wright’s Sexual Frustration Scale Sexual Frustration Factor 2
Sexual Frustration Factor 1 -.34** -.04
Wright’s Sexual Frustration Scale .36**

1

image3.emf

image4.jpg

image5.jpg

image6.jpg

Microsoft_Excel_Worksheet1.xlsx

Sheet1

RMSEA CFI SRMR χ2 (df)
One Factor 0.158 0.653 0.124 860.91 (90)
Two Factor 0.127 0.779 0.09 580.72 (90)

image2.png