psychology essay outline then 1600 word essay

Section is Missing

Poor

Weak

Acceptable

Good

Excellent

Strongest Behavioral Style

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Did not mention one's strongest behavioral style.

Points Range:10.2 (10.20%) - 12 (12.00%)

Mentioned one's strongest behavioral style without an explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.2 (12.20%) - 14 (14.00%)

Included descriptions of vague or irrelevant behaviors.

Points Range:14.2 (14.20%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included one or two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages.

Points Range:16.2 (16.20%) - 18 (18.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific yet general relevant tendency (but not a specific incident).

Points Range:18.2 (18.20%) - 20 (20.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a relevant specific incident.

Strongest Value

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Did not mention one's strongest value.

Points Range:10.2 (10.20%) - 12 (12.00%)

Mentioned one's strongest value without an explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.2 (12.20%) - 14 (14.00%)

Included descriptions of vague or irrelevant behaviors.

Points Range:14.2 (14.20%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included one or two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages.

Points Range:16.2 (16.20%) - 18 (18.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific yet general relevant tendency (but not a specific incident.

Points Range:18.2 (18.20%) - 20 (20.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a relevant specific incident.

First Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Did not mention a first facet.

Points Range:10.2 (10.20%) - 12 (12.00%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:12.2 (12.20%) - 14 (14.00%)

Included descriptions of vague or irrelevant behaviors.

Points Range:14.2 (14.20%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:16.2 (16.20%) - 18 (18.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:18.2 (18.20%) - 20 (20.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Second Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Did not mention a second facet.

Points Range:10.2 (10.20%) - 12 (12.00%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:12.2 (12.20%) - 14 (14.00%)

Included descriptions of vague or irrelevant behaviors.

Points Range:14.2 (14.20%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:16.2 (16.20%) - 18 (18.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:18.2 (18.20%) - 20 (20.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Third Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 10 (10.00%)

Did not mention a third facet.

Points Range:10.2 (10.20%) - 12 (12.00%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:12.2 (12.20%) - 14 (14.00%)

Included descriptions of vague or irrelevant behaviors.

Points Range:14.2 (14.20%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:16.2 (16.20%) - 18 (18.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:18.2 (18.20%) - 20 (20.00%)

Included at least three detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Section is Missing

Poor

Weak

Acceptable

Good

Excellent

Strongest Behavioral Style

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.5 (8.50%)

Did not mention one's strongest behavioral style.

Points Range:8.67 (8.67%) - 10.2 (10.20%)

Mentioned one's strongest behavioral style without an explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:10.37 (10.37%) - 11.9 (11.90%)

Included a short or cyclical argument(s) on why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.07 (12.07%) - 13.6 (13.60%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true and included one or two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages.

Points Range:13.77 (13.77%) - 15.3 (15.30%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific yet general relevant tendency (but not a specific incident).

Points Range:15.47 (15.47%) - 17 (17.00%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a relevant specific incident.

Strongest Value

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.5 (8.50%)

Did not mention one's strongest value.

Points Range:8.67 (8.67%) - 10.2 (10.20%)

Mentioned one's strongest value without an explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:10.37 (10.37%) - 11.9 (11.90%)

Included a short or cyclical argument(s) on why the result was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.07 (12.07%) - 13.6 (13.60%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true and included one or two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages.

Points Range:13.77 (13.77%) - 15.3 (15.30%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the result was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific yet general relevant tendency (but not a specific incident).

Points Range:15.47 (15.47%) - 17 (17.00%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of relevant behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a relevant specific incident.

First Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.5 (8.50%)

Did not mention a first facet.

Points Range:8.67 (8.67%) - 10.2 (10.20%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:10.37 (10.37%) - 11.9 (11.90%)

Included short or cyclical argument(s) on why the percentile was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.07 (12.07%) - 13.6 (13.60%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true and included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:13.77 (13.77%) - 15.3 (15.30%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:15.47 (15.47%) - 17 (17.00%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Second Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

Did not mention a second facet.

Points Range:8.16 (8.16%) - 9.6 (9.60%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:9.76 (9.76%) - 11.2 (11.20%)

Included short or cyclical argument(s) on why the percentile was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:11.36 (11.36%) - 12.8 (12.80%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true and included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:12.96 (12.96%) - 14.4 (14.40%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:14.56 (14.56%) - 16 (16.00%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Third Facet

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8.5 (8.50%)

Did not mention a third facet.

Points Range:8.67 (8.67%) - 10.2 (10.20%)

Mentioned facet without an explanation of why the percentile was surprising.

Points Range:10.37 (10.37%) - 11.9 (11.90%)

Included short or cyclical argument(s) on why the percentile was surprising or rang true.

Points Range:12.07 (12.07%) - 13.6 (13.60%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true and included one or two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages that illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Points Range:13.77 (13.77%) - 15.3 (15.30%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one very detailed description of a domain-specific general tendency that illustrates the level of the trait one possesses (which was not a specific incident).

Points Range:15.47 (15.47%) - 17 (17.00%)

Included at least one logical explanation of why the percentile was surprising or rang true, included more than two detailed descriptions of behaviors in which one regularly engages, and included at least one clear and very detailed description of a specific incident in which one’s behaviors illustrate the level of the trait one possesses.

Grammar & Syntax

Points Range:0 (0.00%) - 8 (8.00%)

The response was indecipherable or illegible.

Points Range:8.16 (8.16%) - 9.6 (9.60%)

Most sentences were highly problematic (indecipherable). E.g., there existed consistent problems with subject-verb agreement, verb tense agreement, use of pronouns, etc.

Points Range:9.76 (9.76%) - 11.2 (11.20%)

Several sentences were problematic. A few of them were indecipherable. E.g., there existed several problems with subject-verb agreement, verb tense agreement, use of pronouns, etc. A few of these errors impeded communication.

Points Range:11.36 (11.36%) - 12.8 (12.80%)

A few (more than two) sentences contained errors. E.g., there existed a few problems with subject-verb agreement, verb tense agreement, and use of pronouns, etc. However, meaning could still be understood.

Points Range:12.96 (12.96%) - 14.4 (14.40%)

Only one or two sentences contained errors and communication was clear. I.e., any problems with subject-verb agreement, verb tense agreement, use of pronouns, etc. did not impede communication.

Points Range:14.56 (14.56%) - 16 (16.00%)

There were no grammatical or syntactical mistakes. Communication was clear.