| Course Code | Class Code |
| SEC-505 | SEC-505-O500 | Approaches to Learning Scenarios | 75.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Response to Scenarios: Assessment and Challenges | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Response to one or both scenarios demonstrates an inadequate understanding of assessment of developmental characteristics, with a vague explanation of challenges the student is facing. | Response to scenarios demonstrates a moderate and basic understanding of assessment of developmental characteristics, with a marginal explanation of challenges the student is facing. | Response to both scenarios demonstrates an understanding of assessment of developmental characteristics, with a sound explanation of challenges the student is facing. | Response to both scenarios demonstrates an exceptional understanding of assessment of developmental characteristics and behaviors, with a proficient explanation of specific challenges the student is facing. |
| Response to Scenarios: Instruction and Technology | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Response to one or both scenarios are lack of explanation of approaches to instruction that promote physical, cognitive, or socioemotional development of each student with undeveloped opportunities to facilitate learning with the use of technology. | Response to scenarios includes a basic and unclear explanation of approaches to instruction that promote physical, cognitive, or socioemotional development of each student with limited opportunities to facilitate learning with the use of technology. | Response to scenarios demonstrates a reasonable understanding of approaches to instruction that promote physical, cognitive, or socioemotional development of each student with sound opportunities to facilitate learning with the use of technology. | Response to scenarios demonstrates a proficient understanding of a variety of approaches to instruction that promote physical, cognitive, or socioemotional development of each student with well-researched opportunities to facilitate learning with the use of technology. |
| Scenario #1 | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Response to scenario #1 includes an irrelevant explanation of how to use Response to Intervention to support learning, with unfocused intervention strategies, steps, and technology. | Response to scenario #1 includes a simple explanation of how to use Response to Intervention to support learning, with logical intervention strategies, steps, and technology. | Response to scenario #1 includes a reasonable explanation of how to use Response to Intervention to support learning, with clear intervention strategies, steps, and technology. | Response to scenario #1 includes an outstanding explanation of how to use Response to Intervention to support learning, with specific intervention strategies, steps, and technology. |
| Scenario #2 | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Response to scenario #2 includes an unclear explanation of strategies, including a vague use of technology tools, to support learning and process information. | Response to scenario #2 includes a rudimentary explanation of strategies, including the use of technology tools, to support learning and process information. | Response to scenario #2 includes a clear explanation of strategies, including a reasonable use of technology tools, to support learning and process information. | Response to scenario #2 includes a proficient explanation of strategies, including the skillful use of technology tools, to support learning and process information. |
| Research Citations and Format | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken. | Some citations may be missing where needed; or some of the sources do not support the submission; or APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken. | All sources are credible, adequate, and support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. | All sources are credible, appropriate, and strongly support the submission. All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 15.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
bubblegum
Sec505Wk2Rubric.xlsx
