Please help me in writing my paper
SCORING GUIDE: Mini-Research or Project Option
|
CONTENT |
||||
|
Clarity/Organization |
||||
|
5 Central Claims are clearly stated early on. Focus is marinated and supportive material is related to focus. Conclusion returns to focus. |
4 Same as 5, but a little wandering off topic. |
3 Topic is stated, but focus gets lost in one or more places. |
2 Focus not stated, some focus in supportive material. |
1 Lacks focus. Paper rambles, lacks conclusion. |
|
Writing |
||||
|
5 Each paragraph and sentence is clear. Writing is crisp, clear, compact. |
4 Mostly clear, well written. |
3 Writing rambles a bit or may be long-winded, but effort is evident. |
2 Little clarity and/or cleanness |
1 Paragraphs and sentences ramble, are disconnected. |
|
Relevance |
||||
|
5 Paper’s relevance to the author is discussed. Paper’s relevance to understanding American education past, present, and future is explained clearly. |
4 Paper’s relevance to author is discussed. Relevance to course is described. |
3 Paper’s relevance to author is hinted at (experiences in education). Some connection is made to American education or to equity and justice, but it is not explicit. |
2 Author does not reveal relevance, but links paper to course. |
1 Relevance to author is not described. No connection made to course or equity and justice. |
|
Thoughtfulness and Substance |
||||
|
5 Author has clearly “dug deep” to understand the topic. Author is an author on the topic. Author recognizes limitations of project and suggests future efforts. |
4 Mostly evident, as in 5. |
3 Author demonstrates interest and has done some research, but has not become an authority on the topic. Is aware of limitations. |
2 Surface level of understanding. Effort evident, but not deep. |
1 Little evidence of effort to wrestle with topic. Surface only. |
|
Resources - # of resources |
||||
|
5 8 |
4 6-7 |
3 4-5 |
2 3 |
1 Fewer than 3 |
|
Thoroughness |
||||
|
5 Author has clearly “dug deep” to analyze the topic. Author has obvious knowledge of key ideas. Author is an authority on the topic. |
4 As in 5, but may miss being an authority. |
3 Author demonstrates interest and has done some careful research, but has not become an authority on the topic. |
2 Surface level of understanding. Effort evident, but not deep. |
1 Little evidence of effort to wrestle with topic. Surface only. |
|
FORMAT |
||||
|
Length |
||||
|
5 3-5 pages, appropriate to topic/project. |
4 3-5 pages, mostly appropriate. |
3 3-5 pages, length is developed with filler. |
2 2-3 pages, too short for topic. |
1 >3 pages, not appropriate length. |
|
Formatting/Conventions |
||||
|
5 Blocked, word-processed, 1” margins, 12-point font. Spelling, usage, paragraphing, sentence structure correct. |
4 Most conventions followed. |
3 Formatting correct. Some errors in conventions. |
2 Formatting not correct. Some convention errors. |
1 Serious errors in formatting and conventions. |
|
Total /40 |
39-40=20 37-38=19 35-36=18 33-34=17 31-32=16 29-30=15 27-28=14
25-26=13 23-24=12 21-22=11 19-20=10 17-18=9 15-16=8 13-14=7
11-12=6 1-10=5 no paper = 0