Care Setting Environmental Analysis

Criteria

Non-performance

Basic

Proficient

Distinguished

Synthesize stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals.

Does not list stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals.

Lists but does not synthesize stories and evidence, or fails to clearly relate stories and evidence to quality and safety goals.

Synthesizes stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals.

Synthesizes stories and evidence about times when a care setting performed at its best with regard to quality and safety goals. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the synthesis).

Propose positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting.

Does not propose positive goals for a care setting.

Proposed goals are positive but not attainable, or will not lead to ethical and culturally sensitive improvement of organizational quality and safety, or are not clearly aligned with the care setting’s mission, vision, and values.

Proposes positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting.

Proposes positive, attainable quality and safety improvement goals for a care setting, and identifies assumptions on which proposed goals are based.

Conduct a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals.

Does not present the findings of a SWOT analysis of a care setting.

Conducts a SWOT analysis of a care setting that is not clearly focused on quality and safety goals.

Conducts a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals.

Conducts a SWOT analysis of a care setting, with respect to quality and safety goals, and impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.

Describe an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting's mission, vision, and values—that should be improved.

Does not describe an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis that should be improved.

Describes an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis, but does not show its relevance to a care setting's mission, vision, and values.

Describes an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting's mission, vision, and values—that should be improved.

Describes an area of concern identified in a SWOT analysis—relevant to a care setting's mission, vision, and values—that should be improved. Identifies criteria that could be used to evaluate such an improvement.

Compare the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others.

Does not describe data gathering and interactions with others.

Describes data gathering and interactions with others, but does not compare these activities using an AI and SWOT approach to analysis.

Compares the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others.

Compares the AI and SWOT approaches to analysis with regard to data gathering and interactions with others, and acknowledges one’s own assumptions and biases.

Analyze the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach.

Does not analyze leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects.

Analyzes leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, but does not clearly distinguish between an AI and SWOT approach.

Analyzes the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach.

Analyzes the leadership characteristics and skills most desired in the person leading potential performance improvement projects, taking both an AI and SWOT approach. Identifies areas of uncertainty or knowledge gaps.

Communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.

Does not communicate analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.

Communication is not consistently clear and professional; errors in grammar or mechanics distract from the message, or communication lacks respect for stakeholders or colleagues.

Communicates analyses clearly and in a way that demonstrates professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues.

Communicates analyses clearly, logically, and persuasively, demonstrating professionalism and respect for stakeholders and colleagues. Grammar and mechanics are virtually error-free.

Integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Does not integrate relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references using APA style.

Sources lack relevance or credibility, are poorly integrated, or are incorrectly formatted.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Integrates relevant and credible sources of evidence to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are error-free.