PHASE 3 Implementation APA SEVEN RUBRIC AND INTRUCTIOS ATTACHED

· Score 6.48 / 10

· Integration of Knowledge

25% of total result

1.5

Oustanding

The paper demonstrates that the author understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Concepts are integrated into the writer’s own insights. The writer provides concluding remarks that show analysis and synthesis of ideas.

2.5

Very Good

The paper demonstrates that the author, mostly, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course. Some conclusions, however, are not supported in the body of the paper.

2

Good

The paper demonstrates that the author, to a certain extent, understands and has applied concepts learned in the course.

1.5

Unacceptable

The paper does not demonstrate that the author has understood, and applied concepts learned in the course.

1

Criterion Feedback

Please read the detailed feedback within this paper- several areas of concern that need to be corrected prior to final submission

· Topic Focus

25% of total result

1.5

Oustanding

Topic Focus 12.5% The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis

2.5

Very Good

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position.

2

Good

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

1.5

Unacceptable

The topic is not clearly defined.

1

Criterion Feedback

Topic needs to be more focused and developed - not clearly articulated within the paper

See feedback

· Depth of Discussion

13% of total result

0.78

Oustanding

In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper.

1.3

Very Good

In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

1.04

Good

The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

0.78

Unacceptable

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections

0.52

Criterion Feedback

Multiple areas of development needed- missing key information on the discussion

See feedback

Sample size, inclusion, exclusion criteria, flow charts or graphs, a place where the study was to take place, ethical considerations etc.. should be developed.

· Cohesiveness

13% of total result

0.78

Oustanding

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources.

1.3

Very Good

Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

1.04

Good

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

0.78

Unacceptable

It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationship

0.52

Criterion Feedback

There are areas that do not tie in to the overall these or topic- please visit the writing lab- multiple error found within the paper

· Spelling and Grammar

12% of total result

0.72

Oustanding

Minimal spelling and/or grammar mistakes

1.2

Very Good

Some spelling and or grammar mistakes.

0.96

Good

Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes.

0.72

Unacceptable

An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.

0.48

Criterion Feedback

see feedback

· Sources

6% of total result

0.6

Oustanding

Over 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

0.6

Very Good

5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

0.48

Good

Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.

0.36

Unacceptable

Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.

0.24

· Citations

6% of total result

0.6

Oustanding

Cites all data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography .

0.6

Very Good

Cites most data obtained from other sources. APA citation style is used in both text and bibliography.

0.48

Good

Cites some data obtained from other sources.

0.36

Unacceptable

The citation style is inconsistent or incorrect. It does not cite sources.