PHASE 3 Implementation APA SEVEN RUBRIC AND INTRUCTIOS ATTACHED

· Score 7.5 / 10

· Integration of Knowledge

25% of total result

2

· Topic Focus

25% of total result

2

Oustanding

Topic Focus 12.5% The topic is focused narrowly enough for the scope of this assignment. A thesis statement provides direction for the paper, either by a statement of a position or hypothesis

2.5

Very Good

The topic is focused but lacks direction. The paper is about a specific topic, but the writer has not established a position.

2

Good

The topic is too broad for the scope of this assignment.

1.5

Unacceptable

The topic is not clearly defined.

1

Criterion Feedback

read the feedback and answer the questions- especially the logistics one

· Depth of Discussion

13% of total result

0.78

Oustanding

In-depth discussion and elaboration in all sections of the paper.

1.3

Very Good

In-depth discussion and elaboration in most sections of the paper.

1.04

Good

The writer has omitted content. Quotations from others outweigh the writer’s own ideas excessively.

0.78

Unacceptable

Cursory discussion in all the sections of the paper or brief discussion in only a few sections

0.52

Criterion Feedback

some areas need to be developed and discussed more- read feedback provided

Sample size, inclusion, exclusion criteria, flow charts or graphs, a place where the study was to take place, etc.. should be developed.

· Cohesiveness

13% of total result

1.04

Oustanding

Ties together information from all sources. Paper flows from one issue to the next with no headings. Author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources Mostly, it ties together information from all sources.

1.3

Very Good

Mostly, it ties together information from all sources. Paper flows with only some disjointedness. The author’s writing demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

1.04

Good

Sometimes ties together information from all sources. Paper does not flow. Disjointedness is apparent. The author’s writing does not demonstrate an understanding of the relationship among material obtained from all sources.

0.78

Unacceptable

It does not tie together information. Paper does not flow and appears to be created from disparate issues. Headings are necessary to link concepts. Writing does not demonstrate understanding any relationship

0.52

Criterion Feedback

Paper mostly ties together- read feedback and make corrections

· Spelling and Grammar

12% of total result

0.72

Oustanding

Minimal spelling and/or grammar mistakes

1.2

Very Good

Some spelling and or grammar mistakes.

0.96

Good

Noticeable spelling and grammar mistakes.

0.72

Unacceptable

An unacceptable number of spelling and/or grammar mistakes.

0.48

Criterion Feedback

several spelling/grammar/APA errors

· Sources

6% of total result

0.36

Oustanding

Over 5 current sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature and acknowledged as such if they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

0.6

Very Good

5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative.

0.48

Good

Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are credible.

0.36

Unacceptable

Fewer than 5 current sources or fewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. Not all web sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.

0.24

· Citations

6% of total result

0.6