A right to experiment drugs

COMPETENCY 1

Articulate ethical issues in health care.

CRITERION

Explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Your result: Distinguished

Distinguished

Analyzes how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues, and identifies assumptions on which the analysis is based.

Proficient

Explains how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Basic

Explains how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Non-Performance

Does not explain how the principle of informed consent is relevant to the issues.

Faculty Comments:

Thank you for addressing assumptions in the analysis!

CRITERION

Explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients, and impartially considers conflicting evidence and other perspectives.

Proficient

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Basic

Explains the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Non-Performance

Does not explain the costs and benefits of offering unapproved experimental drugs to patients.

Faculty Comments:

Thank you for developing this discussion!

COMPETENCY 2

Apply sound ethical thinking related to a health care issue.

CRITERION

Identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles, and describes how to apply them to contemporary issues.

Proficient

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Basic

Identifies relevant ethical theories and moral principles, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Non-Performance

Does not identify relevant ethical theories and moral principles.

Faculty Comments:

No change from previous score / submission

CRITERION

Articulate arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Your result: Proficient

Distinguished

Analyzes arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients, and identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty where further information could improve the analysis.

Proficient

Articulates arguments using examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Basic

Articulates arguments with examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients, but in an unclear, incomplete, or inaccurate manner.

Non-Performance

Does not articulate arguments or use examples for and against offering pre-approved drugs to wider pools of patients.

Faculty Comments:

Thank you for developing this discussion!

COMPETENCY 3

Apply in text the standard writing conventions for the discipline, including structure, voice, person, tone, and citation formatting.

CRITERION

Exhibit proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.

Your result: Basic

Distinguished

Exhibits proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills, and ensures the writing reflects the quality and expertise expected of a professional.

Proficient

Exhibits proficiency in clear and effective academic writing skills.

Basic

Writes in an ineffective and inconsistent manner that does not exhibit effective academic writing skills or deliver the message clearly.

Non-Performance

Does not exhibit proficiency in clear or effective academic writing skills.

Faculty Comments:

No change from previous score / submission