SCMTBONUS
|
Grade Levels: |
Undergraduate Essay Exam Rubric Source: http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes |
Top of Form
|
|
|||||
|
|
Poor/Unsatisfactory (N/A) |
Basic/Satisfactory (N/A) |
Solid/Good (N/A) |
Expert/Excellent (N/A) |
|
|
Content |
Poor/Unsatisfactory The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology. |
Basic/Satisfactory The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately). |
Solid/Good The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples. |
Expert/Excellent The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples. |
|
|
Reasoning |
Poor/Unsatisfactory The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem. |
Basic/Satisfactory The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications. |
Solid/Good The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications. |
Expert/Excellent The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications. |
|
|
Writing |
Poor/Unsatisfactory The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization. |
Basic/Satisfactory The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization. |
Solid/Good The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization |
Expert/Excellent The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts. |
|
Bottom of Form
15569729
The essay is often
15569730
The essay is most
15569731
1
The essay is clea
%26%2C%2B33R
rubricgradepostf_
0
rubricgradeeditf.c
rubricshowc.cfm
NO
920CBC25F55A9
B618117429774A
no
2434625
2434626
2434627
2434628
15569716
Poor/Unsatisfacto
993996
15569717
Basic/Satisfactory
15569718
Solid/Good
15569719
Expert/Excellent
formDE
15569720
The essay illustrat
15569721
15569722
15569723
15569724
The essay reflects
15569725
http://www.rcamp
15569726
15569727
15569728
The essay does n
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Essay Exam Rubric S
ource:
http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes
Poor/
Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Basic/Satisfactory
(N/A)
Solid/Good
(N/A)
Expert/Excellent
(N/A)
Content
Poor/Unsatisfactory
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing
the relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining
key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
Basic/Satisfactory
The essay illustrates
rudimentary
understanding of the
course material by: (1)
mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the
key concepts
/ideas
(though failing to fully
or accurately explain
many of them); (3)
using terminology,
though sometimes
inaccurately or
inappropriately; and
(4) incorporating some
key claims/points, but
failing to explain the
reasoning behind them
(or doing so
inaccu
rately).
Solid/Good
The essay
illustrates solid
understanding of
the course material
by correctly: (1)
addr
essing most of
the relevant
content; (2)
identifying and
explaining most of
the key
concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the
reasoning behind
most of the key
points/claims; and
(5) (where
necessary or
useful)
substantiating some
po
ints with accurate
examples.
Expert/Excellent
The essay illustrates
exemplary
understanding of the
course material by
thoroughly and
correctly: (1)
addressing the
relevant content; (2)
identifying and
explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the
reasoning
behind key
points/claims; and
(5) (where necessary
or useful)
substantiating points
with several accurate
and original
examples.
Reasoning
Poor/Unsatisfactory
The essay reflects
substandard or poor
reasoning by: (1) failing
to synthesize the
material or doing so
inaccurately; (2) failing
to make connections
between
ideas/claims/points or
doing so inaccurate
ly;
and (3) failing to
evaluate the issue or
problem.
Basic/Satisfactory
The essay reflects
basic reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some
of the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2)
making a few
connections between
ideas/claims/points,
but ignoring or
inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem a
t a
very basic/superficial
level; and (4) ignoring
assumptions and
implications.
Solid/Good
The essay refle
cts
fairly strong
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing
material, (2)
making appropriate
connections
between some of
the key
ideas/claims/points;
(3) accurately
evaluating the
issue/problem; and
(4) identifying ad
discussing key
assumptions and/or
implications.
Expert/Excellent
The essay reflects
expert reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing
material; (2) making
connections b
etween
relevant
ideas/claims/points;
(3) presenting an
insightful and
thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue
or problem; (4)
identifying and
discussing important
nuances in the
relevant material;
and (5) identifying
and discussing key
assumptions and/or
implications.
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate Essay Exam Rubric Source:
http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes
Poor/Unsatisfactory
(N/A)
Basic/Satisfactory
(N/A)
Solid/Good
(N/A)
Expert/Excellent
(N/A)
Content
Poor/Unsatisfactory
The essay illustrates poor
understanding of the
course material by (1)
failing to address or
incorrectly addressing
the relevant content; (2)
failing to identify or
inaccurately
explaining/defining key
concepts/ideas; (3)
ignoring or incorrectly
explaining key
points/claims and the
reasoning behind them;
and (4) incorrectly or
inappropriately using
terminology.
Basic/Satisfactory
The essay illustrates
rudimentary
understanding of the
course material by: (1)
mentioning, but not
fully explaining, the
relevant content; (2)
identifying some of the
key concepts/ideas
(though failing to fully
or accurately explain
many of them); (3)
using terminology,
though sometimes
inaccurately or
inappropriately; and
(4) incorporating some
key claims/points, but
failing to explain the
reasoning behind them
(or doing so
inaccurately).
Solid/Good
The essay
illustrates solid
understanding of
the course material
by correctly: (1)
addressing most of
the relevant
content; (2)
identifying and
explaining most of
the key
concepts/ideas; (3)
using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the
reasoning behind
most of the key
points/claims; and
(5) (where
necessary or
useful)
substantiating some
points with accurate
examples.
Expert/Excellent
The essay illustrates
exemplary
understanding of the
course material by
thoroughly and
correctly: (1)
addressing the
relevant content; (2)
identifying and
explaining all of the
key concepts/ideas;
(3) using correct
terminology; (4)
explaining the
reasoning behind key
points/claims; and
(5) (where necessary
or useful)
substantiating points
with several accurate
and original
examples.
Reasoning
Poor/Unsatisfactory
The essay reflects
substandard or poor
reasoning by: (1) failing
to synthesize the
material or doing so
inaccurately; (2) failing
to make connections
between
ideas/claims/points or
doing so inaccurately;
and (3) failing to
evaluate the issue or
problem.
Basic/Satisfactory
The essay reflects
basic reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing some
of the material, though
remains vague and
undeveloped; (2)
making a few
connections between
ideas/claims/points,
but ignoring or
inaccurately
connecting others; (3)
evaluating the
issue/problem at a
very basic/superficial
level; and (4) ignoring
assumptions and
implications.
Solid/Good
The essay reflects
fairly strong
reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing
material, (2)
making appropriate
connections
between some of
the key
ideas/claims/points;
(3) accurately
evaluating the
issue/problem; and
(4) identifying ad
discussing key
assumptions and/or
implications.
Expert/Excellent
The essay reflects
expert reasoning by:
(1) synthesizing
material; (2) making
connections between
relevant
ideas/claims/points;
(3) presenting an
insightful and
thorough evaluation
of the relevant issue
or problem; (4)
identifying and
discussing important
nuances in the
relevant material;
and (5) identifying
and discussing key
assumptions and/or
implications.