SCMTBONUS

profileAngel smoke
SCMT319-EssayExamiRubirc-.docx

Grade Levels:

Undergraduate Essay Exam Rubric Source: http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes

Top of Form

Powered by iRubric

 

Poor/Unsatisfactory (N/A)

Basic/Satisfactory (N/A)

Solid/Good (N/A)

Expert/Excellent (N/A)

Content

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay illustrates poor understanding of the course material by (1) failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; (2) failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; (3) ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and (4) incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay illustrates rudimentary understanding of the course material by: (1) mentioning, but not fully explaining, the relevant content; (2) identifying some of the key concepts/ideas (though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them); (3) using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and (4) incorporating some key claims/points, but failing to explain the reasoning behind them (or doing so inaccurately).

Solid/Good

The essay illustrates solid understanding of the course material by correctly: (1) addressing most of the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating some points with accurate examples.

Expert/Excellent

The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the course material by thoroughly and correctly: (1) addressing the relevant content; (2) identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; (3) using correct terminology; (4) explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims; and (5) (where necessary or useful) substantiating points with several accurate and original examples.

Reasoning

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay reflects substandard or poor reasoning by: (1) failing to synthesize the material or doing so inaccurately; (2) failing to make connections between ideas/claims/points or doing so inaccurately; and (3) failing to evaluate the issue or problem.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay reflects basic reasoning by: (1) synthesizing some of the material, though remains vague and undeveloped; (2) making a few connections between ideas/claims/points, but ignoring or inaccurately connecting others; (3) evaluating the issue/problem at a very basic/superficial level; and (4) ignoring assumptions and implications.

Solid/Good

The essay reflects fairly strong reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material, (2) making appropriate connections between some of the key ideas/claims/points; (3) accurately evaluating the issue/problem; and (4) identifying ad discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

Expert/Excellent

The essay reflects expert reasoning by: (1) synthesizing material; (2) making connections between relevant ideas/claims/points; (3) presenting an insightful and thorough evaluation of the relevant issue or problem; (4) identifying and discussing important nuances in the relevant material; and (5) identifying and discussing key assumptions and/or implications.

Writing

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to: (1) inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; (2) reliance on disjointed and incomprehensible thoughts and clauses; and (3) lack of recognizable organization.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay is often unclear and difficult to follow due to: (1) some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; (2) ideas sometimes being fragmented, wondering and/or repetitive; and (3) poor organization.

Solid/Good

The essay is mostly clear as a result of: (1) appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; (2) minimal number of tangents and lack of repetition; and (3) fairly good organization

Expert/Excellent

The essay is clear, and concise as a result of: (1) appropriate and precise use of terminology; (2) absence of tangents and coherence of thoughts; and (3) logical organization of ideas and thoughts.

Bottom of Form

15569729

The essay is often

15569730

The essay is most

15569731

1

The essay is clea

%26%2C%2B33R

rubricgradepostf_

0

rubricgradeeditf.c

rubricshowc.cfm

NO

920CBC25F55A9

B618117429774A

no

2434625

2434626

2434627

2434628

15569716

Poor/Unsatisfacto

993996

15569717

Basic/Satisfactory

15569718

Solid/Good

15569719

Expert/Excellent

formDE

15569720

The essay illustrat

15569721

15569722

15569723

15569724

The essay reflects

15569725

http://www.rcamp

15569726

15569727

15569728

The essay does n

Grade Levels:

Undergraduate

Essay Exam Rubric S

ource:

http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes

Poor/

Unsatisfactory

(N/A)

Basic/Satisfactory

(N/A)

Solid/Good

(N/A)

Expert/Excellent

(N/A)

Content

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay illustrates poor

understanding of the

course material by (1)

failing to address or

incorrectly addressing

the relevant content; (2)

failing to identify or

inaccurately

explaining/defining

key

concepts/ideas; (3)

ignoring or incorrectly

explaining key

points/claims and the

reasoning behind them;

and (4) incorrectly or

inappropriately using

terminology.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay illustrates

rudimentary

understanding of the

course material by: (1)

mentioning, but not

fully explaining, the

relevant content; (2)

identifying some of the

key concepts

/ideas

(though failing to fully

or accurately explain

many of them); (3)

using terminology,

though sometimes

inaccurately or

inappropriately; and

(4) incorporating some

key claims/points, but

failing to explain the

reasoning behind them

(or doing so

inaccu

rately).

Solid/Good

The essay

illustrates solid

understanding of

the course material

by correctly: (1)

addr

essing most of

the relevant

content; (2)

identifying and

explaining most of

the key

concepts/ideas; (3)

using correct

terminology; (4)

explaining the

reasoning behind

most of the key

points/claims; and

(5) (where

necessary or

useful)

substantiating some

po

ints with accurate

examples.

Expert/Excellent

The essay illustrates

exemplary

understanding of the

course material by

thoroughly and

correctly: (1)

addressing the

relevant content; (2)

identifying and

explaining all of the

key concepts/ideas;

(3) using correct

terminology; (4)

explaining the

reasoning

behind key

points/claims; and

(5) (where necessary

or useful)

substantiating points

with several accurate

and original

examples.

Reasoning

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay reflects

substandard or poor

reasoning by: (1) failing

to synthesize the

material or doing so

inaccurately; (2) failing

to make connections

between

ideas/claims/points or

doing so inaccurate

ly;

and (3) failing to

evaluate the issue or

problem.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay reflects

basic reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing some

of the material, though

remains vague and

undeveloped; (2)

making a few

connections between

ideas/claims/points,

but ignoring or

inaccurately

connecting others; (3)

evaluating the

issue/problem a

t a

very basic/superficial

level; and (4) ignoring

assumptions and

implications.

Solid/Good

The essay refle

cts

fairly strong

reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing

material, (2)

making appropriate

connections

between some of

the key

ideas/claims/points;

(3) accurately

evaluating the

issue/problem; and

(4) identifying ad

discussing key

assumptions and/or

implications.

Expert/Excellent

The essay reflects

expert reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing

material; (2) making

connections b

etween

relevant

ideas/claims/points;

(3) presenting an

insightful and

thorough evaluation

of the relevant issue

or problem; (4)

identifying and

discussing important

nuances in the

relevant material;

and (5) identifying

and discussing key

assumptions and/or

implications.

Grade Levels:

Undergraduate Essay Exam Rubric Source:

http://www.rcampus.com/rubricshowc.cfm?code=TX9368X&sp=yes

Poor/Unsatisfactory

(N/A)

Basic/Satisfactory

(N/A)

Solid/Good

(N/A)

Expert/Excellent

(N/A)

Content

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay illustrates poor

understanding of the

course material by (1)

failing to address or

incorrectly addressing

the relevant content; (2)

failing to identify or

inaccurately

explaining/defining key

concepts/ideas; (3)

ignoring or incorrectly

explaining key

points/claims and the

reasoning behind them;

and (4) incorrectly or

inappropriately using

terminology.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay illustrates

rudimentary

understanding of the

course material by: (1)

mentioning, but not

fully explaining, the

relevant content; (2)

identifying some of the

key concepts/ideas

(though failing to fully

or accurately explain

many of them); (3)

using terminology,

though sometimes

inaccurately or

inappropriately; and

(4) incorporating some

key claims/points, but

failing to explain the

reasoning behind them

(or doing so

inaccurately).

Solid/Good

The essay

illustrates solid

understanding of

the course material

by correctly: (1)

addressing most of

the relevant

content; (2)

identifying and

explaining most of

the key

concepts/ideas; (3)

using correct

terminology; (4)

explaining the

reasoning behind

most of the key

points/claims; and

(5) (where

necessary or

useful)

substantiating some

points with accurate

examples.

Expert/Excellent

The essay illustrates

exemplary

understanding of the

course material by

thoroughly and

correctly: (1)

addressing the

relevant content; (2)

identifying and

explaining all of the

key concepts/ideas;

(3) using correct

terminology; (4)

explaining the

reasoning behind key

points/claims; and

(5) (where necessary

or useful)

substantiating points

with several accurate

and original

examples.

Reasoning

Poor/Unsatisfactory

The essay reflects

substandard or poor

reasoning by: (1) failing

to synthesize the

material or doing so

inaccurately; (2) failing

to make connections

between

ideas/claims/points or

doing so inaccurately;

and (3) failing to

evaluate the issue or

problem.

Basic/Satisfactory

The essay reflects

basic reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing some

of the material, though

remains vague and

undeveloped; (2)

making a few

connections between

ideas/claims/points,

but ignoring or

inaccurately

connecting others; (3)

evaluating the

issue/problem at a

very basic/superficial

level; and (4) ignoring

assumptions and

implications.

Solid/Good

The essay reflects

fairly strong

reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing

material, (2)

making appropriate

connections

between some of

the key

ideas/claims/points;

(3) accurately

evaluating the

issue/problem; and

(4) identifying ad

discussing key

assumptions and/or

implications.

Expert/Excellent

The essay reflects

expert reasoning by:

(1) synthesizing

material; (2) making

connections between

relevant

ideas/claims/points;

(3) presenting an

insightful and

thorough evaluation

of the relevant issue

or problem; (4)

identifying and

discussing important

nuances in the

relevant material;

and (5) identifying

and discussing key

assumptions and/or

implications.