Case study 3 continued from 2
echidester
SCM6030_Stevenson_Module3_Case1.docxSCM 6030 – Strategic Project Management for Supply Chain Management
Module 3 – Case #1
Turned in via Canvas. Please see grading rubric below.
Continuing your Module 2 – Case #1, continue your project for the learnings from Chap 6 & 7.
Your assignment:
1) Complete the following:
a. Construct a project network using either the AON-Activity on Node, or, AOA-Activity on Arrow.
b. Complete a RBS – Risk Breakdown Structure (Follow example of 7.3)
c. Compete a Risk Assessment Form and Risk Severity Matrix. Determine if any are in the Red Zone – Major Risk and identify those.
d. Using any Red Zone – Major Risk that were identified, use Risk Response Development and create a Risk Response Matrix.
2) Turn in only 1 file. It can be in excel, word or PowerPoint, but all items must be contained in 1 file for submission.
There are many different templates you can use. There are ones in our book, on the PowerPoint lectures, many formats online, formats from your work or make your own custom formats in excel, word or PowerPoint. Content of the work in a clean easy to understand format is what is being graded.
|
Criteria |
14 points |
11-13 points |
7-10 points |
0-6 points |
|
Completeness |
Complete in all respects; reflects all requirements |
Complete in most respects; reflects most requirements |
Incomplete in many respects; reflects few requirements |
Incomplete in most respects; does not reflect requirements |
|
Understanding |
Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an accomplished understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an acceptable understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
Demonstrates an inadequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s) |
|
Analysis & evaluation |
Presents an insightful and thorough analysis of all issues identified; includes all necessary financial calculations |
Presents a thorough analysis of most issues identified; includes most necessary financial calculations |
Presents a superficial analysis of some of the issues identified; omits necessary financial calculations |
Presents an incomplete analysis of the issues identified |
|
|
Makes appropriate and powerful connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates complete command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied |
Makes appropriate connections between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates good command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied |
Makes appropriate but somewhat vague connections between the issues and concepts studied in the reading; demonstrates limited command of the strategic concepts and analytical tools studied |
Makes little or no connection between the issues identified and the strategic concepts studied in the reading |
|
|
Supports diagnosis and opinions with strong arguments and evidence; presents a balanced and critical view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective |
Supports diagnosis and opinions with reasons and evidence; presents a fairly balanced view; interpretation is both reasonable and objective |
Supports diagnosis and opinions with limited reasons and evidence; presents a somewhat one-sided argument |
Supports diagnosis and opinions with few reasons and little evidence; argument is one-sided and not objective |
|
|
Presents detailed, realistic, and appropriate recommendations clearly supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading |
Presents specific, realistic, and appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading |
Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations supported by the information presented and concepts from the reading |
Presents realistic or appropriate recommendations with little, if any, support from the information presented and concepts from the reading |
|
Research |
Supplements case study with relevant and extensive research into the present situation of the company; clearly and thoroughly documents all sources of information |
Supplements case study with relevant research into the present situation of the company; documents all sources of information |
Supplements case study with limited research into the present situation of the company; provides limited documentation of sources consulted |
Supplements case study, if at all, with incomplete research and documentation |
|
Writing mechanics |
Writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and relevant data and information; extremely well-organized |
Writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness and contains only a few errors; includes sufficient details and relevant data and information; well-organized |
Writing lacks clarity or conciseness and contains numerous errors; gives insufficient detail and relevant data and information; lacks organization |
Writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail and relevant data and information; poorly organized |
