| | Performance Category Comparative Analysis (Weighted) | | | | | | | Performance Category Comparative Analysis (Unweighted) |
| | | Asia-Pac | CanDo | Davis | Dihachi | Weights (%) | | | Asia-Pac | CanDo | Davis | Dihachi |
| | Supplier Quality | | | | | 25% | | Supplier Quality |
| | Management and Personnel Capability | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5% | | Management and Personnel Capability | 2 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| | Information Systems Capability | 3 | 0.6 | 3 | 1.8 | 3% | | Information Systems Capability | 5 | 1 | 5 | 3 |
| | Process and Tech. Capability | 6 | 3.6 | 6 | 6 | 6% | | Process and Tech. Capability | 5 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| | Long-term Partnership Potential | 1.6 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 3.2 | 4% | | Long-term Partnership Potential | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| | Previous History and Performance | 4 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 4 | 4% | | Previous History and Performance | 5 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
| | Supply Management Efforts | 0.6 | 3 | 1.8 | 2.4 | 3% | | Supply Management Efforts | 1 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
| | Weighted Total | 17.2 | 14.2 | 17.6 | 22.4 | 25% | | Unweighted Total | 20 | 17 | 21 | 26 |
| | Product Quality | | | | | 20% | | Product Quality |
| | Product Quality Performance | 4.8 | 1.6 | 4.8 | 8 | 8% | | Product Quality Performance | 3 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| | Percentage of Business Devoted to PC Production | 3.2 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 4 | 4% | | Percentage of Business Devoted to PC Production | 4 | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| | Tolerance for Defects | 4.8 | 1.6 | 8 | 6.4 | 8% | | Tolerance for Defects | 3 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| | Weighted Total | 12.8 | 5.6 | 15.2 | 18.4 | 20% | | Unweighted Total | 10 | 5 | 11 | 14 |
| | Delivery Reliability | | | | | 20% | | Delivery Reliability |
| | Delivery Performance | 7.2 | 5.4 | 9 | 5.4 | 9% | | Delivery Performance | 4 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| | Lead Time | 1.4 | 4.2 | 5.6 | 1.4 | 7% | | Lead Time | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| | Frequency of Shipment | 0.8 | 2.4 | 4 | 0.8 | 4% | | Frequency of Shipment | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
| | Weighted Total | 9.4 | 12 | 18.6 | 7.6 | 20% | | Unweighted Total | 6 | 9 | 14 | 5 |
| | Responsiveness to Demand and Cust. Needs | | | | | 20% | | Responsiveness to Demand and Cust. Needs |
| | Demand Flexibility | 7.8 | 5.2 | 10.4 | 10.4 | 13% | | Demand Flexibility | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| | Customization Flexibility | 4.2 | 5.6 | 4.2 | 2.8 | 7% | | Customization Flexibility | 3 | 4 | 3 | 2 |
| | Weighted Total | 12 | 10.8 | 14.6 | 13.2 | 20% | | Unweighted Total | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| | Cost Competitiveness | | | | | 15% | | Cost Competitiveness |
| | Product Cost Competitiveness | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5% | | Product Cost Competitiveness | 5 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| | Total Cost Competitiveness | 4.2 | 4.2 | 1.4 | 4.2 | 7% | | Total Cost Competitiveness | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 |
| | Potential to Negotiate Lower Costs | 1.2 | 1.2 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 3% | | Potential to Negotiate Lower Costs | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 |
| | Weighted Total | 10.4 | 6.4 | 5.8 | 10 | 15% | | Unweighted Total | 10 | 6 | 7 | 10 |
| | Results | | | | | | | Results |
| | Total Points (Out of 100) | 61.8 | 49 | 71.8 | 71.6 | | | Total Points (Out of 85) | 52 | 43 | 60 | 61 |
| | Percentage Score | 61.8% | 49% | 71.8% | 71.6% | | | Percentage Score | 61% | 51% | 71% | 72% |