School Counseling Empirical Article
Featured Research
Spotlighting Stigma and Barriers: Examining Secondary Students’ Attitudes Toward School Counseling Services
Richard W. Auger 1 , Nicholas R. Abel
2 , and Brandie M. Oliver
2
Abstract Student attitudes toward accessing school counseling services were the focus of a survey of 3,584 middle school and high school students. Respondents identified barriers to seeking help from school counselors, including stigma, a desire to manage problems themselves, a lack of a positive relationship with their school counselor, and a concern that the counselor would not keep disclosures confidential. This study also examined the impact of gender, age, and race/ethnicity on students’ willingness to seek help from their school counselor. We present implications for practice and future research.
Keywords adolescents, confidentiality, help seeking, school counseling, stigma, willingness
Considerable research has supported the value of counseling
services for children and adolescents in schools (Fox & Butler,
2007; Reback, 2010; Whiston, Tai, Rahardja, & Eder, 2011).
For example, analysis of a large national sample of elementary-
aged students found that states with greater availability of
school counselors, due to policies supporting elementary
school counseling, showed higher third-grade test scores in
math and reading and lower levels of internalizing and exter-
nalizing problem behaviors among students (Reback, 2010).
Furthermore, a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of 153 school
counseling interventions found a small to moderate effect size
of d ¼ .30, indicating that students who received school coun- selor interventions have measurably higher outcomes across
cognitive, behavioral, and affective domains than students who
do not receive those interventions (Whiston et al., 2011).
School counseling services have also proven effective for a
range of more specific issues and goals, from supporting immi-
grant students’ career development (Watkinson & Hersi, 2014)
to reducing the achievement gap by increasing the academic
achievement of African American high school students (Bruce,
Getch, & Ziomek-Daigle, 2009). The broad finding is clear:
Counseling in schools is an effective way to address a range of
student issues (Reback, 2010; Whiston et al., 2011).
Despite the proven effectiveness of counseling for middle
school and high school students, many adolescents have shown
a consistent reluctance to seek and accept therapeutic help
(e.g., Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Del Mauro & Williams,
2013; Gulliver, Griffiths, & Christensen, 2010). In fact,
researchers have found that the willingness of youth with
mental health issues to seek and accept counseling help drama-
tically decreases as they move through adolescence (Cuffe
et al., 2001). Research inside and outside the United States
reveals that more than half of all high school students may
be reluctant to seek professional help for their problems (Heath,
Baxter, Toste, & McLouth, 2010; Rughani, Deane, & Wilson,
2011). Reasons for this reluctance include the stigma surround-
ing mental health treatment, a fear that confidentiality will not
be upheld, concern about being judged, a lack of faith regarding
the effectiveness of counseling, and the belief that seeking
counseling is a sign of weakness (Del Mauro & Williams,
2013; Fox & Butler, 2007; Gulliver et al., 2010; Rughani
et al., 2011; Timlin-Scalera, Ponterotto, Blumberg, & Jackson,
2003). Adolescent boys—specifically African American
boys—seem particularly reluctant to seek counseling services
for social/emotional issues (Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Eliot,
Cornell, Gregory, & Fan, 2010).
The findings above suggest that many adolescents are reluc-
tant to seek help from counselors, even though counseling is a
demonstrably effective service. Although a moderate body of
research addresses general help seeking among adolescents
1 Minnesota State University, Mankato, MN, USA 2
Butler University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Corresponding Author:
Richard W. Auger, PhD, Minnesota State University, 107 Armstrong Hall,
Mankato, MN 56001, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Professional School Counseling Volume 22(1): 1-12
ª 2019 American School Counselor Association
Article reuse guidelines: sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/2156759X18811275 journals.sagepub.com/home/pcx
(Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Eliot et al., 2010), minimal
research has been conducted on middle school and high school
students’ attitudes toward services provided by school counse-
lors, and much more information is needed to better understand
this phenomenon. An important step in delivering effective
counseling services in middle schools and high schools is to
better understand the reasons students may be reluctant to see
their counselor. The purpose of this article is to explore stu-
dents’ attitudes about school counseling services and examine
barriers that may prevent them from seeking those services. To
that end, we conducted a large, multistate study in which we
surveyed middle school and high school students on their atti-
tudes toward school counselors and school counseling services.
Many adolescents are reluctant to seek help from
counselors, even though counseling is a
demonstrably effective service.
Attitudes Toward Seeking Counseling Help Among Adolescents
A large body of research indicates that seeking professional help
for social–emotional problems is difficult for adolescents (Chan
& Quinn, 2012; Corry & Leavey, 2017; Del Mauro & Williams,
2013; Fox & Butler, 2007; Raviv, Raviv, Vago-Gefen, & Fink,
2009). Survey research has consistently indicated that fewer than
half of adolescents report being willing to seek help from a
health-care professional for a variety of emotional troubles
(Boldero & Fallon, 1995; Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Rughani
et al., 2011). In a seminal study of 1,013 adolescents in Australia,
Boldero and Fallon (1995) found that respondents were much
more likely to seek help from friends (40%) or parents (36%), as opposed to a professional helper such as a doctor or counselor
(12.7%). A more recent study of Australian adolescents found that only 17% of males and 29% of females were willing to seek help from a health-care professional for emotional issues (Rugh-
ani et al., 2011). Chandra and Minkovitz (2006) found a similar
pattern of results when surveying 274 eighth graders in the
United States, with respondents being more than 5 times more
likely to turn to friends when experiencing an emotional prob-
lem, as opposed to turning to a counselor. More recently, Corry
and Leavey (2017) found through focus group research that
adolescents reported a persistent lack of trust that served as a
barrier to seeking help from medical professionals. Perhaps most
concerning is the finding that adolescents who have the highest
level of suicidal ideation, and thus are in the greatest need of
professional support, are least likely to report an interest in seek-
ing help from either professional or informal sources of support
(Goodwin, Mocarski, Marusic, & Beautrais, 2013; Wilson,
Deane, & Ciarrochi, 2005).
Barriers to Seeking Professional Help
Researchers have identified several barriers that interfere with
adolescents’ willingness to seek professional help for social/
emotional problems (Boldero & Fallon, 1995; Chan & Quinn,
2012; Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Del Mauro & Williams,
2013; Fox & Butler, 2007; Gulliver et al., 2010; Wilson &
Deane, 2012). A consistent finding across studies is that ado-
lescents often prefer to manage problems on their own, rather
than turn to professional helpers (Boldero & Fallon, 1995;
Chan & Quinn, 2012; Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006). Although
part of the reason adolescents may avoid seeking help from
counselors is that they are engaging in the normal and healthy
process of developing a sense of personal autonomy and desire
to manage problems on their own (Wilson & Deane, 2012), this
tendency toward self-reliance can also be a contributing factor
in inhibiting adolescents from seeking needed professional
counseling help. A second barrier to seeking counseling help
is adolescents’ sense that the counselor is a virtual stranger
with whom they do not feel comfortable sharing problems
(Fox & Butler, 2007). Another barrier identified in the liter-
ature is the stigma adolescents frequently associate with talk-
ing to a counselor (Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006; Fox &
Butler, 2007; Gulliver et al., 2010). Chandra and Minkovitz
(2006) found that 59% of eighth graders were too embarrassed to see a counselor because of what other students might say if
they found out. Similarly, Fox and Butler (2007) identified
that fear of being seen by other students entering the counse-
lor’s office is a barrier.
Stigma may serve as a barrier for many adolescents, but even
those adolescents who do not appear to stigmatize help from
counselors may still avoid seeking professional help. Focus
group research with U.S. adolescents found that even if adoles-
cents find value in counseling and would not judge peers who
were in counseling, they would resist seeking professional coun-
seling help for themselves (Del Mauro & Williams, 2013), a
finding more pronounced for boys (Raviv et al., 2009). Adoles-
cents tend to overestimate their ability to manage emotional
problems, presuming they are better able to handle their own
problems than may actually be the case (Raviv et al., 2009).
Another critical barrier that interferes with adolescents’
willingness to seek help from professional counselors is a lack
of trust in the counselor. Multiple studies have found that start-
lingly high percentages of adolescents do not trust counselors
and do not believe counselors will keep their conversations
confidential (Chan & Quinn, 2012; Chandra & Minkovitz,
2006; Del Mauro & Williams, 2013; Fox & Butler, 2007;
Timlin-Scalera et al., 2003). For example, when Chandra and
Minkovitz (2006) surveyed a group of eighth graders to iden-
tify barriers to seeking counseling help, 42.7% of the respon- dents indicated that they did not trust counselors. Research has
indicated that adolescents who report higher levels of trust
regarding counseling are more likely to seek counseling help
(Biolcati, Palareti, & Mameli, 2018). A final barrier that may
impact adolescents’ desire to seek help from counselors is a
fear of being judged; some studies indicate that adolescents
may resist seeking counseling help because they are worried
what the counselor will think about them and their problems
(Del Mauro & Williams, 2013; Yap, Reavley, & Jorm, 2013).
2 Professional School Counseling
Age, Gender, and Racial/Ethnic Differences in Help- Seeking Behavior
Within the context of the broad finding that adolescents often
are reluctant to seek help from counselors, research has also
revealed differences in help-seeking patterns based on age,
gender, and race/ethnicity (Cuffe et al., 2001; Heath et al.,
2010). Age appears to be closely related to use of mental health
services. One longitudinal study found a striking decrease in
use of mental health services from early adolescence to early
adulthood, with usage rates across the three data collection
points falling from 24% to just 3% (Cuffe et al., 2001). Other survey research has found that middle school students are more
likely than high school students to seek help from school-based
programs for nonsuicidal self-injury (Heath et al., 2010).
Researchers have also identified gender differences in help
seeking with findings consistently indicating that adolescent
boys tend to be more reluctant than adolescent girls to seek
counseling help both in school (Eliot et al., 2010) and out of
school (Boldero & Fallon, 1995; Chandra & Minkovitz, 2006;
Cheung, Dewa, Cairney, Veldhuizen, & Schaffer, 2009).
Among adolescents who experience suicidal ideation or
attempts, boys are again substantially less likely than girls to
access mental health services (Cheung et al., 2009). Although
the broad finding is that adolescent boys are less likely than
adolescent girls to seek counseling help, the research reveals
more subtle gender differences. One study of more than a thou-
sand adolescents in Scotland found that boys were more likely
to view going to counseling as a sign of weakness, while girls
were more likely to question the value of counseling (Chan &
Quinn, 2012). Moreover, although girls are more likely to seek
counseling, they are more prone to worry about being judged
by the counselor (Yap et al., 2013).
In several studies, researchers have examined the relation-
ship between race/ethnicity and adolescent help seeking
(Bryan, Moore-Thomas, Day-Vines, Holcomb-McCoy, &
Mitchell, 2009; Eliot et al., 2010; Ho, Yeh, McCabe, & Hough,
2007). Their results consistently revealed that race/ethnicity
matters when examining patterns of help seeking, but showed
that these relationships are complex and sometimes contradic-
tory (Bryan et al., 2009; Eliot et al., 2010). As a case in point, a
survey of more than 7,000 ninth-grade students found that
African American students were significantly less likely to
seek help for bullying and threats of violence as compared to
other racial groups (Eliot et al., 2010). Conversely, examina-
tion of a large national sample of eighth-grade students in the
United States showed that African American students were
substantially more likely to see their school counselor as com-
pared to White students, although it was not clear how many of
those students sought out their school counselor voluntarily
(Bryan et al., 2009). Other research revealed lower mental
health usage rates among Latino and Asian/Pacific Islander
adolescents as compared to White and African American youth
(Ho et al., 2007). Research has identified several factors that
may help explain racial differences in help-seeking behavior,
including cultural mistrust of majority helpers (Duncan &
Johnson, 2007) and strong parental affiliation with an alterna-
tive culture (Ho et al., 2007). In sum, the existing research
suggests that race is an important influence on students’ will-
ingness to seek counseling services, although the precise man-
ner in which race is related to help seeking is complex and not
yet fully understood.
To further examine the issues above in the specific context
of school counseling services, we surveyed a large group of
middle and high school students to assess their attitudes toward
counseling and school counselors. Our ultimate goals were
(a) identifying factors that feed the reluctance of middle and
high school students to seek help from their school counselors
and (b) developing recommendations to address these factors,
thereby enhancing student willingness to access school coun-
seling services. As a first step toward these larger goals, we
designed the current study to seek preliminary answers to the
following research questions:
(1) What attitudes or beliefs do middle school and high
school students hold that either increase or decrease
the likelihood they will seek help from their school
counselor?
(2) What is the impact of gender, age, and race/ethnicity
on students’ willingness to seek help from their school
counselor?
Method
Procedures
Upon receiving approval for the study from the institutional
review boards at our respective universities, we invited and
received commitments from school counselors at 11 secondary
schools (N ¼ 11) in two Midwestern states to serve as site coordinators for the study. Coordinators were not invited at
random but contacted based on their existing relationships with
one or more of the authors, either as a graduate program alum-
nus or an internship site supervisor. In exchange for a US$100
stipend, coordinators were asked to distribute informed consent
documents, invite students to participate, and ensure that a link
to the online survey instrument was distributed to willing par-
ticipants in a manner convenient for students and staff.
Although each coordinator used a slightly different method for
survey administration, they most commonly asked teachers to
share the link with participants during a study hall, homeroom,
or other noninstructional time. Site coordinators were given
freedom to invite groups of students to participate according
to school data needs and convenience. Ultimately, nine schools
elected to invite all students to participate and two schools
chose to invite selected grade levels. Site coordinators worked
with their building and district administrators to determine pro-
cedures for parental consent, with all schools ultimately choos-
ing to use a passive consent process. Site coordinators reported
that no parent/guardian chose to opt their student out of the
project and no student was unwilling to participate. This was
Auger et al. 3
confirmed by the researchers who discovered that all students
who accessed the survey answered “yes” to the informed assent
statement, signaling their willingness to participate.
Instrument
Unable to locate an instrument to measure all the variables in
question, we created our own tool later named the Barriers,
Experiences, and Attitudes Toward School Counseling
(BEATS) survey. Design of the instrument began with a thor-
ough review of literature related to adolescent help seeking,
specifically in school and professional counseling settings.
As noted above, previous research on the topic has uncovered
numerous reasons why some adolescents tend to avoid seeking
help and, when they do, which persons in their life they are
most likely to approach. Ultimately, the 51-item BEATS
instrument consisted of five sections, each grounded in the
literature and designed to gather data related to the research
questions: (a) basic demographics (e.g., grade, ethnicity); (b)
experiences with the school counselor (e.g., number of meet-
ings this year, reasons for meetings); (c) willingness to see the
school counselor for various academic, college/career, and
social/emotional issues (e.g., “Change your schedule,”
“Explore college options,” and “You’ve been feeling very sad
lately”) provided on a Likert-type Scale with responses from 1
(very unlikely) to 5 (very likely); (d) perceived barriers to see-
ing the school counselor for each issue above (e.g., “The coun-
selor might tell someone what I said,” “I don’t know my
counselor well enough to talk about this,” and “I like to handle
stuff like this on my own”) provided on a Likert-type Scale
with responses from 1 (definitely WOULD NOT stop me) to 5
(definitely WOULD stop me); and (e) open-response items
(e.g., “What could the school counselors in your school do to
be more helpful to students?”).
Prior to the study, we pilot tested the BEATS on seven
willing adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18. Following
completion of the survey, we asked these participants to pro-
vide feedback on length, clarity, reading level, and content. We
revised the instrument based on this feedback, and the survey
was deemed acceptable for use in the study.
Participants
The study was carried out at 11 secondary schools (N ¼ 11) in two Midwestern states. General characteristics of the schools
were as follows: two large, public high schools with Grades
10–12 (suburban); two medium-sized, Catholic high schools
with Grades 9–12 (one suburban and one medium-sized city);
three small, public high schools with Grades 9–12 (rural); one
small, public secondary school with Grades 6–12 (rural); one
large, public middle school with Grades 6–8 (medium-sized
city); one small, public middle school with Grades 6–8 (rural);
and one small, public middle school with Grades 7–8 (rural).
Table 1 provides additional characteristics of the participating
school sites, including student demographics.
A total of 3,584 students in Grades 6–12 took the survey,
with participants in Grades 6–8 (n ¼ 1,287) categorized as middle school (MS) students and those in Grades 9–12
(n ¼ 2,287) considered high school (HS) students. Ten parti- cipants did not indicate a grade level. Participants self-
identified their gender in an open-response format and were
categorized as male (n ¼ 1,731, 48.3%), female (1,773, 49.5%), gender nonconforming (31, 0.9%), no response (21, 0.6%), or other response (28, 0.8%). Students similarly self-identified their ethnicity and were categorized as White
(n ¼ 2,756, 76.9%), African American (191, 5.3%), Latina/ Latino (158, 4.4%), multiracial (135, 3.8%), Asian/Pacific Islander (121, 3.4%), American Indian (17, <1%), no response (90, 2.5%), or other response (116, 3.2%).
Results
Basic Descriptive Statistics
We analyzed quantitative data using the PSPP free statistical
software package (GNU Project, 2016). Basic descriptive anal-
yses revealed that the vast majority of students indicated
Table 1. Participating School Characteristics.
General Information Approximate Student Population (Ethnicity Counts Expressed in %)
Grade Levels Setting/Type
School Counselors Total White
African American Latina/o
Asian/ Pacific Islander
American Indian Multiracial
School A 7–12 Rural/public 1 444 96.6 0.2 1.4 0.9 0.9 0.9 School B 6–8 Rural/public 1 298 78.2 2.0 17.8 0.6 0.3 1.3 School C 9–12 Suburban/private 4 732 91.8 0.8 3.1 1.1 0.1 3.0 School D 9–12 Rural/public 2 857 87.9 4.0 2.1 2.4 0.2 3.4 School E 9–12 Urban/public 9 2,388 25.9 51.5 14.7 1.1 0.1 6.7 School F 9–12 Rural/public 1 251 78.8 0.8 19.5 .4 0 0 School G 9–12 Rural/public 1.3 509 83.1 0.4 13.6 0.2 0.4 1.0 School H 6–8 Medium outstate city/public 2 888 84.0 8.0 3.4 2.1 0.3 2.0 School I 10–12 Suburban/public 6 1,598 60.6 18.9 9.1 .1 0.4 4.2 School J 7–8 Rural/public .7 253 81.8 0 14.2 0 0.4 2.8 School K 9–12 Medium outstate/private 1 137 91.2 1.5 2.2 0 0 2.9
4 Professional School Counseling
knowing their school counselor’s name (90.4%) and office location (88.3%), although a lower percentage reported know- ing how to schedule a meeting with their school counselor
(73%). Students reported meeting with their school counselor (defined in the survey as an individual or group counseling
session) approximately 2–3 times in the past year (M ¼ 3.36, median ¼ 2), although more than 20% of participants reported zero meetings with their school counselor during that time.
Academics (46%) were the most common reason for these meetings, followed by college/career planning (29%), and social/emotional issues (18%). When asked to rate their will- ingness to seek help from their school counselor for specific
issues across the academic, college/career, and social/emo-
tional domains on a Likert-type Scale from 1 (very unlikely)
to 5 (very likely), students reported being most willing to seek
help for academic or college/career reasons, with the most
likely scenarios being: “Changes to your schedule” (M ¼ 3.47, SD ¼ 1.50), “Exploring college options” (M ¼ 3.42, SD ¼ 1.35), and “Deciding which classes to take” (M ¼ 3.33, SD ¼ 1.36). Students indicated they were least likely to seek help for social/emotional reasons, with the lowest-rated
scenarios being, “You’ve been feeling very sad lately” (M ¼ 1.98, SD ¼ 1.20), “Ongoing problem with your parents or friend” (M ¼ 2.11, SD ¼ 1.19), and “Anxiety or stress” (M ¼ 2.31, SD ¼ 1.31). Differences were detected by demo- graphic variables on a number of items; we discuss this below.
Students reported meeting with their school
counselor approximately 2–3 times in the past year,
although more than 20% of participants reported zero meetings with their school counselor during
that time.
Barriers to Seeking Help From the School Counselor
To answer the first research question related to barriers to
seeking help, students were asked to respond to a list of eight
reasons an adolescent might choose not to seek help from their
school counselor. As explained above, a small body of litera-
ture exists on general attitudes toward help seeking among
adolescents, and the eight reasons selected for inclusion in this
study were drawn from common findings across previous stud-
ies. In the present study, we asked participants to rate the
degree to which each of these eight reasons would stop them
from seeing their school counselor for various academic, col-
lege/career, and social/emotional issues, using a Likert-type
Scale from 1 (definitely WOULD NOT stop me) to 5 (definitely
WOULD stop me). Table 2 shows the results for this section of
the survey. Regardless of the type of presenting concern, stu-
dents consistently rated the following reasons as the greatest
barriers to seeking help from the school counselor: (a) “I would
talk to a parent, friend, or teacher about this instead”; (b) “I like
to handle this stuff on my own”; (c) “I don’t know my counse-
lor well enough to talk about this”; and (d) “The counselor
might tell someone what I said.”
Differences by Developmental Level, Ethnicity, and Gender
To answer the second research question, we utilized w2 and one-way analysis of variance followed by post hoc tests
(Bonferroni method) to detect differences by developmental
level, ethnicity, or gender.
Differences by developmental level. We noted many differences between middle school and high school students, starting with
the percentage of middle school students (47.7%) and high school students (17.3%) who reported no meetings with their school counselor in the previous year. The reasons for meetings
that did occur also differed, with middle school students being
much more likely than high school students to report meeting
with the school counselor for a social/emotional reason (26.7% vs. 12.5%), while the opposite was true for academics (12.8% vs. 64.6%) and college/career planning (2.5% vs. 44.3%). As illustrated in Table 3, these findings paralleled student
responses on items related to their willingness to seek help
from the school counselor, with middle school students being
more willing than high school students to seek help for all
scenarios related to social/emotional issues, but significantly
less likely for all scenarios related to academics and college/
career planning (all differences significant at p � .001). For
Table 2. To What Degree Would the following Reasons Stop You From Seeing Your School Counselor for Help With Each Type of Issue?
Academic College/Career Social/Emotional
M SD M SD M SD
I would talk to a parent, friend, or teacher about this instead 3.01 1.37 2.65 1.34 3.17 1.43 I like to handle this stuff on my own 2.89 1.36 2.53 1.33 3.15 1.42 I don’t know my counselor well enough to talk about this 2.59 1.30 2.21 1.22 2.93 1.43 The counselor might tell someone what I said 2.57 1.38 2.11 1.25 2.89 1.46 I didn’t know the counselor did stuff like this 2.25 1.14 2.05 1.10 2.47 1.35 I don’t know how to make an appointment with my counselor 2.12 1.25 2.09 1.21 2.31 1.30 It’s weak to get help for something like this 2.02 1.14 1.94 1.10 2.47 1.31 It’s embarrassing or not cool to get help from the counselor for this 1.89 1.00 1.77 1.03 2.43 1.34
Note. 1 ¼ very unlikely; 2 ¼ unlikely; 3 ¼ undecided; 4 ¼ likely; 5 ¼ very likely.
Auger et al. 5
example, the two issues for which middle school students
reported being most likely to seek help from the school coun-
selor were, “a friend told you they were thinking of harming
themselves” and “bullying,” while these scenarios rated only
seventh and eighth most likely for high school students.
Very few developmental differences were found regarding
perceived barriers to seeking help. Regardless of the domain of
the scenario, both middle school and high school students
endorsed two reasons far more frequently than others when
asked what would stop them from seeking help from the school
counselor: (a) “I would talk to a parent, friend, or teacher about
this instead” and (b) “I like to handle this stuff on my own.”
Those barriers were followed in likelihood by “I don’t know
my counselor well enough to talk about this” and “The coun-
selor might tell someone what I said,” with the order of these
two reasons differing slightly by developmental level and
domain of the presenting issue.
Differences by ethnicity. We also noted several differences by ethnicity, beginning with the finding that many students of
color did not know their school counselor’s name. Specifically,
White students were statistically more likely to report knowing
their counselor’s name (92.7%) than were multiracial (83.7%, p � .05) and African American (79.1%, p � .001) students. Despite this finding, no significant differences were detected
by ethnicity with regard to the number of reported meetings
with a school counselor over the past year.
w2 analyses detected statistically significant differences (p � .01) by ethnicity with regard to reasons given by students for
meeting with their school counselor over the past year. African
American (15.7%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (10.7%) students were less likely than all other groups to report meeting with a
school counselor in the past year for social/emotional reasons.
This trend was also observed in student ratings on items related
to their willingness to seek help from a school counselor for
specific scenarios involving social/emotional issues. For exam-
ple, when asked to rate how likely they were to seek out the
counselor for help with “ongoing problem with parents or
friend” on a scale from 1 to 5, African American (M ¼ 1.82) and Asian/Pacific Islander (M ¼ 1.71) students reported being significantly less likely (p � .05) than White (M ¼ 2.11) or Latina/Latino students (M ¼ 2.24).
Conversely, African American students were most likely of
all groups to report meeting with a school counselor for aca-
demic reasons (62.3%), and this was similarly reflected in their willingness to seek help from the school counselor for issues
such as “change your schedule” (M ¼ 3.66) and “learn about better ways to study” (M ¼ 2.69). Finally, although African American students typically reported being more willing than
White students to seek help for college/career planning, a
smaller percentage of African American students (26.2%) reported actually meeting with their counselor for this reason
as compared to White students (31.6%).
Differences by gender. We found very few statistically signifi- cant differences by gender in this sample, as male, female, and
nonconforming students reported both similar levels of willing-
ness to see the school counselor and similar perceived barriers
to doing so. We did note differences in the number of contacts
with a school counselor in the past year, with nonconforming
students reporting significantly more (M ¼ 8.68, p � .05) than male (M ¼ 3.4) and female (M ¼ 3.27) students. The reported reasons for these meetings also differed, with female (22.3%) and nonconforming (45.2%) students reporting more meetings than males (12.1%) for social/emotional issues. Given the lit- erature on help seeking and gender, we found the relatively
sparse differences detected in this sample somewhat surprising.
Open-Ended Questions
Research trends are shifting to include qualitative data within
quantitative studies as a way to reveal themes and common
threads in a specific area being studied (Erwin, Brotherson,
& Summers, 2011) and to provide a broader and more holistic
understanding of the phenomenon (Wright, 2014). The primary
purpose of qualitative questioning within a survey is to gain
insight into the participants’ worldviews and capture their
unique and authentic experiences and interpretations of these
experiences (Marshall & Rossman, 1999; Rubin & Bellamy,
2012; Saris & Gallhofer, 2014).
To that end, the BEATS survey included the following four
open-ended questions:
1. What would be the biggest reason that would make you
willing to see your school counselor if you had a problem?
2. What would be the biggest reason you would NOT
choose to see your school counselor when you had a
problem?
Table 3. How Likely Is It That You Would Go to Your School Counselor for the Following Issues?
Issue
Middle School
High School
M SD M SD
Change your schedule* 2.20 1.27 4.19 1.1 Exploring college options* 2.51 1.31 3.92 1.07 Deciding which classes to take* 2.42 1.28 3.83 1.13 Figuring out what jobs/careers you might like* 2.40 1.29 3.26 1.27 Learning how to pay for college* 2.29 1.23 3.17 1.24 Problem with a teacher* 2.59 1.38 3.05 1.35 A friend told you they were thinking of
harming themselves* 3.36 1.59 2.93 1.45
Bullying* 3.19 1.53 2.60 1.38 Learning new or better ways to study* 2.28 1.23 2.44 1.23 Anxiety or stress* 2.56 1.41 2.17 1.24 Ongoing problem with your parents or
friend* 2.50 1.31 1.89 1.07
You’ve been feeling very sad lately* 2.39 1.35 1.75 1.05
Note. 1 ¼ very unlikely; 2 ¼ unlikely; 3 ¼ undecided; 4 ¼ likely; 5 ¼ very likely. *Significant at p � .001.
6 Professional School Counseling
3. What could the school counselors in your school do to
be more helpful to students?
4. If you feel hesitant to see your school counselor, is there
anything she or he can do to make you more willing to
go? If yes, what would that be?
To explore the meaning and synthesize the open
responses, two members of the research team conducted a
thorough review of the data set by reading and rereading the
text. Independently, the researchers carried out a descriptive
content analysis of the data and determined main themes from
the four open-ended questions. Next, the two authors came
together and worked collaboratively to arrive at a consensus
on the main themes and patterns that emerged from the data
analyzed. This review of responses revealed a variety of clear
themes and patterns.
For Question 1, two main themes emerged, each illustrating
a condition under which the students would be willing to see
the school counselor: (a) for help with task-oriented items and
(b) when their perceived safety is at risk or there is a feeling of
crisis. With regard to the first theme, seeing the school coun-
selor for schedule changes or college-related questions was
commonly described. One student shared, “I would only see
my counselor if it was about college prep, SAT/ACT testing, or
about my schedule.” These task-oriented meetings represent
low-risk opportunities for quick interactions with the school
counselor that do not require a prior relationship or put the
student at risk of being judged. The second theme focused on
safety concerns (bullying, suicide, abuse, etc.). Students
reported a reluctant willingness to seek help in these cases,
although seeing the counselor was clearly viewed as a last
resort. For example, a student wrote that they would seek help,
“If I had a serious problem like suicide, family problems,
abuse, or severe bullying,” and another shared, “[If] one of
my friends was having a serious mental health issue.” A num-
ber of comments portrayed seeing the school counselor as a last
resort: “It would be that I cannot find any other way to solve it
and no one else that knows better” and “If I could not get help
anywhere else.” These responses suggest many students see
school counselors as responsive services providers to be called
upon only for simple tasks or during crises when nobody else
can help.
The following five themes emerged across responses to
Question 2, which asked students to identify the main reason
they would not choose to see the school counselor: (a) concern
about confidentiality, (b) lack of rapport/connectedness, (c)
stigma associated with school counseling, (d) counselor com-
petence, and (e) prefer others/self as support. The most preva-
lent among these concerns was confidentiality. Many students
were clearly worried about their privacy and did not believe
conversations with their school counselor would be kept con-
fidential. One student expressed the concern in this way: “The
biggest reason I would not choose to see my school counselor
would be if they told everyone what you two talked about in
private.” Another student shared a specific example of a breach
of confidentiality: “Because of them telling about my family
issues. They have done that before where they say things are
confidential and then tell what I said.”
The most prevalent among these concerns was
confidentiality. Many students were clearly worried
about their privacy and did not believe
conversations with their school counselor would be
kept confidential.
A second barrier mentioned by many respondents was a lack
of rapport or connection with the school counselor that resulted
in students being less willing to seek out their school counselor
for support. This was reflected in comments such as “I don’t
take my problems to people I don’t know” and “The biggest
reason I would choose not to see the counselor would be that I
do not know her very well and don’t feel comfortable talking
about my problems.”
The third area that students discussed was the stigma sur-
rounding school counseling. For example, one student stated,
“My friends would think that I am weird if I go see the
counselor.” Others made similar comments, such as “I am
afraid someone might find out and make fun of me and tell
everyone and they would make fun of me” and “The biggest
reason . . . would be that I would be embarrassed if my friends saw me going to the office. I wouldn’t want other people start-
ing to talk about me and wondering what problems I have.”
These feelings seem directly connected to a negative percep-
tion of entering the school counseling office and speak to how
the student body perceives the services offered as well as how
“problems” are viewed in the school.
The final two themes were counselor competence and the
preference to rely on others or self for support. Student
responses indicated a general sense that the problem would get
worse if they saw the school counselor or a feeling that the
school counselor is not helpful or competent. One student sim-
ply stated, “They don’t know anything,” which, while harsh,
accurately represented a number of student responses. In a
similar vein, another student wrote, “Our school counselor
never does anything about the situation until someone gets
hurt,” and another said, “It might make the problem worse.”
One student simply shared, “She isn’t very helpful.” These
statements could indicate a lack of understanding of the level
of training and scope of work of a school counselor, as well as a
sense that students were not satisfied with how a previous issue
was addressed. This might contribute to the finding that many
students want to handle problems on their own or with friends
and family, rather than with a school counselor. This was
summed up by responses such as “I like handling it myself or
talking to my closest friends and family” and “Friends are
easier to talk to and more accessible.”
Four themes emerged from responses to the final two open-
ended questions, providing insight into how school counselors
might be more helpful to students. These themes (a) provide
more individual meetings, (b) increase accessibility, (c) explain
Auger et al. 7
the roles/responsibilities of a school counselor, and (d) normal-
ize help seeking. Students repeatedly stated a desire for school
counselors to be more visible in the school, more involved in
students’ lives, and to intentionally reach out to students. For
example, one student noted that, “She [school counselor] could
meet us in class and show us how to plan a meeting and talk to
us one-on-one about our personal life.” Other students sug-
gested that counselors could “Socialize with the students more
so they can get to know them better” or “Have more scheduled
meetings for students who don’t go and make appointments
themselves” in order to build rapport and increase accessibility.
Students repeatedly stated a desire for school
counselors to be more visible in the school, more
involved in students’ lives, and to intentionally
reach out to students.
Interestingly, these sentiments seem to contradict the
responses given to the previous questions when students
reported a general distrust and lack of desire to seek help from
school counselors. But when asked explicitly about how school
counselors could be more helpful, many students stated that
counselors should actively reach out to students and get to
know them outside the counseling office. Students encouraged
counselors to “just talk to us more” and “interact with more
kids” as simple yet effective examples of how to foster open-
ness in the student–counselor relationship.
In addition to a better relationship, students reported need-
ing to learn the basics about school counseling, including the
name of their counselor, how to schedule an appointment, the
services offered by the school counselor, and the roles and
responsibilities of a school counselor (including confidential-
ity). The following are a few examples of participant responses
related to this need: “Assure me that I don’t need to be afraid to
talk with them or other people,” “Make it more well known
how to get in contact with them,” “Make it easier to set up
appointments,” and “Email me or talk to me to see if I have
problems.” In summary, the suggestions offered by students
reflect a genuine interest in connecting with their school coun-
selor in a meaningful, intentional way.
Finally, we emphasize that many students used the open-
ended response items to state that their school counselor was
doing a good job and should not change a thing (e.g., “Keep
being awesome”; “I think they’re fantastic as it is”). Although
the spirit of constructive criticism inherent in academic research
tends to pull researchers’ attention toward issues that are proble-
matic, we want to acknowledge the impressive efforts of the
school counselors represented in our study and those across the
country, most of whom are doing the best they can, given their
training, caseloads, and constraints of their work settings.
Discussion
The results of this study highlight many notable patterns in
secondary students’ attitudes toward seeking help from a
school counselor. One important finding supported by both
quantitative and open-ended responses was related to the rea-
sons students choose not to see their school counselor. First and
foremost, secondary students clearly prefer to solve all but the
most serious problems on their own or with the help of a friend
or family member before turning to a school counselor.
Although the exact reasons for this are unclear, two contribut-
ing factors could be concerns about confidentiality and a lack
of rapport/relationship with the school counselor, both of which
students consistently expressed in quantitative and qualitative
responses. All of these barriers have been identified in previous
studies on help seeking among children and adolescents (Del
Mauro & Williams, 2013; Fox & Butler, 2007; Rughani et al,
2011; Timlin-Scalera et al., 2003), and they also seem relevant
in the context of school counseling services.
This study uncovered many differences by ethnicity and
developmental level regarding the reasons students will see their
school counselor. High school students were much more likely
than middle school students to have met with their school coun-
selor in the previous year, although the reasons for these meet-
ings differed greatly, with most high schoolers reporting
academics or college/career planning as the reason for seeing
their counselor, while middle schoolers were more likely to
report social/emotional reasons. Although this may be expected
given the nature of student development and concerns at various
ages, a counselor working within a comprehensive school coun-
seling program would aim to provide students with needed ser-
vices across all domains and at the very least work to ensure that
students feel equally comfortable seeking help from the counse-
lor for a variety of issues. That said, in this particular sample,
middle school students indicated a far greater willingness to seek
help for social/emotional reasons (e.g., “bullying”) than issues in
the other domains, while high school students expressed the
most willingness to seek help related to academics (e.g., “change
my schedule”). Similar differences were noted by ethnicity, with
African American and Asian American students expressing less
willingness than White students to seek help for social/emotional
concerns. Very few differences were detected by gender in this
sample, with male, female, and nonconforming students report-
ing similar degrees of willingness to seek help from the school
counselor and similar barriers to doing so.
The results of this study point to the importance of school
counselors acknowledging and addressing student concerns and
demographic differences through outreach, relationship build-
ing, and education on the role of the school counselor. Confi-
dentiality weighs especially heavily on the minds of adolescents
and is not a simple issue to address, given the complexities of
balancing student trust and relationship with the counselor’s duty
to disclose certain information when required by law or guided
by professional ethics and decision-making (Stone, 2017).
Limitations
Like all research findings, the results of this study should be
interpreted with caution. First, the study participants were not
8 Professional School Counseling
chosen at random, but out of convenience given their standing
as students at a school where the research team had an existing
relationship with the school counselor. This makes the results
dependent on the work of just a few school counselors, all of
whom were previously known to the researchers. Furthermore,
the settings and demographics of these schools do not perfectly
represent the states in which they are located (let alone the
United States as a whole) and, therefore, are not widely gen-
eralizable. Third, given the nature of survey research, the
degree to which participants’ responses accurately represented
their feelings and experiences, rather than a pattern of social
desirability, is also unclear. This is especially true in light of the
findings regarding student concerns about confidentiality.
Another limitation is the BEATS instrument, for which mea-
surements of reliability and validity were not available since it
was developed specifically by the researchers for use in this
study and tested on only a small pilot sample of adolescents
prior to deployment. Fifth, given the length and quantity of
open-ended responses provided by participants, we were not
able to analyze these data in a thorough, systematic manner,
which may raise concerns about validity. Although the results
may be interesting to some and useful in supporting quantita-
tive findings, they should not be used to draw major conclusions.
Finally, we did not measure the overall effectiveness of each
school counseling program, including the degree to which coun-
seling departments were using a comprehensive school counsel-
ing approach such as the American School Counselor
Association (ASCA) National Model (2012). Research has
shown that comprehensive school counseling programs provide
many benefits (Carey & Harrington, 2010a, 2010b), and the
variables examined in this study might have been impacted by
the degree of structure within each school’s counseling program.
Implications for Practice
As noted above, we observed many differences by ethnicity and
developmental level. Noting these differences, reflecting on pos-
sible reasons for them, and developing strategies to address them
are critical for school counselors. For example, middle school
students in the sample were far more likely and willing to see a
school counselor for social/emotional reasons than were high
school students. Counselors at both levels might consider
whether this is the case at their school, and if so, why that might
be. Are high school counselors doing enough intentional out-
reach, education, and prevention on social/emotional develop-
ment and wellness? Conversely, are middle school counselors
doing enough work related to academic planning and college/
career readiness? School counselors are in a position to be
change agents who work to address equity gaps and increase the
multicultural competency of the faculty and staff. Effective com-
prehensive school counseling programs cannot survive without
great efforts on the part of the school counselor to win the
investment of the entire school community. School counselors
can no longer work in silos or wait for students to approach them
for help. Instead, counselors must take the lead in reaching out
and educating students, teachers, administrators, families, and
the general public on the value and scope of school counseling
programs and on the importance of working collaboratively.
School counselors would also be wise to address the barriers
to seeking school counseling services noted by the students in
this study, especially since these findings were consistent with
previous research on adolescent help-seeking behaviors. Con-
cern about confidentiality, the tendency to rely on self or family
and friends for help, and a lack of trust and rapport with the
school counselor are issues that cannot be ignored if school
counselors hope to establish an environment in which students
feel comfortable seeking help for a variety of issues. Educating
students and staff on the role of the school counselor and build-
ing an advisory council (ASCA, 2012) might be first steps
toward addressing these concerns. By widely educating stake-
holders and convening a team that understands issues such as
confidentiality, program goals, and appropriate tasks and use of
time, school counselors help ensure they have the trust and time
needed for direct services to build rapport with students and
establish a safe, secure environment in which all students feel
comfortable seeking out school counseling services.
Concern about confidentiality, the tendency to rely
on self or family and friends for help, and a lack of
trust and rapport with the school counselor are
issues that cannot be ignored.
To ensure school counselors have the opportunity to imple-
ment evidence-based programming and develop more compre-
hensive school counseling programs, they must work closely
with their building-level administrators to identify a shared
vision for school counseling services and clear roles and
responsibilities for the school counselor (ASCA, 2012; Mallory
& Jackson, 2007). In an effort to build support for a more
comprehensive program, school counselors may be helped by
sharing research with principals demonstrating that students
who feel their school counselor cares about them are more
likely to feel connected to school in general, which in turn is
associated with a host of positive academic and nonacademic
outcomes (Lapan, Wells, Petersen, & McCann, 2014).
The ASCA National Model (2012) provides a framework for
school counselors to develop and deliver outcome-based ser-
vices to address the academic, social/emotional, and college/
career readiness needs of all students through a comprehensive
program organized around four components: foundation, man-
agement, delivery, and accountability. All the while, school
counselors are called to display the key skills, attitudes, and
dispositions needed to be effective, including the four specific
themes of the ASCA National Model (2012): leadership, advo-
cacy, collaboration, and systemic change. Although schools
must examine solutions to the barriers identified in these
research findings in the context of their specific settings and
student populations, as a starting point, we offer suggestions
that align with the ASCA National Model (2012). As with any
intervention, counselors should target each action toward a
Auger et al. 9
specific goal and measure the effectiveness of the response in
impacting student outcomes.
� Implement looping (i.e., having school counselor move through the grade levels with the same set of students) to
maximize the development of close student–counselor
relationships (Delivery, Collaboration, Advocacy).
� Hold regularly scheduled individual or small group meetings with students to build trust and rapport (Deliv-
ery, Collaboration, Leadership, Advocacy).
� Use technology to regularly communicate with students and make it easy to schedule meetings (Delivery, Col-
laboration, Leadership).
� In schools with multiple counselors, allow students to see any counselor without an appointment for simple
requests. Use technology to communicate the content
of these meetings to the assigned counselor (Delivery,
Collaboration, Leadership, Systemic Change).
� Educate students and staff about school counseling. Pos- sible topics include the training and expertise of school
counselors, services provided, a typical meeting with the
counselor, how to schedule appointments, and confiden-
tiality. Reach out to students as early as possible, includ-
ing at transition meetings, visits to other buildings in a
district, and back-to-school events. Be proactive—do
not wait for students to find you (Delivery, Collabora-
tion, Leadership, Advocacy, Systemic Change).
� Seek regular feedback from students, staff, and parents regarding the effectiveness of the school counseling pro-
gram, including barriers to seeking help. School coun-
selors might use our study results as a starting point for
surveying students on reasons they do or do not seek out
their counselor. Keep an open mind and operate from a
growth mindset when analyzing feedback. Remember
that counselors are in schools to serve students, so we
need to listen to their voices (Management, Account-
ability, Systemic Change, Leadership, Advocacy).
� Keep the school website updated with information about the school counseling program and protocols such as
scheduling appointments so it is easily accessible to
students and stakeholders (Foundation, Management,
Leadership, Advocacy, Collaboration).
� Consider using volunteers for work that does not require access to confidential student information in order to
free up time to meet face-to-face with students and build
trust and rapport (Delivery, Collaboration, Leadership).
Suggestions for Future Research
Further research is needed in the area of student attitudes
toward seeking help from the school counselor. For example,
researchers might consider replicating this study in different
geographic locales and/or with demographic samples more rep-
resentative of the national population. Qualitative researchers
might build on the findings from the open-ended questions
using smaller samples and more rigorous methodology.
Researchers also might gather data from other stakeholders
such as school counselors, teachers, parents, and administrators
to allow for comparison with student attitudes. Future studies
might use experimental methods to determine the effectiveness
of specific interventions targeted at student concerns raised in
this study (e.g., confidentiality, trust). Especially helpful
research would address such interventions embedded within a
comprehensive school counseling program, such as one based
on the ASCA National Model (2012) and studied longitudinally
with an eye toward measurable student outcomes. Reviewing
school counseling intervention research, particularly evidence-
based programs that could be modified to address the needs of
the school, might also be advantageous. For example, the All
Hands on Deck program provides an excellent template show-
casing a school counselor-led initiative focusing on academic
pressure, social support, and relational trust (Salina et al.,
2013). Finally, interested researchers might include other vari-
ables such as student-to-school-counselor ratio, degree and
fidelity of implementation of a comprehensive school counsel-
ing program, and type of student–counselor interaction to mea-
sure any differences in student outcomes and attitudes.
Conclusion
School counselors provide essential support and services to
students, but the results of this study indicate that a variety of
beliefs, attitudes, and barriers impede the ability and willing-
ness of students to seek help from their counselor. Finding
ways to minimize these barriers is critical, so that students can
receive the support and guidance they need. Some positive
steps in this direction are easy, such as ensuring students
know how to access school counseling services. Addressing
other barriers, such as student concern about confidentiality,
is much more complex. School counselors need to find ways
to educate students and other stakeholders about the services
they can provide and reach out to students who may be reluc-
tant to seek help on their own. Further research clearly is
needed in this area.
References
American School Counselor Association. (2012). ASCA National
Model: A framework for student counseling programs (3rd ed.).
Alexandria, VA: Author.
Biolcati, R., Palareti, L., & Mameli, C. (2018). What adolescents
seeking help teach us about a school-based counseling service.
Child & Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35, 45–56. doi:
10.1007/s10560-017-0503-7
Boldero, J., & Fallon, B. (1995). Adolescent help-seeking: What do
they get help for and from whom? Journal of Adolescence, 18,
193–209. doi:10.1006/jado.1995.1013
Bruce, A. M., Getch, Y. Q., & Ziomek-Daigle, J. (2009). Closing the
gap: A group counseling approach to improve test performance of
African-American students. Professional School Counseling, 12,
450–457. doi:10.1177%2F2156759X0901200603
10 Professional School Counseling
Bryan, J., Moore-Thomas, C., Day-Vines, N. L., Holcomb-McCoy, C.,
& Mitchell, N. (2009). Characteristics of students who receive
school counseling services: Implications for practice and research.
Journal of School Counseling, 7(21), 1–29. Retrieved from http://
www.jsc.montana.edu/articles/v7n21.pdf
Carey, J. C., & Harrington, K. M. (2010a). Nebraska school counsel-
ing evaluation report. Amherst, MA: Center for School Counseling
Outcome Research and Evaluation.
Carey, J. C., & Harrington, K. M. (2010b). Utah school counseling
evaluation report. Amherst, MA: Center for School Counseling
Outcome Research and Evaluation.
Chan, S., & Quinn, P. (2012). Secondary school students’ views of
inhibiting factors in seeking counseling. British Journal of Guidance
& Counseling, 40, 527–543. doi:10.1080/03069885.2012.719603
Chandra, A., & Minkovitz, C. S. (2006). Stigma starts early: Gender
differences in teen willingness to use mental health services. Jour-
nal of Adolescent Health, 38, 754e1–754e8. doi:10.1016/
j.jadohealth.2005.08.011
Cheung, A., Dewa, C., Cairney, J., Veldhuizen, S., & Schaffer, A.
(2009). Factors associated with use of mental health services for
depressed and/or suicidal youth aged 15–24. Community Mental
Health Journal, 45, 300–306. doi:10.1007/s10597-009-9205-8
Corry, D. A. S., & Leavey, G. (2017). Adolescent trust and primary care:
Help-seeking for emotional and psychological difficulties. Journal
of Adolescence, 54, 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2016.11.003
Cuffe, S. P., Waller, J. L., Addy, C. L., McKeown, R. E., Jackson, K.
L., Moloo, J., & Garrison, C. Z. (2001). A longitudinal study of
adolescent mental health service use. The Journal of Behavioral
Health Services & Research, 28, 1–11. doi:10.1007/bf00287230
Del Mauro, J. M., & Williams, D. J. (2013). Children and adolescents’
attitudes toward seeking help from professional mental health pro-
viders. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling,
35, 120–138. doi:10.1007/s10447-012-9172-6
Duncan, L. E., & Johnson, D. (2007). Black undergraduate students’
attitude toward counseling and counselor preference. College Stu-
dent Journal, 41, 696–719.
Eliot, M., Cornell, D., Gregory, A., & Fan, X. (2010). Supportive
school climate and student willingness to seek help for bullying
and threats of violence. Journal of School Psychology, 48,
533–553. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2010.07.001
Erwin, E. J., Brotherson, M. J., & Summers, J. A. (2011). Understand-
ing qualitative meta-synthesis: Issues and opportunities in early
childhood intervention research. Journal of Early Intervention,
33, 186–200. doi:10.1177/1053815111425493
Fox, C. L., & Butler, I. (2007). “If you don’t want to tell anyone else
you can tell her”: Young people’s views on school counselling.
British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 35, 97–114. doi:
10.1080/03069880601106831
GNU Project. (2016). GNU PSPP for GNU/Linux (version 0.10.1)
[computer software]. Boston, MA: Free Software Foundation.
Retrieved from https://www.gnu.org/software/pspp/
Goodwin, R. D., Mocarski, M., Marusic, A., & Beautrais, A. (2013).
Thoughts of self-harm and help-seeking behavior among youth in
the community. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior, 43,
305–312. doi:10.1111/sltb.12017
Gulliver, A., Griffiths, K. M., & Christensen, H. (2010). Perceived
barriers and facilitators to mental health help-seeking in young
people: A systematic review. BMC Psychiatry, 10, 1–9. doi:
10.1186/1471-244x-10-113
Heath, N. L., Baxter, A. L., Toste, J. R., & McLouth, R. (2010).
Adolescents’ willingness to access school-based support for non-
suicidal self-injury. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 25,
260–276. doi:10.1177/08295573510377979
Ho, J., Yeh, M., McCabe, K., & Hough, R. L. (2007). Parental cultural
affiliation and youth mental health service use. Journal of Youth &
Adolescence, 36, 529–542. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9114-x
Lapan, R. T., Wells, R., Petersen, J., & McCann, L. A. (2014). Stand
tall to protect students: School counselors strengthening school
connectedness. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92,
304–315. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.2014.00158.x
Mallory, B. J., & Jackson, M. H. (2007). Balancing the load: How to engage
counselors in school improvement. Principal Leadership, 7, 34–37.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1999). Designing qualitative
research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Raviv, A., Raviv, A., Vago-Gefen, I., & Fink, A. S. (2009). The
personal service gap: Factors affecting adolescents’ willingness
to seek help. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 483–499. doi:10.1016/
j.adolescence.2008.07.004
Reback, R. (2010). Schools’ mental health services and young chil-
dren’s emotions, behavior, and learning. Journal of Policy Analysis
and Management, 29, 698–727. doi:10.1002/pam20528
Rubin, A., & Bellamy, J. (2012). Practitioner’s guide to using research
for evidence-based practice (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Rughani, J., Deane, F. R., & Wilson, C. J. (2011). Rural adolescents’
help-seeking intentions for emotional problems: The influence of
perceived benefits and stoicism. The Australian Journal of Rural
Health, 19, 64–69. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1584.2011.01185.x
Salina, C., Girtz, S., Eppinga, J., Martinez, D., Kilian, D. B., Lozano,
E., . . . Shines, T. (2013). All hands on deck: A comprehensive,
results-driven counseling model. Professional School Counseling,
17, 63–75. doi:10.1177%2F2156759X0001700112
Saris, W. E., & Gallhofer, I. N. (2014). Wiley series in survey meth-
odology: Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for
survey research (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Stone, C. (2017). School counseling principles: Ethics and law (4th
ed.). Alexandria, VA: American School Counselor Association.
Timlin-Scalera, R. M., Ponterotto, J. G., Blumberg, F. C., & Jackson,
M. A. (2003). A grounded theory study of help-seeking behaviors
among White male high school students. Journal of Counseling
Psychology, 50, 339–350. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.3.339
Watkinson, J. S., & Hersi, A. A. (2014). School counselors supporting
African immigrant students’ career development: A case study.
The Career Development Quarterly, 62, 44–55. doi:10.1002/
j.2161-0045.2014.00069
Whiston, S. C., Tai, W. L., Rahardja, D., & Eder, K. (2011). School
counseling outcome: A meta-analytic examination of interven-
tions. Journal of Counseling & Development, 89, 37–55. doi:
10.1002/j.1556-6678.2011.tb00059.x
Wilson, C. J., & Deane, F. P. (2012). Brief report: Need for autonomy
and other perceived barriers relating to adolescents’ intentions to
Auger et al. 11
seek professional mental health care. Journal of Adolescence, 35,
233–237. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.06.011
Wilson, C. J., Deane, F. P., & Ciarrochi, J. (2005). Can hopelessness
and adolescents’ beliefs and attitudes about seeking help account
for help negation? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 1525–1539.
doi:10.1002/jclp.20206
Wright, R. J. (2014). Research methods for counseling: An introduc-
tion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yap, M. H., Reavley, N., & Jorm, A. F. (2013). Where would young
people seek help for mental disorders and what stops them? Find-
ings from an Australian national survey. Journal of Affective Dis-
orders, 147, 255–261. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.014
Author Biographies
Richard W. Auger, PhD, is a professor of counselor education
at Minnesota State University in Mankato, MN. Email: richard.
Nicholas R. Abel, EdD, is an assistant professor of counsel-
ing in the College of Education at Butler University in
Indianapolis, IN.
Brandie M. Oliver, EdD, is an associate professor, also in the
College of Education at Butler University.
12 Professional School Counseling
<< /ASCII85EncodePages false /AllowTransparency false /AutoPositionEPSFiles true /AutoRotatePages /None /Binding /Left /CalGrayProfile (Gray Gamma 2.2) /CalRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CalCMYKProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /sRGBProfile (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /CannotEmbedFontPolicy /Warning /CompatibilityLevel 1.4 /CompressObjects /Off /CompressPages true /ConvertImagesToIndexed true /PassThroughJPEGImages false /CreateJobTicket false /DefaultRenderingIntent /Default /DetectBlends true /DetectCurves 0.1000 /ColorConversionStrategy /LeaveColorUnchanged /DoThumbnails false /EmbedAllFonts true /EmbedOpenType false /ParseICCProfilesInComments true /EmbedJobOptions true /DSCReportingLevel 0 /EmitDSCWarnings false /EndPage -1 /ImageMemory 1048576 /LockDistillerParams true /MaxSubsetPct 100 /Optimize true /OPM 1 /ParseDSCComments true /ParseDSCCommentsForDocInfo true /PreserveCopyPage true /PreserveDICMYKValues true /PreserveEPSInfo true /PreserveFlatness false /PreserveHalftoneInfo false /PreserveOPIComments false /PreserveOverprintSettings true /StartPage 1 /SubsetFonts true /TransferFunctionInfo /Apply /UCRandBGInfo /Remove /UsePrologue false /ColorSettingsFile () /AlwaysEmbed [ true ] /NeverEmbed [ true ] /AntiAliasColorImages false /CropColorImages false /ColorImageMinResolution 266 /ColorImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleColorImages true /ColorImageDownsampleType /Average /ColorImageResolution 175 /ColorImageDepth -1 /ColorImageMinDownsampleDepth 1 /ColorImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeColorImages true /ColorImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterColorImages true /ColorImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /ColorACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /ColorImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /JPEG2000ColorACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000ColorImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasGrayImages false /CropGrayImages false /GrayImageMinResolution 266 /GrayImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleGrayImages true /GrayImageDownsampleType /Average /GrayImageResolution 175 /GrayImageDepth -1 /GrayImageMinDownsampleDepth 2 /GrayImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeGrayImages true /GrayImageFilter /DCTEncode /AutoFilterGrayImages true /GrayImageAutoFilterStrategy /JPEG /GrayACSImageDict << /QFactor 0.40 /HSamples [1 1 1 1] /VSamples [1 1 1 1] >> /GrayImageDict << /QFactor 0.76 /HSamples [2 1 1 2] /VSamples [2 1 1 2] >> /JPEG2000GrayACSImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /JPEG2000GrayImageDict << /TileWidth 256 /TileHeight 256 /Quality 30 >> /AntiAliasMonoImages false /CropMonoImages false /MonoImageMinResolution 900 /MonoImageMinResolutionPolicy /OK /DownsampleMonoImages true /MonoImageDownsampleType /Average /MonoImageResolution 175 /MonoImageDepth -1 /MonoImageDownsampleThreshold 1.50286 /EncodeMonoImages true /MonoImageFilter /CCITTFaxEncode /MonoImageDict << /K -1 >> /AllowPSXObjects false /CheckCompliance [ /None ] /PDFX1aCheck false /PDFX3Check false /PDFXCompliantPDFOnly false /PDFXNoTrimBoxError true /PDFXTrimBoxToMediaBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXSetBleedBoxToMediaBox false /PDFXBleedBoxToTrimBoxOffset [ 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 0.00000 ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfile (U.S. Web Coated \050SWOP\051 v2) /PDFXOutputConditionIdentifier (CGATS TR 001) /PDFXOutputCondition () /PDFXRegistryName (http://www.color.org) /PDFXTrapped /Unknown /CreateJDFFile false /Description << /ENU <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> >> /Namespace [ (Adobe) (Common) (1.0) ] /OtherNamespaces [ << /AsReaderSpreads false /CropImagesToFrames true /ErrorControl /WarnAndContinue /FlattenerIgnoreSpreadOverrides false /IncludeGuidesGrids false /IncludeNonPrinting false /IncludeSlug false /Namespace [ (Adobe) (InDesign) (4.0) ] /OmitPlacedBitmaps false /OmitPlacedEPS false /OmitPlacedPDF false /SimulateOverprint /Legacy >> << /AllowImageBreaks true /AllowTableBreaks true /ExpandPage false /HonorBaseURL true /HonorRolloverEffect false /IgnoreHTMLPageBreaks false /IncludeHeaderFooter false /MarginOffset [ 0 0 0 0 ] /MetadataAuthor () /MetadataKeywords () /MetadataSubject () /MetadataTitle () /MetricPageSize [ 0 0 ] /MetricUnit /inch /MobileCompatible 0 /Namespace [ (Adobe) (GoLive) (8.0) ] /OpenZoomToHTMLFontSize false /PageOrientation /Portrait /RemoveBackground false /ShrinkContent true /TreatColorsAs /MainMonitorColors /UseEmbeddedProfiles false /UseHTMLTitleAsMetadata true >> << /AddBleedMarks false /AddColorBars false /AddCropMarks false /AddPageInfo false /AddRegMarks false /BleedOffset [ 9 9 9 9 ] /ConvertColors /ConvertToRGB /DestinationProfileName (sRGB IEC61966-2.1) /DestinationProfileSelector /UseName /Downsample16BitImages true /FlattenerPreset << /ClipComplexRegions true /ConvertStrokesToOutlines false /ConvertTextToOutlines false /GradientResolution 300 /LineArtTextResolution 1200 /PresetName ([High Resolution]) /PresetSelector /HighResolution /RasterVectorBalance 1 >> /FormElements true /GenerateStructure false /IncludeBookmarks false /IncludeHyperlinks false /IncludeInteractive false /IncludeLayers false /IncludeProfiles true /MarksOffset 9 /MarksWeight 0.125000 /MultimediaHandling /UseObjectSettings /Namespace [ (Adobe) (CreativeSuite) (2.0) ] /PDFXOutputIntentProfileSelector /DocumentCMYK /PageMarksFile /RomanDefault /PreserveEditing true /UntaggedCMYKHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UntaggedRGBHandling /UseDocumentProfile /UseDocumentBleed false >> ] /SyntheticBoldness 1.000000 >> setdistillerparams << /HWResolution [288 288] /PageSize [612.000 792.000] >> setpagedevice