Considerations for Outsourcing
Outsourcing Educational Services
Michelle Marsura
EDUC 567 – School Administration & Budget
Fall 2021
Dr. Staci Kimmons
Scenario: My school district wants to outsource special education services.
For Outsourcing
Against Outsourcing
Efficiency – Administrative overhead can be eliminated, freeing up individuals for other responsibilities. There will no longer be a need for in-house scheduling, observations, or state evaluations.
Expertise – The organization providing the service will be experts in their field and in implementing services. School personnel will no longer have to spend their time becoming familiar with the latest research, state law, or resources available. Time is money and this will save many people a lot of time.
Long-Term Costs – The company will oversee hiring, training new employees, updating equipment, renewing licenses, and other recurring costs.
Loss of Control – With special education services outsourced, the school will no longer have control over scheduling, strategically matching teachers with students, or protocols.
Timeliness of Service – With operations moved outside of the building, getting answers to questions may take longer. Teachers will no longer have the option of walking over and asking a quick question or requesting support last minute or in an emergency.
Community Relationships – The current relationships between staff members and between staff and students will be lost. Many families have become comfortable with their current SPED coordinator and may not trust the outside company.
Stakeholder
Involvement*
Responsibility – When students and families have concerns, or are not seeing the desired results, who is responsible? While the answer may be the company, the lines are blurred because the company was hired by school. However, that
doesn’t mean we have control over every
aspect.
Flexibility – Not having to adhere to school contracts, calendars, or legal requirements, the company can regularly assess and amend the services they provide. Schools are often stuck with programs and personnel to at least the end of the school year, if not longer.
Accountability*
Informed Decision-Making*
* See notes below for more information
Stakeholder Involvement – Everyone who will be impacted by this decision should be informed about the options, have a chance to share their views, and be notified of final decisions in a timely manner.
Accountability – Regardless of who oversees SPED services, there needs to be measures in place to hold the services accountable to improving student learning.
Informed Decision-Making – Those making the final decision should be relative experts in SPED. They should know how it currently works in the district, who will be impacted if outsourcing were to occur, and how the company plans to integrate and improve upon the existing structures. They should also know how to read and analyze contracts and determine measures of success.
2
References
McKenzie, A. S., & Bishop, A. M. (2009). Outsourcing Special Education Services. School Administrator, 66(9), 16–19.
Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (2005, September). Is outsourcing part of the solution to the higher education cost dilemma? Institute for Higher Education Policy. Retrieved October 16, 2021, from https://www.ihep.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/uploads_docs_pubs_outsourcing.pdf.