First three Journal Entries (1 of 2 assignments)
Running head: KARL CHILDERS LEADERSHIP JOURNAL 1
Karl Childers
Initial Eldership Journal
PSY 3541: Psychology of Leadership
Fall 2015
Note: Use the naming scheme from the syllabus for your file.
This would be Karl_Childers_Journal 1.
KARL CHILDERS LEADERSHIP JOURNAL 2
Journal Entry 1: Best Leader I have Experienced (This is not in your text.)
(Instructor Note: This example is an average response worth a “C” for a grade. Good ones
are a bit longer.)
The best leader I have encountered was a supervisor I had at the Sheriff’s Office. I am a
deputy sheriff and have been so for over seven years. I have seen leadership. A prime example of
this was a supervisor that I had, who is now deceased. The man always came to work, no matter
how ill he was due to his chemotherapy treatments. He went to calls with his deputies and even
took reports when he knew that they were down several men each. He asked for advice from the
younger deputies as technology had passed him by in his some 44 years of police work.
He was someone that would never deny someone the night off, even if he knew he was
short on staffing, and he knew that he would have to answer calls for service. In order to get one
of his deputies to come to work because he didn't have enough money to get the tire on his car
replaced, this supervisor opened his own wallet giving the deputy the money to get the tire fixed
with the stipulation to pay it back whenever he could afford it.
This supervisor in his first assignment took a squad of deputies, all with less than six
months experience. By the time this supervisor took his second assignment, his squad of brand
new deputies led the precinct in all statistics, as they worked as hard as they could for their
supervisor. The most important thing about this is that the supervisor never asked his
subordinates to do anything that he would not do himself.
KARL CHILDERS LEADERSHIP JOURNAL 3
Journal Entry 2: Leader’s Self Insight 1.1: Your Learning Style: Using Multiple
Intelligences
(Instructor Note: This example is from an old text. We do not use this assessment any
longer but it provides an example of an average response worth a “C” for a grade.)
I scored highest with logical-mathematical intelligence answering mostly true on all three
questions. Interpersonal intelligence was my second highest scoring mostly true on two of the
questions. For the three other intelligences, I answered mostly true on just one of the questions
for each category. I think this fits in well with my career path. Being in the field of law
enforcement, you need to have strong problem solving skills. You also need to positively interact
with people on a daily basis, and this is where interpersonal intelligence is important.
I believe I am on the right track, but I still realize there are some areas I will continue to
work on. One of these areas is better communication skills when dealing with people in highly
stressful situations. This is a good tool to have when entering the field of law enforcement. I
understand the importance of writing reports in a professional manner, and my verbal
intelligence is also another area that needs work.
Journal Entry 2: Leader’s Self Insight 1.5: Leadership Potential
(Instructor Note: This example is from an old text. We do not use this assessment any
longer but it provides an example of an average response worth a “C” for a grade.)
On the leadership potential survey, I answered six out of the seven questions mostly true
for the odd numbers. These questions are considered more important to managerial activities.
On the even numbered questions, I answered four mostly true out of the seven questions. These
questions represent behaviors and activities typical of leadership. Since I answered more
KARL CHILDERS LEADERSHIP JOURNAL 4
questions mostly true for the odd numbered questions, this indicates that I may have better
managerial qualities compared to leadership qualities.
I think that the scores may be somewhat correct. I tend to focus on long-term goals and
being organized with setting priorities. But I do not think this survey gets too in-depth to be able
to label an individual with just twelve questions. I think some of the questions can be indicative
of being a good leader or a good manager.
I do take away that there are similar and very different skills and attributes for
management and leadership. I should use the ones I am good at and recognize where I can
improve. If I recognize those areas, I can work to improve and even compensate and rely on
teammates in certain situations.