i need someone who can assist me to my homewok
jo6699
SampleAnnotatedBibliographyAssignmentSheet.docx
Name:________________________ ENG 102-____
Sample Annotated Bibliography Assignment Sheet
To give you confidence that the entries you’re creating are appropriate for the Community Annotated Bibliography, you will each submit one sample Annotated Bibliography entry for review and a grade.
Below you’ll find the rubric I’ll use to evaluate your entry. I will evaluate all entries submitted as part of your Community Annotated Bibliography using the same criteria.
Please attach this page to your annotated bibliography entry before submitting.
The entry should contain the following four elements:
1. Bibliographic Entry: For each source, begin with the bibliographic information correctly formatted according to MLA style guidelines.
2. General Summary: In around 300 words, articulate a “big picture” assertion—telling what the source is about/accomplishes, overall. Also, describe the major “key points” from the source using Source Attribution Phrases (SAPs). Details, quotations, and paraphrases should NOT be used to create this summary.
3. TRAAP Evaluation: In around 200 words, objectively evaluate the source using the TRAAP criteria. Be sure the criteria are clearly specified and that you include specific information/examples to show how the source meets or does not meet high expectations. End the evaluation with an overall evaluation of the source.
4. Name: Place your full name at the end of this entry. (You will not get credit for this entry if your name is not included.)
Rubric
|
|
A |
B |
C |
D-F |
|
Bibliography 10pts |
Follows MLA format, allowing the reader to identify the source’s type and location. 10-9pts |
Generally follows MLA format, allowing the reader to somewhat identify the source’s type and location. 8-7pts |
Attempts MLA format, but is unclear about the identity of the source’s type and location. 6-5pts |
Fails to use MLA making it impossible to determine the source’s type and location. 4-0pts |
|
General Summary 40pts |
Consistently uses SAPs and clearly maintains big picture focus; has no bias or argument. 40-36pts |
Uses SAPs and maintains big picture focus, has argument. 35-32pts |
SAPs are not used and some details are used, distorting big picture. Some bias and argument are present. 31-28pts |
No or infrequent use of SAPs and detail focused, losing big picture. Source is argumentative, or influenced by bias. 27-0pts |
|
Evaluative Summary 40pts |
Uses all elements of TRAAP, citing evidence from the source to validate assertions. Clear Topic and Concluding sentences are present. 40-36pts |
Either uses some elements of TRAAP or lacks sufficient evidence from the source to validate assertions. Topic and Concluding sentences are present. 35-32pts |
Missing elements of TRAAP and uses insufficient evidence to validate assertions. Lacks Topic and/or Concluding sentences. 31-28pts |
Either missing the Evaluative Summary, does not use TRAAP, or is consistently too vague to validate assertions. Lacks Topic and Concluding sentences. 27-0pts |
|
Format 10pts |
Has all four required elements. 10-9pts |
Missing one of the required four elements. 8-7pts |
Missing more than one of the required four elements. 6-5pts |
Does not reflect the format of an entry for an Ann Bib. 4-0pts |
|
/100 |
|
|||
|
% |
|
