Discussion

Learning Styles and Motivation

The four learning styles listed in the Noe (2020) text include diverger, assimilator, converger, and accommodator. After reading through the descriptions of all four multiple times, I identified the most with two learning styles equally, diverger and assimilator. My dominant learning abilities as a diverger include concrete experience and reflective observation. I recognized many years ago that I would much rather use a hands-on-approach when learning a new skill, because when I am able to physically perform the task as I learn it, I am able to remember the actions I took through mental imagery much better than trying to recall words or verbal directions. Additionally, Noe (2020) lists reflective observation as another dominate learning ability for the diverging learner. I relate to this component especially because I am natural observer of my surroundings. It is the first thing I do when I enter a new environment, or even an environment I am familiar with. I typically use the phrase “assessing the situation” which has become a running joke with my friends and family. I find that I when I am able to observe first, I can then decide how to interact with the situation in the most appropriate way.  Kolb and Kolb (2013) explain that someone with this learning style would rather work with other people or in groups, readily accepts and wants feedback, and is able to look at situations from different perspectives. These are all true for me.

I can equally relate to the assimilator learning style with abstract conceptualization as a dominate learning ability in addition to reflective observation. The description listed in the Noe text, describes this type to be skilled in inductive reasoning and the use of disparate observations to find relationships between different experiences and situations. I also find that at times I am more apt to focus on ideas and concepts rather than people and as Kolb and Kolb (2013) describe, often find that the ideas I invent are more valuable theoretically as opposed to having a practical purpose. However, these theories have played a really important part in the growth of my spiritual life. I may have significant “revelations” as I call it, which have directed me when making important decisions. So often, I have been stuck on a personal problem and try to think my way out of it, only coming back around to realizing that is impossible and exactly why I need God; to fill the void that I am not capable of filling. “Whoever heeds instruction is on the path to life, but he who rejects reproof leads others astray” (English Standard Version, 2001/2016, Proverbs 10:17).

In terms of the best approach to training for my learning styles I believe the best approach would be to begin by engaging in group discussion of what participants think they know about the topic, followed by active participation in learning activities or following along with tasks while being shown how to do it. Next, I think taking time for small group discussions about what the participants learned in the activities would further motivate the participants to absorb the information. Finally, spending time reflecting on and processing the training provided and how to best apply it would provide further motivation to use the new skills learned.

References: