management case analysis

profilealnnrye
s4-PowerPoliticsS220181.pdf

Management Competencies

Session 4: POWER & POLITICS

1

Seminar Leader:

Agenda

1. Warm-up case 2. Approach or Avoid Power and Politics? 3. Gaining and Using Power 4. Stakeholder Analysis

2

1. Warm-Up Case

3

A short clip from Spielberg’s “Lincoln” (2012)

context for the clip: • 1865, President Abraham Lincoln expects the

Civil War to end within a month, and is concerned that his 1863 Emancipation Proclamation (which declared all slaves free men) may be discarded by the courts and African-American be re-enslaved once the war has concluded

• hence he tries to get his proposed 13th constitutional (anti-slavery) amendment passed in congress, but support is shaky with Republicans, and most Democrats oppose it

• in the scene we witness a congressional debate about the proposed amendment

2. Approach or Avoid Power & Politics?

5

Views on Power

“I love power. But it is as an artist that I love it. I love it as a musician loves his violin, to draw out its sounds and chords and harmonies.” -Napoleon Bonaparte

6

“Contact with men who wield power and authority still leaves an intangible sense of repulsion. It's very like being in close proximity to faecal matter.” -Jean Baudrillard

“the power to influence is something that most people would like more of, even if they do not want the responsibility that may go with it.”

charles handy from: “understanding organizations” (1993), p124

7

reasons why people shy away from power & politics

1 just-world-hypothesis

2 ”leadership industry”

3 protecting your self-esteem jeffrey pfeffer prof. of org. behavior, stanford

8

DON’T BE A GRADUATE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF WISHFUL THINKING

9

power-orientation can be good !

10

percentiles

(subordinates’ self-reports)

managers with high institutional power-motivation achieve superior outcomes

affiliative managers (affiliation motivation > power motivation, high inhibition)

personal power managers (power motivation > affiliation motivation, low inhibition)

institutional power managers (power motivation > affiliation motivation, high inhibition)

power/politics-orientation may reduce stress!

Perceptions of organizational and extra- organizational stressors

• Ambiguity and change • Increased accountability • Interpersonal interactions • Organizational politics

Psychological and physiological strain

• Anxiety • Executive stress and well-

being

political skill

source: Political Skill: An Antidote for Workplace StressorsAuthor(s): Pamela L. Perrewé, Gerald R. Ferris, Dwight D. Frink, William P. Anthony Source: The Academy of Management Executive (1993-2005), Vol. 14, No. 3

powerlessness corrupts !

12

people who feel powerless, unimportant, and restricted by rules and regulation get even by:

• being overcontrolling, • being overexacting • demanding “tribute” for fulfilling

requests • venting their frustration on those who

are even less powerful

power and perspective taking

power can blind to the perspectives and feelings of others

you should approach power rather than avoid it but with a critical awareness - leaders who balance power with perspective taking are the most effective

Source: Galinsky et al. (2006). Power and Perspectives not Taken. Psychological Science

3. Gaining and Using Power

14

defining power

power = - (dependence)

person A

person B

relative power/depend.

power is a relational property (not an individual attribute)

in french: pouvoir (noun): resource

pouvoir (verb): behavior, i.e. use of power

15

defining politics

why do we need politics? why does politics exist?

• misaligned interests • diverse perspectives • competition for scarce resources & interdependence

derived from the words "poly" meaning "many", and "tics" meaning "blood-sucking parasites."

(urban dictionary)

(cambridge dictionary)

the activities of people (e.g. elected officials) who seek to influence the way a community (e.g. country, organiza on, etc.) is governed

gaining power

using power

16

a politician …

17

seeks power

wields power

public mandate, courts, grows, and identifies with his constituents/followers

distinguished himself as more capable of using power to advance / defend his constituents and his own interests

translated to your career:

develop and propose ideas that are attractive to others, so that they provide you with support,

resources, etc.

utilize and employ the support and resources that you were given to

get things done in a way that satisfies your supporters.

胡悦瑜�
行使�

Sources of power

18

overcoming a power deficit

personal (e.g. lack of legitimacy)

relational (e.g. lack of network)

positional (e.g. lack of resources)

adapted from: Barsoux, J.-L. and C. Bouquet (2013). "How to overcome a power deficit." MIT SLOAN Management Review 54(4): 45.

uses of power: Lukes’ typology

personal influence: persuasion, inducements, threats, etc.

agenda setting power: determine which issues get talked about, and which are given no/little time and

attention

direct indirect

hegemonic power: hegemon defines the terms of rationality (e.g. the rules of the

ruling class become the ruling ideas)

20

Marc Andreessen (Silicon Valley venture

capitalist)

Rupert Murdoch (CEO, Newscorp)

Milton Friedman (Nobel-Prize winning

economist)

胡悦瑜�
霸权�

>> critical reflection: consider the “ends” not just the “means”

21

stakeholder mapping your go-to tool for navigating the political “jungle”

22

r. edward freeman’s logical pillars of the stakeholder approach

• interaction + interdependence: whatever your strategy, you actions affect others, and others affect you

• understanding: to better anticipate/manage stakeholders interactions, you need to understand their attitudes and behavior

• value position/proposition: you have to provide stakeholders with a clear answer to the questions “what do we stand for?” and “what do we offer?”

• operationalize: stakeholder management works at three levels: rational (strategic priorities of the organization as a whole), process (incorporate stakeholder issues in standard operating procedures), transactional (direct, day-to-day bargaining with stakeholders)

• balance: stakeholder interests need to balance

23

stakeholder mindset

stakeholder analysis

stakeholder management

胡悦瑜�

stakeholder mindset: why do stakeholders matter?

24

Kantian approach (Evan and Freeman, 1993)

• treats people “as ends unto themselves”

• managers should make corporate decisions respecting stakeholders’ well being

Fairness approach (Phillips 1997)

• moral obligation for firms to treat stakeholders fairly and thus to consider their interests when making strategic decisions

• stability of these relationships depends on the sharing of, at least, a core of principles or values

Optimization approach

• attempts to gain maximal support/benefits from stakeholders with minimal efforts/concessions

• stability of stakeholder relations may be preference on cost/benefit grounds

idealisminstrumentalism

stakeholder analysis: a closer look at stakeholders constellations

25

issue

constituents representatives

stakeholder group / faction

stakeholder analysis: in-depth understanding of attitudes and behavior

for each stakeholder identify:

determines level of alignment

(from strong agreement to strong disagreement)

level of engagement (from high to

low engagement)

1. (general) interests + (underlying) values 2. (specific) stake in the issue(s)

• potential benefits • potential costs

3. urgency of the issue to them 4. sources of power

• consider strengths and weaknesses 5. affiliations with other stakeholders

26

stakeholder mapping table (step 1)

stakeholder interests & values potential benefits

potential costs

urgency of claim

sources of power affiliations

strengths weaknesses

1)

2)

3)

4)

27

stakeholder mapping matrix (step 2)

highlow stakeholders’ level of

ENGAGEMENT

low

high

A LI

G N

M EN

T w

it h

st ak

eh ol

de r

positive relationship

negative relationship

adapted from Peter Block’s power map, see e.g. http://bigthink.com/articles/agreement-and-trust

adversaries opponents

alliesbedfellows

fence sitters

28

stakeholder mapping matrix (step 2)

adversaries opponents

alliesbedfellows

positive relationship

negative relationship

adapted from Peter Block’s power map, see e.g. http://bigthink.com/articles/agreement-and-trust

fence sitters

low power

high power

positive relationship

negative relationship

highlow stakeholders’ level of

ENGAGEMENT

low

high

A LI

G N

M EN

T w

it h

st ak

eh ol

de r

status quo stakeholder map for issue ___________

29

30

an exercise for stakeholder mapping

robin williams as unconventional, rule- breaking teacher mr. keating at elite preparatory school “welton academy”

who are the stakeholders of the school?

what are their positions in the support/engagement matrix regarding keating’s unconvential teaching? (consider stakeholders’ values/interests, potential gains/losses, strength/weaknesses, loyalties/affiliations)

based on your analysis, what recommendations would you give to mr. keating?

remember triangulation !

key takeaway: don’t be fooled by your own mind.

your awareness and perception of stakeholders and their interests etc. is subjective and likely subject to a variety of biases

cross-verify / falsify your assessment with others views

31

politics and empathy

“people may work, not in order to produce needed goods and services, not to have steady income, […] but to have something useful to do, and to prove to themselves that their lives are worthwhile. […] the job of the business politician is to keep people feeling this way. if he does – if he “creates the incentive that makes the other incentives effective” – he will turn out to be justified whatever his cost otherwise.”

miles, 1961

32