research paper
5/2/2018
1
Problem Solving Framework 7
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
Problem Solving Framework 8
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
5/2/2018
2
Understanding Decision Making 9
Three Steps To Decide 10
5/2/2018
3
The Impact Of Thinking Style 11
Two Different Styles
Rational thinking
Using knowledge, skills and experience
Applying logic to reach conclusions
Analyzing issues to understand the whole picture
Intuitive thinking
Conclusions by hunch
Being led by emotion and sensitivity
Using imagination to create new ideas
12
5/2/2018
4
Rational or Intuitive 13
Are You Right Brained Or Left? 14
5/2/2018
5
15
Are You Right Brained Or Left?
It Can Be Good To Trust Your Instincts 16
5/2/2018
6
It Might Be Simple
Programmed Decisions
Things that have occurred often enough such that you
can have rules and guidelines.
Examples?
Non-programmed Decisions
Situations that are unique, poorly defined, unstructured,
have important consequences, or all of the above.
Examples?
17
Organizational
Problem
Low Possibility of failure High
Certainty Risk Uncertainty Ambiguity
Programmed Vs. Non-Programmed
Programmed Nonprogrammed
Decisions Decisions
Problem
Solution
18
5/2/2018
7
BA 301
Research & Analysis of Business Problems
19
Problem Solving Framework 20
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
5/2/2018
8
Problem Solving Framework 21
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
22
Smart People, Bad Decisions
5/2/2018
9
Cognitive Bias 23
Cognition is the process of thought.
To become acquainted with…
Cognitive Bias is our tendency to make errors in
judgment based on cognitive factors – things we
know or understand, or think we know or
understand.
Cognitive Bias might distort the way we perceive
reality.
Cognitive Bias 24
Cognitive Bias
can lead to
errors in
judgment.
5/2/2018
10
What Can We Do To Avoid it? 25
Recognize how easy it is to make simple mistakes by
using intuition alone.
Learn to spot the most common decision-making
biases.
Learn simple methods for combating these biases in
judgment.
Judgment Error #1
The odds of dying in your lifetime from air travel is 1 in 11 million. The odds of dying in a traffic accident is 1 in 5,000.
26
Or
Availability Bias
5/2/2018
11
Judgment Error #2
I only paid $22,500. Wow, I made a great deal!
You paid $80,000 less for your home than the initial price offering. Were you a great negotiator, or was this an example of anchoring bias?
27
Anchoring Bias
Judgment Error #3
Look at this series of numbers. It conforms to a rule. What is the rule for this set of numbers?
The rule – any three ascending numbers.
The tendency to seek and rely on information that will confirm what we already believe, and to avoid data that will contradict our pre-existing views.
28
Confirmation Bias
4, 62,
5/2/2018
12
29
Judgment Error #4
80% of students believed they were in the top 30% of safe drivers.
A survey asked 829,000 high school students to rate
their own ability to “get along with others,” 60 percent
rated themselves in the top 10%, and 25% rated
themselves in the top 1%.
In spelling – people were correct 80% of the time, but
were 100% confident of their answers.
30
Overconfidence Bias
5/2/2018
13
Judgment Error #5
What is the probability of tossing “tails”?
31
50%
Judgment Error #5
What is the probability of tossing ten in a row?
0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5x0.5
32
0.09%
5/2/2018
14
Judgment Error #5
After 5 straight tails, what is the probability of
tossing another “tails”?
A form of Representativeness bias, also called
“Gambler’s Fallacy”.
33
50%
Probability Bias
Judgment Error #6 34
Hyperbolic Discounting
Now!
1 Year!
5/2/2018
15
Avoiding Bias
1. Do not jump to conclusions.
2. Do not assume a relationship is a cause; record and test your decision outcomes.
3. Do not base your conclusion only on your experience.
4. Do not just look to support your case; look for non-supporting evidence too.
5. Do not fall prey to overconfidence; get confidence evidence and ranges.
35
Some Other Biases
Selective search for evidence
A tendency to gather facts that support certain conclusions but disregard others that support other conclusions.
Selective perception
We tend to screen out evidence that we do not think is relevant.
Wishful thinking (optimism)
We tend to see things positively – this distorts our thinking and perception.
Groupthink
Peer pressure to conform to the opinions of the group.
36
5/2/2018
16
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases
anchoring - the tendency to rely too heavily, or "anchor," on one trait or piece of information when making decisions.
bandwagon effect - the tendency to do (or believe) things because many other people do (or believe) the same.
belief bias - the tendency to base assessments on personal beliefs (see also belief perseverance and Experimenter's regress)
bias blind spot - the tendency not to compensate for one's own cognitive biases.
confirmation bias - the tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions.
contrast effect - the enhancement or diminishment of a weight or other measurement when compared with recently observed contrasting object.
disconfirmation bias - the tendency for people to extend critical scrutiny to information which contradicts their prior beliefs and accept uncritically information that is congruent with their prior beliefs.
endowment effect - the tendency for people to value something more as soon as they own it.
hyperbolic discounting - the tendency for people to have a stronger preference for more immediate payoffs relative to later payoffs, the closer to the present both payoffs are.
illusion of control - the tendency for human beings to believe they can control or at least influence outcomes which they clearly cannot.
impact bias - the tendency for people to overestimate the length or the intensity of the impact of future feeling states.
just-world phenomenon - the tendency for people to believe the world is "just" and so therefore people "get what they deserve."
loss aversion - the tendency for people to strongly prefer avoiding losses than acquiring gains (see also sunk cost effects)
mere exposure effect - the tendency to express undue liking for things merely because they are familiar with them.
color psychology - the tendency for cultural symbolism of certain colors to affect affective reasoning.
planning fallacy - the tendency to underestimate task-completion times.
pseudocertainty effect - the tendency to make risk-averse choices if the expected outcome is positive, but risk-seeking choices to avoid negative outcomes.
rosy retrospection - the tendency to rate past events more positively than they had actually rated them when the event occurred.
selective perception - the tendency for expectations to affect perception.
status quo bias - the tendency for people to like things to stay relatively the same.
Von Restorff effect - the tendency for an item that "stands out like a sore thumb" to be more likely to be remembered than other items.
37
BA 301 Spring 2014 -
Data Analysis
BA 301
Research & Analysis of Business Problems
43
5/2/2018
17
Problem Solving Framework 44
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
Problem Solving Framework 45
Context & Background
Problem Analysis & Description
Solution Development
Evaluation & Decision- Making
Communication & Implementation
5/2/2018
18
The Cuban Missile Crisis 46
Group, Or Go It Alone
Group Advantages
Diversity of perspective
Deeper discussions
More ideas
Easier buy-in and likely support
Group Disadvantages
Conflict
Groupthink
Changing risk perspective
47
5/2/2018
19
Could I Be An Astronaut? 48
Perception Of Risk
Your perspective on risk relative to gain will
affect personal decision making.
Risk is presented in different ways:
Dread, where you have no control (terrorism)
Unknown, where you really don’t know what will
happen (GMO)
Depends on the numbers.
49
5/2/2018
20
Think About Risk
Final seconds of game with rival, coach must choose
a play with a.) 95% chance of a tie score or b.)
30% chance of victory
College senior with talent must choose a.) medical
school (80% chance of success) or b.) acting (20%
chance of success)
50
Evaluating The Risk
Improbable Unlikely Likely Very Likely
L o w
M e d iu
m H
ig h
N e g
a ti
v e i m
p a
c t
Likelihood of events occurring
51
5/2/2018
21
Evaluating The Risk
Improbable Unlikely Likely Very Likely
L o w
M e d iu
m H
ig h
N e g
a ti
v e i m
p a
c t
Likelihood of events occurring
52
Evaluating The Risk
Improbable Unlikely Likely Very Likely
L o w
M e d iu
m H
ig h
N e g
a ti
v e i m
p a
c t
Likelihood of events occurring
53
5/2/2018
22
Think About Risk 54
Think About Risk 55
5/2/2018
23
Decision-Making Tools
Use objective criteria and rational methods
Weighted Criteria Matrix
Cost/Benefit Analysis
Alternatives Table
Pros and Cons
Paired Comparison
Decision Trees
Trade-off Table
56
Ever Buy A Lemon? 57
5/2/2018
24
Decision? 58
Repair: $1,500
Replace: $12,500
Weighted Matrix Example
Situation Analysis:
The old heat pump was installed in 2000 – clearly a lemon!
New heat pumps are far more efficient than the old ones.
New heat pumps use Puron as coolant.
Natural gas is not available in my neighborhood.
Unknown long term maintenance costs on old heat pump.
59
5/2/2018
25
Evaluation Criteria
Short term financial impact.
Long term financial impact.
Energy efficiency.
Peace of mind!
Air filtration capability.
60
Weighted Matrix Procedure
Give a weight to each of the criteria
Total of weights must add to 1
Rank each solution in terms of how well it satisfies
the criteria
From 1 to 10
Multiply the weights by the ranks for each option
and add them up
Higher score wins
61
5/2/2018
26
Ranking Matrix 62
1.00
Ranking Matrix 63
1.00
5/2/2018
27
Ranking Matrix 64
1.00
Ranking Matrix 65
1.00
5/2/2018
28
Ranking Matrix 66
1.00
Ranking Matrix 67
1.00
5/2/2018
29
Ranking Matrix 68
1.00
Alternatives Table
Weed out the bad ones.
Criteria Job 1 Job 2 Job 3 Job 4
Salary $38,000 $42,000 $41,000 $46,000
Schedule 38 hrs/wk 40 hrs/wk 50+ hrs/wk 60+ hrs/wk
Benefits Medical, Dental,
401K
Medical, Dental Medical,
Company Car
Medical, Dental,
401K,
Concierge
Service
Environment Cubicle, Relaxed Office, Relaxed Travel, Flexible,
Relaxed
Travel, Intense
5/2/2018
30
Alternatives Table
Weed out the bad ones.
Criteria Job 1 Job 2 Job 3 Job 4
Salary $38,000 $42,000 $41,000 $46,000
Schedule 38 hrs/wk 40 hrs/wk 50+ hrs/wk 60+ hrs/wk
Benefits Medical, Dental,
401K
Medical, Dental Medical,
Company Car
Medical, Dental,
401K,
Concierge
Service
Environment Cubicle, Relaxed Office, Relaxed Travel, Flexible,
Relaxed
Travel, Intense
Trade-Off Table 71
Profits Customer Costs Time To
Implement
Internal
Resources
Alternative A Profits up by
$1,000
Costs to
customer
increases $1 per
unit
4 months 20 people
Alternative B Profits up by
$10,000
Costs to
customer
increases $0 per
unit
7 months 15 people
5/2/2018
31
Pros And Cons
List the pros
Score them on a +1 to +10 scale
List the cons
Score them on a -1 to -10 scales
Add them up
Positive is good, or look for a difference in the scores
for multiple options
72
Paired Comparison 73
Person 1
Person 2
Person 3
5/2/2018
32
Decision Trees 79
Decision Trees 80
5/2/2018
33
My Dog’s Decision Tree 81
Effective Decision Making
Well Defined Objectives
Assumption Testing
Multiple Alternatives
Practice the five “WHYS”
Open Debate
82