week 2 and 7 paper
arnita
ruthtitlepageandbiblography.docxA rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Top of Form
Name: Ruth Title Page and Bibliography Rubric
|
|
Advanced 92-100% |
Proficient 84-91% |
Developing 1-83% |
Not Present 0% |
|
Title Page |
Points: Points Range: 7 (26.92%) - 7 (26.92%)
Excellent with all the proper information per Turabian format. Feedback: |
Points: 6 (23.08%) Points Range: 6 (23.08%) - 6 (23.08%)
Good but missing some required information. Feedback: Overall, good work. just a small issue see the note at left. |
Points: Points Range: 1 (3.85%) - 5 (19.23%)
Missing require information and lacks Turabian format. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present Feedback: |
|
Bibliography |
Points: Points Range: 10 (38.46%) - 11 (42.31%)
Lists at least 5 excellent sources with a good representation of commentaries. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 9 (34.62%) - 9 (34.62%)
Lists less than 5 excellent sources which qualify per course instructions. Feedback: |
Points: 4 (15.38%) Points Range: 1 (3.85%) - 8 (30.77%)
Lists less than 5 acceptable sources. Sources are old or devotional. Lacks good commentaries per course instructions. Feedback: 1 good source (Hubbard) 1 that is okay (Decker). All others need to be removed and replaced. Do not use them in the paper. |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present Feedback: |
|
Turabian Format |
Points: Points Range: 8 (30.77%) - 8 (30.77%)
Title page and bibliography are in excellent Turabian format. Feedback: |
Points: Points Range: 7 (26.92%) - 7 (26.92%)
Title page and bibliography are in good Turabian format but have some need of editing. Feedback: |
Points: 6 (23.08%) Points Range: 1 (3.85%) - 6 (23.08%)
Title page and bibliography need extensive editing for Turabian format. Feedback: Single space within entries, italics, etc. See the notes. |
Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
Title Page6 (23.08%)
Levels of Achievement:
Advanced 92-100% 7 (26.92%) - 7 (26.92%)
Excellent with all the proper information per Turabian format.
Proficient 84-91% 6 (23.08%) - 6 (23.08%)
Good but missing some required information.
Developing 1-83% 1 (3.85%) - 5 (19.23%)
Missing require information and lacks Turabian format.
Not Present 0% 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present
Feedback:
Overall, good work. just a small issue see the note at left.
Bibliography4 (15.38%)
Levels of Achievement:
Advanced 92-100% 10 (38.46%) - 11 (42.31%)
Lists at least 5 excellent sources with a good representation of commentaries.
Proficient 84-91% 9 (34.62%) - 9 (34.62%)
Lists less than 5 excellent sources which qualify per course instructions.
Developing 1-83% 1 (3.85%) - 8 (30.77%)
Lists less than 5 acceptable sources. Sources are old or devotional. Lacks good commentaries per course instructions.
Not Present 0% 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present
Feedback:
1 good source (Hubbard) 1 that is okay (Decker). All others need to be removed and replaced. Do not use them in the paper.
Turabian Format6 (23.08%)
Levels of Achievement:
Advanced 92-100% 8 (30.77%) - 8 (30.77%)
Title page and bibliography are in excellent Turabian format.
Proficient 84-91% 7 (26.92%) - 7 (26.92%)
Title page and bibliography are in good Turabian format but have some need of editing.
Developing 1-83% 1 (3.85%) - 6 (23.08%)
Title page and bibliography need extensive editing for Turabian format.
Not Present 0% 0 (0%) - 0 (0%)
Not present
Feedback:
Single space within entries, italics, etc. See the notes.
Raw Total: 16.00000 (of 26.00000)
Feedback to Learner
Make the changes and it will be a solid foundation for your paper.
Bottom of Form
%7B%220.230769
0.2307692
%7B%220.038461
%7B%220.000000
%7B%220.384615
%7B%220.346153
0.1538462
%7B%220.307692
0.2307692
Exit
%7B%220.269230
