child advocacy
Weekly Topic Paper
|
Qualities & Criteria |
Excellent (2 points) |
Good (1 point) |
Poor (0 point) |
Earned Points |
|
Content/Information All elements of the topics are addressed. The information is technically sound. Information based on careful research. (Worth 2 points) |
The paper includes an in-depth assessment of what was learned through the module. Text references are used. |
The paper includes surface information, no text references used. |
Poor content, no substance and information submitted is not related to any of the modules. |
|
|
|
Excellent (2 points) |
Good (1 point) |
Poor (0 points) |
|
|
Quality of Writing Clarity of sentences and paragraphs. No errors and spelling, grammar and use of English. Organization and coherence of ideas (Worth 2 points) |
The paper is well written from start to finish, without spelling or grammar errors. The paper is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way. |
The paper is well written for the most part, without spelling or grammar errors. The paper is for the most part well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way. |
The paper is not well written, and contains many spelling and/or grammar errors. The paper is badly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.
|
|
|
|
Excellent (1point) |
Good (1/2 point) |
Poor (0 points) |
|
|
Format/Layout Presentation of the information; Structuring of text; Follows requirements of length, font and style (Worth 1 points) |
Paper is at least 3 pages long, 12 point font, double spaced, with 1” margins. |
Paper meets some, but not ALL length and format requirements |
Paper is less than 3 pages and does not follow format requirements. |
|
|
*TOTAL* (Possible=5 points) |
|
|
|
|
· Based on Rubric by Dr. Stella Porto from UMUC