Week 3 Discussion - BUS3055

profileSandy4tx
RubricWeek1Discussion.pdf

SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Activity: Week 1 Discussion

Course: BUS3055-Business Law for Commercial Transactions SU01

Name: Sandra Villarreal

40 / 40

Response No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points

Satisfactory (C: 28- 31) 31 points

Proficient (B: 32- 35) 35 points

Exemplary (A: 36- 40) 40 points

Criterion Score

Quality of Initial Posting No initial posting exists to evaluate.

The information

provided is

inaccurate, not

focused on the

assignment’s topic,

and/or does not

answer the

question(s) fully.

Response

demonstrates

incomplete

understanding of

the topic and/or

inadequate

preparation.

The information

provided is

accurate, giving a

basic understanding

of the topic(s)

covered. A basic

understanding is

when you are able

to describe the

terms and concepts

covered. Despite

this basic

understanding,

initial posting may

not include

complete

development of all

aspects of the

assignment.

The information

provided is

accurate, displaying

a good

understanding of

the topic(s) covered.

A good

understanding is

when you are able

to explain the terms

and topics covered.

Initial posting

demonstrates

sincere reflection

and addresses most

aspects of the

assignment,

although all

concepts may not

be fully developed.

Criterion Feedback

You have done an excellent job with your initial discussion post this week. You have demonstrated full understanding of the topics for the week and

articulated your points clearly. You have answered all of the questions in the assignment successfully.

The information

provided is

accurate, providing

an in-depth, well

thought-out

understanding of

the topic(s) covered.

An in-depth

understanding

provides an analysis

of the information,

synthesizing what is

learned from the

course/assigned

readings.

0 / 20

Participation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion ScoreParticipation No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Participation in Discussion May include one or more of the

following:

*Comments to only

one other student's

post.

*Comments are not

substantive, such as

just one line or

saying, “Good job”

or “I agree.

*Comments are off

topic.

Comments to two

or more classmates’

initial posts but only

on one day of the

week. Comments

are substantive,

meaning they

reflect and expand

on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two

or more classmates’

initial posts on more

than one day.

Comments are

substantive,

meaning they

reflect and expand

on what the other

student wrote.

Comments to two

or more classmates’

initial posts and to

the instructor's

comment (if

applicable) on two

or more days.

Responses

demonstrate an

analysis of peers’

comments, building

on previous posts.

Comments extend

and deepen

meaningful

conversation and

may include a

follow-up question.

Criterion Feedback

You have not responded to any of your classmates for the discussion this week. This is an essential component of discussion assignments. Please

carefully review the participation policy here so you can earn maximum credit in the coming weeks.

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

No responses to

other classmates

were posted in this

discussion forum.

16 / 20

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Writing Mechanics (Spelling,

Grammar, Citation Style) and

Information Literacy

No postings for

which to evaluate

language and

grammar exist.

Numerous issues in

any of the

following: grammar,

mechanics, spelling,

use of slang, and

incomplete or

missing citations

and references. If

required for the

assignment, did not

use course, text,

and/or outside

readings (where

relevant) to support

work.

Minor errors in

grammar,

mechanics, or

spelling in the initial

posting are present.

Minor errors in

formatting citations

and references may

exist. If required for

the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for

both the initial post

and some of the

comments to other

students. Sources

include course and

text readings as well

as outside sources

(when relevant) that

are academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles,

other text books,

.gov Web sites,

professional

organization Web

sites, cases,

statutes, or

administrative

rules).

Minor to no errors

exist in grammar,

mechanics, or

spelling in both the

initial post and

comments to

others. Formatting

of citations and

references is

correct. If required

for the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for

both the initial post

and the comments

to other students.

Sources include

course and text

readings as well as

outside sources

(when relevant) that

are academic and

authoritative (e.g.,

journal articles,

other text books,

.gov Web sites,

professional

organization Web

sites, cases,

statutes, or

administrative

rules).

Some spelling,

grammatical, and/or

structural errors are

present. Some

errors in formatting

citations and

references are

present. If required

for the assignment,

utilizes sources to

support work for

initial post but not

comments to other

students. Sources

include course/text

readings but

outside sources

(when relevant)

include non-

academic/authoritat

ive, such as Wikis

and .com resources.

Total 56 / 80

Overall Score

Writing No Submission 0 points

Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points

Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points

Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points

Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points

Criterion Score

Criterion Feedback

Overall, you have done a good job with your communication and citation for this assignment, but you need to be cautious of citation formatting

errors and be sure to use credible academic sources in all of your assignment submissions. If you need any help on citations or formatting, you can

learn more here: Citations 101

No Submission 0 points minimum

There was no

submission for this

assignment.

Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum

Satisfactory progress has not been

met on the competencies for this

assignment.

Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum

Satisfactory progress has been

achieved on the competencies for

this assignment.

Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum

Proficiency has been achieved

on the competencies for this

assignment.

Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimum

The competencies for this

assignment have been

mastered.