Week 3 Discussion - BUS3055
SUO Discussion Rubric (80 Points) - Version 1.2 Activity: Week 1 Discussion
Course: BUS3055-Business Law for Commercial Transactions SU01
Name: Sandra Villarreal
40 / 40
Response No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 27) 27 points
Satisfactory (C: 28- 31) 31 points
Proficient (B: 32- 35) 35 points
Exemplary (A: 36- 40) 40 points
Criterion Score
Quality of Initial Posting No initial posting exists to evaluate.
The information
provided is
inaccurate, not
focused on the
assignment’s topic,
and/or does not
answer the
question(s) fully.
Response
demonstrates
incomplete
understanding of
the topic and/or
inadequate
preparation.
The information
provided is
accurate, giving a
basic understanding
of the topic(s)
covered. A basic
understanding is
when you are able
to describe the
terms and concepts
covered. Despite
this basic
understanding,
initial posting may
not include
complete
development of all
aspects of the
assignment.
The information
provided is
accurate, displaying
a good
understanding of
the topic(s) covered.
A good
understanding is
when you are able
to explain the terms
and topics covered.
Initial posting
demonstrates
sincere reflection
and addresses most
aspects of the
assignment,
although all
concepts may not
be fully developed.
Criterion Feedback
You have done an excellent job with your initial discussion post this week. You have demonstrated full understanding of the topics for the week and
articulated your points clearly. You have answered all of the questions in the assignment successfully.
The information
provided is
accurate, providing
an in-depth, well
thought-out
understanding of
the topic(s) covered.
An in-depth
understanding
provides an analysis
of the information,
synthesizing what is
learned from the
course/assigned
readings.
0 / 20
Participation No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion ScoreParticipation No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfactory (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Participation in Discussion May include one or more of the
following:
*Comments to only
one other student's
post.
*Comments are not
substantive, such as
just one line or
saying, “Good job”
or “I agree.
*Comments are off
topic.
Comments to two
or more classmates’
initial posts but only
on one day of the
week. Comments
are substantive,
meaning they
reflect and expand
on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two
or more classmates’
initial posts on more
than one day.
Comments are
substantive,
meaning they
reflect and expand
on what the other
student wrote.
Comments to two
or more classmates’
initial posts and to
the instructor's
comment (if
applicable) on two
or more days.
Responses
demonstrate an
analysis of peers’
comments, building
on previous posts.
Comments extend
and deepen
meaningful
conversation and
may include a
follow-up question.
Criterion Feedback
You have not responded to any of your classmates for the discussion this week. This is an essential component of discussion assignments. Please
carefully review the participation policy here so you can earn maximum credit in the coming weeks.
Writing No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
No responses to
other classmates
were posted in this
discussion forum.
16 / 20
Writing No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Writing Mechanics (Spelling,
Grammar, Citation Style) and
Information Literacy
No postings for
which to evaluate
language and
grammar exist.
Numerous issues in
any of the
following: grammar,
mechanics, spelling,
use of slang, and
incomplete or
missing citations
and references. If
required for the
assignment, did not
use course, text,
and/or outside
readings (where
relevant) to support
work.
Minor errors in
grammar,
mechanics, or
spelling in the initial
posting are present.
Minor errors in
formatting citations
and references may
exist. If required for
the assignment,
utilizes sources to
support work for
both the initial post
and some of the
comments to other
students. Sources
include course and
text readings as well
as outside sources
(when relevant) that
are academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles,
other text books,
.gov Web sites,
professional
organization Web
sites, cases,
statutes, or
administrative
rules).
Minor to no errors
exist in grammar,
mechanics, or
spelling in both the
initial post and
comments to
others. Formatting
of citations and
references is
correct. If required
for the assignment,
utilizes sources to
support work for
both the initial post
and the comments
to other students.
Sources include
course and text
readings as well as
outside sources
(when relevant) that
are academic and
authoritative (e.g.,
journal articles,
other text books,
.gov Web sites,
professional
organization Web
sites, cases,
statutes, or
administrative
rules).
Some spelling,
grammatical, and/or
structural errors are
present. Some
errors in formatting
citations and
references are
present. If required
for the assignment,
utilizes sources to
support work for
initial post but not
comments to other
students. Sources
include course/text
readings but
outside sources
(when relevant)
include non-
academic/authoritat
ive, such as Wikis
and .com resources.
Total 56 / 80
Overall Score
Writing No Submission 0 points
Emerging (F-D: 1- 13) 13 points
Satisfaction (C: 14- 16) 16 points
Proficient (B: 17- 18) 18 points
Exemplary (A: 19- 20) 20 points
Criterion Score
Criterion Feedback
Overall, you have done a good job with your communication and citation for this assignment, but you need to be cautious of citation formatting
errors and be sure to use credible academic sources in all of your assignment submissions. If you need any help on citations or formatting, you can
learn more here: Citations 101
No Submission 0 points minimum
There was no
submission for this
assignment.
Emerging (F to D Range) 1 point minimum
Satisfactory progress has not been
met on the competencies for this
assignment.
Satisfactory (C Range) 56 points minimum
Satisfactory progress has been
achieved on the competencies for
this assignment.
Proficient (B Range) 64 points minimum
Proficiency has been achieved
on the competencies for this
assignment.
Exemplary (A Range) 72 points minimum
The competencies for this
assignment have been
mastered.