RubricTP3.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-200 ELM-200-O501 Complex Learning Analysis 90.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (65.00%) Approaching (75.00%) Acceptable (85.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Learning Activity 25.0% Not addressed. Learning activities ineffectively promote critical thinking and problem-solving and are inappropriate for the developmental age of the grade level identified. Learning activities somewhat promote critical thinking and problem-solving and marginally appropriate for the developmental age of the grade level identified. Learning activities reasonably promote critical thinking and problem-solving that is appropriate for the developmental age of the grade level identified. Description of learning activities creatively promotes critical thinking and problem-solving that is innovatively appropriate for the developmental age of the grade level identified.
Explanation 25.0% Not addressed. Explanation poorly demonstrates how the activity challenges students' complex cognitive processes and. insufficiently demonstrates how activity is appropriate for the developmental age of students. Explanation sufficiently demonstrates how the activity challenges students' complex cognitive processes and. minimally demonstrates how activity is appropriate for the developmental age of students. Explanation accurately demonstrates how the activity challenges students' complex cognitive processes and. competently demonstrates how activity is appropriate for the developmental age of students. Explanation comprehensively demonstrates how the activity challenges students' complex cognitive processes and expertly demonstrates how activity is appropriate for the developmental age of students.
Rationale 25.0% Not addressed. Rationale inadequately compares and contrasts how elementary students differ in their physical, cognitive, and linguistic development and illogically applies the concepts to future professional practice. Rationale basically compares and contrasts how elementary students differ in their physical, cognitive, and linguistic development and attempts to apply the concepts to future professional practice. Rationale clearly compares and contrasts how elementary students differ in their physical, cognitive, and linguistic development and logically applies the concepts to future professional practice. Rationale thoroughly compares and contrasts how elementary students differ in their physical, cognitive, and linguistic development and proficiently applies the concepts to future professional practice.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 15.0% Not addressed. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. Submission includes mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. Submission is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few are present. A variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech are used, as well as appropriate practice and content-related language. Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 10.0% Not addressed. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors are present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are documented completely and correctly, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage 100%