Humanities Paper (Analyze art work)

Rubrictask2.doc

Home >Literature homework help >Humanities Paper (Analyze art work)

UXT Task 2 (0917)

	Not Evident	Approaching Competence	Competent
A1. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide an appropriate description of initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.	The submission provides a description, with insufficient detail, of initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.	The submission provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of initial thoughts and/or feelings about the work.
A2. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide an appropriate description of at least 1 aspect of particular interest from the selected work.	The submission provides a description, with insufficient detail, of at least 1 aspect of particular interest from the selected work.	The submission provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of at least 1 aspect of particular interest from the selected work.
B1. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide an appropriate description of the historical context of the period in which the work was created.	The submission provides a description, with insufficient detail, of the historical context of the period in which the work was created.	The submission provides an appropriate description, with sufficient detail, of the historical context of the period in which the work was created.
B2. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide a discussion of how the artist’s biography provides insights into the work.	The submission provides a discussion, with insufficient detail, of how the artist’s biography provides insights into the work.	The submission provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of how the artist’s biography provides insights into the work.
B3. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide an analysis of how the work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period.	The submission provides an analysis, with insufficient detail, of how the work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period.	The submission provides a plausible analysis, with sufficient detail, of how the work explores a particular theme and/or stylistic characteristic from its period.
B4. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide a logical explanation of the relevance of the work for today’s audiences.	The submission provides an explanation, with insufficient detail, of the relevance of the work for today’s audiences.	The submission provides a logical explanation, with sufficient detail, of the relevance of the work for today’s audiences.
C. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27642171	The submission does not provide a logical discussion of how initial feelings or thoughts towards the work changed as a result of the analysis.	The submission provides a discussion, with insufficient detail, of how initial feelings or thoughts towards the work changed as a result of the analysis.	The submission provides a logical discussion, with sufficient detail, of how initial feelings or thoughts towards the work changed as a result of the analysis.
D. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/71484321	The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.	The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations and/or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate.	The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available.
E. https://lrps.wgu.edu/provision/27641407	Content is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.	Content is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.	Content reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.