Module One
Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric.html
PSY 530 Module One Short Paper Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
This paper will help to you explain and apply significant contributor.
Prompt
Write a short paper on the history of social psychology and the people who have contributed to the field that engages the following:
- How has the field of psychology changed over the course of history?
- Who do you believe was the most significant contributor to the creation and evolution of social psychology throughout its history? Explain your reasoning.
- How does knowledge of social psychology’s history inform analysis of classic and modern social psychology theories and research?
Use the Shapiro Library for your research. Do not use internet references (e.g, .com, .org, .net websites).
What to Submit
Submit your short paper as a 2- to 3-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, title page, subject headers, and all sources cited in APA style within the text and in the reference section.
Module One Short Paper Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (90%) | Needs Improvement (70%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Field of Psychology Changes | Meets “Proficient” criteria and crafts the explanation on how the field of psychology has changed over the course of history using examples from the readings | Accurately explains how the field of psychology changed over the course of history | Explains how the field of psychology changed over the course of history, but in a manner that may not be fully accurate or may lack sufficient detail | Does not explain how the field of psychology changed over the course of history | 30 |
| Most Significant Contributor | Meets “Proficient” criteria and explains reasoning using examples from the readings | Accurately describes the most significant contributor to the creation and evolution of social psychology throughout its history; explains reasoning | Accurately describes the most significant contributor to the creation and evolution of social psychology throughout its history, but does not explain reasoning or does so in a manner that may not be fully accurate or may be cursory | Does not describe the most significant contributor to the creation and evolution of social psychology throughout its history | 30 |
| Knowledge of Social Psychology’s History Informs Analysis | Meets “Proficient” criteria and shows keen insight connecting classic and modern social psychology theories and research with specific examples from the readings | Describes how the knowledge of social psychology’s history informs analysis, and discusses both classic and modern social psychology theories and research | Describes how the knowledge of social psychology’s history informs analysis, but the description may be cursory or may not discuss both classic and modern social psychology theories and research | Does not describe how the knowledge of social psychology’s history informs analysis | 30 |
| Use of Sources and Citation | Meets “Proficient” criteria and fluently utilizes a group of sources to support reasoning | Uses appropriate library sources and correctly cites them in APA style in the document and in the reference list | Does not use appropriate library sources or does not properly cite them in APA style | Does not use or cite sources | 5 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format | Submission has no major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization | Submission has major errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas | Submission has critical errors related to grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas | 5 |
| Total: | 100% |