Marketing ( product-life cycle)
MRKETING DEPARTMENT: AOL PROCESS
Rubrics for Presentations
Student Name: Student ID:
Course Code : Term:
|
Traits/Criteria |
Exceeds Expectations (4 points) |
Meets Expectations (3 points) |
Developing Expectations (2 points) |
Does not Meet Expectations (1 point) |
|
Organization
|
Excellent and logical sequencing of ideas |
Acceptable sequencing of ideas |
Sequencing acceptable only with improvement |
Poor sequencing of ideas |
|
Content coverage
|
Covers most of the contents of the assignment |
Acceptable coverage of contents |
Covers the minimum Contents |
Does not even cover the minimum contents |
|
Posture and eye contact
|
Maintains good eye contact and posture most of the time |
Acceptable eye contact and posture most of the time |
Weak eye contact and posture |
Poor eye contact and postures |
|
Time management
|
Good time management and keeps an appropriate pace for each point presented |
Somewhat stays within the time frame |
Important elements are just covered within time |
Seriously fails to stay within the time frame |
|
Attire
|
Meets good standard of business dress |
Meets acceptable standard of business dress |
Meets minimum standard of business dress |
Does not even meet minimum standard of business dress |
|
Visual presentation
|
Uses visual aids that relate well to text and presentation |
Uses visual aids that somewhat support text and presentation |
Visual aids used are weak |
Uses poor or no visual aids |
|
Engagement
|
Audience was well engaged and kept interested |
Acceptable audience engagement |
Weak audience engagement |
Poor audience engagement |
|
Elocution
|
Clear pronunciation in all parts of the presentation |
Acceptable pronunciation in most part of the presentation |
Weak pronunciation in most part of the presentation |
Poor pronunciation in most part of the presentation |
|
Response to questions |
Answers all questions with excellent elaboration |
Answers most questions but weak elaborations |
Answers only some questions and weak elaboration |
Answers poorly and often fails to elaborate |
|
References |
Presents proper references |
Presents acceptable references |
Presents only minimum references |
Poor or no references |
|
Category Totals
|
|
|
|
|
Total Score: ……. + ……. + ……. = …….
Name of Evaluator: Signature of Evaluator: