Assignment 7

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

70.0 %Content

15.0 %Job Performance Evaluation

The written proposal does not include a job performance evaluation.

A job performance is included, but is incomplete or lacks details.

A job performance is included and minimally describes the tasks and performance of employees.

A job performance is included and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are examples of performance indicators based on observation conducted.

A job performance is well developed and clearly describes the tasks and performance of employees. There are detailed examples of tasks and performance indicators based on observation conducted and how they relate to job performance outcomes.

20.0 %Reward and Encouragement Strategies

The written proposal does not include rewards, incentives, encouragement, or competitive package strategies.

Rewards, incentives, encouragement, and competitive package strategies are included, but are incomplete or lack details.

There is some description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance.

There is a detailed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are examples of these elements observed within the current organization.

There is a well-developed description of rewards, incentives, and competitive package strategies that support employee performance. There are detailed examples of these elements observed within the current organization and rewards provided for job performance outcomes.

20.0 %Leveraging on Employee Strengths

The written proposal does not include leveraging on human capital.

The written proposal includes a description of leveraging on employee strengths, but the description is incomplete or lacks details.

There is some description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance.

There is a detailed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization.

There is a well-developed description of leveraging on employee strengths to improve performance. There are detailed examples of current practices to leverage on employee strengths observed within the organization and how skills and performance support outcomes.

15.0 %Culture Within the Organization

The written proposal does not include a description of the culture within the organization.

The written proposal includes a description of the culture within the organization, but is incomplete or lacks details.

There is some description of the culture within the organization.

There is a detailed description of the culture within the organization. There are examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization.

There is a well-developed description of the culture within the organization. There are detailed examples included based on the observations conducted within the organization and how the culture contributes to performance outcomes.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage