Order 622544: Assignment Benchmark - Selecting Technology to Meet Business Needs

Top of Form

Rubrics for assignment

Benchmark - Selecting Technology to Meet Business Needs

1 Unsatisfactory 0.00%

2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00%

3 Satisfactory 79.00%

4 Good 87.00%

5 Excellent 100.00%

100.0 %Content

5.0 % Business Problem

Discussion of a business problem suitable for innovation is not included.

Discussion of a business problem suitable for innovation is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of a business problem suitable for innovation is included but lacks explanation and relevant details.

Discussion of a business problem suitable for innovation is complete and includes explanation and relevant details.

Discussion of a business problem suitable for innovation is extremely thorough with extensive explanation and numerous relevant details.

15.0 % Research

Evidence of research for potential information technology solutions to address the problem, including crowdfunding and technology forum websites, is not included.

Evidence of research for potential information technology solutions to address the problem, including crowdfunding and technology forum websites, is incomplete or incorrect.

Evidence of research for potential information technology solutions to address the problem, including crowdfunding and technology forum websites, is partially included and accurate.

Evidence of research for potential information technology solutions to address the problem, including crowdfunding and technology forum websites, is mostly complete and accurate.

Evidence of research for potential information technology solutions to address the problem, including crowdfunding and technology forum websites, is complete and accurate.

15.0 % Technology Selection

Justification of technology selection, including how the technology could be applied to the business and how it can positively address the problem, is not included.

Justification of technology selection, including how the technology could be applied to the business and how it can positively address the problem, is incomplete or incorrect.

Justification of technology selection, including how the technology could be applied to the business and how it can positively address the problem, is included but lacks explanation and supporting details.

Justification of technology selection, including how the technology could be applied to the business and how it can positively address the problem, is complete and includes explanation and supporting details.

Justification of technology selection, including how the technology could be applied to the business and how it can positively address the problem, is extremely thorough and includes extensive explanation and substantial supporting details.

15.0 % Technology Impact Adoption Summary

Summary of the impact adoption analysis of the technology, including discussion of measureable organizational value (MOV), is not included.

Summary of the impact adoption analysis of the technology, including discussion of measureable organizational value (MOV), is incomplete or incorrect.

Summary of the impact adoption analysis of the technology, including discussion of measureable organizational value (MOV), is included but lacks explanation and supporting details.

Summary of the impact adoption analysis of the technology, including discussion of measureable organizational value (MOV), is complete and includes explanation and supporting details.

Summary of the impact adoption analysis of the technology, including discussion of measureable organizational value (MOV), is extremely thorough and includes extensive explanation and substantial supporting details.

15.0 % Five-Component Framework

Discussion of how adoption of the technology innovation will impact each of the five components of the business is not included.

Discussion of how adoption of the technology innovation will impact each of the five components of the business is incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of how adoption of the technology innovation will impact each of the five components of the business is included but lacks explanation and relevant details.

Discussion of how adoption of the technology innovation will impact each of the five components of the business is complete and includes relevant details.

Discussion of how adoption of the technology innovation will impact each of the five components of the business is extremely thorough and includes substantial relevant details.

15.0 % Ethical Implications (C. 3.2)

Discussion of the ethical implications of implementing the selected technology and consideration of the ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective are not included.

Discussion of the ethical implications of implementing the selected technology and consideration of the ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective are incomplete or incorrect.

Discussion of the ethical implications of implementing the selected technology and consideration of the ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective are included but lack explanation and supporting details.

Discussion of the ethical implications of implementing the selected technology and consideration of the ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective are complete and include explanation and supporting details.

Discussion of the ethical implications of implementing the selected technology and consideration of the ethical implications from a Christian worldview perspective are extremely thorough and include extensive explanation and substantial supporting details.

5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

5.0 % Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 % Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 % Total Weightage

Bottom of Form